日本経済研究センターの英語

本戦略において我が国は、東アジア経済統合を積極的に推進すべく、ASEAN10か国に日本、中国、韓国、インド、豪州、ニュージーランドを加えた計16か国（ASEAN＋6）での経済連携協定たる「東アジア包括的経済連携（東アジアEPA・CEPEA（Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia））」構想、そして東アジア版OECDのような国際的体制の構築に向けた第一歩として、地域共通の課題に研究・政策提言を通じて知的貢献を行う「東アジア・ASEAN経済研究センター（ERIA：Economic Research Institute for ASEAN　and East Asia）」構想を提唱した。例文帳に追加

The strategy advocates the following initiatives to actively promote economic integration in East Asia: the "Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia (CEPEA)," which is an economic partnership agreement among a total of 16 countries comprising 10 ASEAN nations plus Japan, China, Republic of Korea, India, Australia, and New Zealand; and the "Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA)," which is designed to make intellectual contributions through researches and policy recommendations on common issues in the region, as an initial step to establishing an international body, like the East Asian version of the OECD. - 経済産業省

対処方法としては、2012 年10‒12 月期の前年同期比（「平均風速」と呼ばれる）や、四半期GDP（季節調整値）の前期比年率（「瞬間風速」と呼ばれる）を併せて確認することがある（梅田・宇都宮（2009）、日本経済研究センター（2010）等）。例文帳に追加

To deal with this issue, it is necessary to confirm other factors as well, such as data of Oct.?Dec. 2012 compared with the data of the same quarter of 2011 (so-called "average wind speed") and quarter-on-quarter annualized rate of the quarterly GDP (seasonally adjusted) (so-called "instantaneous wind speed"). (Umeda/Utsunomiya (2009) and Japan Center for Economic Research (2010), etc.) - 経済産業省

我が国政府は、ASEANと5か国・地域それぞれの間でのEPA ／ FTAが間もなく出そろうことを見据え、東アジア経済統合に向けた次のステップとなる枠組みを構築するべく、2007年１月の東アジアサミットで、ASEAN10か国に日本、中国、韓国、インド、オーストラリア・ニュージーランドを加えた計16か国での経済連携協定を結ぶ「東アジアEPA」（CEPEA：Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia）の民間専門家研究及び東アジア経済統合に向けた域内共通課題に関する調査研究と域内格差是正のための政策提言を行う「東アジア・ASEAN経済研究センター（ERIA：Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia）」の設立を提案し、各国首脳の同意を得た。例文帳に追加

The Government of Japan has anticipated the conclusion of EPAs/FTAs among/between each of ASEAN and the above mentioned countries and thus sought to build a framework for the next steps toward an East Asia economic integration. To this end, on the occasion of an East Asia summit in January 2007, Japan proposed a project of private sector researchers to study the Comprehensive Economic Partnership in East Asia (CEPEA) to be established based on an economic partnership agreement among the 16 countries - ten ASEAN members plus Japan, China, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand. Japan also proposed the establishment of an Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), designed to research and study issues shared within the region and present policy proposals to narrow intra-regional gaps. These proposals were met with the approval of the heads of the member countries. - 経済産業省

ここでは、東アジア経済統合を積極的に推進するための、ASEAN10か国に日本、中国、韓国、インド、豪州、ニュージーランドを加えた計16 か国（ASEAN＋6）での経済連携協定たる東アジア包括的経済連携（東アジアEPA・CEPEA）を中心とする東アジアの経済連携、東アジア版OECDのような国際的体制の構築に向けた第一歩として、地域共通の課題に研究・政策提言を通じて知的貢献を行う東アジア・ASEAN経済研究センター（ERIA）、米国や中国を含むアジア太平洋の21 の国・地域から構成され地域枠組みであるアジア太平洋経済協力（APEC）について紹介する。例文帳に追加

This section introduces specific efforts, represented by the East Asian Economic Partnership led by the Comprehensive Economic Partnership of East Asia (East Asia EPA/CEPEA), which is based on an economic partnership agreement among16 countries (ASEAN pus 6), namely the 10 ASEAN member states, and Japan, China, South Korea, India, Australia and New Zealand. The East Asian Economic Partnership aims for the active promotion of East Asian economic integration. This section also introduces the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA), which provides intellectual contribution through research and policy proposals on the common challenges in the region as a first step toward the creation of an international organization serving as an East Asian version of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD); and the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), which is a regional framework comprising 21 countries/regions in the Asia Pacific region, including the United States and China. - 経済産業省

しかしながら危機後においては、貯蓄率が維持されたため、国内からの資金供給は比較的潤沢である一方で、投資の担い手である企業部門と資金仲介の役割を果たす金融部門とが共に危機により打撃を受け、その後もその脆弱性が解消されていないために、投資が低調となっているとも考えることができる（浦田・日本経済研究センター（2004））。例文帳に追加

The savings rates were maintained after the crisis, resulting in a relatively abundant supply of domestic funds. Investment was nevertheless weak, perhaps because both the corporate sector, which is a leading investor, and the financial sector, which fulfills the role of financial intermediary, were hurt by the crisis and have not yet overcome their vulnerabilities (Urata, Japan Center for Economic Research (2004)). - 経済産業省