「Financial Reconstruction」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(3ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Regarding this fact, the FSA mentioned "aggressive efforts geared toward business recovery" as one of the specific items it promoted in its Action Plan to Strengthen the Functions of Community- Based Finance (Fiscal 2005-2006). The FSA has called on financial institutions to "make aggressive efforts geared toward business recovery, including canceling excessive debt of SMEs and business reconstruction that Chapter 1 ― Business recovery for SMEs and revitalization of the small enterprises that support regions 155 meets the changing needs of society"例文帳に追加

これに関して、金融庁は「地域密着型金融の機能強化の推進に関するアクションプログラム（平成17年～18年度）」において、具体的推進項目の一つとして「事業再生にむけた積極的な取組み」をあげており、金融機関に対し、「中小企業の過剰債務の解消や社会のニーズの変化に対応した事業の再構築など、事業再生に向けた積極的取組みを行うよう」要請してきた。 - 経済産業省

I have jurisdiction over private financial institutions, so the FSA has put into force the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, so as to ensure that finance firmly supports recovery efforts. Unusually for a financial act, this act provides a framework under which Deposit Insurance Corporation takes over non-performing loans that are held by Shinkin banks and credit cooperatives after the passage of a certain period of time. Therefore, this act naturally calls on the managers of financial institutions to build up capital based on their own judgment. We enacted the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, with the support of all political parties and groups, and also drew up the Guidelines of Workout for Restructuring Debt Owed by Individual Debtors. In addition, prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations and Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake were established in order to resolve the double loan problem, which has become a major issue in the Diet. Many members of the latter organization's secretariat come from the FSA. In that sense, I believe that the FSA is making every possible effort toward restoration and recovery. The FSA will continue to do its utmost to support the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas through such activities as encouraging the active and effective use of various recovery support measures. At the same time, I would like to stress that financial institutions have provided very vigorous cooperation. 例文帳に追加

特に私の場合は民間の金融機関を所掌しているわけでございますから、金融庁といたしましても、復興に向けた（取組みを）金融がしっかり下支えするべく、震災特例を設けた金融機能強化法、これは私は金融立法としては異例なことだと思っておりますが、信用金庫、信用組合を含め、しばらく経っても不良債権が残っていれば、預金保険機構で請け負いましょうという枠組みの法律でございますから、そういった意味では、当然、自己資本もしっかり経営者の判断で積んでいただきたいということも言っておりますので、そういった意味では、私はまさに震災特例の金融機能強化法を国会の全会派のご協力をいただきまして作らせていただきましたし、また、「個人債務者の私的整理（に関する）ガイドライン」、それから産業復興機構、東日本大震災（事業者）再生支援機構、これは国会で大きく問題が起きた二重ローンの問題、これは実は事務局（職員）の多くは金融庁から行かせていただいておりまして、そういったことで金融庁としては全力を挙げて復旧復興に努めさせていただいているつもりでございますが、各種の復興支援策の積極的かつ効果的な活用を促すなど、引き続き、被災地の復興支援に全力で取り組んでまいりたいと思うと同時に、ぜひ強調したいのは、金融機関も今回非常によく協力していただけたと思っております。 - 金融庁

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provision of Article 97-2, paragraph (3) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to an Insurance Company and the Subsidiary Companies, etc. (referring to Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined in that paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of the Insurance Company that invest, at the time when this Act enters into force, the assets prescribed in that paragraph on behalf of one single person in a total amount that exceeds the amount calculated pursuant to the provision of that paragraph, or to the investment of such assets by the Subsidiary Companies, etc. of the Insurance Company on behalf of that one single person, provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. 例文帳に追加

２　新保険業法第九十七条の二第三項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に同一人に対する同項に規定する資産の運用の額が合算して同項の規定により計算した額を超えている保険会社及び当該保険会社の子会社等（同項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該保険会社の子会社等の当該同一人に対する当該資産の運用については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

However, in other cases, we will require the exercise of the consulting function, such as diagnosis of the condition of companies and advice on and support for optimal solutions. There are also institutional frameworks and schemes for various other activities, such as enhancing relationship banking and strengthening cooperation with prefectural consultation forums on support for business rehabilitation of SMEs, as well as strengthening cooperation with prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations in the three disaster-stricken prefectures of the Tohoku region. The Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake was established on the basis of a bill jointly drawn up by lawmakers of the three ruling parties at that time, and support for business rehabilitation has been promoted. The Development Bank of Japan plays the central role in setting up funds in cooperation with private financial institutions. 例文帳に追加

しかし、私が今さっき申しましたように、コンサルタント機能を十分出しなさいとか、あるいは、これは主に経産省が関係する色々な企業診断、最適な解決策の提示・（支援を図るための）コンサルタント機能の発揮等、地域密着型金融の深化を徹底、あと法律によって各県に作っている組織である中小企業再生支援協議会との連携強化、また、東北の被災3県にとりましては、産業復興機構、あるいは議員立法で3党が一緒に作っていただいた東日本大震災事業者再生支援機構等との連携強化、それから事業再生等の支援を図るための、様々な制度・仕組みを作っておりまして、これは日本政策投資銀行が中心になって、この民間金融機関と一緒にファンドを各地で作っております。 - 金融庁

In closing, I would like to extend my sincerest condolences to those who lost loved ones in the recent earthquake and the unprecedented tsunami in the Indian Ocean last December and another earthquake in March.As an Asian neighbor, Japan provided assistance to the maximum extent possible in three ways—financial resources, human resources, and knowledge and expertise—while drawing upon our experience in disaster prevention.Hereafter, it is vital for us to provide medium- to long-term assistance for rehabilitation and reconstruction in the affected countries.We expect the Bank to play an important role in this regard, while fully collaborating with other donors. 例文帳に追加

最後になりますが、昨年12月及び本年3月のインド洋沖での地震と未曾有の大津波の被害にあわれた方々、犠牲者の方々に、改めて心からご冥福を祈り、お見舞いを申し上げます。我が国としても、今般の事態に対し、同じアジアの一員として、そして、津波・地震といった自然災害への対策における先進国として、人的貢献、資金、知見の三点で最大限の貢献を実行しています。今後は、被災国の中長期的な復旧・復興を支援していくことが重要であり、この点において世銀が他の多国間・二国間ドナーと十分に協調しつつ積極的な役割を果たすことを期待しています。 - 財務省

In response G7 Finance Ministers agreed that we would not expect debt payments from affected countries that request it until the World Bank and IMF have completed a full needs assessment of their reconstruction and financing requirements, recognizing that some countries may be unable to make debt payments. We will work, within the Paris Club, with other creditors to achieve a consensus for this approach; depending on the conclusions of the needs assessments, we also stand ready to consider all appropriate measures for further assistance; the IMF, World Bank, Asian Development Bank and other multilateral institutions should make the strongest efforts possible to provide financial assistance, including through emergency post-disaster facilities; and we support urgent consideration by relevant fora of the international community to put in place an effective tsunami early warning system in the Indian Ocean, and the infrastructure necessary to make it effective. 例文帳に追加

これを受けて、G7 の財務大臣は以下の点について合意した。我々は、国によっては債務返済に支障をきたすおそれがあることに鑑み、世界銀行と IMF が被災国の完全な復興・資金ニーズアセスメントを完了するまでの間、要請があった被災国について、債務の支払いを期待しない。我々は、この方策につき、パリクラブにおいて、他の債権国ともコンセンサスが得られるよう作業する。我々は、上記のニーズアセスメントの結果によっては、更なる支援のため、あらゆる適切な措置について検討する用意もある。IMF、世界銀行、アジア開発銀行及びその他の国際機関は、緊急災害向けファシリティを通じた支援を含め、被災国に対して資金支援を行うよう最大限の努力をすべきである。我々は、国際社会の適切な場において、インド洋における効果的な津波早期警戒システムの構築及びそのために必要なインフラ整備について、早急に検討することを支持する。 - 財務省

Article 130 (1) The provision of Article 97-2, paragraph (2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199 of the Insurance Business Act revised by the provision of Article 22 (hereinafter referred to as "Current Insurance Business Act") of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the investment of assets on behalf of one single person (referring to the one single person prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph) by an Insurance Company (referring to an Insurance Company as defined in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) (including a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (referring to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or a Licensed Specified Juridical Person (referring to a Licensed Specified Juridical Person as defined in Article 223, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the amount of those assets prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph (2) of the Current Insurance Business Act which are invested by the Insurance Company on behalf of that one single person exceeds, at the time when this Act enters into force, the amount calculated pursuant to the provision of that paragraph, provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. 例文帳に追加

第百三十条　第二十二条の規定による改正後の保険業法（以下「新保険業法」という。）第九十七条の二第二項（新保険業法第百九十九条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に同一人（新保険業法第九十七条の二第二項に規定する同一人をいう。次項において同じ。）に対する同条第二項に規定する資産の運用の額が同項の規定により計算した額を超えている保険会社（新保険業法第二条第二項に規定する保険会社をいう。以下同じ。）（外国保険会社等（新保険業法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。以下同じ。）及び免許特定法人（新保険業法第二百二十三条第一項に規定する免許特定法人をいう。以下同じ。）を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の当該同一人に対する当該資産の運用については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provision of Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the ownership of Shares, etc. (referring to Shares, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (12) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by an Insurance Company or any of its Subsidiary Companies in a domestic company (referring to a domestic company as defined in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the Insurance Company or the Subsidiary Company owns, at the time when this Act enters into force, Shares, etc. in the domestic company in a total number that exceeds its shareholding threshold, etc. (referring to the shareholding threshold, etc. prescribed in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. In this case, for the purpose of applying the provision of that Article to the ownership of Shares, etc. in the domestic company on and subsequent to the date, the Insurance Company or its Subsidiary Company shall be deemed to have acquired as at the date the Shares, etc. of the domestic company in excess of the shareholding threshold, etc. following the events prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (2) of that Article. 例文帳に追加

７　新保険業法第百七条第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新保険業法第二条第十二項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新保険業法第百七条第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している保険会社又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provision of Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to holding of Shares, etc. (meaning Shares, etc. as defined by Article 2(7) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a domestic company (meaning domestic company as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank and/or its Subsidiary Companies of which the total number exceeds the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. (meaning the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, the provision of Article 16-3 of the New Banking Act shall apply to such holding of Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company by deeming that the Bank and/or the Subsidiary Companies acquire, on that day, the Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company in excess of the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. by a cause provided by the main clause of Article 16-3(2) of the New Banking Act. 例文帳に追加

７　新銀行法第十六条の三第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新銀行法第二条第七項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新銀行法第十六条の三第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している銀行又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム