「印である」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(298ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

先行技術は，次のものからなる。 (a)書面又は口頭による開示により，実施により，又はその他の方法で，発明を主張する出願の出願日又は優先日の前に公衆の利用に供されているすべてのもの。フィリピンにおけるものでない先使用は，外国で普及していても，当該先使用が印刷文書又は有形の形式で開示されていない場合は，先行技術の一部を構成することができない。 (b)IP法第44条に基づき公開され，フィリピンにおいて出願され又は効力を有し，かつ，当該出願の出願日又は優先日より前の出願日又は優先日を有する特許出願，実用新案登録又は意匠登録の全内容。ただし，IP法第31条に基づいて先の出願の出願日を正当に主張する出願は，当該先の出願日において有効な先行技術であるものとし，かつ，双方の出願の出願人又は発明者が同一でないことを条件とする。(IP法第24条) 2以上の出願が同一の発明に関して独立して出願され，後の出願が最先の出願又は先の出願が公開される前に出願された場合は，後の出願の出願日又は優先日以後にIP法第44条に基づき公開された先の又は最先の出願の全内容は，後の出願の新規性を損なうものとする。例文帳に追加

Prior art shall consist of: (a) Everything made available to the public by means of a written or oral disclosure, by use, or in any other way, before the filing date or the priority date of the application claiming the invention. Prior use which is not present in the Philippines, even if widespread in a foreign country, cannot form part of the prior art if such prior use is not disclosed in printed documents or in any tangible form. (b) The whole contents of an application for a patent, utility model, or industrial design registration, published under Sec. 44 of IP CODE, filed or effective in the Philippines, with a filing or priority date that is earlier than the filing or priority date of the application: Provided, That the application which has validly claimed the filing date of an earlier application under Section 31 of IP CODE, shall be prior art with effect as of the filing date of such earlier application: Provided further, That the applicant or the inventor identified in both applications are not one and the same, (Sec. 24, IP CODE): Where two or more applications are independently filed with respect to the same invention, and the later applications are filed before the first application or earlier application is published, the whole contents of the first or earliest filed application published in accordance with Sec. 44, IP CODE on or after the filing date or priority date of the later filed application shall be novelty destroying with respect to the later filed application. - 特許庁

(2) 本条において， 「権限ある公務員」とは，商標に関する外国の成文法に基づき商標登録簿又はその他商標に関する記録の調製と保管の権限を当該外国政府から与えられた者又は当局をいう。 「書類」とは，次をいう。 (a) 商標に関する外国の成文法に基づき当該外国で維持管理されている商標登録簿又はその他商標記録の印刷若しくは手書きの謄本又は抄本，又は (b) 外国で商標として登録され若しくはその他承認された商標に関する何らかの事項又は行為に係るその他の書類 「商標」とは，図案，ブランド，標題，ラベル，チケット，名称，署名，語，文字，数字又はそれらの組合せであって，当該商品又はサービスと所有者又は登録使用者として当該商標を(当該外国において)使用する権利を有する者との間の業としての関係を，その者の身元の表示の有無に拘らず，表示する目的で若しくは表示するために，何らかの商品又はサービスに関して使用されており若しくは使用される予定であり，かつ，(商標に関する当該外国の成文法に基づいて)当該外国で商標として登録され若しくはその他承認されているものをいう。ただし，当該外国において，他の外国との相互主義に基づく協定により当該外国が登録し又はその他承認している他の外国の商標を含まない。例文帳に追加

(2) For the purpose of this section . “authorised officer” means a person or authority authorised by the government of the foreign state to keep and maintain a register or other record of trade marks under any written law in force in the foreign state relating to trade marks; “document” means - (a) a printed or written copy of or, extract from, the Register or other records of trade marks kept and maintained in the foreign state under any written law in force in the foreign state relating to trade marks; or (b) any other document pertaining to any matter or act in relation to trade marks registered in or otherwise recognised by the foreign state as trade marks; “trade mark” means any device, brand, heading, label, ticket, name, signature, word, letter, numeral or any combination thereof which is used or proposed to be used in relation to goods or services for the purpose of indicating or so as to indicate a connection in the course of trade between the goods or services and a person having the right either as proprietor or as registered user to use the trade mark (in the foreign state) whether with or without any indication of the identity of that person and which is registered or otherwise recognised by the foreign state as a trade mark (under any written law in force in the foreign state relating to trade marks) but does not include the trade marks of another foreign state registered in or otherwise recognised by the foreign state by virtue of a reciprocal arrangement between the foreign state and that other foreign state. - 特許庁

前掲東京地裁平成１３年７月２５日判決は、「法４６条４号に該当するか否かについては、著作物を利用した書籍等の体裁及び内容、著作物の利用態様、利用目的などを客観的に考慮して、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する例外的な場合に当たるといえるか否か検討すべきことになる。」とし、「被告書籍は、幼児向けに、写真を用いて、町を走る各種自動車を解説する目的で作られた書籍であり、合計２４種類の自動車について、その外観及び役割などが説明されていること、各種自動車の写真を幼児が見ることを通じて、観察力を養い、勉強の基礎になる好奇心を高めるとの幼児教育的観点から監修されていると解されること、表紙及び本文１４頁の掲載方法は、右の目的に照らして、格別不自然な態様とはいえないので、本件書籍を見る者は、本文で紹介されている各種自動車の一例として、本件バスが掲載されているとの印象を受けると考えられること等の事情を総合すると、原告作品が描かれた本件バスの写真を被告書籍に掲載し、これを販売することは、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する行為には、該当しないというべきである。」として著作権法第46条第４号の要件を充たさないとした。例文帳に追加

In the City Bus case the Tokyo District Court July 25, 2001 ruled that "whether or not Article 46, Item 4 is applicable should depend on whether the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or the reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. In order to determine this, circumstances such as the formalities, the contents, the manner and method of use of the publication should be objectively examined." In light of these criteria, the judgment further held that "the Defendant's book is a publication edited for the purpose of explaining to children various types of vehicles running on the street by using their photographs. It provides an explanation on the exterior and role of each of the 24 types of vehicles in total. This book is edited from the viewpoint of pre-school education in that children are expected to develop their observation skills as well as curiosity, which will in the future become a basis for learning. The method of inserting the picture in the cover page and page 14 is not unnatural in light of the purpose of this publication. Considering that the viewers of this book will have the impression that the photograph of the bus is placed on various pages as an the example of the diverse vehicles referred to in the body text of the book, the act of selling a book which includes a photograph of the bus with the plaintiff's work shall not fall under the relevant criteria as previously descirbed; the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or such reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. Therefore, such act does not fulfill the conditions required under Article 46, Item 4 of the Copyright Law.  - 経済産業省

生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造（ツクリカタメ）なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。例文帳に追加

Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス