「SEVEN」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(86ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

I will look into the fine details later, but basically, government offices are financed by taxes, and have authority based on the Constitution and laws, as a matter of course. The Cabinet is formed as a result of election by the people; then the Prime Minister comes forth, who appoints the Minister for Financial Services according to the Constitution. As this is an extremely democratic government office, it is common sense from my point of view to properly keep or publicly disclose the minutes regarding financial regulation and supervision which have a huge impact in ordinary circumstances as a basic rule, given that an executive branch of government is basically in the public domain. From what I have heard, minutes of seven or eight meetings were disclosed to the public after it was said that this would be done initially, but information on the progress in the interim was not disclosed at all. I think this is extremely odd in view of the rules of the executive branch of government. Basically, from the viewpoint of common sense, it is odd as a government in an open democratic nation that there are no minutes, especially on such a matter that has later had a significant impact on banking regulation and supervision, given the rules of government offices. 例文帳に追加

私、より細かいことまでは後から勉強しますけれども、基本的にお役所というのは税金で成り立っておりまして、当然憲法、法律による権限がございまして、当然国民の選挙によって内閣ができて、総理大臣が出てきて、その総理大臣は憲法に従って金融担当大臣を任命するわけですから、これは極めて民主的な役所であるわけですから、私の常識としては、基本的にやはり行政というのは公のことですから、普通であれば非常に影響の大きい金融行政というのはきちんとやはり議事録を残す、あるいはきちんと皆様方に公表するということが基本的なルールだと思っておりますけれども、何か聞いたところによると、最初だけやりますといって、7、8回（議事録の公表を）やったのですか、途中の経過は一切公表しなかったという話を聞きますし、私自身、非常にこれは何か行政のルールとして大変おかしいことだなというふうに私は思っておりまして、もう一回きちんと、法律的な話等々はまた詰めて、私は法律家ではございませんけれども、基本的にごく常識的に考えて、本当に役所のルールとして、開かれた民主主義国家における政府として、ましてや非常に後から銀行行政に関して大きな影響を与えた話でございますから、私は（議事録がないという事は）いかがなものかなと思っております。 - 金融庁

(8) The Transferred Juridical Person who manage the business and property pertaining to the insurance contract underwritten before the day of the Transfer Register pursuant to the provision of paragraph (5) shall be deemed as the Specified Insurer who continuously carries on the specified insurance business pursuant to the provisions of Article 2, paragraph (1) or (4) of the Supplementary Provisions, and the provisions of Article 3 of the Supplementary Provisions (excluding paragraph (2)), the preceding Article (limited to paragraphs (7) to (12) and (14)), following Article (limited to paragraphs (2) and (5).), and Articles 8 and 16 of the Supplementary Provisions shall be applied. In this case, the term "by the day when six months have passed since the Effective Date (or, if the underwriting of the insurance is performed for the first time after the Effective Date, the date of such underwriting; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article.)" in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "after the day on which the Transfer Register provided in Article 5, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions was registered without delay" and the term ": provided, however, that this shall not apply to a person who applies for the license set forth in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act or for the registration set forth in Article 272, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act by the day on which such six months have passed" in the Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "by the day when two years have passed since the Effective Date" in paragraph (2) of the following Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "it shall be applied pursuant to the provision of paragraph (8) of the preceding Article by the day when six years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," the term "five years have passed since the Effective Date" in paragraph (8) of the preceding Article, Article 8, paragraph (2) and Article 16, paragraph (18) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "eight years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," the term "by the day when two years have passed since the Effective Date" in Article 8, paragraph (2) and Article 16, paragraphs (1), (17) and (18) of the Supplementary Provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "it shall be applied pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph (8) of the Supplementary Provisions by the day when six years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act," and the term "seven years have passed since the Effective Date" in Article 16, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "ten years have passed since the Effective Date of the Revision Act"; any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

８　第五項の規定により移行登記をした日前に引き受けた保険契約に係る業務及び財産の管理を行う移行法人は、附則第二条第一項又は第四項の規定により引き続き特定保険業を行う特定保険業者とみなして、附則第三条（第二項を除く。）、前条（第七項から第十二項まで及び第十四項に限る。）、次条（第二項及び第五項に限る。）並びに附則第八条及び第十六条の規定を適用する。この場合において、附則第三条第一項中「施行日から起算して六月を経過する日（同日後に施行日後初めて保険の引受けを行う場合には、当該引受けを行う日。以下この項において同じ。）までに」とあるのは「附則第五条第一項に規定する移行登記をした日以後遅滞なく」と、「しなければならない。ただし、当該六月を経過する日までに新保険業法第三条第一項の免許又は新保険業法第二百七十二条第一項の登録の申請をした者については、この限りでない」とあるのは「しなければならない」と、次条第二項中「施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間に」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して六年を経過する日までの間に前条第八項の規定により適用する」と、同項並びに附則第八条第二項及び第十六条第十八項中「施行日から起算して五年」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して八年」と、附則第八条第二項並びに第十六条第一項、第十七項及び第十八項中「施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間に」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して六年を経過する日までの間に附則第五条第八項の規定により適用する」と、同条第一項中「施行日から起算して七年」とあるのは「整備法の施行の日から起算して十年」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions concerning the Central Labor Relations Commission and the Prefectural Labor Relations Commission (excluding the provisions of Article 19-2; Article 19-3, paragraphs 1 to 4, inclusive, and the proviso to paragraph 6; Article 19-4, paragraph 2; Article 19-6; Article 19-7, second sentence of paragraph 1, paragraph 4 and paragraph 5; Article 19-10; Article 19-11, paragraph 2 and paragraph 3; paragraph 2, paragraph 3 and paragraph 6 of the preceding article (limited to the part to which the proviso to Article 19-3, paragraph 6 shall apply mutatis mutandis); Article 24, paragraph 2; Article 24-2, paragraph 1, paragraph 2, proviso to paragraph 4 and paragraph 6; Article 26, paragraph 2; and Article 27-23) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Central Labor Relations Commission for Mariners and the Local Labor Relations Commission for Mariners. In this case, the term "seven or more" in Article 19-3, paragraph 5 shall be deemed to be replaced with "three or more"; "the Prime Minister" in Article 19-7, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; "with the consent of the Central Labor Relations Commission in the case of an employer member or a labor member, or with the consent of both Houses in the case of a public member" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Central Labor Relations Commission for Mariners"; "the Prime Minister" in paragraph 3 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; "an employer member or a labor member" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "a member of the Central Labor Relations Commission for Mariners"; "Minister of Health, Labor and Welfare" in Article 19-11, paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; "under the jurisdiction of the prefectural governors" in paragraph 1 of the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "whose jurisdictional district shall be that of each District Transport Bureau (excluding districts specified by Cabinet Order for District Transport Bureaus specified by Cabinet Order) and the district specified by the Cabinet Order concerned, and, for the time being, the district of Okinawa prefecture"; "the prefectural governor" in paragraph 6 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism"; "In cases concerning the labor relations of employees of specified Incorporated Administrative Agency, national forestry businesses, or Japan Post, the Central Labor Relations Commission shall assume exclusive jurisdiction over conciliation, mediation, arbitration, and disposition (with respect to disposition under the provisions of Article 5, paragraph 1, and Article 11, paragraph 1 concerning a labor union which is formed or joined by employees of specified Incorporated Administrative Agency, national forestry businesses, and Japan Post, such disposition shall be limited to that specified by Cabinet Order); and the Central Labor Relations Commission shall assume initial jurisdiction over conciliation, mediation, arbitration, and disposition; and "two or more prefectures" in Article 25, paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with "two or more jurisdictional districts of the Local Labor Relations Commission for Mariners." 例文帳に追加

４　中央労働委員会及び都道府県労働委員会に関する規定（第十九条の二、第十九条の三第一項から第四項まで及び第六項ただし書、第十九条の四第二項、第十九条の六、第十九条の七第一項後段、第四項及び第五項、第十九条の十、第十九条の十一第二項及び第三項、前条第二項、第三項及び第六項（第十九条の三第六項ただし書を準用する部分に限る。）、第二十四条第二項、第二十四条の二第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第六項、第二十六条第二項並びに第二十七条の二十三の規定を除く。）は、船員中央労働委員会及び船員地方労働委員会について準用する。この場合において、第十九条の三第五項中「七人以上」とあるのは「三人以上」と、第十九条の七第二項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、「使用者委員及び労働者委員にあつては中央労働委員会の同意を得て、公益委員にあつては両議院」とあるのは「船員中央労働委員会」と、同条第三項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、「使用者委員又は労働者委員」とあるのは「船員中央労働委員会の委員」と、第十九条の十一第一項中「厚生労働大臣」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、前条第一項中「都道府県知事の所轄の下に」とあるのは「各地方運輸局の管轄区域（政令で定める地方運輸局にあつては、政令で定める区域を除く。）及び当該政令で定める区域を管轄区域として並びに当分の間沖縄県の区域を管轄区域として」と、同条第六項中「都道府県知事」とあるのは「国土交通大臣」と、第二十五条第一項中「特定独立行政法人職員、国有林野事業職員及び日本郵政公社職員の労働関係に係る事件のあつせん、調停、仲裁及び処分（特定独立行政法人職員、国有林野事業職員又は日本郵政公社職員が結成し、又は加入する労働組合に関する第五条第一項及び第十一条第一項の規定による処分については、政令で定めるものに限る。）について、専属的に管轄するほか、二以上の都道府県」とあるのは「二以上の船員地方労働委員会の管轄区域」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム