eu lawとは 意味・読み方・使い方

In 1999, Japan and the EU lodged a complaint against the US with claims that remedy measures against dumping prescribed under the 1916 AD Act are not AD duties permitted by GATT and AD agreements and that the triple damages and other provisions of the law are inconsistent with the WTO agreements.例文帳に追加

1999 年、我が国及びEU は、本法所定のダンピングに対する救済措置が、GATT 及びAD 協定で許容されているAD 税ではなく3 倍賠償である点等がWTO 協定違反として米7国を提訴した。 - 経済産業省

In actual fact, this process of converting the measures into domestic law was often delayed, but the EU was able to not only apply political pressure through the European Commission but also to take the legal measure of filing a suit to the European Court of Justice in order to force countries to go through the process.例文帳に追加

実際、この転換作業は滞ることが多かったが、EUはこれを行使させるため欧州委員会による政治的圧力だけでなく、欧州司法裁判所へ提訴するという法的措置を採ることができた。 - 経済産業省

The Copyright Law of Japan and the EU Copyright Directive provide for the right of making available or uploading. However, the US Copyright Act does not clearly provide for such a right, despite the fact that the United States ratified these two treaties.例文帳に追加

この権利に関して、我が国は著作権法、EU は著作権指令においてその権利内容を明示的に規定しているが、米国は前述２つの条約を批准しているにもかかわらず、この権利について著作権法上明記していない。 - 経済産業省

Although the free movement of workers within the EU were possible by law, little progress was actually made in the movements of workers within the region mainly due to language barriers, and social security systems and labor regulations differing from one country to another, failing to contain the widening disparity of labor cost among all countries.例文帳に追加

EU域内での労働者の自由移動は法的には予定されているものの、言語の壁や国ごとに異なる社会保障制度、労働規制などから実際には域内労働移動は進まず、各国間の労働コスト格差の拡大を抑制することはできなかったものとみられる。 - 経済産業省

The future direction of these efforts is paid close attention as they clearly set their sights on the building the "modality of new company image" and this could influence corporate law throughout the European Union in the future.例文帳に追加

その中で「新しい企業像のあり方」を構築することが明確に意識されているとともに、将来的にはEUワイドの会社法にも影響を与え得ることから、今後の動向が注目される。 - 経済産業省

In response, the United States designated the European Union under Title VII of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, as “a country which maintains procurement practices discriminatory toward the United States.” This provision of US law provides for sanctions against countries that discriminate against US firms in their public procurement practices. Subsequent consultations between the two parties failed to resolve the issue. January 1, 1993 was the member countries’ deadline for implementing the EU directive (for developing related domestic laws). On February 1, the United States announced its intent to invoke sanctions beginning on March 22, 1993.例文帳に追加

米国は、この点について、1992年２月に、政府調達制裁条項（タイトルⅦ）に基づき、EU を「米国に対し差別的な調達慣行を維持する国」と認定し、EU と協議を行ってきたが、本指令が1993年１月１日に加盟国の実施（国内関係法令の整備）期限を迎えたことを受けて、同年２月１日、EU に対し、米国連邦政府によるEU からの政府調達のうち、政府調達協定の対象外の調達（ただし、国防関連等の調達は本件措置の対象から除外。）を禁止する旨の制裁措置を同年３月22日に発動するとの発表を行った。 - 経済産業省

For example, the majority of the proposals in Completing the Internal Market: White Paper from the Commission to the European Council were implemented by being converted into domestic law in the parliaments of each EU country after being adopted by the Council of the European Union. This meant that there was a possibility that the adopted measures would not be appropriately implemented if they were not converted into domestic law by each country.例文帳に追加

例えば、域内市場白書の提案の大半は、欧州閣僚理事会で採択された後に、それを各国が国内議会で国内法に転換するという方式で実行に移されたが、これは、各国が国内法に転換しなければ、採択された措置が適切に実施されない可能性があることを意味した。 - 経済産業省

(Japan, China, Taiwan, the EC and the United States participated as third parties.) The Panel Report in DS296 was circulated on February 21, 2005. The Korean Government and the United States appealed certain issues of law covered in the Panel Report and certain legal interpretations developed by the Panel.例文帳に追加

（我が国、中国、台湾が第三国参加。EU、米国も相互のパネルに第三国参加。）2005年２月21日、米国の相殺関税についてのパネル報告（DS296）配布後、韓国、米国ともに上訴し、６月27日に上級委報告が配布、７月21日に紛争解決機関（DSB）会合にて採択された。 - 経済産業省