「Engaged」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(464ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 46 (1) With regard to a client undertaking involving dust work prescribed in item (iii) of paragraph (1) of Article 2 of the Pneumoconiosis Act (Act No. 30 of 1960) (hereinafter such work shall be referred to as "dust work" in this Article), to which workers are dispatched for dispatch work in said undertaking, the provisions of Articles 5 to 9-2 inclusive, Articles 11 to 14 inclusive, paragraph (3) of Article 15, Articles 16 to 17 inclusive and Article 35-2 of said Act (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied to such undertaking, by deeming the person carrying out the client undertaking to be the business operator, as prescribed in item (v) of paragraph (1) of Article 2 of said Act, employing the workers under dispatching (limited to those who are or have been regularly engaged in dust work; hereinafter the same shall apply up to paragraph (4) and in paragraph (7)) (hereinafter such business operator shall be referred to simply as a "business operator" in this Article), and by deeming the workers under dispatching to be workers employed by the person carrying out the client undertaking concerned. In this case, the term "separation from employment" in paragraph (1) of Article 9-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "separation from employment (with regard to a worker under dispatching prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 46 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act"), the termination of the provision of Worker Dispatching services, as prescribed in item (i) of Article 2 of the Worker Dispatching Act, pertaining to the worker under dispatching concerned; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph);" and the term "this Act" in Article 35-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "this Act (including the provisions of Article 46 of the Worker Dispatching Act)". 例文帳に追加

第四十六条　労働者がその事業における派遣就業のために派遣されている派遣先の事業で、じん肺法（昭和三十五年法律第三十号）第二条第一項第三号に規定する粉じん作業（以下この条において単に「粉じん作業」という。）に係るものに関しては、当該派遣先の事業を行う者を当該派遣中の労働者（当該派遣先の事業において、常時粉じん作業に従事している者及び常時粉じん作業に従業したことのある者に限る。以下第四項まで及び第七項において同じ。）を使用する同法第二条第一項第五号に規定する事業者（以下この条において単に「事業者」という。）と、当該派遣中の労働者を当該派遣先の事業を行う者に使用される労働者とみなして、同法第五条から第九条の二まで、第十一条から第十四条まで、第十五条第三項、第十六条から第十七条まで及び第三十五条の二の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則の規定を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第九条の二第一項中「、離職」とあるのは「、離職（労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十六条第一項に規定する派遣中の労働者については、当該派遣中の労働者に係る労働者派遣法第二条第一号に規定する労働者派遣の役務の提供の終了。以下この項において同じ。）」と、同法第三十五条の二中「この法律」とあるのは「この法律（労働者派遣法第四十六条の規定を含む。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) With regard to the application of the provisions of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution, in cases where a Financial Institution Engaged in Trust Business invests the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor, the phrase "and the provisions Article 42-2 and Article 44-3, paragraph (2) (excluding item (ii)) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply mutatis mutandis to business for investing the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations operated by a financial institution, respectively" shall be added after the term "(meaning the Specific Trust Agreement prescribed in Article 24-2 of the Trust Business Act)" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution, the phrases "in these provisions," "Article 34 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act," and "in Article 39, paragraph (4) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution shall be deemed to be replaced with "in these provisions (excluding the provisions of Article 42-2 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act)," "Article 34 of the Trust Business Act" and "in Article 39, paragraph (4) and Article 42-2, item (vi) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act" respectively, and the phrase ", the term 'giving advice to conduct a transaction that is unnecessary in light of the transaction policy, the amount of the transaction, or the market conditions regarding the Investment Advisory Business, or the Investment Management Business that does so' in Article 44-3, paragraph (2), item (iii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with 'or making an investment to conduct a transaction with regard to business for conducting investment of the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor' " shall be added after the phrase "a Financial Institution (meaning a Financial Institution as prescribed in Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution)" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution. 例文帳に追加

