「one million million」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(14ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 249 When a Settlor Company of an Investment Trust or a person who was a Settlor Company of an Investment Trust, a Trust Company, etc., an administrator of the registry of beneficial interest holders, an issuer of the Beneficiary Certificates of a Foreign Investment Trust, an Investment Corporation's organizer(s), Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment, Supervisory Officers at Establishment, corporate officer(s), supervisory officers, accounting auditor(s) or a member to perform the duties thereof, executive liquidator(s), liquidation supervisors, Executive Liquidator's Agent, person to perform duties on behalf of a corporate officer(s), supervisory officers, executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors appointed by a provisional disposition order under Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Remedies Act, person to temporarily perform the duties on behalf of an officer as prescribed in Article 228, paragraph (1), item (v), person to temporarily perform the duties on behalf of an executive liquidator or liquidation supervisor prescribed in Article 228, paragraph (2), item (iii), person to temporarily perform the duties of an accounting auditor as prescribed in Article 233, paragraph (1), item (iii), inspector, Supervisor, Investigator, administrator of Investment Corporation Bonds, manager of the Investment Corporation Bonds to succeed to the administration of the Investment Corporation Bonds, Representative Creditor of an Investment Corporation or Resolution Administrator, Administrative Agent, Asset Management Company, or Asset Custody Company falls under any of the following items, such person shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than one million yen; provided, however, that this shall not apply when such acts should be made subject to criminal punishment: 例文帳に追加

第二百四十九条　投資信託委託会社若しくは投資信託委託会社であつた者、信託会社等、受益権原簿管理人、外国投資信託の受益証券の発行者、投資法人の設立企画人、設立時執行役員、設立時監督役員、執行役員、監督役員、会計監査人若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、清算執行人、清算監督人、清算執行人代理、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された執行役員、監督役員、清算執行人若しくは清算監督人の職務を代行する者、第二百二十八条第一項第五号に規定する一時役員の職務を行うべき者、同条第二項第三号に規定する一時清算執行人若しくは清算監督人の職務を行うべき者、第二百三十三条第一項第三号に規定する一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者、検査役、監督委員、調査委員、投資法人債管理者、事務を承継する投資法人債管理者、代表投資法人債権者若しくは決議執行者、一般事務受託者、資産運用会社又は資産保管会社は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。ただし、その行為について刑を科すべきときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

Article 334 In the case where a director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor or liquidator of a Life Insurance Company that transacts an Insurance Claim Trust Business, commissioned company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (1), insurance administrator, supervising committee member of a liquidating Stock Company or liquidating mutual company who has been appointed pursuant to the provision of Article 527, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), acting director, accounting advisor, company auditor, representative director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer of a Stock Company or Mutual Company who has been appointed pursuant to the provisional disposition order prescribed in Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Relief Act, acting liquidator or Representative Liquidator of a liquidating stock company or liquidating mutual company who has been appointed pursuant to the provisional disposition order prescribed in the same Article, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary officer or temporary liquidator who has been appointed pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4) of the same Act), any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary committee member or temporary executive officer who has been appointed pursuant to the provision of Article 401, paragraph (3) of the same Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 403, paragraph (3) of the same Act), any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary officer or temporary liquidator who has been appointed pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4)), any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary committee member or any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary executive officer or manager who has been appointed pursuant to the provision of Article 401, paragraph (3) of the same Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-25, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-27, paragraph (3)), or a Representative Person in Japan of a Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc. that transacts an Insurance Claim Trust Business, liquidator, commissioned company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 211, insurance administrator or manager, falls under any of the following items, he/she shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than one million yen: 例文帳に追加

第三百三十四条　保険金信託業務を行う生命保険会社の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役若しくは清算人、第百四十四条第一項に規定する受託会社、保険管理人、会社法第五百二十七条第一項（第百八十四条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により選任された清算株式会社若しくは清算相互会社の監督委員、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された株式会社若しくは相互会社の取締役、会計参与、監査役、代表取締役、委員、執行役若しくは代表執行役の職務を代行する者、同条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された清算株式会社若しくは清算相互会社の清算人若しくは代表清算人の職務を代行する者、会社法第三百四十六条第二項（同法第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により選任された一時役員の職務を行うべき者若しくは一時清算人の職務を行うべき者、同法第四百一条第三項（同法第四百三条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により選任された一時委員の職務を行うべき者若しくは一時執行役の職務を行うべき者、第五十三条の十二第二項（第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により選任された一時役員の職務を行うべき者若しくは一時清算人の職務を行うべき者、第五十三条の二十五第二項（第五十三条の二十七第三項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する同法第四百一条第三項の規定により選任された一時委員の職務を行うべき者若しくは一時執行役の職務を行うべき者若しくは支配人又は保険金信託業務を行う外国生命保険会社等の日本における代表者、清算人、第二百十一条において準用する第百四十四条第一項に規定する受託会社、保険管理人若しくは支配人は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well. 例文帳に追加

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁

Article 24 (1) When Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, except in the following items) issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the following items, the company shall submit, for each business year, a report stating the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as an "Annual Securities Report") to the Prime Minister within three months after the end of that business year (or, in the case of a foreign company, within the period specified by a Cabinet Order as the period necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors) pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the respective last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of the Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below, if the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than 500 million yen (or if, in cases where the Securities are Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the amount that is specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Order on the last day of that business year) or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year are fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) or (iv) below, if the Prime Minister approves as specified by a Cabinet Order that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　有価証券の発行者である会社は、その会社が発行者である有価証券（特定有価証券を除く。次の各号を除き、以下この条において同じ。）が次に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、事業年度ごとに、当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業の内容に関する重要な事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「有価証券報告書」という。）を、当該事業年度経過後三月以内（当該会社が外国会社である場合には、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定める期間内）に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において、その発行者である会社の資本金の額が当該事業年度の末日において五億円未満（当該有価証券が第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該会社の資産の額として政令で定めるものの額が当該事業年度の末日において政令で定める額未満）であるとき、及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに当該有価証券が第三号又は第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして政令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム