「know the time of day」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方 - Weblio英語例文検索

(ii) in the case where the company proves that it did not know the fact that the Material Fact occurred pertaining to the company or the fact that the Publication, etc. contains untruth, and that it was not able at the Time of Tender Offer (meaning the time when the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer was submitted in the case of the publication required under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, or the period on or after the day on which the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer was submitted and before the last day of the Tender Offer Period in the case of the publication and notification required under Article 27-22-3(2); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) to know even with reasonable care the fact that the Material Fact occurred pertaining to the company or the fact that the Publication, etc. contains untruth. 例文帳に追加

二　当該会社が、当該会社に重要事実が生じており又は公表等の内容が虚偽であることを知らず、かつ、当該公開買付け当時（前条第一項の規定による公表にあつては当該公開買付届出書の提出の時、同条第二項の規定による公表又は通知にあつては当該公開買付届出書を提出した日以後当該公開買付期間の末日までの間をいう。次項において同じ。）において相当な注意を用いたにもかかわらず知ることができなかつたことを証明したとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) In cases where, at the time of presenting the relevant settlement proposal, suit had not been filed for a claim which had become the subject matter of the Dispute Resolution Procedures, when a suit for the claim is filed and has not been withdrawn by the day on which one month has elapsed from the day when the Member Bank came to know that the Customer has accepted the settlement proposal; 例文帳に追加

二　当該和解案の提示の時において当該紛争解決手続の目的となつた請求に係る訴訟が提起されていない場合において、顧客が当該和解案を受諾したことを加入銀行が知つた日から一月を経過する日までに当該請求に係る訴訟が提起され、かつ、同日までに当該訴訟が取り下げられないとき。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

To provide a digital broadcast receiving apparatus which enables a user to acquire latest information on a program of a short transmission cycle such as current programs of all channels or program information on that day in a short period of time with operations easy to comprehend when the user wants to know the program information in terrestrial digital broadcasting.例文帳に追加

地上波デジタル放送で、ユーザが全チャネルの現在の番組や当日の番組情報などの送信周期が短い番組の最新情報を知りたい場合に、番組情報を短時間で、かつ、分り易い操作で取得できるようにしたデジタル放送受信装置を提供する。 - 特許庁

Article 27-21 (1) The right to claim damages under Article 27-17(1) or the right to claim damages under Article 27-18(1) in cases where Article 27-18(2) is applicable shall be extinguished by prescription when the right is not exercised within one year from the time when the person who is entitled to claim damages comes to know, or is able to know by exercising reasonable care, the violation. The same shall apply to cases where the right is not exercised within five years from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period of the Tender Offer. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の二十一　第二十七条の十七第一項の規定による請求権及び第二十七条の十八第二項の適用がある場合における同条第一項の規定による請求権は、請求権者が当該違反を知つた時又は相当な注意をもつて知ることができる時から一年間、これを行わないときは、時効によつて消滅する。当該公開買付けに係る公開買付期間の末日の翌日から起算して五年間、これを行わないときも、また、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 20 The right to claim damages under Article 18 shall be extinguished by prescription when the right is not exercised within three years from the time when the person who is entitled to claim the damages comes to know, or is able to know, that the Securities Registration Statement or the Prospectus contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement on important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. The same shall also apply when the right is not exercised within seven years (excluding, where an order for suspension has been given under Article 10(1) or Article 11(1), the period from the day when the order was given to the day when the order was canceled) from the time when the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2) for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities comes into effect or the delivery of the Prospectus is made. 例文帳に追加

第二十条　第十八条の規定による賠償の請求権は、請求権者が有価証券届出書若しくは目論見書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けていたことを知つた時又は相当な注意をもつて知ることができる時から三年間、これを行わないときは、消滅する。当該有価証券の募集若しくは売出しに係る第四条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による届出がその効力を生じた時又は当該目論見書の交付があつた時から七年間（第十条第一項又は第十一条第一項の規定による停止命令があつた場合には、当該停止命令があつた日からその解除があつた日までの期間は、算入しない。）、これを行わないときも、また、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The right to claim damages under Article 27-20(1) in cases where paragraph (2) of the preceding Article is applicable shall be extinguished by prescription when the right is not exercised within one year from the time when the person who is entitled to claim damages comes to know, or is able to know by exercising reasonable care, the fact that the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer, etc., Tender Offer Notification, Tender Offer Statement or Tender Offeror's Answer contains any fake statement or false indication on important matters or lacks a statement on any important matters that should be stated or indicated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. The same shall apply to cases where the right is not exercised within five years from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period of the Tender Offer. 例文帳に追加

２　前条第二項の適用がある場合における同条第一項の規定による請求権は、請求権者が公開買付開始公告等、公開買付届出書、公開買付説明書又は対質問回答報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載若しくは表示があり、又は記載若しくは表示すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けていることを知つた時又は相当な注意をもつて知ることができる時から一年間、これを行わないときは、時効によつて消滅する。当該公開買付けに係る公開買付期間の末日の翌日から起算して五年間、これを行わないときも、また、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations. 例文帳に追加

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