commonly arisingとは 意味・読み方・使い方

However, on the assumption that an invention claimed in the application concerned is the invention that was amended in response to the notice of reasons for refusal indicating the lack of inventive step, if the invention claimed in the application concerned is made by adding any matters that do not fall under the scope of well-known art or commonly used art to the invention claimed in the other patent application and therefore it is required to notify an additional reason for refusal to indicate the lack of inventive step by citing another reference, the reason for refusal of the application concerned arising from the lack of inventive step cannot be deemed to be the same as the reason for refusal arising from the lack of inventive step stated in the notice given to the other patent application.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

なお、本願に係る発明を、他の特許出願の進歩性欠如の拒絶理由通知に対する補正後の発明であると仮定した場合において、本願に係る発明が他の特許出願に係る発明に周知・慣用技術とはいえない事項を付加したものであり、新たな引用文献を追加して進歩性欠如の拒絶の理由を再度通知することが必要となる場合には、本願の進歩性欠如の拒絶の理由と当該他の特許出願の拒絶理由通知に係る進歩性欠如の拒絶の理由は同一であるとはいえない。 - 特許庁

On the assumption that an invention claimed in the application concerned is the invention that was amended in response to the notice of reasons for refusal indicating lack of inventive step to the other patent application, if the invention claimed in the application concerned is unable to bring about a new effect because it is made merely by adding wellknown art or commonly used art to the invention claimed in the other patent application, and is therefore found to be unable to overcome the lack of inventive step, the reason for refusal of the application concerned arising from the lack of inventive step based on the same reference document is the same as that stated in the notice given to the other patent application.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

本願に係る発明を、他の特許出願の進歩性欠如の拒絶の理由を含む拒絶理由通知に対する補正後の発明であると仮定した場合において、本願に係る発明が他の特許出願に係る発明に周知・慣用技術を付加したものであって、新たな効果を奏するものではないため、当該進歩性欠如の拒絶の理由を解消していないと判断される場合には、本願についてこのような判断の下に通知しようとする同一の引用文献に基づく同旨の進歩性欠如の拒絶の理由は、当該他の特許出願の拒絶理由通知に係る拒絶の理由と同一である。 - 特許庁