「 大審院」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(2ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

ここに重過失とは、普通の人なら注意義務を尽くして錯誤に陥ることはなかったのに、著しく不注意であったために錯誤に陥ったということである（大審院大正６年１１月８日判決・民録２３－１７５８他）。例文帳に追加

Gross negligence herein refers to cases where a party was extremely careless in erroneously declaring its intent and any reasonable person with normal care would not have made such a mistake (Great Court of Cassation (equivalent to the Supreme Court) Judgment of November 8, 1917, Minroku 23-1758, et.al).  - 経済産業省

三　最高裁判所の判例がない場合に、大審院若しくは上告裁判所たる高等裁判所の判例又はこの法律施行後の控訴裁判所たる高等裁判所の判例と相反する判断をしたこと。例文帳に追加

(iii) In the event that there is no Supreme court precedent, a determination has been rendered that conflicts with a precedent of the former Supreme Court (daishin'in) or a high court that was the court of the final appellate instance, or that conflicts with a precedent of a high court that was the court of second instance at a time after the enforcement date of this Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

同年4月14日には、立憲政體ノ詔書（太政官布告第58号）を発して、行政を担当する太政官・正院、立法を担当する元老院(日本)・地方官会議、司法を担当する大審院を置く三権分立制の基礎を形作った。例文帳に追加

The Imperial edict Rikken Seitai no Shosho (Dajokanfukoku No. 58) was issued on April 14, 1875, whereby the base of the separation of powers was formed such that placed Dajokan and Seiin to take responsibility for administration, Genroin, and Chihokankaigi to take responsibility for legislation, and Daishinin to take responsibility for jurisdiction.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

青木の条約改正案は従来のものと異なり治外法権に関して「対等合意」(外国人裁判官の大審院への不採用、外国人不動産は領事裁判権を撤廃しない限り認めないことを明記）を目指した。例文帳に追加

Aoki's plan to revise the treaty was, unlike the conventional ones at the time, to aim 'taito goi' (agreement on equal basis), (not adopting foreign judges to the Daishin-in (Predecessor of the Supreme Court of Japan), and not admitting the possession of real estate by foreigners unless the counselor jurisdiction was abolished were specified).  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

朕、...ここに元老院(日本)を設け、もって立法の源を広め、大審院を置き、もって審判の権を鞏（かた）くし、又、地方官を召集し、もって民情を通じ公益を図り、漸次に国家立憲の政体を立て、なんじ衆庶と倶にその慶に頼らんと欲す例文帳に追加

I…established Genro-in (the Chamber of Elders) to develop nation's legislation, and established Daishin-in (Predecessor of the Supreme Court) to secure independence of the judiciary, and also summoned local officials to listen to the voices of the people and secure public interest, and aimed at a gradual shift to the constitutional system of government that provided benefits to both me and the public.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

黒田清隆内閣の外相大隈重信は1888年（明治21年）に交渉を再開するが、外国人を大審院に任用するなどの譲歩案がイギリスのロンドンタイムズに掲載されて日本へも伝わると、世論からは激しい批判がわき上がった。例文帳に追加

The Foreign Minister Shigenobu OKUMA in the Kiyotaka KURODA Cabinet restarted the negotiation in 1888, but once the package of concessions including appointment of foreigners in the Supreme Court of Law was reported in London Times in England and communicated to Japan, the Japanese general public criticized it severely.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

２　前項の高等裁判所は、同項の裁判について、最高裁判所の判例（これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは抗告裁判所である高等裁判所の判例）と相反する判断がある場合その他の法令の解釈に関する重要な事項を含むと認められる場合には、申立てにより、決定で、抗告を許可しなければならない。例文帳に追加

(2) Where the judicial decision set forth in the preceding paragraph contains a determination that is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court in charge of an appeal against a ruling, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court) or where said judicial decision is found to involve material matters concerning the construction of laws and regulations, the high court set forth in said paragraph, upon petition, by an order, may permit an appeal against a ruling.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

また、「要素の錯誤」とは、意思表示の内容の主要な部分であり、この点に錯誤がなかったなら、(1)表意者は意思表示をしなかったであろうこと、かつ、(2)意思表示をしないことが一般取引の通念に照らして正当と認められること、とされている（大審院大正７年１０月３日判決・民録２４－１８５２他）。例文帳に追加

Miscomprehension of a material element in this case means miscomprehension with respect to any material part of the declaration of intent. More specifically, a miscomprehension with respect to a material element consists of cases where, (1) the party would not have declared its intention if there had been no such miscomprehension and; (2) a reasonable man would not, in light of general commercial practice, have made such declaration without such miscomprehension (Great Court of Cassation (equivalent to the Supreme Court) Judgment of October 3, 1918, Minroku 24-1852, etc.).  - 経済産業省

第三百十八条　上告をすべき裁判所が最高裁判所である場合には、最高裁判所は、原判決に最高裁判所の判例（これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは控訴裁判所である高等裁判所の判例）と相反する判断がある事件その他の法令の解釈に関する重要な事項を含むものと認められる事件について、申立てにより、決定で、上告審として事件を受理することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 318 (1) With regard to a case in which the judgment in prior instance contains a determination that is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court of second instance, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court) or any other case in which the judgment in prior instance is found to involve material matters concerning the construction of laws and regulations, where the court with which a final appeal shall be filed is the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, upon petition, by an order, may accept such case as the final appellate court.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百九十二条　前二条（法第三百十二条第一項及び第二項の上告理由の記載の方式並びに法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）に規定する上告において、判決が最高裁判所の判例（これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは控訴裁判所である高等裁判所の判例）と相反する判断をしたことを主張するときは、その判例を具体的に示さなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 192 In the final appeal prescribed in the preceding two Articles (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of Article 312 of the Code; and Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code), when alleging that a judgment contains a determination that is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court of second instance, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court), such precedents shall be indicated specifically.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百九十九条　上告受理の申立ての理由の記載は、原判決に最高裁判所の判例（これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは控訴裁判所である高等裁判所の判例）と相反する判断があることその他の法令の解釈に関する重要な事項を含むことを示してしなければならない。この場合においては、第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）第二項及び第三項の規定を準用する。例文帳に追加

Article 199 (1) The reasons for a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal shall be stated by indicating that the judgment of prior instance contains a determination that is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or, precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court of second instance, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court) or involves material matters concerning the construction of laws and regulations. In this case, the provisions of paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code) shall apply mutatis mutandis.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百三条　法第三百二十四条（最高裁判所への移送）の規定により、上告裁判所である高等裁判所が事件を最高裁判所に移送する場合は、憲法その他の法令の解釈について、その高等裁判所の意見が最高裁判所の判例（これがない場合にあっては、大審院又は上告裁判所若しくは控訴裁判所である高等裁判所の判例）と相反するときとする。例文帳に追加

Article 203 A high court, as the final appellate court, shall transfer a case to the Supreme Court pursuant to the provision of Article 324 (Transfer to the Supreme Court) of the Code when the opinion of the high court on interpretation of the Constitution or any other law or regulation is inconsistent with precedents rendered by the Supreme Court (or precedents rendered by the former Supreme Court or those rendered by high courts as the final appellate court or the court of second instance, if there are no precedents rendered by the Supreme Court).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム