「operate for」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(66ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Osaka High Court Judgment, February 27, 1997, p.131 of Hanrei Jiho vol. 1624 "The Respondent Company does not operate the Device by itself, but repeatedly conducts a certain lease business which provides commercially used karaoke devices to users which are highly likely to infringe the representation and performance rights of musical works managed by the Appellant [omitted]. If the user uses this Device for providing karaoke music to their customers without being licensed by the Appellant, the user was aware that it violates the representation and performance rights of musical works managed by the Appellant. Alternatively, if he/she was not aware of it, they should have been, as it would be easy for such user to become aware of it. In this particular case, the Respondent Company was aware of the fact that it continued to provide customers with karaoke services by using the Device without holding any license to do so. The Respondent Company continued and renewed the Lease Agreement and provided the Device, silently accepting Therefore, the Respondent acted jointly with Appellants Noriko and Takashi in the aforementioned infringement of copyrights." 例文帳に追加

大阪高裁平成９年２月２７日判決・判時１６２４号１３１頁「控訴人会社は、自ら本件装置を操作するものではないが、被控訴人が管理する音楽著作物の上映権及び演奏権を侵害するおそれの極めて高い、業務用カラオケ装置をユーザーに提供することを内容とする、リース業務を日常的に反復継続する者として、･･･本件装置のユーザーが被控訴人の許諾を得ないまま本件装置をカラオケ伴奏による客の歌唱に使用すれば、被控訴人が管理する音楽著作物の上映権及び演奏権を侵害することになることを知っていたか、仮に知らなかったとしても容易に知り得たのであるから、これを知るべきであったというべきである。しかるところ、控訴人会社は、･･･許諾を得ないまま本件店舗において本件装置を使用して客に歌唱させていることを認識しながら、右著作権侵害の結果を認容しつつ、本件リース契約を継続、更改して本件装置を提供し、控訴人則子及び同隆による前示本件著作権侵害行為に加担したというべきである。」 - 経済産業省

Article 5 (1) Among living marine resources other than specified living marine resources, the governor of each prefecture may designate, etc. living marine resources by Prefectural Ordinance as living marine resources to be preserved and controlled in the area of the sea designated by Prefectural Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as "the designated area of the sea") by deciding the prefectural catch limit (meaning the maximum annual limit for gathering or catching each type of living marine resources in the designated area of the sea by persons other than those operating a designated fishery, etc. and those provided by Cabinet Order set forth in item (vi) of paragraph (2) of Article 3; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter referred to as "Class I designated living marine resources") or may designate, etc. living marine resources by Prefectural Ordinance as living marine resources to be preserved and controlled, by deciding the prefectural limit for fishing effort (meaning the maximum limit of the total annual fishing effort for the prefecture (the amount of fishing work (excluding work by persons who operate a designated fishery, etc.) carried out for gathering or catching each type of living marine resources, with this amount being expressed as a number of fishing days and by any other index provided in Prefectural Regulations for each mode of gathering or catching related to that type of living marine resources; hereinafter the same shall apply) for each type of living marine resources and for the mode of gathering or catching to which each such type is subject, and in cases where each type of living marine resources are controlled based on the prefectural fishing effort within designated areas of the sea or designated periods of time in relation to a mode of gathering or catching, this shall mean the maximum limit of the total annual fishing effort for the prefecture for each such mode of gathering or catching each type of living marine resources, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as "Class II designated living marine resources"), and when the governor designates Class I and Class II designated living marine resources, he/she shall prescribe the following matters in the Prefectural Plan: 例文帳に追加

第五条　都道府県の知事は、特定海洋生物資源でない海洋生物資源のうち、都道府県の条例で定める海域（以下「指定海域」という。）において、都道府県漁獲限度量（指定海域において、指定漁業等を営む者及び第三条第二項第六号の政令で定める者以外の者が採捕することができる海洋生物資源の種類ごとの年間の数量の最高限度をいう。以下同じ。）を決定すること等により保存及び管理を行う海洋生物資源として都道府県の条例で定める海洋生物資源（以下「第一種指定海洋生物資源」という。）又は都道府県漁獲努力限度量（指定海域において、海洋生物資源の種類ごとにその対象となる採捕の種類並びに当該採捕の種類に係る海域及び期間を定めて都道府県漁獲努力量（海洋生物資源を採捕するために行われる漁ろう作業（指定漁業等を営む者に係るものを除く。）の量であって、採捕の種類別に操業日数その他の都道府県の規則で定める指標によって示されるものをいう。以下同じ。）による管理を行う場合の海洋生物資源の種類ごとの当該採捕の種類に係る年間の都道府県漁獲努力量の合計の最高限度をいう。以下同じ。）を決定すること等により保存及び管理を行う海洋生物資源として都道府県の条例で定める海洋生物資源（以下「第二種指定海洋生物資源」という。）について、都道府県計画において、次に掲げる事項を定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Amid the current economic downturn, financial institutions are after all in a more advantageous position in relation to SMEs. This means that SMEs could not voice their opinion much. Thanks to the enactment of this law, they can now straightforwardly request a change of terms or other matters. Apparently, (former) Minister Kamei also proclaimed a transformation in attitude in the area of financial institution supervision as well. As banking is also a consultancy service, there must be a perspective of not just lending money and getting the money back, but of how to help industry survive and operate decently. That is why a sound and robust financial institution or a generous financial institution is needed and I, as the head of the FSA, pushed forward with conviction a policy for our work of inspections and supervision that is in line with that spirit. 例文帳に追加

