「nation of laws」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方 - Weblio英語例文検索

a business that is mandated by the laws of a nation 例文帳に追加

国の法令によって委任された事務 - EDR日英対訳辞書

courteous respect by one nation for the laws and institutions of another 例文帳に追加

国家が別の国家の法律と制度に対して払う礼儀と尊敬 - 日本語WordNet

a monarchy, of which the ruler has only those powers outlined in the constitution and laws of the nation 例文帳に追加

立憲君主制という,君主の権力が議会によって制限をうけるような政治体制 - EDR日英対訳辞書

At that time, Japan had already tried to reform the unequal treaty as a sovereign nation of modern laws, but this incident accelerated the movement. 例文帳に追加

このことは日本が近代法を運用する主権国家として、当時進行中であった不平等条約改正へのはずみとなった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

We believe that no nation is responsible to itself alone, but that laws of political morality are universal; and that obedience to such laws is incumbent upon all nations who would sustain their own sovereignty and justify their sovereign relationship with other nations. 例文帳に追加

われらは、いづれの国家も、自国のことのみに専念して他国を無視してはならないのであつて、政治道徳の法則は、普遍的なものであり、この法則に従ふことは、自国の主権を維持し、他国と対等関係に立たうとする各国の責務であると信ずる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Supposing that the succession of the surname represents the succession of the household, it can be said that male-line succession is common in the nation, however, a few son-in-laws or daughters take over the family; a remaining convention from the past female-line succession. 例文帳に追加

姓をもって家の継承と見なすならば国民においても男系継承が一般的であるといえるが、婿養子あるいは娘の子が跡を継ぐことも少ないながら存在し、かつての女系継承の残滓ともいえるものも見受けられる。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

His petition dealt with a wide range of matters: 'Constitution,' i.e. the separation of the administrative, legislative, and judiciary branches of government; 'Giji-in' (Diet), i.e. having a bicameral parliament with a lower and upper house; 'Schools'; 'System reform'; 'National polity,' i.e. the shift from the feudal system to the county/prefecture system, abolishment of the hereditary system, and tax system reform; 'Nation building techniques'; 'Iron and steel production'; 'Currency'; 'Food and clothing'; 'Education for women' that promoted the education of girls; 'Heikin-ho' (averaging method), i.e. the average distribution of property; 'Brewing methods'; 'Treaties'; 'National warship program'; 'Harbor regulations'; 'Citizen welfare'; 'Laws concerning hair'; 'Henbutsu-ho' (laws concerning temples), i.e. the opening up of temple schools to the public; 'Shoritsu' (commercial laws); 'Jiho' (timetable method); 'Rekiho' (method of making calendars), i.e. the promotion of the adoption of the solar calendar; and 'Kani' (office doctor), i.e. the promotion of the adoption of Western medical science. 例文帳に追加

三権分立の「政体」に始まり、大院・小院の２院制の「議事院」「学校」「変制」、封建制から郡県制への移行や世襲制の廃止、税制改革まで唱えた「国体」「建国術」「製鉄法」「貨幣」「衣食」女子教育を勧めた「女学」遺産の平均分与の「平均法」「醸造法」「条約」「軍艦国体」「港制」「救民」「髪制」寺の学校への開放を唱えた「変仏法」「商律」「時法」太陽暦の採用を勧めた「暦法」西洋医の登用を訴えた「官医」と内容は多岐にわたる。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Since the 1990s, in addition to the protection of investment property, investment agreements began to incorporate such issues as domestic treatment and most-favored nation treatment at the stage of investment establishment, prohibition of performance requirements22, prohibition of strengthening restriction on foreign investment, obligation to exert efforts for gradual liberalization, and establishment of transparency (including public disclosure of laws and regulations and obligation to give answers to inquiries from the partner country) (“agreements for liberalization and protection of investment”).例文帳に追加

1990年代に入ると、そのような投資財産保護に加えて、投資設立段階の内国民待遇や最恵国待遇、パフォーマンス要求22の禁止、外資規制強化の禁止や漸進的な自由化の努力義務、透明性確保（法令の公表、相手国からの照会への回答義務等）等を盛り込んだ投資協定（「投資保護・自由化協定」）が出てきた。 - 経済産業省

Japan, too, was considered a target of unequal treaties by the allied Western powers because Japan, under the feudal system, did not have various principles of a nation under the rule of law as stipulated in modern Western laws and therefore maintained torture and cruel punishment in criminal cases and regulated free contracts and transactions without giving sufficient protection in civil affairs. 例文帳に追加

日本も封建制度の体制下で欧米の近代法にある法治国家の諸原則が存在しておらず、刑事面では拷問や残虐な刑罰が存置され、民事面では自由な契約や取引関係を規制して十分な保護を与えていなかったために、欧米列強からはその対象国であると考えられていた。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

In the 1990s, however, a new type of investment agreement – the "Investment Protection and Liberalization Agreement" was introduced, which includes provisions to grant the national treatment/most-favored-nation status as soon as the investment is licensed, prohibit the performance requests16, ban enhancement of foreign capital controls, mandate efforts for gradual liberalization, and secure transparency (mandating the publication of laws and response to inquiries from the signatory)17 (see Table 4-4-19).例文帳に追加

1990年代に入ると、そうした通常の投資財産保護の枠組みに加えて、投資許可段階での内国民待遇・最恵国待遇の確保、パフォーマンス要求16の禁止、外資規制強化の禁止や漸進的な自由化の努力義務、透明性（法令の公表、相手国からの照会への回答義務等）の確保等を盛り込んだ新しいタイプの投資協定（「投資保護・自由化協定」）が出てきた（第4-4-19表）17。 - 経済産業省

I will look into the fine details later, but basically, government offices are financed by taxes, and have authority based on the Constitution and laws, as a matter of course. The Cabinet is formed as a result of election by the people; then the Prime Minister comes forth, who appoints the Minister for Financial Services according to the Constitution. As this is an extremely democratic government office, it is common sense from my point of view to properly keep or publicly disclose the minutes regarding financial regulation and supervision which have a huge impact in ordinary circumstances as a basic rule, given that an executive branch of government is basically in the public domain. From what I have heard, minutes of seven or eight meetings were disclosed to the public after it was said that this would be done initially, but information on the progress in the interim was not disclosed at all. I think this is extremely odd in view of the rules of the executive branch of government. Basically, from the viewpoint of common sense, it is odd as a government in an open democratic nation that there are no minutes, especially on such a matter that has later had a significant impact on banking regulation and supervision, given the rules of government offices. 例文帳に追加

私、より細かいことまでは後から勉強しますけれども、基本的にお役所というのは税金で成り立っておりまして、当然憲法、法律による権限がございまして、当然国民の選挙によって内閣ができて、総理大臣が出てきて、その総理大臣は憲法に従って金融担当大臣を任命するわけですから、これは極めて民主的な役所であるわけですから、私の常識としては、基本的にやはり行政というのは公のことですから、普通であれば非常に影響の大きい金融行政というのはきちんとやはり議事録を残す、あるいはきちんと皆様方に公表するということが基本的なルールだと思っておりますけれども、何か聞いたところによると、最初だけやりますといって、7、8回（議事録の公表を）やったのですか、途中の経過は一切公表しなかったという話を聞きますし、私自身、非常にこれは何か行政のルールとして大変おかしいことだなというふうに私は思っておりまして、もう一回きちんと、法律的な話等々はまた詰めて、私は法律家ではございませんけれども、基本的にごく常識的に考えて、本当に役所のルールとして、開かれた民主主義国家における政府として、ましてや非常に後から銀行行政に関して大きな影響を与えた話でございますから、私は（議事録がないという事は）いかがなものかなと思っております。 - 金融庁