「Device Description」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(13ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

In the case of successively photographing video images in the respective scenes of a certain sightseeing beauty spot for instance by the photographing device 1, the video images 31a-31f in the respective scenes and the description text file of the local information acquired from the local information server S through a communication part 7 are made to correspond and stored in a memory.例文帳に追加

撮影装置１により、日光の名所である、「杉並木」３１ａ、「三猿」３１ｂ、「華厳の滝」３１ｃ、「いろは坂」３１ｄ、「日光東照宮」３１ｅ、「日光江戸村」３１ｆのそれぞれのシーンにおける映像を順に撮影していった場合に、それぞれのシーンにおける映像３１ａ〜３１ｆと、地域情報サーバＳから通信部７を介して取得した地域情報の解説テキストファイルと、を対応付けしてメモリに記憶する。 - 特許庁

The knowledge acquisition device comprises a stereotyped information creating means 20 receiving the input of tabular format data described in natural sentences, and extracting the contents of the description as stereotyped information; a similarity determining means 30 for determining the similarity between pieces of stereotyped information to extract their synonymity; and a knowledge forming means 40 for analyzing the result of determination on the similarity and making further inference to form desired knowledge.例文帳に追加

自然文で記述された表形式データを入力とし、その記述内容を定型化した定型情報として抽出する定型情報作成手段２０と、定型情報間での類似度を判定し、これらの同義性を抽出する類似度判定手段３０と、類似度の判定結果を解析しさらに推論して所望の知識を形成する知識形成手段４０と、から構成する。 - 特許庁

To provide an information management device that uses as a medium for information recording a random-accessible recording medium having solved defect problems of a recording medium where only sequential information description and reproduction are possible like conventional video tapes, and records and stores photographic data of an electronic camera recording photographic information on the random-accessible recording medium as information that a user can view through easy operation.例文帳に追加

従来のビデオテープの如きシーケンシャルな情報記述及び再生しかできなかった記録媒体の欠点を克服した、ランダムアクセス可能な記録媒体を情報記録用の媒体として用い、このランダムアクセス可能な記録媒体に撮影情報を記録する電子カメラの撮影データを、簡便な操作にて利用者が見ることが出来る情報として記録・保存する情報管理装置を提供すること。 - 特許庁

The psychological test device analyzes input image data, calculates a predetermined characteristic variable, stores a plurality of comment configuration sentences configuring a comment sentence for the subject, inputs whether an image drawn in the previous test is pertinent to each of the plurality of comment configuration sentences, and prepares a discriminant with the calculated characteristic variable as a description variable and an input pertinent degree as a target variable for each of the plurality of comment configuration sentences.例文帳に追加

心理検査装置は、入力される画像データを解析し、所定の特性変量を算出し、被検者に対するコメント文を構成するコメント構成文を複数格納し、今回以前の検査で描かれた画像が複数のコメント構成文の各々に該当するか否かを入力し、複数のコメント構成文の各々について、算出される特性変量を説明変量とし、入力される該当度を目的変量として、判別式を作成する。 - 特許庁

Where a patent application is filed for an invention that is identical to an invention or device described in the description or drawing(s) originally attached to another application for a patent or a utility model registration that has been filed before the filing date of the patent application and laid open or published after the filing of the patent application, the patent shall not be granted for such an invention. 例文帳に追加

特許出願した発明が、当該特許出願をした日前に特許出願又は実用新案登録出願をして当該特許出願をした後に出願公開又は登録公告された他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願書類に最初に添付された明細書又は図面に記載された発明又は考案と同一である場合、その発明については、特許を受けることはできない。 - 特許庁

(2) The preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where the holder of utility model right or exclusive licensee exercised his/her right, or gave warning thereof, based on the device which has come to fall outside the scope of claims at the time of the registration of the establishment of the utility model right as a result of correction made to the description, scope of claims or drawing attached to the application in the application for a utility model registration under Article 14-2(1) or (7). 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定は、実用新案登録出願の願書に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面についてした第十四条の二第一項又は第七項の訂正により実用新案権の設定の登録の際における実用新案登録請求の範囲に記載された考案の範囲に含まれないこととなつた考案についてその権利を行使し、又はその警告をした場合に準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The electronic device 1 configured to process processing data received from a host computer 2 according to a predetermined command contained in the processing data includes: an authentication means 12 which permits the execution of the processing data when at least two or more authentication commands of a plurality of preliminarily registered authentication commands are included in the processing data received from the host computer 2, and the description order of the two or more authentication commands matches a preliminarily registered authentication order.例文帳に追加

ホストコンピュータ２から受信した処理データを、前記処理データに含まれる所定のコマンドにしたがって処理する電子機器１であって、ホストコンピュータ２から受信した処理データに、予め登録されている複数の認証コマンドのうち少なくとも二以上の認証コマンドが含まれ、かつ、前記二以上の認証コマンドの記述順序が、予め登録されている認証順序と一致したときに、前記処理データの処理の実行を許可する認証手段１２を備える。 - 特許庁

Although the description does not explicitly explain the amended matter, it is clear that the invention provides an intake which faces downward and is horizontally arranged below the impeller at the lower section of the fan, an intake which faces upward and is horizontally arranged above the impeller at the upper section of the fan, and the intakes of the blowers which are arranged in the middle of the width direction of the band-like object (F), taking the descriptions about the working of the device into consideration with drawings. 例文帳に追加

補正事項について、明細書に明示的な記載はないが、明細書に記載された装置の動作に関する記載内容を図面と併せて理解すれば、ファンの下部にある羽根車の下方に下方に向いた水平な吸い込み口があること、ファン22の上部にある羽根車の上方に上方に向いた水平な吸い込み口があること、また、送風装置の吸い込み口が帯状物Fの幅方向の中心にあることがそれぞれ明らかである。 - 特許庁

Notwithstanding Patent Act Article 29 paragraph (1), where a patent application is filed for an invention that is identical to an invention or device described in the description or drawing(s) originally attached to another application for a patent or a utility model registration that has been filed before the filing date of the patent application and laid open or published after the filing of the patent application, the patent shall not be granted for such an invention. 例文帳に追加

特許出願した発明が当該特許出願をした日以前に特許出願又は実用新案登録出願をして当該特許出願をした後に出願公開されたり登録公告された他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願書に最初に添付された明細書又は図面に記載された発明又は考案と同一な場合に、その発明に対しては第1項の規定にかかわらず特許を受けることができない。 - 特許庁

Article 8 (1) A person requesting the grant of a utility model registration may make a priority claim for a device claimed in the application for a utility model registration, based on a device disclosed in the description or scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent, or drawings (in the case where the earlier application was a written application in foreign language, the document in foreign language) originally attached to the application of an earlier application filed for a utility model registration or patent which the said person has the right to obtain (hereinafter an "Earlier Application"), except in the following cases: 例文帳に追加

第八条　実用新案登録を受けようとする者は、次に掲げる場合を除き、その実用新案登録出願に係る考案について、その者が実用新案登録又は特許を受ける権利を有する実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて先にされたもの（以下「先の出願」という。）の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案に基づいて優先権を主張することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Sec.169 False Designations of Origin; False Description or Representation 169.1. Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which: (a) Is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person; or (b) In commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person’s goods, services, or commercial activities, shall be liable to a civil action for damages and injunction provided in Sections 156 and 157 of this Act by any person who believes that he or she is or likely to be damaged by such act.例文帳に追加

第169条 原産地の虚偽表示；虚偽の説明又は表現 169.1商品，サ－ビス若しくは商品の容器に又はそれらに関連して，単語，術語，名称，記号，図案，それらの組合せ，原産地の虚偽表示，又は事実に関する虚偽の若しくは誤認を生じさせる記述若しくは表現であって次に該当するものを商業上使用する者は，その使用によって損害を受ける虞がある者による，第156条及び第157条に規定する損害賠償及び差止のための民事訴訟において，責任を負わなければならない。 (a)自己の他人との関係若しくは関連性について，又は原産地，保証若しくは自己の商品，サ－ビス若しくは商業活動の他人による承認について，混同を生じさせ，誤認を生じさせ又は欺瞞する虞があるもの (b)商業上の広告又は販売促進において，自己の又は他人の商品，サ－ビス又は商業活動の性質，特性，質又は原産地を偽って説明するもの - 特許庁