今、不況の中でございまして、よくお分かりのように、中小企業者と金融機関というのは、やはり金融機関が強いのですよ。（中小企業者は）あまり意見が言えなかったと。ところが、法律を作っていただいたおかげで、条件の変更とかということをきちんと言えるようになった。また、これは亀井（前）大臣のときも言われたと思いますが、金融機関の監督の方もそういうふうな意識の変換というのを非常に亀井（前）大臣が言われたようでございまして、銀行というのはコンサルタント業でもあるわけですから、ただお金を貸して、お金を返してもらうというだけでなくて、いかに産業をきちんと、この産業企業がやはり持続可能でやっていけるかということ、そのために健全で強力な金融機関、あるいは親切な金融機関が必要なのですが、やはり私はそういった意味でもそういったことの精神を踏まえて検査、監督をやっていただきたいということを庁を預かる者として強くそういう方針を打ち出したつもりでございます。 - 金融庁

(a) If an applicant fails to prosecute his application within the required time as provided in these Regulations, the application shall be deemed withdrawn. (b) The time for reply may be extended only for good and sufficient cause, and for a reasonable time specified. Any request for such extension must be filed on or before the day on which action by the applicant is due. The Examiner may grant a maximum of two extensions, provided that the aggregate period granted inclusive of the initial period allowed to file the response, shall not exceed six months from mailing date of the official action requiring such response. (c) Prosecution of an application to save it from withdrawal must include such complete and proper action as the condition of the case may require. Any amendment not responsive to the last official action shall not operate to save the application from being deemed withdrawn. (d) When action by the applicant is a bona fide attempt to advance the case to final action, and is substantially a complete response to the Examiner’s action, but consideration of some matter or compliance with some requirements has been inadvertently omitted, opportunity to explain and supply the omission may be given before the question of withdrawal is considered. (e) Prompt ratification or filing of a correctly signed copy may be accepted in case of an unsigned or improperly signed paper.例文帳に追加

(a)出願人が本規則に規定する期間内に出願を遂行しなかった場合は，当該出願は，取り下げられたものとみなされる。 (b)応答期間は，適切かつ十分な理由がある場合に限り，かつ，指定された合理的な期間にわたり，延長することができる。当該延長の請求は，出願人による応答の期限が到来する日以前にしなければならない。審査官は，最大2回まで延長を認めることができるが，ただし，応答書を提出するために認められた当初期間を含む合計期間は，当該応答を求める庁の処分書の郵送日から6月を超えないものとする。 (c)出願が取り下げられたとみなされないようにするための出願の遂行には，当該事案の事情から必要とされる完全かつ適切な行為を含むものとする。庁による最終処分に応答していない補正は，当該出願を取り下げたとみなされることを防ぐことができない。 (d)出願人による行為が，事案を最終処分に進めるための善意の試みであり，審査官の処分に対する実質的には完全な応答であるにも拘らず，ある事項の検討又はある要件の遵守を不注意により怠っている場合は，取下の問題を検討する前に，当該不作為を説明し，埋め合わせる機会を与えることができる。 (e)署名が脱落した又は署名が不適切な文書の場合においては，正しく署名された写しの速やかな追認又は提出が認められる。 - 特許庁

Article 115-16 (1) A mayor of a Municipality, when it is determined that a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care does not act in compliance with the provision provided when providing said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), does not meet the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1) or the fixed minimum number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph or standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care provided by paragraph (4) of the same Article, with regard to knowledge, skill, or number of employees of the Business Office pertaining to said appointment as service provider, or when it is determined that said Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service does not operate an appropriate Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care in accordance with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (2) or paragraph (4) of the same Article, may specify a due date and recommend to said Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care to act in compliance with the provisions provided when determining said appointment as service provider pursuant to the provisions of Article 115-11, paragraph (5), to comply with the standards as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in Article 115-13, paragraph (1), to employ the number of employees as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as set forth in the same paragraph, to comply with standards concerning employees that engage in Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, and to comply with standards concerning effective support methods for Prevention of Long-Term Care pertaining to a Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care and standards concerning facilities and management of the business of Designated Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care as prescribed by paragraph (2) and paragraph (4) of the same Article. 例文帳に追加

第百十五条の十六　市町村長は、指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者が、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従わず、当該指定に係る事業所の従業者の知識若しくは技能若しくは人員について第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を満たしておらず、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準に従って適正な指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の運営をしていないと認めるときは、当該指定地域密着型介護予防サービス事業者に対し、期限を定めて、第百十五条の十一第五項の規定により当該指定を行うに当たって付された条件に従い、第百十五条の十三第一項の厚生労働省令で定める基準を遵守し、若しくは同項の厚生労働省令で定める員数の従業者を有し、若しくは同条第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに従事する従業者に関する基準を遵守し、又は同条第二項若しくは第四項に規定する指定地域密着型介護予防サービスに係る介護予防のための効果的な支援の方法に関する基準若しくは指定地域密着型介護予防サービスの事業の設備及び運営に関する基準を遵守すべきことを勧告することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム