| 例文 |
be unavoidableの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 161件
Article 164 (1) Where an act necessary for duly asserting the establishment, transfer or modification of a right against a third party (including a provisional registration) was conducted after suspension of payments, etc. took place, if such act was conducted after 15 days had elapsed since the date of establishment, transfer or modification of the right, while knowing that suspension of payments, etc. had taken place, the act may be avoided in the interest of the bankruptcy estate after the commencement of bankruptcy proceedings; provided, however, that this shall not apply to a definitive registration based on prior unavoidable provisional registration. 例文帳に追加
第百六十四条 支払の停止等があった後権利の設定、移転又は変更をもって第三者に対抗するために必要な行為(仮登記又は仮登録を含む。)をした場合において、その行為が権利の設定、移転又は変更があった日から十五日を経過した後支払の停止等のあったことを知ってしたものであるときは、破産手続開始後、破産財団のためにこれを否認することができる。ただし、当該仮登記又は仮登録以外の仮登記又は仮登録があった後にこれらに基づいて本登記又は本登録をした場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(6) The Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism or the prefectural governor may not give approval set forth in paragraph (4) unless the area scheduled to be a Port Area is the minimum area required for the economic operation and management of the said water area as an independent port and is not in conflict with the interest of the local government whose water area borders the proposed Port Area and does not exceed the physical limits of the port as provided for in the Act on Port Regulations (Act No. 174 of 1948); provided, however, that approval may be given for a Port Area that exceeds the physical limits of the port specified by the provisions of the same Act when it is unavoidable to exceed such limits to secure the minimum area necessary for the economical operation and management of the port as an independent port. 例文帳に追加
6 国土交通大臣又は都道府県知事は、予定港湾区域が、当該水域を経済的に一体の港湾として管理運営するために必要な最小限度の区域であつて、当該予定港湾区域に隣接する水域を地先水面とする地方公共団体の利益を害せず、且つ、港則法(昭和二十三年法律第百七十四号)に基づく港の区域の定のあるものについてはその区域をこえないものでなければ、第四項の認可をすることができない。但し、同法に基づく港の区域の定のある港湾について、経済的に一体の港湾として管理運営するために必要な最小限度の区域を定めるために同法に基づく港の区域をこえることがやむをえないときは、当該港の区域をこえて認可することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(4) Even where a resident has not filed a final return form for the year for which he/she seeks deduction pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) or has filed a final return form without a statement made therein or written statement attached thereto regarding the whole or part of the amount to be deducted, the district director may, when he/she finds any unavoidable reason for the resident's failure to file a necessary final return form, make a necessary statement therein or attach a necessary written statement thereto, apply the provision of paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) to any amount for which the statement or written statement set forth in the said paragraph has not been made or attached, only if a document containing the statement set forth in the said paragraph and a written statement set forth in the said paragraph are submitted. 例文帳に追加
4 税務署長は、第一項若しくは第二項の規定による控除を受けようとする年分の確定申告書の提出がなかつた場合又は当該控除をされるべきこととなる金額の全部若しくは一部についての前項の記載若しくは明細書の添付がない確定申告書の提出があつた場合においても、その提出又は記載若しくは添付がなかつたことについてやむを得ない事情があると認めるときは、同項の記載をした書類及び同項の明細書の提出があつた場合に限り、同項の記載又は明細書の添付がなかつた金額につき第一項又は第二項の規定を適用することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(6) Even where a domestic corporation has filed a final return form, etc. or a consolidated final return form prescribed in paragraph (1) without the application or written statement attached thereto as set forth in the preceding paragraph regarding the whole or part of the necessary matters including [1] the amount to be included in the amount of deductible expense pursuant to the said paragraph, [2] the taxed amount of retained income or individually taxed amount of retained income and [3] any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, the district director may, when he/she finds any unavoidable reason for the domestic corporation's failure to make a necessary application or attach a necessary written statement as set forth in the said paragraph, apply the provision of paragraph (1) to any amount for which the application or written statement has not been made or attached, only if such application and written statement are submitted. 例文帳に追加
6 税務署長は、第一項の規定により損金の額に算入されるべきこととなる金額又は課税済留保金額若しくは個別課税済留保金額その他財務省令で定める事項の全部又は一部につき前項の記載又は明細書の添付がない確定申告書等又は同項に規定する連結確定申告書の提出があつた場合においても、同項の記載又は明細書の添付がなかつたことについてやむを得ない事情があると認める場合において、これらの明細書の提出があつたときは、その記載又は明細書の添付がなかつた金額につき第一項の規定を適用することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(6) Even where a consolidated corporation has filed a consolidated final return form, etc. or a final return form prescribed in paragraph (1) without the application or written statement attached thereto as set forth in the preceding paragraph regarding the whole or part of the necessary matters including [1] the amount to be included in the amount of deductible expense pursuant to paragraph (1), [2] the individually taxed amount of retained income or taxed amount of retained income and [3] any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, the district director may, when he/she finds any unavoidable reason for the consolidated corporation's failure to make a necessary application or attach a necessary written statement as set forth in the said paragraph, apply the provision of paragraph (1) to any amount for which the application or written statement has not been made or attached, only if such application and written statement are submitted. 例文帳に追加
6 税務署長は、第一項の規定により損金の額に算入されるべきこととなる金額又は個別課税済留保金額若しくは課税済留保金額その他財務省令で定める事項の全部又は一部につき前項の記載又は明細書の添付がない連結確定申告書等又は同項に規定する確定申告書の提出があつた場合においても、同項の記載又は明細書の添付がなかつたことについてやむを得ない事情があると認める場合において、これらの明細書の提出があつたときは、その記載又は明細書の添付がなかつた金額につき第一項の規定を適用することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(5) In cases of a lease pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) for a building used for a residence (limited to those pertaining to buildings having floor area (in the case where a part of the building is the object of the lease, the floor area of said part) of less than 200 square meters), when it becomes difficult for the building lessee to use the building as his/her principal residence due to an unavoidable circumstance such as a work-related transfer, the receiving of medical care, or the necessity of providing care to a relative, the building lessee may request to terminate the building lease. In this case, the building lease shall be terminated when one month has passed since the day of the request to terminate. 例文帳に追加
5 第一項の規定による居住の用に供する建物の賃貸借(床面積(建物の一部分を賃貸借の目的とする場合にあっては、当該一部分の床面積)が二百平方メートル未満の建物に係るものに限る。)において、転勤、療養、親族の介護その他のやむを得ない事情により、建物の賃借人が建物を自己の生活の本拠として使用することが困難となったときは、建物の賃借人は、建物の賃貸借の解約の申入れをすることができる。この場合においては、建物の賃貸借は、解約の申入れの日から一月を経過することによって終了する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(9) The term "ambulance services" means the services for transporting a person who has suffered an injury or contracted a disease as a result of an accident that occurred due to a disaster or an accident that occurred in the open air or at a place with public access (hereinafter referred to as an "accident due to a disaster, etc." in this paragraph) or as a result of an accident equivalent to an accident due to a disaster, etc. or another cause specified by Cabinet Order that occurred in cases specified by Cabinet Order, and who needs to be transported urgently to a medical institution or any other place, by means of an ambulance team, to a medical institution (meaning a medical institution specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) or any other place (including the services for providing a person who has suffered an injury or contracted a disease with first-aid treatment, as an urgent and unavoidable measure, until such person is placed under the control of a doctor). 例文帳に追加
9 救急業務とは、災害により生じた事故若しくは屋外若しくは公衆の出入する場所において生じた事故(以下この項において「災害による事故等」という。)又は政令で定める場合における災害による事故等に準ずる事故その他の事由で政令で定めるものによる傷病者のうち、医療機関その他の場所へ緊急に搬送する必要があるものを、救急隊によつて、医療機関(厚生労働省令で定める医療機関をいう。)その他の場所に搬送すること(傷病者が医師の管理下に置かれるまでの間において、緊急やむを得ないものとして、応急の手当を行うことを含む。)をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 162 (1) In the following cases, where there are unavoidable reasons, Specified Equity Members or Preferred Equity Members who hold not less than one-tenth (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members or all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members and Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all the matters on which a resolution may be effected at the general meeting of members) respectively, or Specified Equity Members or Preferred Equity Members who hold not less than one-tenth (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or the issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity) may demand the dissolution of a Specific Purpose Company by filing an action: 例文帳に追加
第百六十二条 次に掲げる場合において、やむを得ない事由があるときは、総特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員若しくは優先出資社員を除く。)の議決権の十分の一(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは優先出資社員又は特定出資(自己特定出資を除く。)の総口数若しくは発行済優先出資(自己優先出資を除く。)の十分の一(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の特定出資若しくは優先出資を有する特定社員若しくは優先出資社員は、訴えをもって特定目的会社の解散を請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 52-22 (1) The total amount of granting of credit, etc. (meaning granted credit, or contributed funds specified by a Cabinet Order as a contribution; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) by a Bank Holding Company or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies of the Bank Holding Company (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) and other persons who have a special relationship with the Bank Holding Company specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to one person (including other persons who have a special relationship with said person specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall not exceed the amount calculated by multiplying the total net amount of the equity capital of the Bank Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies by the ratio specified by a Cabinet Order for each category provided therein (hereinafter the amount thus calculated shall be referred to as the "Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company" in this Article); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the total amount of granting of credit, etc. by a Bank Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies to one person exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as a result of a Merger, Joint Incorporation-Type Split or absorption-type split involving said person, or of transfer of another person's business to said person, or by other unavoidable reasons specified by a Cabinet Order, and the Prime Minister has given approval for such excess amount of granting of credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company. 例文帳に追加
第五十二条の二十二 銀行持株会社又はその子会社等(当該銀行持株会社の子会社(内閣府令で定める会社を除く。)その他の当該銀行持株会社と内閣府令で定める特殊の関係のある者をいう。以下この条において同じ。)の同一人(当該同一人と政令で定める特殊の関係のある者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)に対する信用の供与等(信用の供与又は出資として政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。)の額は、政令で定める区分ごとに、合算して、当該銀行持株会社及びその子会社等の自己資本の純合計額に政令で定める率を乗じて得た額(以下この条において「銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額」という。)を超えてはならない。ただし、信用の供与等を受けている者が合併をし、共同新設分割若しくは吸収分割をし、又は営業を譲り受けたことにより銀行持株会社又はその子会社等の同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えることとなる場合その他政令で定めるやむを得ない理由がある場合において、内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加
2 新銀行法第十三条第二項(新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額(同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等(同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加
第百二条 第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法(以下「新銀行法」という。)第十三条第一項(第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法(以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。)第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法(以下「新信用金庫法」という。)第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法(以下「新労働金庫法」という。)第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律(以下「新協金法」という。)第六条において準用する場合(以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。)を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等(同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)の額が信用供与等限度額(同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を超えている銀行(新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。)、長期信用銀行(新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。)、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会(新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。)(以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。)の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会(労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 例文 |
| ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