(3) Among devices disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are disclosed in the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings (in the case where the Earlier Application was a written application in foreign language prescribed in Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the Earlier Application contains a priority claim under the preceding paragraph or Article 41(1) of the Patent Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of this Act), excluding any device disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the Earlier Application is based), the Utility Model Bulletin pertaining to the Earlier Application or the laying open of the Earlier Application shall be deemed to have been issued or effected at the time when the Utility Model Bulletin pertaining to the said application for a utility model registration was issued, and the main clause of Article 3-2 of the Utility Model Act or Article 29-2of the Patent Act shall apply. 例文帳に追加

３　第一項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う実用新案登録出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面に記載された考案のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案（当該先の出願が第一項若しくは同法第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は同法第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された考案を除く。）については、当該実用新案登録出願について実用新案掲載公報の発行がされた時に当該先の出願について実用新案掲載公報の発行又は出願公開がされたものとみなして、第三条の二本文又は同法第二十九条の二本文の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3)(hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin" or in the patent bulletin under Article 66 (3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person. 例文帳に追加

実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面(同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された考案又は発明(その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。)と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。 - 特許庁

Article 3-2 Where a device claimed in an application for a utility model registration is identical with a device or invention (excluding a device created or an invention made by the creator of the device claimed in the said application for a utility model registration) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a utility model registration or for a patent which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said application for a utility model registration and published after the filing of the said application for a utility model registration in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) (hereinafter the "Utility Model Bulletin") or in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a utility model registration shall not be granted for such a device notwithstanding paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said application for a utility model registration, the applicant of the said application and the applicant of the other application for a utility model registration or for a patent are the same person. 例文帳に追加

第三条の二　実用新案登録出願に係る考案が当該実用新案登録出願の日前の他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて当該実用新案登録出願後に第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行又は特許法第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報の発行若しくは出願公開がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（同法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案又は発明（その考案又は発明をした者が当該実用新案登録出願に係る考案の考案者と同一の者である場合におけるその考案又は発明を除く。）と同一であるときは、その考案については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、実用新案登録を受けることができない。ただし、当該実用新案登録出願の時にその出願人と当該他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

When these phrases “a numerical evaluation means for evaluating human’s emotion” and “an emotional judgment means for judging human’s pleasure based on signals from the numerical evaluation means” are interpreted literally, no concrete example cannot be pictured, therefore novelty etc. cannot be sufficiently evaluated. At the same time, the detailed description of the device seems not to indicate a means other than that of detecting sound louder than the definite level. As the result, the “numerical evaluation means for numerically evaluating human’s emotion” and the “emotional judgment means for judging human’s pleasure based on signals from the numerical evaluation means” are evaluated on the assumption that they are detecting sound larger than the definite level. 例文帳に追加

「人間の感情を数値化する感情数値化手段」及び「感情数値化手段からの信号に基づき人間が喜んでいることを判断する喜怒哀楽判定手段」は、その文言どおりに認定すると、具体的なものが想定できないため十分な新規性等の評価ができず、また、考案の詳細な説明の記載からは、一定音量以上の音を検出する手段以外のことを意味しているとも考えられないから、「人間の感情を数値化する感情数値化手段」及び「感情数値化手段からの信号に基づき人間が喜んでいることを判断する喜怒哀楽判定手段」は、一定音量以上の音を検知する手段であるという前提で評価を行う。 - 特許庁

Regarding a "mechanism for adjusting angles" as matters used to define the invention of the device for opening fertilizer bags, the original claim describes a "mechanism for adjusting the angle which is composed of a means for keeping the angle and a pivot means," and the detailed explanation of the invention of the originally attached description mentions a "mechanism for adjusting the angle composed of: a means for keeping the angle including the arm inserted between a chute and a retaining pole; and a pivot means including a pin rotationally pivoting the chute to the retaining pole," as a working example. While the working example explains a "pivot means including a pin rotationally pivoting the chute to the retaining pole," the original claim mentions a "pivot means" without describing its specific structure. 例文帳に追加

本事例では、肥料袋の開封装置の発明特定事項のつである「傾斜角度調節機構」について、当初の特許請求の範囲には、「角度保持手段と枢支手段からなる傾斜角度調節機構」と記載されており、当初明細書の発明の詳細な説明には、実施例として「樋と保定支柱との間に介装したアームにより構成される角度保持手段と樋を保定支柱に対して回動可能に枢支するピンにより構成される枢支手段からなる傾斜角度調節機構」と記載されている。すなわち、実施例の「樋を保定支柱に対して回動可能に枢支するピンにより構成される枢支手段」に対応して、当初の特許請求の範囲には、特定の構造に言及することなく、「枢支手段」と記載されている。 - 特許庁

This article refers to an invention claimed in a patent application that is identical to an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims, or drawings (in the case of a foreign-language application under Article 36bis (2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36bis (1)) originally attached to another patent application or registration application of a utility model filed prior to the date that the said patent application was filed and published after the said patent application was filed in the patent gazette under Article 66 (3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as “gazette containing the patent”) or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14 (3) of the utility Model Act (Act No.123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as “utility model bulletin”) describing matters provided for in each of the paragraph s of the respective Article or the publication of the patent application. In this case, a patent shall not be granted for the invention notwithstanding Article 29 (1). 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であって当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報(以下「特許掲載公報」という)の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号)第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という)の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面(第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあっては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された発明又は考案(その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く)と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。 - 特許庁

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the written application in foreign language under Article 36bis (2) , the document in foreign language as provided in Article 36bis (1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent bulletin under Article 66(3) of the patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "patent bulletin" or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14 (3) of the utility model Act (Act No.123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29 (1) ; provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person. 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報(以下「特許掲載公報」という。)の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号)第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。)の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面(第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された発明又は考案(その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。)と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person. 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁

Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person. 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であって当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあっては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 特許庁

Article 29-2 Where an invention claimed in a patent application is identical with an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims or drawings (in the case of the foreign language written application under Article 36-2(2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36-2(1)) originally attached to the written application of another application for a patent or for a registration of a utility model which has been filed prior to the date of filing of the said patent application and published after the filing of the said patent application in the patent gazette under Article 66(3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as "gazette containing the patent") or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14(3) of the utility Model Act (Act No. 123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as "utility model bulletin") describing matters provided for in each of the paragraphs of the respective Article or for which the publication of the patent application has been effected, a patent shall not be granted for such an invention notwithstanding Article 29(1); provided, however, that this shall not apply where, at the time of the filing of the said patent application, the applicant of the said patent application and the applicant of the other application for a patent or for registration of a utility model are the same person. 例文帳に追加

第二十九条の二　特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報（以下「特許掲載公報」という。）の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号）第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報（以下「実用新案掲載公報」という。）の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された発明又は考案（その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く。）と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。ただし、当該特許出願の時にその出願人と当該他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願の出願人とが同一の者であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Among devices claimed in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are disclosed in the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings (in the case where the Earlier Application was a written application in foreign language prescribed in Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the Earlier Application contains a priority claim under the preceding paragraph or Article 41(1) of the Patent Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of this Act), excluding any device disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the Earlier Application is based), the said application for a utility model registration shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the Earlier Application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 3, the main clause of Article 3-2, Article 7(1) to (3), Article 30(1) to (3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 11(1), Article 17, Articles 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 26, Articles 39(3) and (4) and 72 of the Patent Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), Article 29 of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959) and Articles 33-2(3) and 33-3(3) (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act ) of the Trademark Act. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う実用新案登録出願に係る考案のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案（当該先の出願が前項若しくは同法第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は同法第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された考案を除く。）についての第三条、第三条の二本文、前条第一項から第三項まで、第十一条第一項において準用する同法第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第十七条、第二十六条において準用する同法第六十九条第二項第二号、同法第七十九条、同法第八十一条及び同法第八十二条第一項並びに同法第三十九条第三項及び第四項並びに第七十二条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第三項及び第三十三条の三第三項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該実用新案登録出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム