この志望理由書は、論旨の展開に一貫性が無く、散漫な印象です。の英語

This statement-of-purpose essay has no consistency in how the points are laid out and gives a distracted impression.

Any doubts about the validity of this argument are promptly forgotten once we see the data.

Tom's translation is too focused on the rhythm of English translation, and ignores the nuances of the original.

The hidden premise may make it difficult to communicate the writer's intention.

The author tries to compare and contrast timelessness and impermanence.

It cannot plausibly be argued that behaviour of such complexity derives entirely from instinct.

the attraction of the book is precisely its narrowness of focus

This is considered off the main career path for ambitious police officers.

The interpretation of this data, however, is very much in dispute.

The result of this experiment is obscured by the extra variables added in the formula.

The manuscript is a very important discovery because it shows the development of Beethoven's composing.

at first blush the idea possesses considerable intuitive appeal but on closer examination it fails

It is beyond the scope of this paper to argue the input theory in detail.

Perhaps this explanation is one of the most important points of this essay.

In this paper I would like to examine the notion of "dyad style" and its influence on fine arts.

The purpose of this chapter is to examine a number of closely related problems.

This explanation is perhaps one of the most important points of this essay.

Is this explanation indeed one of the most important points of this essay?

the very capaciousness of the idea meant that agreement on fundamentals was unnecessary

These answers confuse cause with consequence.

It seemed obvious to me that the plan needed a few revisions.

The various sides still remain far apart on the bridge issue.

The bug was caused by an elementary error in programming constructs. Well, it was just a trivial error.

the author's elusiveness may at times be construed as evasiveness

Smith's approach differs greatly from others in that he did not take the affixation into consideration.

It is not clear whether Lander intended to alter Emmet's style from the beginning.

Basic to the argument is the assumption that the rules in question are present in the language.

But this claim is emphatically not the one that Dennett is making.

prophetic texts so enigmatic that their meaning has been disputed for centuries

I must point out that we need to clarify the meaning of this over-used concept.