「Damage」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(490ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Infringement where non-compliance with certain contractual requirements A registered trade mark is infringed if a purchaser or owner of goods and the owner or licensee of the registered trade mark have entered into a written contract that requires the purchaser or owner of the goods not to do, in relation to the goods, any of the acts listed in subsection (2); and the owner, for the time being, of the goods has notice of the contractual requirement; and does or authorizes, in the course of trade, or with a view to dealing with the goods in the course of trade, any of those listed acts; and did not purchase the goods for value and in good faith before receiving notice of the contractual requirement; and is not a successor in title to an owner to whom subparagraph (iii) applies. The acts referred to in subsection (1) are the application of the trade mark on the goods after their condition, get-up, or packaging has been altered in any manner specified in the contract: if the trade mark is on the goods, the alteration, part removal, or part obliteration of the trade mark: the application of any other trade mark to the goods: the addition to the goods of any written material that is likely to damage the reputation of the trade mark: if the trade mark is on the goods, and there is something else on the goods that indicates a connection in the course of trade between the owner or licensee and the goods, the removal or obliteration, whether wholly or partly, of the trade mark.例文帳に追加

契約上の一定の義務を守らない場合の権利侵害次に掲げる事情においては，登録商標の権利が侵害される。商品の購入者又は所有者と登録商標の所有者又は使用権者とが，その商品の購入者又は所有者が，その商品に関し，(2)に記載する何れの行為も実行しないことを要求する書面による契約を締結しており，かつそのときの商品所有者が，契約義務を認知しており，かつ業として，又は業として当該商品を取り扱う目的で，それらの行為の何れかを実行するか又は許可し，かつ契約義務についての通知を受ける前に，有価かつ善意で当該商品を購入しておらず，かつ(iii)が適用される所有者の権原の承継人でない場合(1)において言及した行為とは，次のことである。商品の状態，外装，若しくは包装が契約に指定されている形で変更された後での，その商品への商標の利用商標が商品に付されている場合において，商標の変更，一部除去又は一部抹消その商品への他の商標の利用商品に対する，商標の評判に害を与える虞のある文面資料の追加商標が商品に付されており，かつ，所有者又は登録使用権者とその商品との間の業としての関連を示す他の事項もその商品に表示されている場合において，商標の除去又は抹消。その場合，それが，全部であるか一部であるかを問わない。 - 特許庁

On November 29, 2005 the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare published four notifications and two ministerial ordinances pursuant to Paragraph 3, Article 11, which was newly added to the Food Sanitation Law based on the Law to Partially Amend the Food Sanitation Law (Law No. 55, 2003):- Notification to specify uniform limit (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 497, 2005)- Notification to designate exempted substances (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 498, 2005)- Notification to partially revise the Specifications and Standards for Food, Food Additives, Etc. (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 499, 2005)- Notification to partially revise the Guidelines for the Implementation of Monitoring and Guidance Concerning Food Sanitation (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Notification No. 495, 2005)- Ordinance to partially revise the Enforcement Regulations under the Food Sanitation Law (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ordinance No. 166, 2005)- Ordinance to partially revise the Ministerial Ordinance Concerning Compositional Standards, Etc. for Milk and Milk Products (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ordinance No.167, 2005) Notification No. 497 specifies a level as the amount unlikely to cause damage to human health that Paragraph 3, Article 11 of the Food Sanitation Law requires the Minister to set. Hereinafter the level is referred to as “uniform limit.”例文帳に追加

食品衛生法等の一部を改正する法律（平成１５年法律第５５号。以下「一部改正法」という。）による改正後の食品衛生法第１１条第３項の規定については、食品衛生法等の一部を改正する法律の一部の施行期日を定める政令（平成１７年政令第３４５号）により、平成１８年５月２９日より施行されることとされたが、これに伴い、食品衛生法第１１条第３項の規定により人の健康を損なうおそれのない量として厚生労働大臣が定める量を定める件（平成１７年厚生労働省告示第４９７号。以下「一律基準告示」という。）、食品衛生法第１１条第３項の規定により人の健康を損なうおそれのないことが明らかであるものとして厚生労働大臣が定める物質を定める件（平成１７年厚生労働省告示第４９８号。以下「対象外物質告示」という。）、食品、添加物等の規格基準の一部を改正する件（平成１７年厚生労働省告示第４９９号。以下「残留基準等告示」という。）、食品衛生法施行規則の一部を改正する省令（平成１７年厚生労働省令第１６６号）、乳及び乳製品の成分規格等に関する省令の一部を改正する省令（平成１７年厚生労働省令第１６７号）及び食品衛生に関する監視指導の実施に関する指針の一部を改正する件（平成１７年厚生労働省告示第４９５号）が本日公布されたところである。 - 厚生労働省

(3) In the case where NEDO performs transitional functions related to the coal mining industry pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), the phrase "the functions listed in paragraph (1), item (xiv) of the preceding Article" in Article 16, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the functions listed in paragraph (1), item (xiv) of the preceding Article, and transitional functions related to the coal mining industry as prescribed in Article 12, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions (including functions incidental thereto) (limited to the functions listed in Article 12, paragraph (1), item (i) through item (iii) of the Temporary Measures Concerning Compensation, etc. for Coal Mine Damage (Act No. 97 of 1963; hereinafter referred to the 'Old Compensation Act') prior to its repeal under Article 2 of the Act on the Rearrangement of Relevant Acts Upon Completion of the Structural Adjustment of the Coal Mining Industry (Act No. 16 of 2000; hereinafter referred to as the 'Rearrangement Act') in the case where the relevant provisions of Article 12, paragraph (1) of the Old Compensation Act are to be deemed to remain effective pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Rearrangement Act)"; the phrase "the functions listed in paragraph (1), item (xiv) of the preceding Article" in Article 16, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the functions listed in paragraph (1), item (xiv) of the preceding Article and transitional functions related to the coal mining industry as prescribed in Article 12, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions (limited to the functions related to exercising the right to obtain reimbursement as prescribed in Article 36-19, paragraph (1) of the Act on Temporary Measures Concerning the Structural Adjustment of the Coal Mining Industry (Act No. 156 of 1955; hereinafter referred to as the 'Old Structural Adjustment Act') prior to its repeal under Article 2 of the Rearrangement Act, which are to be deemed to remain effective pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, paragraph (4) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Rearrangement Act, and the functions listed in Article 12, paragraph (1), item (i) to item (iii) of the Old Compensation Act which are to be deemed to remain effective pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Rearrangement Act (including functions incidental thereto))"; the phrase "the entrusted financial institution or juridical person" in Article 16, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the entrusted financial institution or juridical person or the bank that has accepted the entrustment of functions under Article 36-19, paragraph (1) of the Old Structural Adjustment Act which are to be deemed to remain effective pursuant to the provisions of Article 3, paragraph (4) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Rearrangement Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'entrusted bank')"; the phrase "of the entrusted financial institution or juridical person" in Article 16, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the entrusted financial institution or juridical person or of the entrusted bank"; the phrase "and item (xiii) (limited to the part pertaining to Article 20, item (i) of the Assistive Products Act)" in Article 18 shall be deemed to be replaced with "item (xii) (limited to the part pertaining to Article 20, item (i) of the Assistive Products Act), and Article 12, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions (limited to the part pertaining to Article 12, paragraph (1), item (v) of the Old Compensation Act which is to be deemed to remain effective pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (5) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Rearrangement Act)"; the phrase "the entrusted financial institution or juridical person" in Article 26 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the entrusted financial institution or juridical person or the entrusted bank"; the phrase "those prescribed in Article 15" in Article 27, item (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "those prescribed in Article 15 and transitional functions related to the coal mining industry as prescribed in Article 12, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions"; and the phrase "and Cabinet Order based thereon" in Article 50 of the Act on General Rules shall be deemed to be replaced with ", the Act on Temporary Measures Concerning the Structural Adjustment of the Coal Mining Industry (Act No. 156 of 1955; limited to the part which is to be deemed to remain effective pursuant to the provisions of Article 3 of the Supplementary Provisions of the Rearrangement Act) prior to its repeal under Article 2 of the Act on the Rearrangement of Relevant Acts Upon Completion of the Structural Adjustment of the Coal Mining Industry (Act No. 16 of 2000; hereinafter referred to as the 'Rearrangement Act'), the Act on Temporary Measures Concerning Compensation, etc. for Coal Mine Damage (Act No. 97 of 1963; limited to the part which is to be deemed to remain effective pursuant to the provisions of Article 5 of the Supplementary Provisions of the Rearrangement Act) prior to its repeal under Article 2 of the Rearrangement Act, and orders based on these Acts." 例文帳に追加

３　第一項の規定により機構が石炭経過業務を行う場合には、第十六条第一項中「前条第一項第十四号に掲げる業務」とあるのは「前条第一項第十四号に掲げる業務及び附則第十二条第一項に規定する石炭経過業務（石炭鉱業の構造調整の完了等に伴う関係法律の整備等に関する法律（平成十二年法律第十六号。以下「整備法」という。）附則第五条第一項及び第三項の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる整備法第二条の規定による廃止前の石炭鉱害賠償等臨時措置法（昭和三十八年法律第九十七号。以下「旧賠償法」という。）第十二条第一項第一号から第三号までに掲げる業務（これらの業務に附帯する業務を含む。）に限る。）」と、同条第四項中「前条第一項第十四号に掲げる業務」とあるのは「前条第一項第十四号に掲げる業務及び附則第十二条第一項に規定する石炭経過業務（整備法附則第三条第四項の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる整備法第二条の規定による廃止前の石炭鉱業構造調整臨時措置法（昭和三十年法律第百五十六号。以下「旧構造調整法」という。）第三十六条の十九第一項に規定する求償権の行使の業務並びに整備法附則第五条第一項及び第三項の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる旧賠償法第十二条第一項第一号から第三号までに掲げる業務（これらの業務に附帯する業務を含む。）に限る。）」と、「受託金融機関等に対し」とあるのは「受託金融機関等若しくは整備法附則第三条第四項の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる旧構造調整法第三十六条の十九第一項の規定により業務の委託を受けた銀行（以下「受託銀行」という。）に対し」と、「受託金融機関等の」とあるのは「受託金融機関等若しくは受託銀行の」と、第十八条中「第十三号（福祉用具法第二十条第一号に係る部分に限る。）」とあるのは「第十二号（福祉用具法第二十条第一号に係る部分に限る。）並びに附則第十二条第一項（整備法附則第五条第五項の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる旧賠償法第十二条第一項第五号に係る部分に限る。）」と、第二十六条中「受託金融機関等」とあるのは「受託金融機関等又は受託銀行」と、第二十七条第一号中「第十五条に規定する業務」とあるのは「第十五条に規定する業務並びに附則第十二条第一項に規定する石炭経過業務」と、通則法第五十条中「及びこれに基づく政令」とあるのは「、石炭鉱業の構造調整の完了等に伴う関係法律の整備等に関する法律（平成十二年法律第十六号。以下「整備法」という。）第二条の規定による廃止前の石炭鉱業構造調整臨時措置法（昭和三十年法律第百五十六号。整備法附則第三条の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる部分に限る。）及び整備法第二条の規定による廃止前の石炭鉱害賠償等臨時措置法（昭和三十八年法律第九十七号。整備法附則第五条の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる部分に限る。）並びにこれらに基づく命令」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（資産流動化法第七十六条第一項（資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十九条　会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項（剰余金の配当等に関する責任）の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条（株主に対する求償権の制限等）の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条（買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任）の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項（欠損が生じた場合の責任）の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム