Moral Courtとは 意味・読み方・使い方

NTT had published names, telephone numbers and addresses of the Plaintiffs in the telephone dictionaries issued and distributed by NTT although they had requested NTT not to do so. With respect to this matter, the Plaintiffs claimed that they suffered mental damages due to the invasion of their privacy and filed an action against NTT with the Tokyo District Court, demanding, in addition to the compensation of damages for mental suffering, that NTT distribute advertisements to the recipients of such telephone directories by NTT, asking them to dispose of them on the ground of the moral rights. The Tokyo District Court ruled that NTT was liable for tort on the ground of invasion of privacy rights and ordered NTT to pay 100,000 yen as compensation for mental suffering.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

原告が、自己の氏名、電話番号及び住所を電話帳に掲載しないよう求めたにもかかわらずこれを掲載されてプライバシーを侵害され、精神的損害を蒙ったと主張して、電話帳の発行・配布業務を行うNTTに対し、人格権に基づき、原告の電話番号等の掲載された電話帳の配布先に当該電話帳の廃棄を求める広告の配布を請求するとともに、不法行為に基づき、慰謝料の支払を請求した事案において、プライバシー侵害に基づくNTTの不法行為責任を認め、慰謝料として10万円の支払を命じた。 - 経済産業省

In one of the precedents a person's right to have his/her name pronounced correctly was disputed in the context of "name rights". The Supreme Court ruled that "a person's name shall be viewed as forming part of his/her moral rights because it not only distinguishes an individual from other persons in our society but also symbolizes his/her identity and personality; and therefore serves as basis for being respected as an individual.". Thus "a person's interest to having his/her name called exactly shall be protected under the tort law." (Supreme Court, February 16, 1988, petty bench III, NHK Japanese Name Case, p.27 of Minshu vol. 42-2).発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

氏名権については、氏名を正確に称呼される利益をめぐって争われた事例で、最高裁は、「氏名は、社会的にみれば、個人を他人から識別し特定する機能を有するものであるが、同時に、その個人からみれば、人が個人として尊重される基礎であり、その個人の人格の象徴であって、人格権の一内容を構成する」とその法的根拠を人格権に求め、「氏名を正確に称呼される利益は、不法行為法上の保護される」（最高裁昭和 63年2月16日第三小法廷判決・民集 42巻2号 27頁、ＮＨＫ日本語読み事件）と判断した。 - 経済産業省

Article 114-6 (1) In a lawsuit pertaining to an infringement on the moral rights of author, copyright, right of publication, moral rights of performer or neighboring right, the court may, upon petition of a party, issue an order, in the form of a decision, to any other party, etc., trial counsel or assistant in court to a party or legal counsel, that trade secrets (means "trade secrets" as provided for in Article 2, paragraph (6) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993); the same shall apply hereinafter) in the possession of the [petitioning] party shall not be used for purposes other than those in furtherance of said lawsuit and shall not be disclosed to persons other than those against whom an order pertaining to such trade secrets has been issued pursuant to the provisions of this paragraph, where a prima facie showing has been made that each of the reasons listed below applies; provided, however, that the foregoing shall not apply where, at the time of such petition, the party, etc. [against which the petitioned order is sought to be issued], trial counsel [against which the petitioned order is sought to be issued] or assistant in court [against which the petitioned order is sought to be issued] had already acquired or possessed such trade secrets by means other than through inspection of the briefs as provided for in item (i) or the examination of evidence or the disclosure provided for in that item.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

第百十四条の六　裁判所は、著作者人格権、著作権、出版権、実演家人格権又は著作隣接権の侵害に係る訴訟において、その当事者が保有する営業秘密（不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第二条第六項に規定する営業秘密をいう。以下同じ。）について、次に掲げる事由のいずれにも該当することにつき疎明があつた場合には、当事者の申立てにより、決定で、当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人に対し、当該営業秘密を当該訴訟の追行の目的以外の目的で使用し、又は当該営業秘密に係るこの項の規定による命令を受けた者以外の者に開示してはならない旨を命ずることができる。ただし、その申立ての時までに当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人が第一号に規定する準備書面の閲読又は同号に規定する証拠の取調べ若しくは開示以外の方法により当該営業秘密を取得し、又は保有していた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The patent owner has the right to require: - discontinue violation of a patent; - indemnification of losses caused, including lost profit and compensation of moral damage by a person guilty of violation of a patent; - exaction of income received by the infringer of a patent instead of indemnification of losses; - payment of compensation by an infringer in the amount of 10 to 50,000 minimum salaries established by the legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic, determined at the discretion of court instead of indemnification of losses or exaction of income; - confiscation of products to ones own benefit introduced to an economic turnover or stored for this purpose and considered as infringing a patent as well as means specially directed for the infringement of a patent; - publication of court decision in order to rehabilitate his/her business reputation.例文帳に追加

