「not present」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(98ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(a) After the action of the Examiner, if the same be adverse in any respect, the applicant, if he persists in his application for a patent, must reply thereto and may request re-examination or reconsideration, with or without amendment. (b) In order to be entitled to re-examination or reconsideration, the applicant must make a request therefor in writing, and he must distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the Examiner’s action; the applicant must respond to every ground of objection and rejection in the prior Examiner’s action (except that request may be made that objections or requirements as to form, not necessary to further consideration of the claims, be held in abeyance until a claim is allowed), and the applicant’s action must appear throughout to be a bona fide attempt to advance the case to final action. The mere allegation that the Examiner has erred will not be received as a proper reason for such reexamination or reconsideration. (c) In amending an application in response to a rejection, the applicant must clearly point out the patentable inventiveness and novelty which he thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections.例文帳に追加

(a)審査官による処分後，その処分が何れかの点において出願人に不利であった場合において，出願人がその特許出願を続行しようとするときは，出願人は，当該処分に応答した上で，補正して又は補正することなく再審査又は再審理を請求することができる。 (b)再審査又は再審理の権利を得るためには，出願人は，書面によりこれを請求しなければならず，審査官による処分の過誤と考えられる点を明瞭かつ詳細に指摘しなければならない。出願人は，審査官による以前の処分における異論及び拒絶の理由の何れにも応答しなければならない(ただし，クレームの更なる検討には関係しない方式についての異論又は要求を，クレームが許容されるまで保留にするように求める請求をすることができる)。また，出願人の行為は，一貫して，出願を最終処分まで進めるための善意の試みであることを示すものでなければならない。審査官が過誤を犯した旨の単なる主張は，再審査又は再審理の適切な理由として認められない。 (c)拒絶に応答して出願を補正するに際し，出願人は，引例によって開示された技術水準又は申し立てられた異論を考慮して，クレームが提示していると考える特許可能な発明性及び新規性を明瞭に指摘しなければならない。出願人は，当該補正が当該引例又は異論をどのように回避するかも示さなければならない。 - 特許庁

I made a comment at the informal ministerial gathering today, which was obviously not a comment from the head of the administration, but I am Vice-Chief of the People's New Party (PNP), and the current government is, as you know, a coalition of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and the PNP. Accordingly, Prime Minister Kan, right after he assumed office, met with (PNP) Chief Shizuka Kamei to discuss how the two parties would cooperate in policymaking, at which meeting I was also present as the PNP Secretary-General at that time. Under the three-party coalition that preceded the current one, there was a committee called the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which was set up as a forum for the parties to coordinate or match their policies, but then the Social Democratic Party left the coalition. That is why how the remaining parties should cooperate in policymaking afterwards was a subject of discussion at the party leader meeting right after Prime Minister Kan became the new Prime Minister, during which both leaders agreed to go about it properly. Then as it turned out, as you know, we had a House of Councilors election and the same subject also just came up again during the recent meeting of the two party leaders, who supposedly agreed to "do it (policy cooperation)." That is why I decided to make an elaborate comment on this subject to Prime Minister Kan at today's informal ministerial gathering, to which Prime Minister Kan responded by telling Mr. Gemba, who is a state minister and is also DPJ's Policy Research Committee Chair, to work on policy cooperation with the PNP in the proper way - therefore, Policy Research Committee Chair Gemba and I proceeded to discuss how it should be done, a task that I presume will basically be handled mainly by policy research committee chairs. 例文帳に追加

今日、閣僚懇で、私はこれは行政の長としての発言ではございませんけれども、国民新党の副代表でもございますし、両党、民主党と国民新党のご存じのように連立内閣でございますから、両党間の政策協議をどうするのかということは、実は菅総理がなられた後、すぐ亀井静香（国民新党）代表と話をされまして、当時私は幹事長でございましたから、同席をいたしまして、前の3党連立内閣のときは、基本政策閣僚委員会というのがございまして、ここで政策を整合性を図る、あるいはすり合わせをするということでございましたが、社民党さんが連立を離脱されましたので、その後の政策協力をどうするかということが当時菅総理が実現した後のすぐの党首会談でのテーマで、しっかりやりましょうという話でございましたが、ご存じのように参議院選挙になりましたので、またこの前も両党首会談でそのことが議題になって、「（政策協力を）やろう」ということでございましたから、今日閣僚懇で菅総理に相当申し上げまして、ちょうど玄葉さんが民主党の国務大臣兼政調会長でございますから、菅総理からもきちっと国民新党のほうとの政策協議をするようにということでございまして、玄葉政調会長と私ともどういうふうにするのかと、基本的に政調会長中心だというふうに思いますけれども、そのことを打ち合わせをさせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁

As for the first question, the general rule of the financial bankruptcy processing system is actually fixed-amount protection, as I explained last week. Exceptions to this rule are cases in which there is a possibility of systemic risk arising, as you know. The examples I brought up the other day were the Incubator Bank of Japan and Ashikaga Bank: the Incubator Bank of Japan had about 400 billion yen in loans, and Ashikaga Bank had 4 trillion yen in loans. In particular, Ashikaga Bank is a financial institution designated by the Tochigi Prefectural Government, and its share in the regional community was extremely high, so as an exception, we convened the Financial Crisis Response Council for Ashikaga Bank. The Council is chaired by the Prime Minister, and its members include the Minister for Financial Services, the Chief Cabinet Secretary, FSA Commissioner, the Minister of Finance, and the Governor of the Bank of Japan. Exceptions are cases in which a systemic risk exists. In the present case, we determined that there is no such systemic risk. As I explained last week, the Bank only dealt in fixed-term deposits, meaning that there was no settlement system in its business model in the first place. We determined that the impact in the event of bankruptcy would not be broad because of the lack of transfers and the products being limited to fixed-term deposits. In that sense, we abided by the general rule and applied fixed-amount protection. 例文帳に追加

最初の質問でございますけれども、これは実は、私は先週も申し上げましたように、金融破綻処理制度の原則は定額保護でございまして、そして例外といたしまして、ご存じのようにシステミック・リスクが起こる可能性がある場合は、例えばこの前、日本振興銀行と足利銀行の例を引き合いに出しましたが、日本振興銀行は約4,000億円の貸付金、足利銀行は４兆円の貸付金でございまして、特に足利銀行というのは、確か、栃木県の指定の金融機関でもございまして、その地域における足利銀行の占有率というのは非常に高いということもございまして、これは例外的に足利銀行は、金融危機対応会議というのを開かせていただきまして、これは内閣総理大臣が議長でございまして、当然、金融大臣もメンバーでございますが、内閣官房長官、金融担当大臣、金融庁長官、財務大臣、日本銀行総裁と。それが要するにシステミック・リスクのあるときでございますが、今回の場合は、金融破綻の原則でございまして、そこまでのシステミック・リスクはないということを考えまして、それから先週申し上げましたように、これは定期預金しか扱っておりませんので、いわゆる決済システムには、この銀行は最初から決済システムというのは、そういうものがないビジネスモデルでございまして、ですから、例えば振り込みとか、そういうこともございませんし、定期預金だけでございますから、そういった意味で、破綻したときの広がりというのは少ないと、そういったことも、これはいろいろこの前も説明しました。そういった意味で、やはり原則は原則で、私は定額保護ということにさせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁

(12) Where a person (excluding the corporations listed in Appended Table 1 of the Corporation Tax Act, specified book-entry transfer institution, etc., foreign intermediary and any other person specified by a Cabinet Order) makes, for the first time since April 1, 1999, entries or records under the book-entry transfer system with regard to specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. (meaning specified short-term government or company bonds, principal-only book-entry transfer national government bonds prescribed in Article 90(2) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc., and coupon-only book-entry transfer national government bonds prescribed in paragraph (3) of the said Article for which separate trading of principal and interest prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article has been conducted pursuant to the provision of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in the person's account that will be or has been established with a specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. (meaning a [1] book-entry transfer institution prescribed in Article 2(2) of the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc., [2] an institution that shall be deemed to be the said book-entry transfer institution pursuant to the provision of Article 48 of the said Act, and [3] a specified account management institution (meaning a specified account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(ii)) and specified indirect account management institution (meaning a specified indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(iii)), with each of which the said book-entry transfer institution (including an institution that shall be deemed as such) has established an account in accordance with the operational rules prescribed in Article 3(1)(v) of the said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or established with a foreign intermediary (meaning a foreign indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(viii) (hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "foreign indirect account management institution") and a foreign further indirect account management institution prescribed in Article 5-2(5)(vii) (hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "foreign further indirect account management institution"); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), via a business office, etc. (meaning a business office, etc. prescribed in Article 5-2(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. or an overseas business office, etc. (meaning a business office or any other office of a foreign intermediary which is located outside Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) of the said foreign intermediary, such person shall, upon making the first entries or records under the book-entry transfer system (limited to those made in the said account; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), submit a written notice stating the person's name and address (or any other place specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance in the case where the person does not have an address in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. through which the person makes the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system, or submit such a written notice via the foreign intermediary through which the person makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. through another foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said foreign intermediary and such other foreign further indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) and the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.), to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. through which the said foreign intermediary (in the case where the said foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution: the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc.) makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said specified book-entry transfer national government bonds, etc. In this case, such person who submits the said written notice shall present a copy of the person's certificate of residence, certificate of registered matters of the corporation and any other document specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph to paragraph (18) as "identification documents") to the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. to which the said written notice is submitted (excluding the case where the said written notice is submitted via the said foreign intermediary; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or to the head of the overseas business office, etc. of the said foreign intermediary to which the said written notice is submitted, and the head of the business office, etc. of the specified book-entry-transfer institution, etc. to which the said written notice is submitted or the head of the overseas business office, etc. of the said foreign intermediary to which the said written notice is submitted shall confirm, by the said identification documents, the name and address stated in the said written notice. 例文帳に追加

１２　平成十一年四月一日以後最初に特定振替機関等（社債等の振替に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する振替機関及び同法第四十八条の規定により当該振替機関とみなされる者並びに当該振替機関（当該みなされる者を含む。）の同法第三条第一項第五号に規定する業務規程の定めるところにより口座の開設を受けた特定口座管理機関（第五条の二第五項第二号に規定する特定口座管理機関をいう。）及び特定間接口座管理機関（第五条の二第五項第三号に規定する特定間接口座管理機関をいう。）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は外国仲介業者（第五条の二第五項第八号に規定する外国間接口座管理機関（以下この条において「外国間接口座管理機関」という。）及び同項第七号に規定する外国再間接口座管理機関（以下この条において「外国再間接口座管理機関」という。）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に開設され、又は開設されている口座において当該特定振替機関等の営業所等（第五条の二第一項に規定する営業所等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等（外国仲介業者の国外にある営業所又は事務所をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を通じて特定振替国債等（特定短期公社債並びに社債等の振替に関する法律第九十条第二項に規定する分離元本振替国債及び財務省令で定めるところにより同条第一項に規定する元利分離が行われた同条第三項に規定する分離利息振替国債をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の振替記載等を受ける者（法人税法別表第一に掲げる法人、特定振替機関等、外国仲介業者その他の政令で定めるものを除く。）は、その者の氏名又は名称及び住所（国内に住所を有しない者にあつては、財務省令で定める場所。以下この条において同じ。）その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した告知書を、その最初に振替記載等（当該口座においてされるものに限る。以下この条において同じ。）を受ける際、その振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に対し、又はその振替記載等を受ける外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が他の外国再間接口座管理機関において当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける場合には、当該外国仲介業者及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る他の外国再間接口座管理機関）及び当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）を経由して当該外国仲介業者（当該外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）が当該特定振替国債等の振替記載等を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長に対し提出しなければならない。この場合において、当該告知書の提出をする者は、当該告知書の提出（当該外国仲介業者を経由して提出する場合を除く。以下この項において同じ。）をする特定振替機関等の営業所等の長又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等の長にその者の住民票の写し、法人の登記事項証明書その他の政令で定める書類（以下この項から第十八項までにおいて「確認書類」という。）を提示しなければならないものとし、当該告知書の提出を受ける特定振替機関等の営業所等の長又は当該外国仲介業者の国外営業所等の長は、当該告知書に記載されている氏名又は名称及び住所を当該確認書類により確認しなければならないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム