英和和英

名詞

Q. E. D.

1. Alternative form of Q.E.D. (“some fact or scenario that proves an argument or proposition”)
   • 1814 February, G. D. Yeats, “Account of Ann Fooks’s Case of Ischuria and Vomiting of Urine”, in Samuel Fothergill, John Want, editors, The Medical and Physical Journal, volume XXXI, part 2, number 180, London: Published for the proprietors, by J. Adlard, […]; and sold by J. Souter, […], →OCLC, page 122:

     This was exactly the Q. E. D. of the paper.

   • 1825, William Magee, “Supplement to the Remarks on the Unitarian Version of the New Testament”, in Discourses and Dissertations on the Scriptural Doctrines of Atonement & Sacrifice; […], volume II, Philadelphia, Pa.: S. Potter & Co. […]; Jesper Harding, printer, →OCLC, footnote, page 266:

     The Unitarian might therefore here easily produce his Q. E. D. for the exclusion of all but the maintainers of Christ's proper humanity from the pale of Christianity.

   • 1827, “Anglicanus” [pseudonym], “Letter III”, in View of the Character, Position, and Prospects, of the Edinburgh Bible Society. In Seven Letters, Edinburgh: Printed for Brown & Wardlaw, […]; and sold by M. Ogle, […], →OCLC, page 24:

     Whoever starts a doubt as to the validity of any of those allegations to which he has set his Q. E. D. is indicted as a disturber of the peace.

アナグラム

• DEQ

語源

From Late Latin QED, from Latin quod erat demonstrandum.

発音

• (Received Pronunciation) IPA: /ˌkjuːiːˈdiː/
• (General American) IPA: /ˌkjuˌiˈdi/

成句

Q.E.D.

1. (mathematics, dated) Initialism of quod erat demonstrandum (“what was to be proved; what was to be demonstrated”): placed at the end of a mathematical proof to show that the theorem under discussion is proved.
   • 1684 August 30, Mr. Ash, “A New and Easy Way of Demonstrating Some Propositions in Euclid”, in Philosophical Transactions: Giving Some Accompt of the Present Undertakings, Studies and Labours of the Ingenious in Many Considerable Parts of the World, volume XIV, number 162, London: Printed by T. R. for John Martyn, printer to the Royal Society; […] , →OCLC, page 674:

     [A]fter the same manner S and U are proved to be equal, therefore the square of CB is equal to the square of the 2 other sides Q E D.

   • 1803, “The Mathematical Repository, Nº 63”, in The Gentleman’s Diary, or The Mathematical Repository; an Almanack for the Year of Our Lord 1803: […], London: Printed for the Company of Stationers by Nichols and Son, […]; [a]nd sold by George Greenhill, […], →OCLC, page 33:

     Now let any right line meet four harmonicals in ${\displaystyle A}$, ${\displaystyle C}$, ${\displaystyle B}$, ${\displaystyle D}$, and if those harmonicals be parallel, the thing is evident; but, if they intersect in ${\displaystyle V}$, draw ${\displaystyle ECF}$ parallel to ${\displaystyle VD}$, the line most remote from ${\displaystyle C}$; then, by the first part, ${\displaystyle EC=CF}$, and ${\displaystyle AD:AC::VD:EC}$ or ${\displaystyle CF}$. Therefore ${\displaystyle AD:AC::BD:CB}$. q. e. d.

   • 1999, William Dunham, “Euler and Analytic Number Theory”, in Euler: The Master of Us All (The Dolciani Mathematical Expositions; 22), [Washington, D.C.]: Mathematical Association of America, →ISBN, page 64:

     By Cases 1 and 2, we see that any finite collection of ${\displaystyle 4k-1}$ primes cannot contain all such primes. Thus there are infinitely many primes of this type. ¶ Q.E.D.

2. (by extension) Used to indicate that an argument or proposition is proved by the existence of some fact or scenario.
   • 1809, Diedrich Knickerbocker [pseudonym; Washington Irving], chapter IV, in A History of New York, from the Beginning of the World to the End of the Dutch Dynasty. […], volume I, New York, N.Y.: Inskeep & Bradford, […], →OCLC, book I, page 42:

     That this part of the world has actually been peopled (Q. E. D.) to support which, we have living proofs in the numerous tribes of Indians that inhabit it.

   • 1870, Benedict de Spinoza [i.e., Baruch Spinoza], R[obert] Willis, “[The Ethics.] Part I.—Of God.”, in Benedict de Spinoza; His Life, Correspondence, and Ethics, London: Trübner & Co., […], →OCLC, page 418:

     PROP[OSITION] VI. One substance cannot be produced by another substance. ¶ Demonst[ration]. In the preceding proposition we have seen that there cannot in the nature of things be two Substances of the same attribute, or that they have anything in common (by Prop. II.); and so (by Prop. III.) one cannot be the cause of, or be produced by, another: q. e. d.

   • 1908 July, C. H. Claudy, “Tanks”, in Frank V. Chambers, editor, The Camera: An Illustrated Magazine Devoted to the Advancement of Photography, volume 12, number 7, Philadelphia, Pa.: The Camera Publishing Company, page 252:

     Of all those on the market, Eastman's is the only one with a solution tight, locking cover. ¶ Q. E. D.

使用する際の注意点

• When used to end a mathematical proof, QED is somewhat dated or traditional; modern textbooks often use the graphical symbol ∎ (the halmos or tombstone) instead. Other languages generally use a vernacular abbreviation, such as French CQFD (“ce qu'il fallait démontrer”) or Portuguese C.Q.D. (“como queríamos demonstrar”).

別の表記

• QED, Q. E. D., q. e. d., q.e.d.

関連する語

• QEF

名詞

Q.E.D. (plural Q.E.D.s)

1. A certain fact or scenario that proves an argument or proposition; a justification.
   • 1867, Ouida [pseudonym; Maria Louise Ramé], “The General’s Match-making; or, Coaches and Cousinship”, in Cecil Castlemaine’s Gage, and Other Novelettes, London: Chapman and Hall, […], →OCLC, page 233:

     We all go in for the dolce here except you, and you're such a patent machine for turning out Q.E.D.s by the dozen, that you can no more help working than the bedmaker can help taking my tea and saying the cat did it, […]

   • 1936 April, Nina Melville, “The Theatre”, in V[ictor] F[rancis] Calverton [pseudonym; George Goetz], editor, The Modern Monthly: An Independent Journal of Radical Opinion, volume IX, number 9, →OCLC, page 27, column 1:

     The same thing, I believe, that was lacking in Let Freedom Ring—lack of dramatic integration, lack of dramatic intensity, lack of all those elements, call them what you will, which make a play a play and not a tract, and certainly not a Q.E.D. thesis.

別の表記

• QED

参照

Further reading

• Q.E.D. on Wikipedia.Wikipedia

アナグラム

• DEQ