独占法人の英語

４　この法律において「入札談合等」とは、国、地方公共団体又は特定法人（以下「国等」という。）が入札、競り売りその他競争により相手方を選定する方法（以下「入札等」という。）により行う売買、貸借、請負その他の契約の締結に関し、当該入札に参加しようとする事業者が他の事業者と共同して落札すべき者若しくは落札すべき価格を決定し、又は事業者団体が当該入札に参加しようとする事業者に当該行為を行わせること等により、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律（昭和二十二年法律第五十四号）第三条又は第八条第一項第一号の規定に違反する行為をいう。例文帳に追加

(4) The term "bid rigging etc." in this Act shall mean, in respect of conclusion of agreements by the government, local governments or specified corporations (hereinafter referred to as "government, etc.") for the sale and purchase, lease, contract, etc., with a counter party to be chosen by auction or other competitive means (hereinafter referred to as "bidding, etc."), the acts in violation of the provision of Article 3 or Article 8, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act on the Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (Act No. 54 of 1947), through such practices that a entrepreneur wishing to participate in the bidding decides in conjunction with other entrepreneurs the successful bidder or the successful bid price, or the trade association makes an entrepreneur wishing to participate in the said bidding do the said acts.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　排除命令は、私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第九十条第三号（確定排除措置命令違反の罪）、第九十二条（懲役及び罰金の併科）、第九十五条第一項第二号、第二項第二号及び第三項（両罰規定）、第九十五条の二（違反行為の防止等をしない法人の代表者への罰則）並びに第九十五条の三（違反行為の防止等をしない事業者団体の理事等への罰則）（それぞれ同法第九十条第三号に係る部分に限る。）並びに第九十七条（排除命令違反に対する過料）の規定の適用については、排除措置命令とみなす。例文帳に追加

(3) For the purpose of application of the provisions of Article 90 (iii) (Violation against final and binding cease and desist order), Article 92 (Concurrent punishment), Article 95 (1) (ii), (2) (ii) and (3) (Double punishment), Article 95-2 (Punishment of representatives of juridical persons who have failed to prevent violation) and Article 95-3 (Punishment of directors, etc. of trade associations who have failed to prevent violation) (each of the provisions are limited to the segments pertaining to Article 90 (iii) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade), and Article 97 (Civil fine for violation of cease and desist order) a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

我が国のベンチャーキャピタルの歴史は、1963年に国が設立した中小企業投資育成会社（東京・大阪・名古屋）がその嚆矢となっている。また、その後、1972年から民間ベンチャーキャピタルが成長を始めた以降も、独占禁止法上の取扱い（持株会社の禁止との関係等）や投資事業有限責任組合制度の導入など、制度的な整備に伴ってベンチャーキャピタル産業が拡大してきたと言える。さらに、独立行政法人中小企業基盤整備機構や日本政策投資銀行は、民間投資家とともに投資事業有限責任投資組合方式のベンチャーファンドを組成する事業を積極的に展開しており、言わば、民間資金の呼び水機能を果たすものとして、我が国におけるベンチャーファンドの組成促進に貢献している。例文帳に追加

The history of venture capital in Japan started with small and medium business investment and consultation companies founded by the government in 1963 (Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya SBICs). Since 1972, when private sector venture capitals started to grow, the industry has been expanding with development of legal and regulatory arrangements, such as the amendment of the Antitrust Act in its treatment of venture capitals (their relation to the clause prohibiting holding companies, etc.), and introduction of the system of limited liability partnership (LLP) for investment. SMRJ and the Development Bank of Japan (BDJ), together with private sector investors, are working aggressively for projects to form venture funds under the scheme of investment LLPs. They are working, you could say, to prime the pump to enable money to be injected from the private sector, and help more venture funds to be formed in Japan.発音を聞く  - 経済産業省

第五十六条の二　内閣総理大臣は、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、金融商品取引業者等、これと取引をする者、当該金融商品取引業者等（登録金融機関を除く。）がその総株主等の議決権の過半数を保有する銀行等（以下この項において「子特定法人」という。）、当該金融商品取引業者等を子会社（第二十九条の四第三項に規定する子会社をいう。以下この条において同じ。）とする持株会社（私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第九条第五項第一号に規定する持株会社をいう。以下この条において同じ。）若しくは当該金融商品取引業者等から業務の委託を受けた者に対し当該金融商品取引業者等の業務若しくは財産に関し参考となるべき報告若しくは資料（当該子特定法人にあつては、当該金融商品取引業者等（登録金融機関を除く。）の財産に関し参考となるべき報告又は資料に限る。）の提出を命じ、又は当該職員に当該金融商品取引業者等、当該子特定法人、当該金融商品取引業者等を子会社とする持株会社若しくは当該金融商品取引業者等から業務の委託を受けた者の業務若しくは財産の状況若しくは帳簿書類その他の物件の検査（当該子特定法人にあつては当該金融商品取引業者等（登録金融機関を除く。）の財産に関し必要な検査に、当該金融商品取引業者等を子会社とする持株会社又は当該金融商品取引業者等から業務の委託を受けた者にあつては当該金融商品取引業者等の業務又は財産に関し必要な検査に限る。）をさせることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 56-2 (1) When the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, he/she may order a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., a person who conducts transactions with the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., a Bank, etc., the majority of whose Voting Rights Held by All the Shareholders, etc. are held by the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (excluding Registered Financial Institutions) (hereinafter such a Bank, etc. shall be referred to as a "Subsidiary Specified Juridical Person" in this paragraph), a Holding Company (meaning holding companies prescribed in Article 9(5)(i) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) which holds the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. as its Subsidiary Company (meaning subsidiary companies prescribed in Article 29-4(3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), or a person who received entrustment of business from the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. to submit reports or materials that will be helpful for understanding the business or property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (with regard to said Subsidiary Specified Juridical Person, limited to reports or materials that will be helpful for understanding the property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (excluding Registered Financial Institutions)), or have the officials inspect the status of the business or property, or the books and documents or other articles of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., the Subsidiary Specified Juridical Person, the Holding Company which holds the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. as its Subsidiary Company, or the person who received entrustment of business from the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (with regard to the Subsidiary Specified Juridical Persons, the inspection shall be limited to what is necessary to understand the property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (excluding Registered Financial Institutions), and with regard to the Holding Company which holds the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. as its Subsidiary Company, or the person who received entrustment of business from the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc., the inspection shall be limited to what is necessary to understand the business or property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc.).発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム