patent abilityとは 意味・読み方・使い方

the ability of any person to whom a licence would be granted under the order to exploit the patent to the public advantage発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

ライセンスが公共の利益のために当該発明を実施すべき旨の命令に基づいて付与される者の能力 - 特許庁

Article 9 The purpose of the patent attorney examination shall be to judge whether or not a person has knowledge and ability to apply it necessary to a person who intends to become a patent attorney, and the examination shall be conducted by the method of written examination comprising a short answer examination (including multiple-choice examination. The same shall apply hereinafter.) and an essay examination, and oral examination, pursuant to the provision of the following Article.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第九条　弁理士試験は、弁理士となろうとする者に必要な学識及びその応用能力を有するかどうかを判定することをもってその目的とし、次条に定めるところによって、短答式（択一式を含む。以下同じ。）及び論文式による筆記並びに口述の方法により行う。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 15-2 (1) The specific infringement lawsuit counsel examination shall be conducted for the patent attorneys who have completed such a training course relating to the necessary knowledge and practical ability to become a counsel concerning specific infringement lawsuits as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, in order to judge whether or not such attorneys have such knowledge and practical ability by the method of essay writing examination.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第十五条の二　特定侵害訴訟代理業務試験は、特定侵害訴訟に関する訴訟代理人となるのに必要な学識及び実務能力に関する研修であって経済産業省令で定めるものを修了した弁理士に対し、当該学識及び実務能力を有するかどうかを判定するため、論文式による筆記の方法により行う。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Where a compulsory license is applied for, and the applicant has proved to the Institute that he has the technical and economic ability referred to in Article 71 of the Law, the owner of the patent shall be allowed to inspect the application in order that he may, within the two months following the notification, make such observations as may serve his interests.例文帳に追加

強制ライセンスが申請されかつ申請人が法第71条に規定される自己の技術的及び経済的能力を産業財産庁に証明した場合，特許権者にその通知が与えられ，特許権者は当該申請についての調査を行い通知日から2月以内に自己の利益を守る意見を申し立てることが許される。 - 特許庁

A person skilled in the art refers to a hypothetical person who has common general knowledge in the art to which the claimed invention pertains and the ability to use ordinary technical means for research and development (including experiment, analysis, manufacture, etc.); who has the ability to exercise ordinary creativity in selecting materials and changing designs, optimizing numerical ranges and replacing elements with equivalent parts; and who is able to comprehend based on his/her own knowledge all technical matters regarding the state of the art in the field to which a claimed invention pertains at the time of filing a patent application.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

当業者とは、請求項に係る発明が属する技術分野における技術常識を有し、通常の技術手段を研究開発（実験、分析、製造等を含む。）に利用する能力を有する仮想人物であって、材料の選択及び設計変更、数値範囲の最適化及び均等物による要素の置換において通常の創作能力を発揮し、自身の知識に基づいて、請求項に係る発明が属する分野における特許出願時の技術水準にある技術事項をすべて理解できる仮想人物をいう。 - 特許庁

If the invention first mentioned in the claims before an amendment does not have any special technical feature, no same or corresponding special technical feature can be found between said invention and an invention after the amendment. Therefore, it cannot be said that the requirements of unity of invention are met in the relationships between all of the inventions that we reexamined in terms of the requirements for patent ability, such as novelty and inventive step, in the claims before the amendment and all of the inventions in the claims after the amendment.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

補正前の特許請求の範囲の最初に記載された発明が特別な技術的特徴を有しない場合には、当該発明と補正後の発明との間で、同一の又は対応する特別な技術的特徴を見出すことができず、したがって、補正前の特許請求の範囲において新規性・進歩性等の特許要件についての審査が行われたすべての発明と補正後の特許請求の範囲のすべての発明との間で、発明の単一性の要件を満たすとはいえない。 - 特許庁

Where an invention with a special technical feature was found among inventions in the claims before the amendment that we reexamined in terms of the requirements for patent ability, such as novelty and inventive step, by following ① to ③ of the [Procedure for deciding the subject of the examination] in 4.2 in Part I, Chapter2 "Requirements of unity of Invention," inventions in the claims after the amendment, in the same category, which include all matters specifying the invention with a special technical feature before the amendment (see, Note), will be the subject of the examination without questioning the requirements under Article 17bis (4).発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

補正前の特許請求の範囲の新規性･進歩性等の特許要件についての審査が行われた発明に、第Ⅰ部第2 章「発明の単一性の要件」の4.2［審査対象の決定手順］①～③に従って特別な技術的特徴を有する発明が見出された場合には、補正後の特許請求の範囲において、当該補正前の特別な技術的特徴を有する発明の発明特定事項をすべて含む(注）同一カテゴリーの発明については、第17 条の2 第4 項の要件を問わずに審査対象とする。 - 特許庁