特許所有者は，次のことを求める権利を有する。 － 特許侵害の停止 － 特許侵害人による，逸失利益を含む損失の補償及び道徳的被害の補償 － 損失の補償に代えて，特許侵害人が受け取った収入の強制取立 － 損失の補償又は収入の強制取立に代えて，裁判所の裁量で決められるキルギス共和国の法定最低賃金の10倍から5万倍までの金額での侵害人による補償の支払 － 私利のために経済的転用に導入され又はその目的のために保管され，特許侵害とみなされた製品及び特に特許侵害のために向けられた手段の没収 － 当人の事業の名声を回復するための裁判所決定の公表 - 特許庁

Sec.216 Remedies for Infringement 216.1. Any person infringing a right protected under this law shall be liable: (a) To an injunction restraining such infringement. The court may also order the defendant to desist from an infringement, among others, to prevent the entry into the channels of commerce of imported goods that involve an infringement, immediately after customs clearance of such goods. (b) Pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns or heirs such actual damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the infringement as well as the profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement, and in proving profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove sales only and the defendant shall be required to prove every element of cost which he claims, or, in lieu of actual damages and profits, such damages which to the court shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded as penalty. (c) Deliver under oath, for impounding during the pendency of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe, sales invoices and other documents evidencing sales, all articles and their packaging alleged to infringe a copyright and implements for making them. (d) Deliver under oath for destruction without any compensation all infringing copies or devices, as well as all plates, molds, or other means for making such infringing copies as the court may order. (e) Such other terms and conditions, including the payment of moral and exemplary damages, which the court may deem proper, wise and equitable and the destruction of infringing copies of the work even in the event of acquittal in a criminal case.例文帳に追加

216.1本法の規定により保護される権利を侵害する者は，次のことに対して応じる責任がある。 (a)その侵害を止めさせる差止命令。裁判所は，特に，侵害に係る輸入商品の取引の場への持込を防止するために，その商品の税関手続の直後に，被告に対して，侵害を止めることを命令することもできる。 (b)著作権者，その譲受人又はその相続人に対して，法的費用その他の支出を含み，それらの者が侵害により蒙った実際の損害，及び侵害者が侵害により得た利益を支払うこと利益を立証するに当たっては，原告は販売の事実を立証することのみ要求され，被告が要した費用の詳細を立証することを要求される。又は，実際の損害及び利益に代えて，裁判所にとって相応と認められ，かつ，罰金とはみなされない損害賠償を支払うこと (c)訴訟の係属の間における押収のために，裁判所が定める条件で，販売送り状その他販売を立証する文書，著作権を侵害すると申し立てられた物品及びその包装，並びにそれら物品を製作する器具を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (d)裁判所の命令に従い，補償しないで破棄するため，侵害する複製物又は装置，及び図版，鋳型その他侵害する複製物を製作する手段を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (e)刑事訴訟において無罪宣告があった場合であっても，裁判所が適切であり，賢明であり，かつ，衡平であるとみなすことができる教訓的かつ見せしめの損害賠償の支払，及び著作物を侵害する複製物の廃棄を含む，その他の条件 - 特許庁

Tokyo District Court judgment dated June 14, 2005 (p.135 of Hanrei Jiho No. 1917) states that, "However, the actual method of use of self-identifying information is diverse varies, for analysis of whether or not it should constitute an infringement of rights and remedies thereto, the interests of both parties must be specifically balanced in view of the conflicting interests such as the freedom of expression and commercial activities, and so emphasis should not be placed too much on the predominance of moral rights. More specifically, the contents and nature, the purpose and method of use of self-identifying information, and the significance of damages incurred by the individuals there from should be comprehensively examined." This case argues that, for determining whether or not the publicity rights have been infringed, such publicity rights should be specifically balanced with a broader range of rights, not limited to the freedom of expression, while the King Crimson Case focused solely on the "freedom of expression" as the only conflicting interest.発音を聞く 例文帳に追加

東京地裁平成１７年６月１４日判決・判時１９１７号１３５頁は、「しかしながら、実際に生じ得る個人の同一性に関する情報の使用の態様は千差万別であるから、権利侵害の成否及びその救済方法の検討に当たっては、人格権の支配権たる性格を過度に強調することなく、表現の自由や経済活動の自由などの対立利益をも考慮した個別的利益衡量が不可欠であり、使用された個人の同一性に関する情報の内容・性質、使用目的、使用態様、これにより個人に与える損害の程度等を総合的に勘案して判断する必要があるものと解される。」と述べ、パブリシティ権侵害の成否の判断において、キングクリムゾン高裁判決が「表現の自由」のみを対立利益としていたのに対し、表現の自由の場合に限定しない、より一般的な個別的な利益衡量が必要であることを認めている。 - 経済産業省