６　信託業務を営む金融機関が委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う場合における金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律の規定の適用については、同法第二条の二中「、金融機関」とあるのは「金融機関」と、「準用する。」とあるのは「、金融商品取引法第四十二条の二及び第四十四条の三第二項（第二号を除く。）の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）は金融機関が行う投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う業務について、それぞれ準用する。」と、「これらの規定中」とあるのは「これらの規定（金融商品取引法第四十二条の二の規定を除く。）中」と、「金融商品取引法第三十四条」とあるのは「同法第三十四条」と、「同条第四項中」とあるのは「同条第四項及び同法第四十二条の二第六号中」と、「「金融機関（金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項に規定する金融機関をいう。）の責めに帰すべき事故」」とあるのは「「金融機関（金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項に規定する金融機関をいう。）の責めに帰すべき事故」と、同法第四十四条の三第二項第三号中「投資助言業務に関して取引の方針、取引の額若しくは市場の状況に照らして不必要な取引を行うことを内容とした助言を行い、又はその行う投資運用業」とあるのは「委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う業務」」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With regard to a client undertaking to which workers are dispatched for dispatch work in said undertaking, the provisions of Article 11, Articles 14 to 15-3 inclusive, Article 17, Articles 20 to 27 inclusive, Articles 28-2 to 30-3 inclusive, Article 31-3, Article 36 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of paragraphs (1) and (4) of Article 30, paragraphs (1) and (4) of Article 30-2, and paragraphs (1) and (4) of Article 30-3), Article 45 (excluding paragraph (2)), Articles 57-3 to 57-5 inclusive, paragraph (3) of Article 59, Article 60, paragraph (1) of Article 61, Articles 65 to 65-4 inclusive, the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to workers whom a person carrying out a client undertaking has caused to be engaged in work specified by a Cabinet Order referred to in the second sentence of the same paragraph (including workers under dispatching); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), paragraph (3) of Article 66, paragraph (4) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2), and to paragraph (3) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and paragraph (5) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2), and to paragraphs (3) and (4) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), Article 66-3 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2), and to paragraphs (3), (4) and (5) of the same Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), Article 66-4, Article 68, Article 71-2, Section 1 of Chapter 9, Articles 88 to 89-2 inclusive of the Industrial Safety and Health Act and the provisions of orders based on the provisions concerned (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply, by deeming the person carrying out said client undertaking to be a business operator employing the workers under dispatching, and by deeming the workers under dispatching concerned to be workers employed by the person carrying out the client undertaking concerned. In this case, the term "the provisions of this Act or Order issued thereunder" in paragraph (1) of Article 29 of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of this Act or orders issued based on this Act (including cases where these provisions are applied under the provisions of Article 45 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act)"), or the provisions of paragraph (10) of the same Article or orders based on the provisions of the same paragraph"; the term "the provisions of this Act or Order issued thereunder" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of this Act or orders issued based on this Act (including cases where these provisions are applied under the provisions of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act), or the provisions of paragraph (10) of the same Article or orders based on the provisions of the same paragraph"; the term "this Act and the provisions of ordinances based thereon" in item (v) of paragraph (1) of Article 30 and in paragraph (7) of Article 88 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provisions of this Act or orders based on this Act (including cases where these provisions are applied under the provisions of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act)"; and the term "paragraph (1) through (4) of Article 66, proviso in paragraph (5) or Article 66-2" in Article 66-4 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the first sentence or the second sentence of paragraph (2) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to workers whom a person carrying out a client undertaking has caused to be engaged in the work specified by a Cabinet Order referred to in the second sentence of the same paragraph (including workers under dispatching prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Worker Dispatching Act); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), paragraph (3) of Article 66, paragraph (4) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of Article 66; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or the proviso to paragraph (5) of Article 66 (limited to those parts pertaining to the provisions of the first sentence and the second sentence of paragraph (2), paragraph (3) and paragraph (4) of Article 66)". 例文帳に追加

３　労働者がその事業における派遣就業のために派遣されている派遣先の事業に関しては、当該派遣先の事業を行う者を当該派遣中の労働者を使用する事業者と、当該派遣中の労働者を当該派遣先の事業を行う者に使用される労働者とみなして、労働安全衛生法第十一条、第十四条から第十五条の三まで、第十七条、第二十条から第二十七条まで、第二十八条の二から第三十条の三まで、第三十一条の三、第三十六条（同法第三十条第一項及び第四項、第三十条の二第一項及び第四項並びに第三十条の三第一項及び第四項の規定に係る部分に限る。）、第四十五条（第二項を除く。）、第五十七条の三から第五十七条の五まで、第五十九条第三項、第六十条、第六十一条第一項、第六十五条から第六十五条の四まで、第六十六条第二項前段及び後段（派遣先の事業を行う者が同項後段の政令で定める業務に従事させたことのある労働者（派遣中の労働者を含む。）に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、第三項、第四項（同法第六十六条第二項前段及び後段並びに第三項の規定に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）並びに第五項（同法第六十六条第二項前段及び後段、第三項並びに第四項の規定に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、第六十六条の三（同法第六十六条第二項前段及び後段、第三項、第四項並びに第五項の規定に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、第六十六条の四、第六十八条、第七十一条の二、第九章第一節並びに第八十八条から第八十九条の二までの規定並びに当該規定に基づく命令の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則の規定を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第二十九条第一項中「この法律又はこれに基づく命令の規定」とあるのは「この法律若しくはこれに基づく命令の規定（労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十五条の規定により適用される場合を含む。）又は同条第十項の規定若しくは同項の規定に基づく命令の規定」と、同条第二項中「この法律又はこれに基づく命令の規定」とあるのは「この法律若しくはこれに基づく命令の規定（労働者派遣法第四十五条の規定により適用される場合を含む。）又は同条第十項の規定若しくは同項の規定に基づく命令の規定」と、同法第三十条第一項第五号及び第八十八条第七項中「この法律又はこれに基づく命令の規定」とあるのは「この法律又はこれに基づく命令の規定（労働者派遣法第四十五条の規定により適用される場合を含む。）」と、同法第六十六条の四中「第六十六条第一項から第四項まで若しくは第五項ただし書又は第六十六条の二」とあるのは「第六十六条第二項前段若しくは後段（派遣先の事業を行う者が同項後段の政令で定める業務に従事させたことのある労働者（労働者派遣法第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣中の労働者を含む。）に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）、第三項、第四項（第六十六条第二項前段及び後段並びに第三項の規定に係る部分に限る。以下この条において同じ。）又は第五項ただし書（第六十六条第二項前段及び後段、第三項並びに第四項の規定に係る部分に限る。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion. 例文帳に追加

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。 - 金融庁

Article 24-6 Article 24, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person who engages in the Money Lending Business (excluding Money Lenders; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) assigns to any other person the claims under a loan contract; Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 20-2, Article 21, and Article 24, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an assignee of the claims under the loan contract of a person who engages in the Money Lending Business in the case of assignment thereof; Article 24-2, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person who engages in the Money Lending Business concludes a guarantee contract in relation to a loan contract with a Guarantee Business Operator; Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 20-2, and Article 21 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Guarantee Business Operator who has acquired the right to obtain reimbursement under a guarantee which the Guarantee Business Operator has provided to the person who engages in the Money Lending Business in relation to such person's loan contract, the right to obtain reimbursement pertaining to the performance of obligations under the loan contract of the person who engages in the Money Lending Business or the guarantee contract therefor, claims related to the subrogation by such performance, or guarantee claims related thereto (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to a Guarantee, etc." in this Article); Article 24-3, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person who engages in the Money Lending Business entrusts to any other person the performance of obligations under the Contract for a Loan; Article 20, paragraph (1) and (2), Article 20-2, and Article 21 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person who, based on entrustment from a person who engaged in the Money Lending Business, has made performance of the obligations under the Contract for a Loan of said person who engages in the Money Lending Business and who has acquired the right to obtain reimbursement pertaining to the performance of obligations or claims related to the subrogation by such performance, or guarantee claims related thereto (hereinafter referred to as the "Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to Performance under Entrustment" in this Article) (excluding the cases where a Guarantee Business Operator has acquired the Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to the Guarantee, etc. in relation to the Contract for a Loan); Article 24-4, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Guarantee Business Operator assigns to any other person the Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to a Guarantee, etc.; Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 20-2, Article 21, and Article 24-4, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an assignee of a right to obtain reimbursement pertaining to a guarantee contract in the case of assignment of the Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to the Guarantee, etc.; paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a person who, based on entrustment from a person who engages in the Money Lending Business, has made performance of the obligations under the loan contract of such person who engages in the Money Lending Business, assigns to any other person the Right to Obtain Reimbursement, etc. Pertaining to Performance under Entrustment (excluding the Right to Obtain Reimbursement, etc. Pertaining to a Guarantee, etc. under the Contract for a Loan acquired by the Guarantee Business Operator); and Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 20-2, Article 21, and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to the assignee of the Right to Obtain Reimbursement Pertaining to Performance under Entrustment in the case of assignment thereof. In this case, necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の六　第二十四条第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者（貸金業者を除く。以下この条において同じ。）が貸付けに係る契約に基づく債権を他人に譲渡する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二、第二十一条並びに第二十四条第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者の貸付けに係る契約に基づく債権の譲渡があつた場合における当該債権を譲り受けた者について、第二十四条の二第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者が保証業者と貸付けに係る契約について保証契約を締結する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二並びに第二十一条の規定は保証業者が貸金業を営む者との間でその貸付けに係る契約についてした保証に基づく求償権、当該貸金業を営む者の当該貸付けに係る契約若しくはその保証契約に基づく債務の弁済に係る求償権若しくは当該弁済による代位に係る債権又はこれらの保証債権（以下この条において「保証等に係る求償権等」という。）を取得した場合における当該保証等に係る求償権等を取得した保証業者について、第二十四条の三第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者が貸付けの契約に基づく債務の弁済を他人に委託する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二並びに第二十一条の規定は貸金業を営む者の委託を受けて当該貸金業を営む者の貸付けの契約に基づく債務の弁済をした者が当該債務の弁済に係る求償権若しくは当該弁済による代位に係る債権又はこれらの保証債権（以下この条において「受託弁済に係る求償権等」という。）を取得した場合（保証業者が当該貸付けの契約に係る保証等に係る求償権等を取得した場合を除く。）における当該弁済をした者について、第二十四条の四第一項の規定は保証業者が保証等に係る求償権等を他人に譲渡する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二、第二十一条並びに第二十四条の四第一項の規定は保証等に係る求償権等の譲渡があつた場合における当該保証契約に係る求償権等を譲り受けた者について、前条第一項の規定は貸金業を営む者の委託を受けて当該貸金業を営む者の貸付けの契約に基づく債務の弁済をした者が受託弁済に係る求償権等（保証業者が取得した当該貸付けの契約に係る保証等に係る求償権等を除く。）を他人に譲渡する場合について、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十条の二、第二十一条並びに前条第一項の規定は受託弁済に係る求償権等の譲渡があつた場合における当該受託弁済に係る求償権等を譲り受けた者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム