もず唱平の英語

ただ、『愚管抄』に保元の乱についての話が「少々アルトカヤウケタマハレドモ、イマダ見侍ラズ」とあること、また永仁5年（1297年）成立の『普通唱導集』に「平治・保元・平家の物語」が琵琶法師によって語られたことが記されている。例文帳に追加

"Gukansho" mentions the Hogen Disturbance, saying, 'Although I have heard there may be a little something of the sort, I have not been able to see it,' and "Futsu-shodo shu (A Selection of Ordinary Advocates)," completed in 1297, says that 'Tales of Heiji, Hogen and Heike' were told by Biwa-hoshi (a blind minstrel who played the biwa (lute)).発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

翌年の清盛による後白河法皇幽閉とその後の高官追放の影響を受けて参議に昇進、以仁王の乱追討・福原京遷都ではいずれも平家とともに賛成を唱え、摂関家の九条兼実やその周辺（代表格が藤原定家）と対立している。例文帳に追加

As a result of the confinement of the Cloistered Emperor Goshirakawa and the exile of high officials by Kiyomori the following year, Michichika was promoted to Sangi (councillor), and, together with the Taira family, he expressed his approval of disposing Prince Mochihito and transfer of the capital to Fukuhara-kyo and confronted Kanezane KUJO of the Sekkan-ke (the families which produced regents) and his cronies (representative one is FUJIWARA no Teika).発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

ただし、平山行三は同条にある「取与不和」（合意がないままに相手から取り上げること）の反対解釈として捉えるのに対して、長又高夫は同じく「雖和与者無罪」（合意があって与えられたものなので無罪とすべきところ）に由来するという説を唱えている。例文帳に追加

In this regard, Kozo HIRAYAMA sees the term as the opposite interpretation of "to take something away from someone without getting his/her consent" in the Article, while Takao NAGAMATA has a theory that the term comes from "a person who got something from someone after getting his/her consent shall be considered innocent" in the same Article.発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

水間沾徳（赤穂藩士大高源五・神崎与五郎・冨森助右衛門・萱野三平らの俳諧の師匠）の『沾徳随筆』の中にある「浅野氏滅亡之濫觴」によると「例年1200両かかる勅使饗応役の費用を浅野家は700両しか出さず、吉良がこれに異議を唱えたので両者が不和になり、刃傷の原因となった」とあり、浅野家の費用出し惜しみ説をとる。例文帳に追加

'Asanoshi metsubou no ransho (story of the beginning of fall of the Asano family)' in "Sentoku zuihitsu (essay)" written by Sentoku MIZUMA (the Haikai master of feudal retainers of Ako Domain Gengo OTAKA, Yogoro KANZAKI, Sukeemon TOMINOMORI and Sanpei KAYANO) adopted the theory the Asano family was stingy on the budget, saying as follows: "The Asano family paid only 700 ryo for the expenses to entertain Imperial envoy, which cost 1200 ryo every year, and Kira protested against it, setting them in feud and ended up in Ninjo."発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

これは明治の歴史学者星野恒の唱えたもので、明治30年代に石清水八幡宮祠官田中家文書の中に源頼信が応神天皇陵に納めたとされる永承元年（1046年）告文に「先人新発其先経基其先元平親王其先陽成天皇其先清和天皇」と明記してある事を根拠としたもの。例文帳に追加

The historian Hisashi HOSHINO in the Meiji period stated this theory, which was supported by descriptions between 1897 and 1906 in the family document of the Tanaka family, who were Shinto priests of Iwashimizu Hachiman-gu Shrine, that the Imperial instruction of 1046, which was dedicated to the Mausoleum of Emperor Ojin by MINAMOTO no Yorinobu, explicitly described that: 'the ancestors are Shinbochi, Tsunemoto, Imperial Prince Motohira, Emperor Yozei, and Emperor Seiwa, from newest to oldest.'発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

改易の理由は表向きには忠隣の養女と山口重信との無断婚姻が理由とされているが、実際の理由は大久保長安事件によるとする説や本多正信・正純による策謀とする説、豊臣政権を一掃しようと考えていた家康が、西国大名と親しく、また和平論を唱える可能性のあった忠隣を遠ざけたとする説（三津木國輝『小田原藩主大久保忠世・忠隣』）など諸説あり、明確な理由は不明である。例文帳に追加

The reason for his Kaieki, punishment, was technically said as the unauthorized marriage of the adopted daughter of Tadachika and Shigenobu YAMAGUCHI, however, there are many theories on the real reasons such as the one by the Incident of Nagayasu OKUBO, or by the conspiracy of Masanobu HONDA and Masazumi HONDA, or by Ieyasu who had the intention to get rid of the Toyotomi government alienated Tadachika who had a close relationship with Saigoku Daimyo (Japanese territorial lord in western Japan) and might present a peace plan (according to the "Tadayo and Tadachika OKUBO, the Lord of the Odawara Domain" written by Kuniteru MITSUGI) but the clear reason has not been known.発音を聞く  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

大阪高裁平成９年２月２７日判決・判時１６２４号１３１頁「控訴人会社は、自ら本件装置を操作するものではないが、被控訴人が管理する音楽著作物の上映権及び演奏権を侵害するおそれの極めて高い、業務用カラオケ装置をユーザーに提供することを内容とする、リース業務を日常的に反復継続する者として、･･･本件装置のユーザーが被控訴人の許諾を得ないまま本件装置をカラオケ伴奏による客の歌唱に使用すれば、被控訴人が管理する音楽著作物の上映権及び演奏権を侵害することになることを知っていたか、仮に知らなかったとしても容易に知り得たのであるから、これを知るべきであったというべきである。しかるところ、控訴人会社は、･･･許諾を得ないまま本件店舗において本件装置を使用して客に歌唱させていることを認識しながら、右著作権侵害の結果を認容しつつ、本件リース契約を継続、更改して本件装置を提供し、控訴人則子及び同隆による前示本件著作権侵害行為に加担したというべきである。」例文帳に追加

Osaka High Court Judgment, February 27, 1997, p.131 of Hanrei Jiho vol. 1624 "The Respondent Company does not operate the Device by itself, but repeatedly conducts a certain lease business which provides commercially used karaoke devices to users which are highly likely to infringe the representation and performance rights of musical works managed by the Appellant [omitted]. If the user uses this Device for providing karaoke music to their customers without being licensed by the Appellant, the user was aware that it violates the representation and performance rights of musical works managed by the Appellant. Alternatively, if he/she was not aware of it, they should have been, as it would be easy for such user to become aware of it. In this particular case, the Respondent Company was aware of the fact that it continued to provide customers with karaoke services by using the Device without holding any license to do so. The Respondent Company continued and renewed the Lease Agreement and provided the Device, silently accepting Therefore, the Respondent acted jointly with Appellants Noriko and Takashi in the aforementioned infringement of copyrights."発音を聞く  - 経済産業省