みなせいじちょうの英語

（なお、『姉言記』（文治4年6月30日条）には源通親の話として過去に源氏を外祖父に持つ者が院別当（両院もしくは奨学院）に補された例があり、代表例として藤原扶幹や藤原行成らを挙げている。彼らが源氏長者を兼ねていた可能性もあるが明証は無い）。例文帳に追加

(according to "Shigenki" (dated August 1, 1188), MINAMOTO no Michichika mentioned that there were cases where persons whose maternal grandfather belonged to the Minamoto clan were appointed to the betto (of both schools or of Shogakuin), and cited the name of FUJIWARA no Tasumoto and FUJIWARA no Yukinari as examples. They may have been Genji choja concurrently, but there is no firm evidence)発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

多数の角柱状永久磁石を周期配列し被検査材に磁場を印加する１組乃至複数組の磁石配列ユニットと、被検査材に渦電流を発生させる或いは被検査材の渦電流を検出するコイルを具備している電磁超音波探触子である。例文帳に追加

The electromagnetic ultrasonic probe comprises one or more pairs of magnet arrangement units which periodically arrange many prism-shaped permanent magnets and apply a magnetic field to a member to be inspected, and a coil which generates or detects an eddy current in the member to be inspected. - 特許庁

一方、徳川家康はその権威に着目し、藤原姓を源姓に改め征夷大将軍と源氏長者を一身に兼ねることにより日本国王に相当する権威を手に入れて公家と武家の掌握に利用した、という足利義満＝日本国王論に依拠した説がある（岡野友彦）。例文帳に追加

On the other hand, there is a theory, which is based on the theory of Yoshimitsu ASHIKAGA equals the King of Japan, that Ieyasu TOKUGAWA saw the advantage of its authority, and changed himself from Fujiwara cognomen to Minamoto cognomen, obtaining power equivalent to that of the King of Japan by becoming both seii taishogun (literally, great general who subdues the barbarians) and Genji choja and used such power for controlling both court nobles and samurai families (Tomohiko OKANO).発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

源通親の子供久我通光以降久我家を家名とし、足利義満が太政大臣となるまでは清華家である久我家・堀川家・土御門家・中院家の4家が交互に源氏長者を世襲したが、室町時代に堀河・土御門両家が断絶（戦国時代_(日本)以後の堀川・土御門家はそれぞれ藤原氏・阿倍氏の子孫）し、久我家・中院家両家の世襲となる。例文帳に追加

From the time of MINAMOTO no Michichika's son Michiteru onward, the Minamoto family name was changed to KOGA, and until Yoshimitsu ASHIKAGA became a daijo daijin, the position of head of the Minamoto clan was rotated among the four Seiga families (court noble families whose members were eligible for the position of daijin, or minister) of Koga, Horikawa, Tsuchimikado and Nakanoin; however, the Horikawa and Tsuchimikado families both came to an end during the Muromachi period (the Horikawa and the Tsuchimikado families that have emerged since Japan's Sengoku period are descendants of the Fujiwara and Abe clans, respectively), and the hereditary succession was shared between the Koga and Nakanoin families.発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

第百一条の十六　第百一条の二十第一項の設立の登記後に引受けのない株式があるときは、第百一条の二第一項の総会の決議の当時の会員金融商品取引所の理事長及び理事並びに効力発生日の当時の株式会社金融商品取引所の取締役は、共同してこれを引き受けたものとみなす。株式の引受けの申込みが取り消されたときも、同様とする。例文帳に追加

Article 101-16 (1) When there is any share that has not been subscribed for after the registration of establishment under Article 101-20(1), the president and board members of the Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange as of the time of the resolution of the general meeting prescribed in Article 101-2(1), and the directors of a Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange as of the Effective Date shall be deemed to have jointly subscribed for said shares. The same shall apply to the cases where an application for subscription for shares has been rescinded.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五条　民事訴訟法第三百五十五条第二項（第三百六十七条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、民事調停法（昭和二十六年法律第二百二十二号）第十九条（特定債務等の調整の促進のための特定調停に関する法律（平成十一年法律第百五十八号）第十八条第二項（第十九条において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）又は家事審判法（昭和二十二年法律第百五十二号）第二十六条第二項の訴えの提起の手数料については、前の訴えの提起又は調停の申立てについて納めた手数料の額に相当する額は、納めたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 5 (1) With regard to the fee for filing an action set forth in Article 355, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 367, paragraph (2) of said Code), Article 19 of the Civil Conciliation Act (Act No. 222 of 1951) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Conciliation Proceedings for Expediting Adjustment of Specified Debts, etc. (Act No. 158 of 1999); including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19 of said Act) or Article 26, paragraph (2) of the Act on Adjudication of Domestic Relations (Act No. 152 of 1947), it shall be deemed that an amount equivalent to the amount of the fee paid in relation to the filing of the previous action or petition for conciliation has been paid.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム