「design-based」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(22ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

If the person making the first application, or his or her successor in title, has filed with the same authority a later application relating to the same design, the later application may be invoked as the basis of priority provided that, at the time of filing, the earlier application has been withdrawn, dismissed or rejected, and the documents filed in the case have not become available to the public, and has not left outstanding any right based upon it and has not served as a basis for priority. 例文帳に追加

最初の出願をした者又はその権原承継人が同一の意匠に関して後の出願を同一の当局にした場合は，後の出願は，出願時に先の出願が取り下げられ，却下され又は拒絶され，かつ，当該事件において提出された書類が公衆の利用に供されていないこと，及び当該先の出願に基づく権利が何ら残っておらず，かつ，当該先の出願が優先権の根拠として役立っていないことを条件として，優先権の根拠として主張することができる。 - 特許庁

To cite some specific examples, the FSA has dealt with the problem of unpaid insurance benefits, which we talked about earlier, inappropriate business practices used by foreign exchange margin trading companies, and the issue of mutual aid associations operating without a license, as well as institutional issues, including a revision of the Money Lending Control Act. While dealing with these issues, the FSA has been striving to establish a framework for the protection of users based on a consistent philosophy regarding both matters of inspection and supervision and the institutional design. Also, it has been conducting inspection and supervision in ways to ensure the effectiveness of this framework. 例文帳に追加

一部具体例を申し上げれば、先ほども話題となりました保険金の不払いや支払漏れの問題、悪徳な商法を含む外為証拠金取引業者への対応、無認可共済の問題への対応、さらには貸金業法の改正といった制度面を含む業者対応等々を行ってきているわけでありまして、その中で検査・監督と制度設計の両方を通じた一貫した整合性のある利用者保護の枠組みの整備と、その枠組みの実効性を確保するための検査・監督ということを行ってきているということでございます。 - 金融庁

And it is also confirmed that in terms of forming the polyethylene resin layer on the outer periphery of the hose, the earlier application invention has disclosed a technical idea to make a polyethylene resin layer as thin as possible, without losing these operational effects. Furthermore, also if we consider a description of a preferred embodiment in the earlier application invention that the ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene would be neither melted nor transformed at the time its is being firmly bonded to the vulcanized rubber layer and at the time it is being vulcanized into form, it is clearly confirmed that a person skilled in the art, who came to know the earlier application invention without a clear description of the lower thickness limit for the polyethylene resin layer, may understand at the time of implementing the earlier application invention that the thickness is a matter to be automatically determined, namely a matter of design to be appropriately selected, while taking into account the preferred vulcanized form and other elements, based on the above mentioned technical idea. 例文帳に追加

そして、先行技術の超高分子ポリエチレンは、ゴム層と加硫接着しかつ加硫成形時に溶融変形しないものが好適との記載をも考慮すれば、ポリエチレン樹脂層の厚さについて下限の数値を明記していない先行技術に接した当業者は、先行技術の実施に当たり、上記の技術的思想を基礎に、加硫成形時の適性等をも加味して判断すれば、おのずから定まる事項、すなわち、適宜選択し得る設計的事項であると理解するものと認めるのが相当である。 - 特許庁

If the person making the first application, or his successor in title, has filed with the same authority a later application relating to the same design, the later application may be invoked as the basis of priority provided that, at the time of filing, the earlier application had been withdrawn, dismissed or rejected and the documents filed in the case had not become available to the public, and has not left outstanding any right based upon it and has not served as a basis for priority. Where priority is accepted on the basis of the later application, the earlier application may no longer be invoked as grounds for priority. 例文帳に追加

最初の出願を行った出願人又はその権原承継人が同一特許当局に対して同一の意匠に関する後の出願を行った場合は，当該後の出願を優先権の基礎として援用することができる。ただし，その出願時において，先の出願が既に取下，却下若しくは拒絶されており，かつ，その事件において提出された書類が公衆の利用に供されていなかったこと，先の出願に基づく如何なる権利も残っておらず，かつ，先の出願が優先権の基礎として機能していないことを条件とする。当該後の出願を基礎として優先権が容認された場合は，先の出願は，もはや優先権の根拠として援用することができない。 - 特許庁

Accordingly, from said computer technology (a), it would be easily conceived by a person skilled in the art using ordinary system design technology to select hardware resources for the system configuration, i.e., "invoice approval system comprising an invoice input preparation device which has the first input module for inputting the invoice data, the first output module which displays and prints out the invoice based on the data input to said first input module, the first communication control module, and the first control module which controls the entire device." 例文帳に追加

したがって、上記コンピュータ技術(a)から、「伝票のデータを入力するための第１入力部、該第１入力部に入力されたデータに基づいて当該入力された伝票を表示及び印字する第１出力部、第１通信制御部及び全体を制御する第１制御部を有する伝票入力作成装置と、伝票を表示する第２出力部、承認データの第２入力部、第２通信制御部及び全体を制御する第２制御部を有する伝票承認装置とからなる伝票承認システム」として、ハ－ドウエア資源を選択してシステムを構成することは、当業者が日常的なシステム設計手法を用いて行える程度のことである。 - 特許庁

In addition, individual business processes that have a high degree of materiality (as described below) may be included in the scope. Instead of two-thirds of total sales on a consolidation basis, a certain ratio may be applied to aggregated sales (before elimination of inter-company transactions). For this certain ratio, if that location or business unit was in the assessment scope as a material location or business unit in the previous fiscal year, and if it is confirmed that a) the assessment result indicated effective internal control over that location in the previous fiscal year, b) there were no material changes in the design of internal controls over that location or business unit, c) among the material locations and business units, it is not a particularly material location or business unit, e.g. it is not a core company in the group, then that location or business unit could be excluded from the assessment scope. In that case, as a result, the certain ratio may be less than 2/3 of consolidated sales, etc. to some extent (Note 3) As sales amounts of affiliated companies are not included in a company's consolidated sales, the management cannot use the certain ratio of consolidated sales for affiliates. Instead, the management should evaluate the degree of the affiliate's impact on the company's financial statements and determine whether the affiliate should be deemed to be in the scope or not based on its financial statement. 例文帳に追加

この一定割合については、当該事業拠点が前年度に重要な事業拠点として評価範囲に入っており、イ）前年度の当該拠点に係る内部統制の評価結果が有効であること、ロ）当該拠点の内部統制の整備状況に重要な変更がないこと、ハ）重要な事業拠点の中でも、グループ内での中核会社でないなど特に重要な事業拠点でないことを確認できた場合には、当該事業拠点を本年度の評価対象としないことができると考えられる。その場合、結果として、売上高等の概ね２／３を相当程度下回ることがあり得る。 - 金融庁

(2) For inventions among those claimed in a patent application containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are stated in the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings (in the case where the earlier application was a foreign language written application, foreign language documents) originally attached to the application of the earlier application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the earlier application contains a priority claim under that paragraph or Article 8(1) of the Utility Model Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including its mutatis mutandis Application under Article 11(1) of the Utility Model Act), excluding any inventions disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the earlier application is based), the said patent application shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the earlier application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 29, the main clause of Article 29-2, Articles 30(1) to (3), 39(1) to (4), 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1), 104 (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 65(5) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 184-10(2)))and 126(5) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Articles 17-2(6) and 134-2(5)) of the Patent Act, Articles 7(3) and 17 of the Utility Model Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), and Article 29, 33-2(1) and 33-3(1) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act) of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959 ). 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願に係る発明のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、外国語書面）に記載された発明（当該先の出願が同項若しくは実用新案法第八条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（同法第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された発明を除く。）についての第二十九条、第二十九条の二本文、第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第三十九条第一項から第四項まで、第六十九条第二項第二号、第七十二条、第七十九条、第八十一条、第八十二条第一項、第百四条（第六十五条第五項（第百八十四条の十第二項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）及び第百二十六条第五項（第十七条の二第六項及び第百三十四条の二第五項において準用する場合を含む。）、同法第七条第三項及び第十七条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第一項及び第三十三条の三第一項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該特許出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Among devices claimed in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are disclosed in the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings (in the case where the Earlier Application was a written application in foreign language prescribed in Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the Earlier Application contains a priority claim under the preceding paragraph or Article 41(1) of the Patent Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of this Act), excluding any device disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the Earlier Application is based), the said application for a utility model registration shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the Earlier Application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 3, the main clause of Article 3-2, Article 7(1) to (3), Article 30(1) to (3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 11(1), Article 17, Articles 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 26, Articles 39(3) and (4) and 72 of the Patent Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), Article 29 of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959) and Articles 33-2(3) and 33-3(3) (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act ) of the Trademark Act. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う実用新案登録出願に係る考案のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案（当該先の出願が前項若しくは同法第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は同法第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された考案を除く。）についての第三条、第三条の二本文、前条第一項から第三項まで、第十一条第一項において準用する同法第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第十七条、第二十六条において準用する同法第六十九条第二項第二号、同法第七十九条、同法第八十一条及び同法第八十二条第一項並びに同法第三十九条第三項及び第四項並びに第七十二条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第三項及び第三十三条の三第三項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該実用新案登録出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム