「demonstrate that」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(5ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The Panel issued a report in May 2002, finding that: (i) the EU Regulation constitutes a "technical regulation" under the TBT Agreement; (ii) the Codex standard is a "relevant international standard" as defined in Article 2.4 because both the EU and the Codex standards refer to the same product (preserved sardines) and the EU Regulation sets forth labelling requirements that correspond to the Codex standard although the Codex standard was not used "as a basis for" the EU Regulation; and (iii) the complaining party only bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case by demonstrating that a relevant international standard exists and has not been used as a basis for the technical regulation in question, while the complainant bears the burden of demonstrating that the relevant international standards would be "an ineffective or inappropriate means for the fulfilment of the legitimate objectives." The Panel found that the EU failed to demonstrate that the Codex standard was an ineffective or inappropriate means for the fulfilment of the legitimate objectives (and conversely, Peru demonstrated that the Codex standard was an effective and appropriate means for such objectives). Therefore, the Panel concluded that the EU Regulation violates Article 2.4 of the TBT Agreement.例文帳に追加

パネルは2002年５月に報告書を提出し、①本規則はTBT 協定上の「強制規格」に該当する、②本規則とCodex 規格が共に缶詰イワシという同じ産品を扱い、本規則がCodex 規格に対応するラベリング要件を定めていること等から、Codex 規格はTBT 協定上の「関連する国際規格」に該当するが、Codex 規格は本規則の基礎として用いられていない、③提訴国側は、関連する国際規格が存在し、当該国際規格が問題となっている強制規格の基礎として用いられていないことを示せば足り、「関連する国際規格が、追求される正当な目的を達成する方法として効果的でなく又は適当でない場合」に該当するか否かの挙証責任は措置国側にあるとした上で、本件において、Codex 規格が本規則の追求する正当な目的を達成する方法として効果的でなく又は適当でないことはEU によって立証されておらず（加えて、ペルーはCodex 規格が正当な目的達成のために効果的で適当であることを示す十分な証拠と法的根拠を提示しているとの判断も示した。）、本規則はTBT 協定第２条４項に違反すると認定した。 - 経済産業省

In an action for lapse for failure to use a trademark, the owner of the trademark shall demonstrate that the trademark has been used in accordance with Article 39 or that causes exist justifying the lack of use. The trademark may not be declared lapsed if, in the interval between the expiry of the five-year period to which Article 39 refers and the filing of the application for lapse, effective use of the trademark has begun or has resumed; nevertheless, the start or resumption of use within a period of three months prior to the application for lapse being filed shall not, where that period begins on a date not prior to the expiry of the uninterrupted five-year period of non-use, be taken into account if the preparations for the said start or resumption are made after the owner becomes aware that the application for lapse might be filed.例文帳に追加

商標の不使用を理由として失効を求める訴訟において，商標の所有者は，当該商標が第39条に従い使用されていること又は不使用を正当化する理由が存在することを立証するものとする。商標は，第39条にいう5年の期間の満了から失効を求める申請提出時までの間に当該商標の実効的使用が開始されたか又は再開された場合は，失効を宣言することができない。ただし，失効を求める申請に先立つ3月の期間内の使用の開始又は再開については，その期間が不使用の連続5年の期間の満了時の前でない日に始まる場合で，失効を求める申請が提出される可能性を当該所有者が知得した後に使用の開始又は再開の準備が行われたときは，これを考慮しない。 - 特許庁

The government established one campus of Teikoku (Imperial) University in Kyoto. It had been decided that there would be two universities (in the east and west, respectively) as the center of the best education, and that the two universities would compete with each other as motivation for progress in education; and in Tokyo, several public and private schools as well as Teikoku （Imperial) University already began accepting various applicants; thus the students who had youthful resolution gathered, which is the center of education. However, there were many good, enthusiastic young students gathered at Teikoku (Imperial) University, which was newly established in Kyoto, but the university couldn't accept the applicants who had not graduated from high school, so there was no school to study high education without status as a university, which was the problem of greatest concern, so volunteers who were of the same mind gathered and established the Kyoto Hosei School, entrusting the lectures to the professors of Kyoto Imperial University and other well-known teachers; thus the institution could provide higher education in politics, law and economics to society. Certainly, a reason for that was to demonstrate the government's approval concerning the establishment of education in two places (east and west), and another reason was to make up for the flaw in the educational system whereby Teikoku (Imperial) University was not widely open to applicants who had not graduated from high school ('A Brief History of Ritsumeikan University,' "Ritsumeikan Gakuho," March 1915). 例文帳に追加

政府は曩に一の帝国大学を京都に新設し、天下学問の中心を東西二都に置くの制を採れり、蓋し東西二大学の競争をして学問進歩の動機たらしめんとするに在るべし、而して東京には帝国大学の外各種の官私学校ありて各般学生の志望に充つることを得、青年の志を立つる者此に集合し自ら既に天下学問の中心たり、然るに京都に在りては帝国大学新たに設置せられ関西の学術大に振るわんとし青年の志を有して京都に集まり来るもの頗る多きも、大学の門戸は未だ高等学校卒業生以外の志望者を迎ふるに至らず、大学以外に在りて高等の学術を修めんとするも其機関あることなし、是れ頗る恨事なり、爰に於てか有志の者相図り京都法政学校を新設し、講義を京都帝国大学教授及其他博学知名の諸氏に嘱託し、政治法律経済に関する高等の学術を広く社会に紹介するの一機関たらしめんとす、是れ蓋し、一は政府か学問の中心を東西の二都に置かんとするの趣意に賛同の意を表し、又一は帝国大学か広く門戸を開放して高等学校卒業生以外の志望者を迎ふる能はさるの欠点を補はんとするの微意に出つるものなり　（「立命館大学沿革略」『立命館学報』二　一九一五・大正4年3月） - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス