公益法人の監督の英語

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。例文帳に追加

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations.発音を聞く  - 金融庁

また、金融商品取引業者等の監督において、金融商品取引法（以下「金商法」という。）上に規定されている自主規制機関である金融商品取引業協会（認可金融商品取引業協会又は公益法人金融商品取引業協会をいう。以下同じ。）や金融商品取引所は、金融商品取引業者等に対して市場の実情に精通している者として自らを律していくことにより投資者からの信頼を確保させる自主規制機能を担っており、監督上の連携を密接に行う必要がある。例文帳に追加

Furthermore, the supervisory authorities need to maintain close cooperation with Financial Instruments Firms Associations (which refer to the Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association and Public Interest Corporation-Type Financial Instruments Firms. The same shall apply hereinafter.), which are self-regulatory organizations as specified by the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (hereinafter referred to as “FIEA”), as well as financial instruments exchanges, since they, in their capacity as entities familiar with the circumstances of the market, are responsible for exercising the function of self-regulation that is intended to secure investors’ confidence in Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc.発音を聞く  - 金融庁

公認会計士・監査審査会（以下「審査会」という。）は、昨年10月、昨今の会計監査を巡る状況、国際的な監査事務所に対する監督監視の動向を踏まえ、公益又は投資者保護のために、あずさ監査法人、監査法人トーマツ、新日本監査法人、中央青山監査法人の４大監査法人に対する早急な検査等の措置を行うことを公表し、日本公認会計士協会（以下「協会」という。）の実施した品質管理レビューの報告に対する審査を行った後に、４大監査法人への検査を実施した。例文帳に追加

Recognizing the recent events involving financial audits and the international trends in supervision and monitoring of audit firms, the Certified Public Accountants and Auditing Oversight Board (“Board”) announced in October 2005 that it would urgently inspect the four largest audit firms (referred to in this report as “Big Four firms”), namely KPMG AZSA & Co., Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Ernst & Young ShinNihon, and ChuoAoyama Pricewaterhouse Coopers, in order to protect the public interest and investors.発音を聞く  - 金融庁

第五十二条の十五　内閣総理大臣は、銀行主要株主が法令若しくは法令に基づく内閣総理大臣の処分に違反したとき又は公益を害する行為をしたときは、当該銀行主要株主に対し監督上必要な措置を命じ、又は当該銀行主要株主の第五十二条の九第一項若しくは第二項ただし書の認可を取り消すことができる。この場合において、同条第一項の認可のうち設立に係るものは、当該認可を受けて設立された会社その他の法人である銀行主要株主に対して与えられているものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 52-15 (1) The Prime Minister may, when a Major Shareholder of Bank has violated any laws and regulations or a disposition given by the Prime Minister based on any laws and regulations or has committed an act that harms the public interest, order that Major Shareholder of the Bank to take necessary measures for the purpose of supervision, or rescind the authorization set forth in Article 52-9(1) or in the proviso to Article 52-9(2) for that Major Shareholder of the Bank. In this case, the authorization set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article that pertains to establishment shall be deemed to be granted to the Major Shareholder of the Bank which is the company or any other juridical person that has been established under the authorization.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

保険毎日さんには、いつもこのことに大変、問題意識を持っていただいて、今のご質問でございますけれども、今回の法律の改正は、ご存じのように継続審議になったと認識いたしておりますけれども、平成17年の保険業法改正前から共済事業を行ってきた団体のうち、一定の要件に該当するものについて、契約者保護の観点から一定の規制を設けることにより、共済事業の持続を可能にしつつ、業務の適正な運営を確保しようとするものでございまして、今、ご質問がございましたように、公益法人については各主務官庁でこれまで監督を行ってきており、その業務に関する知見や、これまでの監督を通じての蓄積された情報を有しております。例文帳に追加

I appreciate the awareness that Hokenmainichi always has of this matter – well, I understand that the proposed amendment to the Act is to be continued to the next session for deliberation. The amendment involves establishing, from the standpoint of policyholder protection, certain regulations applicable to those corporations already engaged in a mutual aid business prior to the 2005 amendment to the Insurance Business Act that meet certain requirements, in order for them to maintain their mutual aid business, at the same time to ensure that proper operation in their activities. As your question implies, public interest corporations have thus far been supervised by their respective competent government agencies, which accordingly have knowledge of their operations and a set of information accumulated through the work of supervision in the past.発音を聞く  - 金融庁

第五十六条の四　内閣総理大臣は、協会（認可金融商品取引業協会又は第七十八条第二項に規定する公益法人金融商品取引業協会をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に加入せず、又は金融商品取引所の会員若しくは取引参加者（次項において「会員等」という。）となつていない金融商品取引業者等（金融商品取引業者にあつては、第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者に限る。以下この条において同じ。）の業務について、公益を害し、又は投資者保護に欠けることのないよう、協会又は金融商品取引所の定款その他の規則を考慮し、適切な監督を行わなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 56-4 (1) The Prime Minister shall supervise appropriately the business of a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (with regard to Financial Instruments Business Operators, limited to those engaged in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) who has not joined an Association (meaning an Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association or Public Interest Corporation-Type Financial Instruments Firms Association prescribed in Article 78(2); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or who is not a member or Trading Participant (referred to as a "Member, etc." in the following paragraph) of a Financial Instruments Exchange, while considering the articles of incorporation and any other rules of the Association or Financial Instruments Exchange, so that such business does not harm the public interest or fail to sufficiently protect investors.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七十一条の十六　内閣総理大臣は、保険主要株主が法令若しくは法令に基づく内閣総理大臣の処分に違反したとき又は公益を害する行為をしたときは、当該保険主要株主に対し監督上必要な措置を命じ、又は当該保険主要株主の第二百七十一条の十第一項若しくは第二項ただし書の認可を取り消すことができる。この場合において、同条第一項の認可のうち設立に係るものは、当該認可を受けて設立された会社その他の法人である保険主要株主に対して与えられているものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 271-16 (1) The Prime Minister may, when a Major Shareholder of Insurance Company has violated any laws and regulations or a disposition given by the Prime Minister based on any laws and regulations or has committed an act that harms the public interest, order that Major Shareholder of the Insurance Company to take necessary measures for the purpose of supervision, or rescind the authorization set forth in Article 271-10, paragraph (1) or the proviso to Article 271-10, paragraph (2) for that Major Shareholder of the Insurance Company. In this case, the authorization set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article that pertains to establishment shall be deemed to be granted to the Major Shareholder of Insurance Companies, which is the company or any other juridical person that has been established under the authorization.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム