「more than before」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(35ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Prior art shall consist of: (a) Everything made available to the public by means of a written or oral disclosure, by use, or in any other way, before the filing date or the priority date of the application claiming the invention. Prior use which is not present in the Philippines, even if widespread in a foreign country, cannot form part of the prior art if such prior use is not disclosed in printed documents or in any tangible form. (b) The whole contents of an application for a patent, utility model, or industrial design registration, published under Sec. 44 of IP CODE, filed or effective in the Philippines, with a filing or priority date that is earlier than the filing or priority date of the application: Provided, That the application which has validly claimed the filing date of an earlier application under Section 31 of IP CODE, shall be prior art with effect as of the filing date of such earlier application: Provided further, That the applicant or the inventor identified in both applications are not one and the same, (Sec. 24, IP CODE): Where two or more applications are independently filed with respect to the same invention, and the later applications are filed before the first application or earlier application is published, the whole contents of the first or earliest filed application published in accordance with Sec. 44, IP CODE on or after the filing date or priority date of the later filed application shall be novelty destroying with respect to the later filed application.例文帳に追加

先行技術は，次のものからなる。 (a)書面又は口頭による開示により，実施により，又はその他の方法で，発明を主張する出願の出願日又は優先日の前に公衆の利用に供されているすべてのもの。フィリピンにおけるものでない先使用は，外国で普及していても，当該先使用が印刷文書又は有形の形式で開示されていない場合は，先行技術の一部を構成することができない。 (b)IP法第44条に基づき公開され，フィリピンにおいて出願され又は効力を有し，かつ，当該出願の出願日又は優先日より前の出願日又は優先日を有する特許出願，実用新案登録又は意匠登録の全内容。ただし，IP法第31条に基づいて先の出願の出願日を正当に主張する出願は，当該先の出願日において有効な先行技術であるものとし，かつ，双方の出願の出願人又は発明者が同一でないことを条件とする。(IP法第24条) 2以上の出願が同一の発明に関して独立して出願され，後の出願が最先の出願又は先の出願が公開される前に出願された場合は，後の出願の出願日又は優先日以後にIP法第44条に基づき公開された先の又は最先の出願の全内容は，後の出願の新規性を損なうものとする。 - 特許庁

The Registrar shall refer to an examiner every application in respect of which a complete specification has been filed and if satisfied on the report of the examiner that- the nature of the invention or the manner in which it is to be performed is not particularly described and ascertained in the complete specification, or the application, specification and drawings have not been prepared in the prescribed manner, or the title of the specification does not sufficiently indicate the subject-matter of the invention, or the statement of claim does not sufficiently define the invention, or where a complete specification has been left after a provisional specification, the invention particularly described in the complete specification is not substantially the same as that which is described in the provisional specification, or the invention as described and claimed is prima facie not a manner of new manufacture or improvement, or the specification relates to more than one invention, or in the case of an application claiming priority under section 78A, the specification describes and claims an invention substantially larger than or substantially different from the invention disclosed in the specification field with the application made outside Bangladesh by virtue of which priority is claimed, or in the case of an application for a patent of addition under section 15A, the invention describe and claimed in the specification is not an improvement or modification of that described and claimed in the original specification, he may refuse to accept the application or require that the application, specification or drawings be amended before he proceeds with the application; and in the later case the application shall, if the Registrar so directs, bear date as from the time when the requirement is complied with: Provided that, when a specification comprises more than one invention, the application shall, if the Registrar or the applicant so requires, be restricted to one invention and the other inventions may he made the subject-matter of fresh applications; and any such fresh application shall be proceeded with as a substantive application, but the Registrar may, in his discretion, direct that any such fresh application made before the acceptance of the original application shall bear the date of the original application or such later date as he may fix, and the fresh application shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have been made on the date which it bears in accordance with such direction: Provided further that where a complete specification is left after a provisional specification, the Registrar may, if the applicant so requests, cancel the provisional specification and direct that the application shall be deemed to have been made on the date on which the complete specification was left, and proceed with the application accordingly. 例文帳に追加

登録官は、完全な明細書が提出されたあらゆる出願につき審査官へ付託するものとし、次に掲げる(a)から(h)の各号に該当する旨が審査官報告書において報告される場合、登録官は、出願の受理を拒否すること、又は、出願審査を行う前に、願書、明細書若しくは図面の補正を求めることができ、後者の場合、登録官がそのように命ずるとき、出願の日付は当該補正の要件が満たされた日とする。発明の本質又は実施方法が、完全な明細書中に具体的に記述されておらず、確認されないとき。願書、明細書及び図面が所定の方式で作成されていないとき。明細書の名称は発明の要旨を十分に示していないとき。請求項の記載は発明を十分に定義していないとき。又は、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、完全な明細書に具体的に記載された発明が仮明細書の記載と本質的に同一ではないとき。記載され請求されている発明が一見して新規の製造又は改良の方法ではない。明細書が2 以上の発明に係わるものであるとき。又は、第78A 条により優先権を主張する出願の場合、優先権主張の基礎とされているバングラデシュ国外で行われた出願において提出された明細書で開示されている発明より本質的に広い、又は本質的に異なる発明が明細書に記載され請求されているとき。又は、第15A 条による特許追加出願の場合、明細書に記載され請求される発明が原明細書に記載され請求される発明の改良又は修正ではないとき。ただし、明細書が2 以上の発明から成る場合、当該出願は、登録官又は出願人がそのように求めるとき、1 発明に限定されるものとし、その他の発明は新規出願の対象とすることができる。当該新規出願は実質的な出願として手続きを進め、原出願が受理される前に行われるこのような新規出願につき、原出願の日又は自己が定めるそれ以降の日付を付すよう登録官は自己の裁量において指示することができ、当該新規出願は、本法の適用上、当該指示に従い付与された日付に出願されたものとみなされる。ただし、さらに、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、登録官は、出願人がそのように求めれば、仮明細書を取り消し、出願は完全な明細書が提出された日付に行われたとみなすよう命じることができ、そのように当該出願の手続きを進めることができる。 - 特許庁

(3) When the applicable period referred to in item (ii) of paragraph (1) of Article 32-4 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as "the applicable period" in this Article) exceeds three months, annual working days stipulated by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare referred to in paragraph (3) of Article 32-4 of the Act shall be limited to 280 days in the applicable period. However, in case where the applicable period exceeds three months and there had been the other agreement (including resolutions by a labor-management or resolutions by a working hours reduction task force committee) (if there had been more than one agreement, an agreement just before the new agreement shall be applicable; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "the former agreement") under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 32-4 of the Act with its applicable period exceeding three months and containing one year or less whose last day is followed by the first day of the applicable period, yearly working days shall be shorter one, either days determined by subtracting one day from the yearly working days in the applicable period stipulated under the former agreement or 280 days, if the daily limited working hours exceed longer one, either the daily limited working hours stipulated under the former agreement or nine hours, or the weekly limited working hours exceed longer one, either the weekly limited working hours stipulated under the former agreement or 48 hours. 例文帳に追加

３　法第三十二条の四第三項の厚生労働省令で定める労働日数の限度は、同条第一項第二号の対象期間（以下この条において「対象期間」という。）が三箇月を超える場合は対象期間について一年当たり二百八十日とする。ただし、対象期間が三箇月を超える場合において、当該対象期間の初日の前一年以内の日を含む三箇月を超える期間を対象期間として定める法第三十二条の四第一項の協定（労使委員会の決議及び労働時間短縮推進委員会の決議を含む。）（複数ある場合においては直近の協定（労使委員会の決議及び労働時間短縮推進委員会の決議を含む。）。以下この項において「旧協定」という。）があつた場合において、一日の労働時間のうち最も長いものが旧協定の定める一日の労働時間のうち最も長いもの若しくは九時間のいずれか長い時間を超え、又は一週間の労働時間のうち最も長いものが旧協定の定める一週間の労働時間のうち最も長いもの若しくは四十八時間のいずれか長い時間を超えるときは、旧協定の定める対象期間について一年当たりの労働日数から一日を減じた日数又は二百八十日のいずれか少ない日数とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム