「ひとぞく」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(779ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

５　会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。例文帳に追加

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well.  - 金融庁

ロ　執行裁判所の執行処分に対する執行異議の申立て、民事執行法第十三条第一項の代理人の選任の許可を求める申立て、執行文の付与の申立てに関する処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第三十六条第一項若しくは第三項の規定による強制執行の停止若しくは続行を命じ、若しくは執行処分の取消しを命ずる裁判を求める申立て、同法第四十一条第二項の規定による特別代理人の選任の申立て、同法第四十七条第四項若しくは第四十九条第五項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、執行裁判所に対する配当要求、同法第五十五条第一項の規定による売却のための保全処分若しくは同条第五項の規定によるその取消し若しくは変更の申立て、同法第五十六条第一項の規定による地代等の代払の許可を求める申立て、同法第六十二条第三項若しくは第六十四条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第六十八条の二第一項の規定による買受けの申出をした差押債権者のための保全処分の申立て、同法第七十七条第一項の規定による最高価買受申出人若しくは買受人のための保全処分の申立て、同法第七十八条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第八十三条第一項の規定による不動産の引渡命令の申立て、同法第百十五条第一項の規定による船舶国籍証書等の引渡命令の申立て、同法第百十七条第一項の規定による強制競売の手続の取消しの申立て、同法第百十八条第一項の規定による船舶の航行の許可を求める申立て、同法第百二十七条第一項の規定による差押物の引渡命令の申立て、少額訴訟債権執行の手続における裁判所書記官の執行処分に対する執行異議の申立て、少額訴訟債権執行の手続における裁判所書記官に対する配当要求、同法第百六十七条の十五第三項の規定による申立て、同法第百七十二条第二項の規定による申立て、同法第百八十七条第一項の規定による担保不動産競売の開始決定前の保全処分若しくは同条第四項の規定によるその取消しの申立て又は同法第百九十条第二項の動産競売の開始の許可の申立て例文帳に追加

(b) The filing of an objection to a disposition of execution by the executing court, a petition seeking permission for the appointment of an agent set forth in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Execution Act, an objection to a disposition concerning a petition for a grant of a certificate of execution, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of a compulsory execution or ordering a revocation of a disposition of execution under the provisions of Article 36, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition for appointment of a special agent under the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (2) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 47, paragraph (4) or Article 49, paragraph (5) of said Act, a demand for liquidation distribution by the executing court, a petition for a temporary restraining order on a sale under the provisions of Article 55, paragraph (1) of said Act or for a revocation or change of such an order under the provisions of paragraph (5) of said Article, a petition for permission to pay rent on land, etc. in place of the obligor under the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 62, paragraph (3) or Article 64, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for an obligee effecting a seizure who has made a purchase offer under the provisions of Article 68-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for the highest purchase price offeror or the purchaser under the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 78, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver real property under the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver the certificate of a vessel's nationality, etc. under the provisions of Article 115, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for the rescission of a compulsory auction procedure under the provisions of Article 117, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission for navigation of a vessel under the provisions of Article 118, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver seized property under the provisions of Article 127, paragraph (1) of said Act; an objection to a disposition of execution by a court clerk in the procedure of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a demand on a court clerk for liquidation distribution during the process of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a petition under the provisions of Article 167-15, paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition under the provisions of Article 172, paragraph (2) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order prior to a commencement order for a secured real property auction under Article 187, paragraph (1) of said Act or for revocation of such an order under the provisions of Article 187, paragraph (4), or a petition for permission to commence an auction of movables as set forth in Article 190, paragraph (2) of said Act  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十四条の三十三　第二十四条の六第二項（第一号を除く。）、第二十四条の七、第二十四条の九第一項及び第三項、第二十四条の十二並びに第二十四条の十四から第二十四条の十六までの規定は、センターについて準用する。この場合において、第二十四条の六第二項中「前条第二項」とあるのは「第二十四条の二十八」と、同項第三号中「第二十四条の十六第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「第二十四条の三十三において準用する第二十四条の十六第一項又は第二項」と、同項第四号中「第二十四条の九第三項」とあるのは「第二十四条の三十三において準用する第二十四条の九第三項」と、第二十四条の七第一項中「、試験事務を行う事務所の所在地並びに試験事務の開始の日」とあるのは「並びに第二十四条の二十九に規定する業務を行う事務所の所在地」と、同条第二項、第二十四条の九第一項及び第三項、第二十四条の十二、第二十四条の十四、第二十四条の十五の見出し及び同条第一項並びに第二十四条の十六第二項及び第三項中「試験事務」とあるのは「第二十四条の二十九に規定する業務」と、第二十四条の九第三項中「役員又は試験員」とあるのは「役員」と、「第二十四条の十一第一項の試験事務規程」とあるのは「第二十四条の三十一第一項の情報提供業務規程」と、第二十四条の十六第一項中「第二十四条の六第二項各号」とあるのは「第二十四条の三十三において準用する第二十四条の六第二項各号」と、同条第二項第一号中「この章」とあるのは「第二十四条の三十一第一項若しくは第二十四条の三十二の規定又は第二十四条の三十三において準用するこの章」と、同項第二号中「第二十四条の六第一項各号の一」とあるのは「第二十四条の二十八各号の一」と、同項第三号中「第二十四条の九第三項、第二十四条の十一第二項又は第二十四条の十四」とあるのは「第二十四条の三十一第二項の規定又は第二十四条の三十三において準用する第二十四条の九第三項若しくは第二十四条の十四」と、同項第四号中「第二十四条の十一第一項の規定により認可を受けた試験事務規程」とあるのは「第二十四条の三十一第一項の規定により認可を受けた情報提供業務規程」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 24-33 The provisions of Article 24-6, paragraph (2) (excluding item (i)), Article 24-7, Article 24-9, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 24-12, and Article 24-14 to Article 24-16 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a center. In this case: the phrase "the preceding Article, paragraph (2)" in Article 24-6, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 24-28"; the phrase "Article 24-16, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" in the same paragraph, item (iii) with "Article 24-16, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-33"; the phrase "Article 24-9, paragraph (3)" in the same paragraph, item (iv) with "Article 24-9, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-33"; the phrase ", the location of the office where it administers examination affairs, and the date when it commences examining affairs" in Article 24-7, paragraph (1) with ", and the location of the office where it performs the services prescribed in Article 24-29"; the term "examination affairs" in the same Article, paragraph (2), Article 24-9, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 24-12, Article 24-14, title of Article 24-15, the same Article, paragraph (1), and Article 24-16, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) with "the services prescribed in Article 24-29"; the phrase "officer or examiner" in Article 24-9, paragraph (3) with "officer"; the phrase "rules for administration of examination affairs set forth in Article 24-11, paragraph (1)" therein with "rules for information provision services set forth in Article 24-31, paragraph (1)"; the phrase "any of the items of Article 24-6, paragraph (2)" in Article 24-16, paragraph (1) with "any of the items of Article 24-6, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-33"; the term "this Chapter" in the same Article, paragraph (2), item (i) with "the provisions of Article 24-31, paragraph (1) or Article 24-32, or this Chapter as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-33"; the phrase "any of the items of Article 24-6, paragraph (1)" in the same paragraph, item (ii) with "any of the items of Article 24-28"; the phrase "Article 24-9, paragraph (3), Article 24-11, paragraph (2), or Article 24-14" in the same paragraph, item (iii) with "the provisions of Article 24-31, paragraph (2), or Article 24-9, paragraph (3) or Article 24-14 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-33"; and the phrase "rules for administration of examination affairs approved pursuant to the provisions of Article 24-11, paragraph (1)" in the same paragraph, item (iv) with "rules for information provision services approved pursuant to the provisions of Article 24-31, paragraph (1)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

登録官は、完全な明細書が提出されたあらゆる出願につき審査官へ付託するものとし、次に掲げる(a)から(h)の各号に該当する旨が審査官報告書において報告される場合、登録官は、出願の受理を拒否すること、又は、出願審査を行う前に、願書、明細書若しくは図面の補正を求めることができ、後者の場合、登録官がそのように命ずるとき、出願の日付は当該補正の要件が満たされた日とする。発明の本質又は実施方法が、完全な明細書中に具体的に記述されておらず、確認されないとき。願書、明細書及び図面が所定の方式で作成されていないとき。明細書の名称は発明の要旨を十分に示していないとき。請求項の記載は発明を十分に定義していないとき。又は、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、完全な明細書に具体的に記載された発明が仮明細書の記載と本質的に同一ではないとき。記載され請求されている発明が一見して新規の製造又は改良の方法ではない。明細書が2 以上の発明に係わるものであるとき。又は、第78A 条により優先権を主張する出願の場合、優先権主張の基礎とされているバングラデシュ国外で行われた出願において提出された明細書で開示されている発明より本質的に広い、又は本質的に異なる発明が明細書に記載され請求されているとき。又は、第15A 条による特許追加出願の場合、明細書に記載され請求される発明が原明細書に記載され請求される発明の改良又は修正ではないとき。ただし、明細書が2 以上の発明から成る場合、当該出願は、登録官又は出願人がそのように求めるとき、1 発明に限定されるものとし、その他の発明は新規出願の対象とすることができる。当該新規出願は実質的な出願として手続きを進め、原出願が受理される前に行われるこのような新規出願につき、原出願の日又は自己が定めるそれ以降の日付を付すよう登録官は自己の裁量において指示することができ、当該新規出願は、本法の適用上、当該指示に従い付与された日付に出願されたものとみなされる。ただし、さらに、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、登録官は、出願人がそのように求めれば、仮明細書を取り消し、出願は完全な明細書が提出された日付に行われたとみなすよう命じることができ、そのように当該出願の手続きを進めることができる。例文帳に追加

The Registrar shall refer to an examiner every application in respect of which a complete specification has been filed and if satisfied on the report of the examiner that- the nature of the invention or the manner in which it is to be performed is not particularly described and ascertained in the complete specification, or the application, specification and drawings have not been prepared in the prescribed manner, or the title of the specification does not sufficiently indicate the subject-matter of the invention, or the statement of claim does not sufficiently define the invention, or where a complete specification has been left after a provisional specification, the invention particularly described in the complete specification is not substantially the same as that which is described in the provisional specification, or the invention as described and claimed is prima facie not a manner of new manufacture or improvement, or the specification relates to more than one invention, or in the case of an application claiming priority under section 78A, the specification describes and claims an invention substantially larger than or substantially different from the invention disclosed in the specification field with the application made outside Bangladesh by virtue of which priority is claimed, or in the case of an application for a patent of addition under section 15A, the invention describe and claimed in the specification is not an improvement or modification of that described and claimed in the original specification, he may refuse to accept the application or require that the application, specification or drawings be amended before he proceeds with the application; and in the later case the application shall, if the Registrar so directs, bear date as from the time when the requirement is complied with: Provided that, when a specification comprises more than one invention, the application shall, if the Registrar or the applicant so requires, be restricted to one invention and the other inventions may he made the subject-matter of fresh applications; and any such fresh application shall be proceeded with as a substantive application, but the Registrar may, in his discretion, direct that any such fresh application made before the acceptance of the original application shall bear the date of the original application or such later date as he may fix, and the fresh application shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have been made on the date which it bears in accordance with such direction: Provided further that where a complete specification is left after a provisional specification, the Registrar may, if the applicant so requests, cancel the provisional specification and direct that the application shall be deemed to have been made on the date on which the complete specification was left, and proceed with the application accordingly.  - 特許庁