「case notes」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(2ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

For the purposes of paragraph 3, the terms “the central bank” and “institution wholly owned by that Government” mean: (a) in the case of Japan: (i) the Bank of Japan; (ii) the Japan Finance Corporation; (iii) the Japan International Cooperation Agency; (iv) the Nippon Export and Investment Insurance; and (v) such other similar institution which is wholly owned by the Government of Japan as may be agreed upon from time to time between the Governments of the Contracting States through an exchange of diplomatic notes; 例文帳に追加

３の規定の適用上、「中央銀行」及び「政府が全面的に所有する機関」とは、次のものをいう。(a)日本国については、(i)日本銀行(ii)日本政策金融公庫(iii) 独立行政法人国際協力機構(iv)独立行政法人日本貿易保険(v)日本国政府が全面的に所有するその他の類似の機関で両締約国の政府が外交上の公文の交換により随時合意するもの - 財務省

For the purposes of paragraph 3, the terms “the central bank” and “institution wholly owned by that Government” mean: (a) in the case of Kazakhstan: (i) the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan; (ii) Joint Stock Company “Development Bank of Kazakhstan”; (iii) Joint Stock Company “Kazakhstan State Insurance Corporation for insurance of export credit and investment”; and (iv) such other similar institution the capital of which is wholly owned by the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan as may be agreed upon from time to time between the Governments of the Contracting States through an exchange of diplomatic notes; 例文帳に追加

３の規定の適用上、「中央銀行」及び「政府が全面的に所有する機関」とは、次のものをいう。(a)カザフスタンについては、 (i)カザフスタン国立銀行 (ii)株式会社「カザフスタン開発銀行」(iii)株式会社「輸出信用及び投資に係るカザフスタン国営保険会社」(iv)カザフスタン共和国政府が資本の全部を所有するその他の類似の機関で両締約国の政府が外交上の公文の交換により随時合意するもの - 財務省

Article 1105, paragraph 1 of NAFTA provides an obligation to accord fair and equitable treatment “in accordance with international law.” However, in the Pope and Talbot case it was held that because NAFTA was entered into for the purpose of building a closer economic relationship between the three countries of North America, there is not only an obligation to provide treatment consistent with the minimum standard under international law, but also obligations in addition to such minimum standard. In addition, in the S.D. Myers case it was held that a breach of other provisions under NAFTA automatically establishes a breach of general treatment obligations. Criticisms regarding the interpretation of this provision were raised mainly in the U.S. With a view to posing limitations on the expansive reading of this obligation, the NAFTA Free Trade Commission, in response to such criticisms, published “Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions” on August 1, 2001 confirming that general treatment obligations do not exceed that which is required by the customary international law minimum standard for treatment of aliens, and a breach of another provision of NAFTA, or of a separate international agreement, does not establish that there has been a breach of the general treatment obligations.例文帳に追加

なお、NAFTA 第1105条第１項は、「国際法に従って」公正衡平待遇を与える義務を規定しているが、Pope and Talbot 事件で、NAFTAが北米三国間により一層強固な経済関係を築く目的で締結されたものであることなどから一般国際法上の義務のみでなく、これに付加的なものであるとの判断が下されたこと、また、S.D.Myers事件ではNAFTA 上のこの他の規定に違反している場合、必然的に一般待遇義務にも違反するとの判断が下されたことから、米国を中心にこの規定の解釈について批判の声があがり、これを受ける形で2001年８ 月１ 日にNAFTA 自由貿易委員会（NAFTA FreeTrade Commission）は、公正衡平待遇義務は慣習国際法上の最低基準を付与するものであり、それ以上の待遇を求めるものではないこと、NAFTA 上又は他の国際協定の公正衡平待遇義務以外の義務違反があったことによって、公正衡平待遇義務違反があったこととはならないことを確認する覚書（Notes of Interpretationof Certain Chapter 11Provisions）を公表し、この義務の範囲に制限をかけた。 - 経済産業省

Article 159 (1) In cases where the administration and disposition of Specified Assets under the provisions of an Asset Securitization Plan are completed and Specified Bonds and Specified Promissory Notes are issued or Specific Purpose Borrowings are made, if a Specific Purpose Company that has completed the redemption, payment or the performance thereof carries out business pertaining to Asset Securitization under a new Asset Securitization Plan, the directors of said Specific Purpose Company shall prepare a balance sheet for said Specific Purpose Company and obtain approval at a general meeting of members, without delay in the case of a Type 1 Specific Purpose Company and before canceling the Preferred Equity pursuant to the Asset Securitization Plan in the case of a Type 2 Specific Purpose Company. 例文帳に追加

第百五十九条　資産流動化計画の定めによる特定資産の管理及び処分を終了し、かつ、特定社債若しくは特定約束手形を発行し、又は特定目的借入れを行っている場合においてその償還及び支払並びに弁済を完了した特定目的会社が新たな資産流動化計画に基づく資産の流動化に係る業務を行うときは、当該特定目的会社の取締役は、第一種特定目的会社にあっては遅滞なく、第二種特定目的会社にあっては資産流動化計画の定めにより優先出資を消却する前に、当該特定目的会社の貸借対照表を作成し、社員総会の承認を受けなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(pp) For food with nutrient function claims (meaning food which indicates the functions of the specified nutrients it contains to persons who consume said food so as to supplement said specified nutrients in their daily diet in accordance with the criteria specified by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (excluding food for special dietary uses provided in Article 26, paragraph (5) of the Health Promotion Act and perishable food (excluding eggs)); the same shall apply hereinafter): the fact that it is food with nutrient function claims, the names and functions of the nutrients intended to be indicated as those conforming to the criteria specified by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the amount of nutrients, calories, recommended consumption per day, consumption methods, notes for consumption, the wording to recommend a well-balanced daily diet, and the fact that it has not undergone case-by-case reviews by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare; 例文帳に追加

シ　栄養機能食品（食生活において特定の栄養成分の補給を目的として摂取をする者に対し、当該栄養成分を含むものとして厚生労働大臣が定める基準に従い当該栄養成分の機能の表示をするもの（健康増進法第二十六条第五項に規定する特別用途食品及び生鮮食品（鶏卵を除く。）を除く。）をいう。以下同じ。）にあつては、栄養機能食品である旨、厚生労働大臣が定める基準に適合するものとして表示をしようとする栄養成分の名称及び機能、栄養成分量、熱量、一日当たりの摂取目安量、摂取の方法、摂取をする上での注意事項、バランスの取れた食生活の普及啓発を図る文言並びに厚生労働大臣の個別の審査を受けたものではない旨 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム