「その当時」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(20ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

今般、同法の期限の延長期間を1年としたのは、法制当時よりも現在の経済状況は2年前のリーマン・ショック直後の中小企業金融円滑化法は1年程度の法律としていたのでありますが、現在の経済情勢は2年前のまさにトヨタ自動車の売り上げが4割減ったという、私の地元九州・福岡県は愛知県に次いで2番目に大きな自動車100万台以上生産しておりますけれども、トヨタだ日産だというのが本当に軒並み派遣切りをしまして、そのことを私はもろに感じたわけでございますが、そういった中、この法律を施行させて頂いたわけでございますけれども、同時に資本主義社会、自由主義社会においては、法によって借り手のモラルハザードという金融規律の低下が懸念されている。やっぱりそこは、当然、自由主義社会で大事なことでございまして、やっぱり借りたお金は利子をつけて返すということは原則でございますから、その影響も注視する必要があると思っております。例文帳に追加

When the SME Financing Facilitation Act was established just after the Lehman shock two years ago, it was given the duration of roughly one year. With Toyota suffering a 40 percent drop in car sales two years ago – my home prefecture, Fukuoka, Kyushu, produces more than one million cars and is the second largest car-producing prefecture after Aichi – one after another of the car makers, including Toyota and Nissan, fired temporary workers. It was under those circumstances that we launched this Act, but, at the same time, it is also true that in the context of a capitalist society and a free society, there is a concern that the Act might result in financial discipline deteriorating in the form of moral hazard on the part of borrowers. As it is, indeed, naturally an important factor in a free society, and the basic rule in borrowing money is to pay it back with interest, I do think it necessary to heed any impact of the Act.  - 金融庁

① 無限責任組合員は、あるポートフォリオ投資に係る投資証券等及び／又は投資知的財産権について売却その他の処分、償還、消却、買受け、払戻し、又は弁済がなされること（以下「処分等」と総称する。）により金銭（以下「処分収益」という。）を受領したときは、かかる金銭の受領後［ ］ヶ月以内の無限責任組合員がその裁量により指定する日において、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象組合員等（以下に定義する。）に対し、当該処分収益から、処分等に要した諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）並びに当該処分等の時において支払期限が到来していた当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る本組合の費用（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項の定めに従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額を控除した残額に相当する金銭を、当該各対象組合員等の対象持分割合（但し、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時を基準とする。）に応じて按分した割合により分配するものとする。「対象組合員等」とは、あるポートフォリオ投資について、当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした組合員等をいう。例文帳に追加

(i) If t he General Partner receives funds (“Disposition Profits”) from a sale or other disposition, redemption, cancellation, purchase, refund or repayment (collectively, a “Disposition”) of Portfolio Securities and/or Portfolio Intellectual Property in respect of a Portfolio Investment, the General Partner shall distribute to the Participating Interested Partners (as defined below) in respect of such Portfolio Investment the balance of such Disposition Profits after the deduction of the sum of (x) the total amount of: (a) costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the Disposition and (b) expenses of the Partnership concerning such Portfolio Investment, if any, due and payable at the time of the Disposition; and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article, in proportion to the respective Percentage Interests of such Participating Interested Partners, on such date as the General Partner, in its discretion, designates within [_] months from receipt of such funds (provided that, for a Withdrawing Partner, the distribution shall be based on its Percentage Interests at the time of its withdrawal). “Participating Interested Partners” means, in respect of a Portfolio Investment, the Interested Partners who made contribution in such Portfolio Investment.  - 経済産業省

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。例文帳に追加

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations.  - 金融庁

5. 【免除/除外条項を設けない場合】第47 条に基づく本組合の清算手続における分配を行う日の時点において、無限責任組合員が成功報酬を受領している場合で、かつ、(ⅰ)第29 条又は第47条に基づき組合員等に対して行われた組合財産の分配額（現物分配の場合にはその分配時評価額を含む。以下本条において同じ。）の累計額（以下「対象分配累計額」という。）が、組合員等によりなされた出資履行金額の総額及び同金額の［α］%に相当する金額の合計額（以下「優先分配金額」という。）を下回るか、又は(ⅱ)無限責任組合員が受領した成功報酬の合計額（以下「対象成功報酬累計額」という。）が、対象分配累計額から組合員等の出資履行金額の合計額を控除した金額及び対象成功報酬累計額の合計額の［β］%を超える場合、無限責任組合員は、(x)以下の各号に定める金額のうちいずれか大きい金額又は(y)対象成功報酬累計額の金額のうち、いずれか小さい金額に相当する額を、本組合に速やかに返還するものとする。かかる返還金（以下「クローバック金額」という。）は、本組合への支払いをもって、各組合員等へその持分金額（脱退組合員については脱退当時の持分金額）に応じ按分の上帰属する。例文帳に追加

(5) [If an Excuse/Exclusion clause is not included]If, as of the date of distribution under the liquidation procedures of the Partnership pursuant to Article 47, the General Partner has received an incentive fee and (i) the cumulative amount of the Partnership Assets that has been distributed to the Interested Partners pursuant to Article 29 or Article 47 (in the case of in kind distributions, including the Value at the Time of Distribution thereof; in this Article, the same applies) (the “Cumulative Distributed Amount”) is less than the sum of (a) the total Capital Contributions made by the Interested Partners and (b) an amount equal to [O]% thereof (such sum is hereinafter referred to as the “Preferred Distribution Amount”) or (ii) the total incentive fees received by the General Partner (the “Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount”) exceeds [Q]% of the sum of (A) the Cumulative Distributed Amount after thededuction of the total Capital Contributions made by the Interested Partners and (B) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount, the General Partner shall promptly return to the Partnership the amount equal to the lesser of (x) the larger of the amounts set forth in the items below or (y) the Total Cumulative Incentive Fee Amount. Upon payment to the Partnership, such refund (the “Clawback Amount”) shall be allocated to each Interested Partner in proportion to its Interest Amount (for a Withdrawing Partner, the Interest Amount at the time of withdrawal).  - 経済産業省

第四十三条　附則第四十五条の規定に基づき遺族補償年金を受けることができる遺族の範囲が改定されるまでの間、労働者の夫（婚姻の届出をしていないが、事実上婚姻関係と同様の事情にあつた者を含む。以下次項において同じ。）、父母、祖父母及び兄弟姉妹であつて、労働者の死亡の当時、その収入によつて生計を維持し、かつ、五十五歳以上六十歳未満であつたもの（労働者災害補償保険法第十六条の二第一項第四号に規定する者であつて、同法第十六条の四第一項第六号に該当しないものを除く。）は、同法第十六条の二第一項の規定にかかわらず、同法の規定による遺族補償年金を受けることができる遺族とする。この場合において、同法第十六条の四第二項中「各号の一」とあるのは「各号の一（第六号を除く。）」と、同法別表第一の遺族補償年金の項中「遺族補償年金を受けることができる遺族」とあるのは「遺族補償年金を受けることができる遺族（労働者災害補償保険法の一部を改正する法律（昭和四十年法律第百三十号）附則第四十三条第一項に規定する遺族であつて六十歳未満であるものを除く。）」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 43 (1) Until the scope of surviving family members eligible to receive a compensation pension for surviving family has been revised under the provision of Article 45 of the Supplementary Provisions, a worker's husband (including a person who has not made a notification of marriage but has been in a de facto marital relationship with the worker; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph), parents, grandparents and siblings who were dependent on the worker's income at the time of his/her death and were 55 or over or under 60 years of age (excluding those prescribed in Article 16-2, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act who do not fall under Article 16-4, paragraph (1), item (vi) of said Act) shall, notwithstanding the provision of Article 16-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, be regarded as surviving family members eligible to receive a compensation pension for surviving family under the provisions of said Act. In this case, the term "any of the items of the preceding paragraph" in Article 16-4, paragraph (2) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "any of the items of the preceding paragraph (excluding item (vi))," and the term "surviving family members eligible to receive a compensation pension for surviving family" in the row concerning a compensation pension for surviving family in Appended Table 1 of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "surviving family members eligible to receive a compensation pension for surviving family (excluding surviving family members prescribed in Article 43, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act for Partial Revision to the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (Act No. 130 of 1965) who are under 60 years of age)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム