| 意味 | 例文 |
Operating timeの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 4957件
Article 22 (1) Where any chemical substance has been designated as a Class I Specified Chemical Substance, if the competent ministers find it particularly necessary for preventing the spread of environmental pollution attributable to said chemical substance, they may, to the extent necessary, order persons who were operating the business of manufacturing or importing said chemical substance or a product in which said chemical substance is used at the time of said designation to make efforts to recall said chemical substance or said product and to take any other measures necessary for preventing the spread of environmental pollution attributable to said chemical substance. 例文帳に追加
第二十二条 主務大臣は、一の化学物質が第一種特定化学物質として指定された場合において、当該化学物質による環境の汚染の進行を防止するため特に必要があると認めるときは、必要な限度において、その指定の際当該化学物質又は当該化学物質が使用されている製品の製造又は輸入の事業を営んでいた者に対し、その製造又は輸入に係る当該化学物質又は当該製品の回収を図ることその他当該化学物質による環境の汚染の進行を防止するために必要な措置をとるべきことを命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) Where any product has been designated as a product using a Class I Specified Chemical Substance, if the competent ministers find it particularly necessary for preventing the spread of environmental pollution attributable to the Class I Specified Chemical Substance being used in said product, they may, to the extent necessary, order persons who were operating the business of importing said product at the time of said designation to make efforts to recall said product which they imported and to take any other measures necessary for preventing the spread of environmental pollution attributable to the Class I Specified Chemical Substance being used in said product. 例文帳に追加
２ 主務大臣は、一の製品が第一種特定化学物質使用製品として指定された場合において、当該製品に使用されている第一種特定化学物質による環境の汚染の進行を防止するため特に必要があると認めるときは、必要な限度において、その指定の際当該製品の輸入の事業を営んでいた者に対し、その輸入に係る当該製品の回収を図ることその他当該製品に使用されている第一種特定化学物質による環境の汚染の進行を防止するために必要な措置をとるべきことを命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Judicial precedents finding liability for damages mostly concern cases where transactions were made in financial products or a long time has passed between the conclusion of the contract and the plaintiff's claim for damages. Judicial precedents in (ii) above are cases which ruled that a party had the right to terminate a contract, all concerning real estate transaction. These judicial precedents holds that a supplementary duty exists associated with the conclusion of a sales contract; which obligates the potential Vendor to inform the potential buyer of Important Matters, such as information about the surrounding environment, and as this is important information in deciding whether to conclude the sales contract, the buyer may terminate the sales contract where the Vendor has failed to perform his duty. In many cases where a buyer cannot use information property because no information about its operating environment was provided at the time the contract was concluded, the buyer may terminate the contract and demand a refund of the purchase price. 例文帳に追加
①の裁判例は、金融商品の取引や、契約締結後に長い期間が経過していた場合であり、損害賠償によるトラブル解決が求められたケースであったと考えられる。一方、②の裁判例はいずれも不動産取引のケースであって、契約締結前に売主が買主に周辺環境等の重要事項を提供することは、売買契約の締結に際しての当然の付随義務であり、これが売買契約を締結するか否かを決する上において重要な事柄である以上、当該義務違反をもって買主は売買契約の解除をなし得る、としたものである。動作環境が契約締結時に提供されなかったために、情報財が使用できないようなケースについては、買主は②の契約を解除して、支払済みの対価の返還を求めることが多いものと解される。 - 経済産業省
Commodities are not under my jurisdiction. However, generally speaking, around 2008, when Mr. Koji Omi, who became a Diet member in the same year as I, was Finance Minister, speculative trading was discussed at a summit as a factor behind the rising prices of commodities. The discussion focused mainly on speculative traders operating across borders-at that time, before the Lehman shock, such speculative traders were very active-, and France and Germany proposed the introduction of regulation for speculative trading. In response, the United States and the United Kingdom argued against regulation on the ground that speculative trading is part of commercial activity. This grew into a major issue at the summit, and Japan eventually sided with the United Kingdom and the United States, as I remember it. 例文帳に追加
私は基本的に、日本国憲法の最初の前文に何と書いてあるか。日本国憲法には、第9条でもない、何でもない最初に、「日本国民は、正当に選挙された国会における代表者を通じて行動し」と書いてあります。それには、「国会における代表者」と書いてありまして、衆議院も参議院も、与党も野党も書いてありません。私は、国民新党の議員だった時に国会質問が当たりまして、国会でもこのことを（答弁しました）。やはり、そこは日本国の一番基本です。今、国家の非常に大事な時期でもございますし、まさに国会議員であり、そして国務大臣でもございますから、その大変重たい責任をしっかり果たしていきたいと思っております。 - 金融庁
Article 5 (1) Among living marine resources other than specified living marine resources, the governor of each prefecture may designate, etc. living marine resources by Prefectural Ordinance as living marine resources to be preserved and controlled in the area of the sea designated by Prefectural Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as "the designated area of the sea") by deciding the prefectural catch limit (meaning the maximum annual limit for gathering or catching each type of living marine resources in the designated area of the sea by persons other than those operating a designated fishery, etc. and those provided by Cabinet Order set forth in item (vi) of paragraph (2) of Article 3; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter referred to as "Class I designated living marine resources") or may designate, etc. living marine resources by Prefectural Ordinance as living marine resources to be preserved and controlled, by deciding the prefectural limit for fishing effort (meaning the maximum limit of the total annual fishing effort for the prefecture (the amount of fishing work (excluding work by persons who operate a designated fishery, etc.) carried out for gathering or catching each type of living marine resources, with this amount being expressed as a number of fishing days and by any other index provided in Prefectural Regulations for each mode of gathering or catching related to that type of living marine resources; hereinafter the same shall apply) for each type of living marine resources and for the mode of gathering or catching to which each such type is subject, and in cases where each type of living marine resources are controlled based on the prefectural fishing effort within designated areas of the sea or designated periods of time in relation to a mode of gathering or catching, this shall mean the maximum limit of the total annual fishing effort for the prefecture for each such mode of gathering or catching each type of living marine resources, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as "Class II designated living marine resources"), and when the governor designates Class I and Class II designated living marine resources, he/she shall prescribe the following matters in the Prefectural Plan: 例文帳に追加
第五条 都道府県の知事は、特定海洋生物資源でない海洋生物資源のうち、都道府県の条例で定める海域（以下「指定海域」という。）において、都道府県漁獲限度量（指定海域において、指定漁業等を営む者及び第三条第二項第六号の政令で定める者以外の者が採捕することができる海洋生物資源の種類ごとの年間の数量の最高限度をいう。以下同じ。）を決定すること等により保存及び管理を行う海洋生物資源として都道府県の条例で定める海洋生物資源（以下「第一種指定海洋生物資源」という。）又は都道府県漁獲努力限度量（指定海域において、海洋生物資源の種類ごとにその対象となる採捕の種類並びに当該採捕の種類に係る海域及び期間を定めて都道府県漁獲努力量（海洋生物資源を採捕するために行われる漁ろう作業（指定漁業等を営む者に係るものを除く。）の量であって、採捕の種類別に操業日数その他の都道府県の規則で定める指標によって示されるものをいう。以下同じ。）による管理を行う場合の海洋生物資源の種類ごとの当該採捕の種類に係る年間の都道府県漁獲努力量の合計の最高限度をいう。以下同じ。）を決定すること等により保存及び管理を行う海洋生物資源として都道府県の条例で定める海洋生物資源（以下「第二種指定海洋生物資源」という。）について、都道府県計画において、次に掲げる事項を定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
第四十九条 会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条（招集手続の省略）、第三百十一条（書面による議決権の行使）、第三百十二条（電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）及び第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定（同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。）中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
第四十一条 会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条から第三百二条まで（招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）、第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）、第三百十九条（第四項を除く。）（株主総会の決議の省略）及び第三百二十条（株主総会への報告の省略）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。）の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主（当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。）の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 意味 | 例文 |
 | ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
| Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved. |
| Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved. |
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
検索履歴を保存できる！
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
