| 例文 (999件) |
ひこつしんけいの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 1111件
４ 第一項第二号、第二項第二号ロ及び前項第一号ロに規定する書面を交付する者（以下この条において「書面交付者」という。）は、第一項第二号、第二項第二号ロ及び前項第一号ロに規定する書面の交付に代えて、第七項で定めるところにより、当該書面の交付を受けるべき者（以下この条において「書面被交付者」という。）の同意を得て、当該書面に記載すべき事項（以下この条において「転売制限情報」という。）を電子情報処理組織を使用する方法その他の情報通信の技術を利用する方法であって次に掲げるもの（以下この条において「電磁的方法」という。）により提供することができる。この場合において、書面交付者は、当該書面を交付したものとみなす。例文帳に追加
(4) A person who delivers a document as prescribed in paragraph (1), item (ii), paragraph (2), item (ii), sub-item (b), or item (i), sub-item (b) of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "Deliverer" in this Article) may, in lieu of the delivery of the document as prescribed in paragraph (1), item (ii), paragraph (2), item (ii), sub-item (b), or item (i), sub-item (b) of the preceding paragraph, provide information that should be included in said document (hereinafter referred to as "Information on a Restriction on Resale" in this Article) by a method using an Electronic Data Processing System or a method using other information communications technology, as listed in the following items (hereinafter referred to as "Electromagnetic Means" in this Article) by gaining the consent of a person who is to receive said document (hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient" in this Article), pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7). In this case, the Deliverer shall be deemed to have delivered said document: - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
３ 第一項第二号又は前項第一号ロに規定する書面を交付する者（以下この条において「書面交付者」という。）は、第一項第二号又は前項第一号ロに規定する書面の交付に代えて、第六項で定めるところにより、当該書面の交付を受けるべき者（以下この条において「書面被交付者」という。）の同意を得て、当該書面に記載すべき事項（以下この条において「転売制限情報」という。）を電子情報処理組織を使用する方法その他の情報通信の技術を利用する方法であって次に掲げるもの（以下この条において「電磁的方法」という。）により提供することができる。この場合において、書面交付者は、当該書面を交付したものとみなす。例文帳に追加
(3) A person who delivers a document as prescribed in paragraph (1), item (ii), or item (i), sub-item (b) of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Deliverer" in this Article) may, in lieu of the delivery of a document as prescribed in paragraph (1), item (ii), or item (i), sub-item (b) of the preceding paragraph, provide information that should be included in said document (hereinafter referred to as "Information on the Restriction on Resale" in this Article) by a method using an Electronic Data Processing System or a method using other information and communications technology, as listed in the following items (hereinafter referred to as "Electromagnetic Means" in this Article) with the consent of a person who receives said document (hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient" in this Article), pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6). In this case, the Deliverer shall be deemed to have delivered said document. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
３ 第一項第二号又は前項第一号ロに規定する書面を交付する者（以下この条において「書面交付者」という。）は、第一項第二号又は前項第一号ロに規定する書面の交付に代えて、第六項で定めるところにより当該書面の交付を受けるべき者（以下この条において「書面被交付者」という。）の同意を得て、当該書面に記載すべき事項（以下この条において「転売制限情報」という。）を電子情報処理組織を使用する方法その他の情報通信の技術を利用する方法であって次に掲げるもの（以下この条において「電磁的方法」という。）により提供することができる。この場合において、書面交付者は、当該書面を交付したものとみなす。例文帳に追加
(3) A person who delivers a document as prescribed in paragraph (1), item (ii), or item (i), sub-item (b) of the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Deliverer" in this Article) may, in lieu of the delivery of a document as prescribed in paragraph (1), item (ii), or item (i), sub-item (b) of the preceding paragraph, provide information that should be included in said document (hereinafter referred to as "Information on the Restriction on Resale" in this Article) by a method that uses an Electronic Data Processing System or a method that uses other information and communications technology, as listed in the following items (hereinafter referred to as "Electromagnetic Means" in this Article) with the consent of a person who is to receive said document (hereinafter referred to as the "Recipient" in this Article), pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6). In this case, the Deliverer shall be deemed to have delivered said document: - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
特に内規としてあてはまるものはなかったが、各地の神職のうち特に古い家柄のもの（伊勢神宮荒木田家・河辺家、伊勢神宮松木家、阿蘇神社阿蘇家、宇佐神宮到津家・宮成家、日御碕神社小野家、物部神社(大田市)金子家、日前神宮・國懸神宮紀家、出雲大社北島家・千家家、熱田神宮千秋家、住吉大社津守家、英彦山天台修験座主高千穂家。太字は国造家）、及び僧職のうち血縁によって職を世襲している家（浄土真宗木辺派管長木辺家、同渋谷派管長渋谷家、同高田派管長常盤井家、同興正寺派管長華園家）は華族に列せられた。例文帳に追加
None of these were particularly suitable as a Baron under the bylaw, however, the following were raised to the peerage: Shinto priests of local areas, especially from the old families (the Arakita family of Ise Jingu Shrine, Kawabe family, Matsumoto family of Ise Jingu Shrine, Aso family of Aso-jinja Shrine, Itouzu family and Miyanari family of Usa-jingu Shrine, Ono family of Hinomisaki-jinja Shrine, Kaneko family of Mononobe-jinja Shrine (in Ota city), the Ki family of Hinokuma-jingu Shrine and Kunikakasu-jingu Shrine, Kitajima family and Sen family of Izumo-taisha Shrine, Senshu family of Atsuta-jingu Shrine, the Tsumori family of Sumiyoshitaisha Shrine, Takachiho family of Tendai Shugen zasu (head priest of the temple) of Hikosan; Family names in bold letters indicate that they were kuninomiyatsuko (the heads of local governments), and Buddhist priests' families which inherited positions (the Kibe family, the chief abbot of the Kibe school of Jodo Shinshu - the True Pure Land Sect of Buddhism, the Shibuya family, the chief abbot of the Shibuya school of Jodo Shinshu, and the Hanazono family, the chief abbot of the Kosho-ji Temple of Jodo Shinshu). - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
第百三十一条 次に掲げる航空機の耐空性、騒音及び発動機の排出物並びに航空機乗組員の資格について当該航空機が国籍を有する外国（当該外国と当該航空機の使用者が住所を有する締約国との間に国際民間航空条約第八十三条の二の協定がある場合にあつては、当該締約国を含む。）が行つた証明、免許その他の行為及びこれらに係る資格証書その他の文書は、第十一条第一項若しくは第二項、第二十八条第一項若しくは第二項、第三十三条第一項、第三十四条第一項、第五十九条、第六十五条から第六十七条まで、第九十二条第一項、第百三十四条第一項、第百四十三条又は第百五十条の規定の適用については、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、第六条の航空機登録証明書、第十条第一項の規定による耐空証明、同条第七項の耐空証明書、第二十二条の規定による技能証明、第二十三条の技能証明書、第三十一条第一項の規定による航空身体検査証明、同条第二項の航空身体検査証明書、第三十三条第一項の規定による航空英語能力証明又は第三十四条第一項の規定による計器飛行証明とみなす。例文帳に追加
Article 131 With regard to airworthiness, noise level, engine emissions and aircrew qualification for the following aircraft, any certification, license, or other act, as well as any qualification certificate or other document thereof made by any foreign state to which the nationality of the said aircraft belongs (including any contracting state in cases where there is an agreement under Article 83-2 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation between the said foreign state and any contracting state in which the owner of the said aircraft has the address), shall be regarded as aircraft registration certificate under Article 6, airworthiness certification under Article 10 paragraph (1), airworthiness certificate under paragraph (7) of the same article, competence certification under Article 22, competence certificate under Article 23, aviation medical certification under Article 31 paragraph (1), and aviation medical certificate under paragraph (2) of the same article, aviation English proficiency certification under Article 33 paragraph (1), or instrument flight certification under Article 34 paragraph (1), pursuant to the provision of Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, with regard to application of the provisions of Article 11 paragraph (1) or (2), Article 28 paragraph (1) or (2), Article 33 paragraph (1), Article 34 paragraph (1), Article 59, Articles 65 through 67, Article 92 paragraph (1), Article 134 paragraph (1), Article 143, or Article 150. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(1)本法第73条又は第74条に基づき、登録された商標に関する罪の被疑者が、当該商標の登録が無効であることを主張する場合、次に掲げる手順に従う。(a)治安判事が、かかる抗弁が一見して明らかに支持できることを確信した場合、同判事は起訴を行わず、被疑者が当該登録の無効を理由として登録簿の是正を求める申立書を本法に基づき高等裁判所に提出できるよう、被疑者の抗弁が記録された日から3月間訴追手続きを中断する。(b)被疑者がそのような期限内に、又は治安判事が十分な根拠に基づき認める追加期間内に当該申立てを行ったことを治安判事に証明すると、当該訴追手続きは、是正を求める当該申立て及び不服申立てがあればそれが処理されるまで、さらなる手続きは治安判事により中断される。(c)3月以内又は治安判事が認める延長期間内に、被告の登録簿の是正を求める高等裁判所への申立てを怠る場合、治安判事は当該登録が有効であるかのように当該事件を進行させる。例文帳に追加
(1) When an accused charge with an offence under section 73 or section 74 of this Act in relation to a registered trademark pleads that the registration of the trademarks is invalid, the following procedures shall be followed- (a) if the Magistrate is satisfied that such defense is prima facie tenable, he shall not proceed with the charge but shall adjourn the proceeding for three months from the date on which the plea of the accused is recorded to enable the accused to file an application before the High Court Division under this Act, for the rectification of the Register on the ground that the registration is invalid. (b) if the accused proves to the Magistrate that he has made such application within the time so limited or such further time as the Magistrate may for sufficient cause allow, the further proceedings in the prosecution shall be stayed by the Magistrate till the disposal of such application for rectification and of the appeal, if any, there from. (c) if within a period of three months or within such extended time as my be allowed by the Magistrate, the accused fails to apply to the High Court Division for rectification of the Register, the Magistrate shall proceed with the case as if the registration were valid. - 特許庁
８ 会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第百七十一条の三 第五十条の三、第五十条の四、第五十条の五、第五十条の六第一項、第五十条の七、第五十条の八第二項、第五十条の十及び第五十条の十一の規定は、法第七十八条第四項において準用する法第二十九条第四項の規定による運航管理者の養成施設について準用する。この場合において、第五十条の三第一項中「航空従事者養成施設指定申請書（第十九号の四様式）」とあるのは「運航管理者養成施設指定申請書（第二十九号の二様式）」と、同条第三項第二号中「法第二十五条第一項、第二項及び第三項の限定、法第二十九条の二第一項の変更に係る限定、法第三十三条第一項の航空英語能力証明、法第三十四条第一項の計器飛行証明又は別表第三の一等航空整備士、二等航空整備士、一等航空運航整備士、二等航空運航整備士及び航空工場整備士の資格についての技能証明に係る整備の基本技術の科目の別ごとに定める過程」とあるのは「法第七十八条第一項の運航管理者技能検定に係る過程」と、第五十条の四第一号イ中「法第二十九条第一項（法第二十九条の二第二項、法第三十三条第三項又は法第三十四条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の試験」とあるのは「法第七十八条第四項において準用する法第二十九条第一項の試験」と、第五十条の六第一項中「法第二十九条第四項」とあるのは「法第七十八条第四項において準用する法第二十九条第四項」と、第五十条の七中「航空従事者養成施設指定書（第十九号の五様式）」とあるのは「運航管理者養成施設指定書（第二十九号の三様式）」と、第五十条の八第二項中「前項」とあるのは「技能審査員」と、第五十条の十中「第五十条の二第五項」とあるのは「第百六十八条第一項第六号」と、「第五十条の二第三項及び第四項」とあるのは「第百七十条の六」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
Article 171-3 The provisions prescribed under Article 50-3, Article 50-4, Article 50-5, Article 50-6, Article 50-7, paragraph (2) of the Article 50-8, Article 50-10 and Article 50-11 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the training facility of aircraft dispatchers pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) of the Article 29 of the Act applied mutatis mutandis in compliance with paragraph (4) of the Article 78 of the Act. In this case, the provision "application for designation of airman training facility (Form No. 19-4)" under paragraph (1) of the Article 50-3 shall be interpreted as "application for designation of aircraft dispatchers training facility (Form No. 29-2)"; the provision "restriction of paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Article 25 of the Act, restriction pertaining to the alteration of paragraph (1) of the Article 29-2 of the Act, certification of aeronautical English speaking competence under paragraph (1) of the Article 33 of the Act, certification of instrumental navigation under paragraph (1) of the Article 34 of the Act or the courses stipulated for each subject of basic techniques in maintenance pertaining to the competence test for the qualification of first class aircraft maintenance technician, second class aircraft maintenance technician, first class aircraft line maintenance technician, second class aircraft line maintenance technician and aircraft overhaul technician prescribed in Attachment 3" under paragraph (1) of the Article 50-3 shall be interpreted as "the courses pertaining to the aircraft dispatcher competence examination prescribed under paragraph (1) of the Article 78 of the Act"; the provision "the examinations under paragraph (1) of the Article 29 of the Act (including the cases where the provisions shall apply mutatis mutandis in compliance with Article 29-2 paragraph (2) of the Act, paragraph (3) of the Article 33 of the Act or paragraph (3) of the Article 34 of the Act)" under paragraph (1) of the Article 50-4, (a) shall be interpreted as "examinations under paragraph (1) of the Article 29 applied mutatis mutandis in compliance with paragraph (4) of the Article 78 of the Act"; the provision "paragraph (4) of the Article 29 of the Act" under paragraph (1) of the Article 50-6 shall be interpreted as "paragraph (4) of the Article 29 of the Act applied mutatis mutandis in compliance with paragraph (4) of the Article 78 of the Act"; the provision "designation statement of airman training facility (Form 19-5)" under Article 50-7 shall be interpreted as "designation statement of aircraft dispatchers training facility (Form 29-3)"; the term "preceding paragraph" in paragraph (2) of the Article 50-8 shall be interpreted as "competence examiner"; the provision "paragraph (5) of the Article 50-2" under Article 50-10 shall be interpreted as "item (vi) of the paragraph (1) of the Article 168"; the provision "paragraphs (3) and (4) of the Article 50-2" shall be interpreted as "Article 170-6". - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
６ 会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。例文帳に追加
People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices. - 経済産業省
５ 会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 例文 (999件) |
 | ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
| Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved. |
| 本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。 |
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
検索履歴を保存できる！|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
