「court ruling in judgment」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方 - Weblio英語例文検索

(6) With regard to a judgment that has approved or changed the Ruling Evaluating the Subject Officer's Liability, the court in charge of the case may make a declaration of provisional execution pursuant to the provisions of Article 259(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. 例文帳に追加

６　役員等責任査定決定を認可し、又は変更した判決については、受訴裁判所は、民事訴訟法第二百五十九条第一項の定めるところにより、仮執行の宣言をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The court of first instance shall send to the Patent Office in respect of every judgment ruling on the validity or effectiveness of a patent a copy confirming the legal force of the decisions, for attachment to the patent grant files. 例文帳に追加

第1審裁判所は，特許の効力又は有効性について下す全ての判決に関し，特許庁に対して，特許付与のファイルに添付させるため，判決の法的効力を確認する文書を送付しなければならない。 - 特許庁

The court of first instance shall communicate to the Patent Office in respect of every judgment ruling on the validity or effectiveness of a design right a copy confirming that the decision is final, for attachment to the design files. 例文帳に追加

第1審裁判所は，意匠権の効力又は有効性について下した判決の全てについて，判決が確定したものであることを確認する写しを，該当意匠のファイルに添付させるために，特許庁に送付するものとする。 - 特許庁

(3) When the accused on bail has been found guilty and the judgment has become final and binding, and he/she has subsequently been summoned for its execution but does not appear in court without justifiable reason or flees, the court shall, upon the request of a public prosecutor, sequester the whole or part of the bail bond by a ruling. 例文帳に追加

３　保釈された者が、刑の言渡を受けその判決が確定した後、執行のため呼出を受け正当な理由がなく出頭しないとき、又は逃亡したときは、検察官の請求により、決定で保証金の全部又は一部を没取しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the case where an immediate appeal against a ruling has been lodged, and only when there is prima facie evidence showing that there are circumstances that will cause the revocation of the protection order, an appellate court may order, upon a petition, the suspension of the validity of the protection order until the judgment on the immediate appeal against a ruling has come into effect. The court that originally had jurisdiction over the case may also order such a disposition if the case records are still in its possession. 例文帳に追加

３　即時抗告があった場合において、保護命令の取消しの原因となることが明らかな事情があることにつき疎明があったときに限り、抗告裁判所は、申立てにより、即時抗告についての裁判が効力を生ずるまでの間、保護命令の効力の停止を命ずることができる。事件の記録が原裁判所に存する間は、原裁判所も、この処分を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 256 With regard to a case for which a final appeal has been filed based on grounds that in the judgment, the court unjustly found any law, order, regulation, or ruling to be in violation of the Constitution, the Supreme Court shall prioritize the adjudication of said case above any and all other cases in which no finding of that sort was made in the judgment of prior instance. 例文帳に追加

第二百五十六条　最高裁判所は、原判決において法律、命令、規則又は処分が憲法に違反するものとした判断が不当であることを上告の理由とする事件については、原裁判において同種の判断をしていない他のすべての事件に優先して、これを審判しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 545 (1) In cases where an order is issued for commencement of special liquidation, if the court finds it necessary, the court may, in response to the petition by the Liquidating Stock Company or ex officio, pass judgment evaluating the rights to seek damages pursuant to the liability of the Subject Officers (hereinafter in this article referred to as "Ruling Evaluating Subject Officers' Liability") 例文帳に追加

第五百四十五条　裁判所は、特別清算開始の命令があった場合において、必要があると認めるときは、清算株式会社の申立てにより又は職権で、対象役員等の責任に基づく損害賠償請求権の査定の裁判（以下この条において「役員等責任査定決定」という。）をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vii) With regard to the case, the judge has participated in a ruling, summary order or the decision of the lower court prescribed in item (ii) of Article 266, or in the original judgment of a case which was sent back or transferred pursuant to the provisions of Articles 398 to 400, 412, or 413, or in the examination of evidence which formed the basis of such decisions; provided, however, that this shall not apply when he/she participated as a delegated judge. 例文帳に追加

七　裁判官が事件について第二百六十六条第二号の決定、略式命令、前審の裁判、第三百九十八条乃至第四百条、第四百十二条若しくは第四百十三条の規定により差し戻し、若しくは移送された場合における原判決又はこれらの裁判の基礎となつた取調べに関与したとき。ただし、受託裁判官として関与した場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-20 In the case where an employer has filed an action to a court pursuant to the provisions of the preceding Article, paragraph 1, the court in charge of the action may, at the request of the Labor Relations Commission which has issued the order-for-relief, etc., order the employer to accede to the whole or part of the order-for-relief, etc. until the judgment becomes final, or upon appeal from the parties concerned, or on its own authority rescind or modify this ruling. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の二十　前条第一項の規定により使用者が裁判所に訴えを提起した場合において、受訴裁判所は、救済命令等を発した労働委員会の申立てにより、決定をもつて、使用者に対し判決の確定に至るまで救済命令等の全部又は一部に従うべき旨を命じ、又は当事者の申立てにより、若しくは職権でこの決定を取り消し、若しくは変更することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In the past, cases regarding general conditions of contract such as in a transportation agreement (for example, Judgment of Osaka High Court, June 29, 1965, 16-6 Kakyusaibansho Minji Saibanreishu ("Kaminshu") 1154; Judgment of Kyoto District Court, November 25, 1955; 6-11 Kaminshu 2457 (concerning motor carrier transportation agreement)), the disclosure (e.g. representation) of the terms and conditions was a prerequisite to ruling that the terms and conditions had binding force. However, the court held that terms and conditions are deemed to be incorporated into a contract for transactions concerning the carriage of passengers or cargo transports if such terms and conditions are disclosed to the customers appropriately, so long as it is the established business practice when entering into transactions for such transportation agreements or other similar agreements. 例文帳に追加

運送約款などの普通契約約款に関する過去の判例（例えば航空運送約款に関する大阪高判昭和４０年６月２９日・下級民集１６巻６号 1154頁、自動車運送約款に関する京都地判昭和３０年１１月２５日・下級民集６巻１１号 2457頁など）は、約款を顧客に開示（掲示など）することを約款に法的拘束力を認めるための要件として要求しているが、運送契約などについては約款による取引の商慣行が存在することを理由として、約款が適切に開示されていれば、必ずしも顧客からの約款への同意の意思表示がなくても旅客運送や貨物輸送などの取引に関する契約に当該約款の内容が組み込まれることを認めている。 - 経済産業省

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条（株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力）の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Tokyo High Court judgment of March 31, 2005 upheld the original decision ruling that the service provider had infringed the right to make the copyrighted work transmittable and that there is a concrete and realistic risk that that automatic public transmission services will, by nature, trigger certain types of copyright infringements by its users, which would be foreseeable for the service provider operating such service, who consequently induces such infringements. Moreover, where the service provider may procure certain economic benefits from operating such service, the service provider will be held responsible for the infringement, because such provider has caused damages from actions which are under his/her own control. In this case, it is natural that such service provider should be held liable for such infringement, in other words he/she would himself/herself be regarded as the infringer. 例文帳に追加

東京高裁平成１７年３月３１日判決は、当該サービスが、その性質上、具体的かつ現実的な蓋然性をもってサービス利用者による特定の類型の違法な著作権侵害行為を惹起するものであり、サービス提供者がそのことを予想しつつ当該サービスを提供して、そのような侵害行為を誘発し、しかもそれについてのサービス提供者の管理があり、サービス提供者がこれにより何らかの経済的利益を得る余地があるとみられる事実があるときは、サービス提供者はまさに自らコントロール可能な行為により侵害の結果を招いている者として、その責任を問われるべきことは当然であり、サービス提供者を侵害の主体と認めることができる、と述べて、サービス提供者を著作物の送信可能化権及び自動公衆送信権の侵害主体であると認定した原審の判断を支持した。 - 経済産業省

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）（合併の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム