「judgment call」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方 - Weblio英語例文検索

When the judgment part 15 judges that they are not similar, a slave unit control section 11 outputs a call signal to a nurse call master unit 20.例文帳に追加

それらが類似していないと判定部１５にて判断した場合には、子機用制御部１１は、ナースコール親機２０へ呼出信号を出力する。 - 特許庁

To enable improvement of throughput and reduction of a call interference rate by enabling more appropriate judgment of out-of-synchronization depending on communication types.例文帳に追加

同期外れの判定を通信種別に応じてさらに適切に行えるようにして、スループットの向上と呼切断率の低減を可能にする。 - 特許庁

In the resource judgment processing, a radio base station suitable for a call base station of the group control radio base station is selected.例文帳に追加

リソース判定処理では、グループコントロール無線基地局の通話基地局に適した無線基地局を選定する。 - 特許庁

The users of respective moving machines 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D depress keys corresponding to 'stone-paper-scissors (a kinde of mora)' when they call a judgment center 4 and they are connected to the judgment center 4.例文帳に追加

各移動機２Ａ，２Ｂ，２Ｃ，２Ｄの使用者は、判定センタ４を発呼して判定センタ４と接続されると、「グー」、「チョキ」、「パー」に対応するキーを押下する。 - 特許庁

Since recognition of the function of this pushbutton 1, judgment of whether the call is registered or not, and the judgment of the end of elevator car operations executed by the call registration are all made possible to be done by means of a tactile sense, those of visually handcapped users are able to utilize the elevator without anxiety.例文帳に追加

押しボタン１の機能の認識、呼びが登録されたか否かの判断、および呼びの登録により実行されたエレベータかごの動作終了の判断が、触覚により可能となるので、目の不自由な利用客は安心してエレベータが利用可能となる。 - 特許庁

When a state judgment section 11 judges that a mobile terminal is connected to a charger, or removed from the charger, or the mobile terminal exists in a particular place on the basis of information supplied from a charging state detection section 111 and a position information acquisition section 112, the state judgment section 11 outputs an incoming call storage notice signal to an incoming call judgment section 12.例文帳に追加

状態判断部１１は、充電状態検出部１１１及び位置情報取得部１１２から供給される情報に基づいて、携帯端末が充電器に接続された、又は、充電器からはずされた、或いは、特定の場所に携帯端末が存在すると判断した場合に、着信判断部１２へ着信保持通知信号を出力する。 - 特許庁

When an incoming call is received, a time counting means 4 counts up incoming time 11c by detecting the incoming start and incoming end of an incoming judgment means 3.例文帳に追加

着信があると、時間計測手段４は、着信判定手段３の着信開始および着信終了の検知により着信時間１１ｃを計測する。 - 特許庁

When it is judged that no response to the call signal is received, the apparatus 10 transmits voice guidance to prompt judgment whether or not predetermined video message is reproduced to the origination side cellular phone.例文帳に追加

この呼出信号に対する応答が受信されないと判定した場合に、所定の映像メッセージを再生するか否かの判断を促す音声ガイダンスを発信側携帯電話機に送信する。 - 特許庁

To be more specific the corresponding relation of low order functions to be called to the execution order is prepared as execution order information, and the call judgment processing is executed, and the execution order information is acquired in the low order functions (S200).例文帳に追加

具体的には、コール対象の下位関数とその実行順序との対応関係を実行順序情報として用意しておき、下位関数では、コール判断処理を実行して、実行順序情報を取得する（Ｓ２００）。 - 特許庁

The ringtone volume of an incoming call notification means 102 is controlled by judging a signal received by a communication unit 103 by a level judgment means 104 and judging congestion states of the surroundings of the portable terminal 100.例文帳に追加

通信ユニット１０３で受信した信号をレベル判定手段１０４で、携帯端末装置１００の周囲の混雑状況を判断し、着信報知手段１０２の着信音量を制御する。 - 特許庁

Then, the connection controller 20 judges whether or not the connection request satisfies the connecting condition which the access code indicates and permits or refuses an incoming call (also including transfer) according to a judgment result.例文帳に追加

そして、アクセスコードが示す接続条件を接続要求が満たすか否かを判定し、判定結果に応じて着信（転送も含む。）の許可若しくは拒絶を行う。 - 特許庁

An operator directing section 138 directs a break to the operator 100 if a judgment is made that the time when the operator 100 deals with a user during transfer of the call to the back receiver 2 is shorter than a predetermined permission time.例文帳に追加

そして、オペレータ指示部１３８が該コールがバック受付部２に転送された時に該オペレータ１００がユーザに対応していた時間が予め決められた許容時間以下であると判断した場合に、該オペレータ１００に休憩を指示する。 - 特許庁

For example, when the confirmed caller information denotes setting of unnoticed number, a public phone or an international phone or the like or an informed caller ID is stored in an incoming call reject memory, the control section 27 keeps a hook on state and provides the user to have a judgment opportunity as to whether or not the communication channel is connected to the terminal.例文帳に追加

例えば、確認した発呼側情報が番号非通知設定、公衆電話または国際電話等であったり、または通知された発呼者ＩＤが着信拒否メモリに登録されていれば、オンフック状態を維持したまま、ユーザに通信回線を接続するか否かの判断機会を提供する。 - 特許庁

Then, its own execution order j is acquired (S220), and when it is judged that the call order from a high order function F is valid (S230: YES), its own execution order j is substituted for a variable Yi as the judgment information (S240).例文帳に追加

そして、自身の実行順序ｊを取得し（Ｓ２２０）、上位関数Ｆからのコール順序が正当なものであると判断すると（Ｓ２３０：ＹＥＳ）、自身の実行順序ｊを上記判断情報として変数Ｙｉに代入する（Ｓ２４０）。 - 特許庁

To provide a battery remainder-displaying device for preventing the remainder of a battery from being judged to be an unduly small level immediately after changing from a call state to a wait state by using the sampling and averaging methods of a battery voltage in the case of level judgment when displaying the remainder of the battery with several levels.例文帳に追加

電池残量をレベル分け表示する場合におけるレベル判定に際して電池電圧のサンプリングと平均という手法を用い、通話状態から待ち受け状態に変化した直後において電池残量を不当に少な目のレベルと判定しないような電池残量表示装置を提供する。 - 特許庁

(1) Where a decision at first instance in the substantive civil procedure pronounces judgment against one of the parties and is the subject of appeal, an account of the appeal shall be given to the appellee so that, within a period of three days, he may request the judge to adopt the relevant preventive measures or to call for the appropriate substitutionary security ensuring the effectiveness of the judgment reached, provided that those measures have not been adopted previously or were not insufficient.例文帳に追加

(1) 民事手続による本訴の第1審の判決が当事者の1人に対する判決を宣告するもので，かつ，これが控訴の根拠となる場合は，被控訴人に控訴の理由を伝えるものとし，その結果，3日以内に当該被控訴人は裁判官に，相当する保全措置の採択を申請し又は到達した判決の効力を保証する適切な代替となる保証金を請求することができる。ただし，これらの措置が以前に採用されなかった又は採用されたが不十分であった場合に限られる。 - 特許庁

In this entrance and leaving management system, similarly, it is detected by a wandering report machine whether a person detected by an infrared sensor has an ordinary transmitting type transmitter corresponding to a wandering report and emergency call machine or wandering report and position detecting machine for detecting a wandering aged person or not, and the logic judgment is reversed by the programmable controller, whereby the person having no ordinary transmitting type transmitter is sensed.例文帳に追加

同様に本発明の入退場管理システムでは赤外線センサーに検出した人物を徘徊老人を感知する徘徊お知らせ緊急呼出機叉は徘徊お知らせ位置検知機に対応した常時発信型送信機を持っているか否かを徘徊お知らせ機で感知してプログラマブルコントローラーによりその論理判断を逆転させることにより常時発信型送信機を持っていない人物を感知する。 - 特許庁

The route guiding device includes a judgment section 101 which judges whether the vehicle is in a travel state and a standby guide section 102 which gives notice of a waiting state to the caller who is calling the call equipment.例文帳に追加

この経路誘導装置は、前記車両が走行状態か否かを判定する判定部１０１と、判定部１０１によって走行状態であると判定され、通話機器への通話要求を受けた場合に、前記通話機器への発信者に対して通話待ち状態であることを案内する待機案内部１０２と、を備えることを特徴とする。 - 特許庁

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第六十七条第一項（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで（議事録）及び第三百十六条第一項（株主総会に提出された資料等の調査）の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 90-2 and Article 91 of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the organizer(s) call an Organizational Meeting; the provisions of Article 68, paragraph (5) through paragraph (7), the main clause of Article 72, paragraph (1), Article 73, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), Article 74 through Article 83, and Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation; and the provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837, Article 838, Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to sub-item (g) of item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of absence or an invalidation of a resolution adopted at an Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation or an action seeking rescission of such resolution. In this case, the phrase "shall give public notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two months prior to that date, and shall send notice thereof in writing to the Investors more than two weeks prior to that date" in Article 91, paragraph (1) of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall send notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two weeks prior to that date," the phrase "item (v) of Article 27, or item (i) of Article 59(3)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 67, paragraph (1), item (xvi) or Article 71, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 68, paragraph (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 67(1)" in Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 68(3)" in Article 74, paragraph (4) and Article 76, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 67 and Article 68" in Article 80 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "the court" in Article 81, paragraph (4) and Article 82, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the phrase "The Directors at Incorporation" in Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment and Supervisory Officers at Establishment," the terms "the preceding paragraph" in Article 93, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act and "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 73, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　第九十条の二及び第九十一条の規定は設立企画人が創立総会を招集する場合について、会社法第六十八条第五項から第七項まで、第七十二条第一項本文、第七十三条第一項及び第四項、第七十四条から第八十三条まで並びに第九十三条第二項及び第三項の規定は投資法人の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十一条第一項中「二月前までに当該日を公告し、当該日の二週間」とあるのは「二週間」と、同法第六十八条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「投資法人法第六十七条第一項第十六号又は第七十一条第四項第一号」と、同条第七項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第一項」と、同法第七十三条第四項中「第六十七条第一項第二号」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項第二号」と、同法第七十四条第四項及び第七十六条第二項中「第六十八条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第八十条中「第六十七条及び第六十八条」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第八十一条第四項及び第八十二条第四項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第九十三条第二項及び第三項中「設立時取締役」とあるのは「設立時執行役員及び設立時監督役員」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム