denied applicationとは 意味・読み方・使い方

The function of determining whether or not an application for registration or renewal thereof should be allowed or denied under the facts disclosed in the application and in the references consulted by the Examiner and under the applicable law (statutory and decisional), is a quasi-judicial function and involves the exercise of judicial discretion.例文帳に追加

出願において及び審査官が調査した参考資料において明らかにされた事実並びに適用法(制定法及び判例法)に基づき登録出願又はその更新を許可すべきか又は拒絶すべきかを決定する職務は，準司法的な職務であり，司法裁量権の行使を伴う。 - 特許庁

Eligibility for another child care leave for workers who have already taken a leave or who have withdrawn an application for leave will be expanded to include cases where (1) the child needs care for a period of two weeks or more due to injury, sickness, etc. and (2) admission to a day-care center has been requested but denied for the time being.例文帳に追加

育児休業の再度取得要件及び育児休業申出の撤回後の再度取得要件に、①子が負傷、疾病等により２週間以上の期間にわたり世話が必要となった場合、②保育所に入所申請を行ったが当面入所できない場合、を加える。 - 厚生労働省

Sec.136 Issuance and Publication of Certificate When the period for filing the opposition has expired, or when the Director of Legal Affairs shall have denied the opposition, the Office upon payment of the required fee, shall issue the certificate of registration. Upon issuance of a certificate of registration, notice thereof making reference to the publication of the application shall be published in the IPO Gazette.例文帳に追加

第136条 登録証の発行及び公示 異議申立期間が満了した場合又は法律局長が異議申立を却下すべきものとした場合は，庁は，所定の手数料の納付を待って登録証を発行する。登録証が発行された場合は，当該出願の公告を引用したその旨の通知がIPO公報に掲載される。 - 特許庁

Even if the medicinal use of the claimed medicinal invention differs from the medicinal use of the cited invention, when the relevance of the working mechanism between both has been derived from the publicly known art or common general knowledge at the time of filing, the inventive step of the medicinal invention of the present patent application is usually denied, unless otherwise there is another ground for inferring inventive step such as advantageous effect or the like.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

請求項に係る医薬発明の医薬用途が、引用発明の医薬用途と異なっていても、出願前の公知技術、技術常識により両者間の作用機序の関連性が導き出せる場合は、有利な効果等、他に進歩性を推認できる根拠がない限り、通常は、本願医薬発明の進歩性は否定される。 - 特許庁

Especially on the medical use of invention, the JPO has commented that even if the medicinal use of the claimed medicinal invention differs from that of the cited invention, when the relevance of the working mechanism between both has been derived from the publicly known art or common general knowledge at the time of filing, the inventive step of the medicinal invention of the present patent application is usually denied, unless otherwise there is another ground for inferring inventive step such as advantageous effect or the like.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

特に医薬発明の医薬用途について、JPOは、クレームに係る医薬発明の医薬用途が、引用発明の医薬用途と異なっていても、出願当時の公知技術又は一般常識により両者間の作用機序の関連性が導き出せる場合は、有利な効果等、他に進歩性を推認できる根拠がない限り、通常は、本願医薬発明の進歩性は否定されるとコメントしている。 - 特許庁

(2) When an alien without a status of residence has filed the application set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article and is denied recognition as a refugee or the permission set forth in the preceding paragraph is not granted, the Minister of Justice shall examine whether there are grounds for granting special permission to stay to the alien without a status of residence, and may grant special permission to stay if he/she finds such grounds.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

２　法務大臣は、前条第一項の申請をした在留資格未取得外国人について、難民の認定をしない処分をするとき、又は前項の許可をしないときは、当該在留資格未取得外国人の在留を特別に許可すべき事情があるか否かを審査するものとし、当該事情があると認めるときは、その在留を特別に許可することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3-2) Regarding the medicinal use based on a specific attribute (3-2-1) Application to a specific disease Even if the compounds etc. of the claimed medicinal invention do not differ from the compounds etc. of the cited invention, the novelty of the claimed medicinal invention is not denied when the claimed medicinal invention and the cited invention differ in medicinal use of applying to a specific disease based on the attribute of such compounds etc.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

(3-2) 特定の属性に基づく医薬用途に関して(3-2-1) 特定の疾病への適用請求項に係る医薬発明の化合物等と、引用発明の化合物等とが相違しない場合であっても、請求項に係る医薬発明と引用発明とが、その化合物等の属性に基づき特定の疾病に適用するという医薬用途において相違点がある場合は、請求項に係る医薬発明の新規性は否定されない(事例1～3)。 - 特許庁

The function of determining whether or not an application for grant of patent should be allowed or denied under the facts disclosed in the application and in the references consulted by the Examiner and under the applicable law (statutory and decisional), is a quasi-judicial function and involves the exercise of judicial discretion. Thus, with respect to such function, the Director cannot lawfully exercise direct control, direction and supervision over the Examiners but only general supervision, exercised through a review of the recommendation they may make for the grant of patent and of other actions, and through a review of their adverse decisions by petition or appeal.例文帳に追加

出願において及び審査官が参照した引例において明らかにされた事実並びに適用法(制定法及び判例法)に基づき特許出願を認めるべきか又は拒絶すべきかを決定する職務は，準司法的な職務であり，司法裁量権の行使を伴う。 従って，当該職務に関しては，局長は，審査官に対して直接的な管理，指揮及び監督を合法的に行うことはできず，特許付与及びその他の処分について審査官によってされる勧告の検討を通じて，また，申請又は不服申立に基づき審査官がなした不利な決定の検討を通じて統括的な監督のみを行うことができる。 - 特許庁