「of the King」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(31ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

In September 252, the king of Paekche, met Nagahiko CHIKUMA, an envoy from Japan, and gave him one seven-pronged sword, one nanatsuko no kagami (a mirror with seven small decoration mirrors), and various other treasures, hoping to form a friendship ("Nihonshoki," from the article dated September 252 during the reign of Empress Jingu). 例文帳に追加

五十二年秋九月丁卯朔丙子久氐等從千熊長彥詣之　則獻七枝刀一口七子鏡一面及種種重寶仍啟曰臣國以西有水源出自谷那鐵山其邈七日行之不及當飲是水便取是山鐵以永奉聖朝乃謂孫枕流王曰今我所通東海貴國是天所啟是以垂天恩割海西而賜我由是國基永固汝當善脩和好聚斂土物奉貢不絕雖死何恨自是後每年相續朝貢焉（『日本書紀』神功皇后摂政五十二年九月の条） - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

According to this High Court judgment, although due criticism of, comments on, and introduction of activities for public entertainment performed by a personality should be respected in light of the freedom of expression, the act of selling, under the pretext of the freedom of expression, a publication for commercial purposes that includes a photograph (an image etc.) of or comments on such personality without his/her consent thereto should be beyond the scope of his/her due activities involving the matters pertaining to the freedom of expression. The judgment further argues that the object matter of the expression (a magazine with photos) should be much less valued than that (a published book) in the King Crimson Case and concluded that such magazine is not worthy of being protected on the ground of the freedom of expression. It would appear that this judgment has led to a slightly different approach that does not necessarily place emphasis on the protection of the freedom of expression. 例文帳に追加

同高裁判決は、芸能活動への正当な批判や批評、紹介については、表現の自由として尊重されなければならないとする一方、表現の自由の名のもとに、当該芸能人に無断で商業的な利用目的でその芸能人の写真（肖像等）や記述を掲載した出版物を販売することは、正当な表現活動の範囲を逸脱するものと述べており、対象とされた表現行為（写真掲載雑誌）の価値をキングクリムゾン高裁判決（出版書籍）に比べ著しく低く、表現の自由の保護に値しないとしており、この判断が（表現の自由の保護に比重を大きく置かない）上記判示につながったものと考えられる。 - 経済産業省

Tokyo District Court judgment dated June 14, 2005 (p.135 of Hanrei Jiho No. 1917) states that, "However, the actual method of use of self-identifying information is diverse varies, for analysis of whether or not it should constitute an infringement of rights and remedies thereto, the interests of both parties must be specifically balanced in view of the conflicting interests such as the freedom of expression and commercial activities, and so emphasis should not be placed too much on the predominance of moral rights. More specifically, the contents and nature, the purpose and method of use of self-identifying information, and the significance of damages incurred by the individuals there from should be comprehensively examined." This case argues that, for determining whether or not the publicity rights have been infringed, such publicity rights should be specifically balanced with a broader range of rights, not limited to the freedom of expression, while the King Crimson Case focused solely on the "freedom of expression" as the only conflicting interest. 例文帳に追加

東京地裁平成１７年６月１４日判決・判時１９１７号１３５頁は、「しかしながら、実際に生じ得る個人の同一性に関する情報の使用の態様は千差万別であるから、権利侵害の成否及びその救済方法の検討に当たっては、人格権の支配権たる性格を過度に強調することなく、表現の自由や経済活動の自由などの対立利益をも考慮した個別的利益衡量が不可欠であり、使用された個人の同一性に関する情報の内容・性質、使用目的、使用態様、これにより個人に与える損害の程度等を総合的に勘案して判断する必要があるものと解される。」と述べ、パブリシティ権侵害の成否の判断において、キングクリムゾン高裁判決が「表現の自由」のみを対立利益としていたのに対し、表現の自由の場合に限定しない、より一般的な個別的な利益衡量が必要であることを認めている。 - 経済産業省

In its judgment dated April 26, 2006, the Tokyo High Court (appeal trial judgment for the Bubka Idol case) stated that "it is not appropriate to argue that publicity rights and matters pertaining to infringement thereof shall be and superseded by the protection of freedom of expression simply because it is a publication Instead, the infringement of publicity rights should be analyzed, in consideration of the protection of freedom of expression in the sale of the publication, based on the circumstances such as the reputation, evaluation in the society, name recognition etc, whether the publication contributed to the promotion of its sale, and whether the utilization of such publication should be considered as an unauthorized utilization for commercial purposes." The approach taken by this judgment was slightly different from that consistently held since the King Crimson Case, which focused on whether the infringer "solely" utilized the celebrity's power to attract the customers' attention. 例文帳に追加

もっとも、平成１８年４月２６日東京高裁判決（いわゆるブブカアイドル事件控訴審判決）は、「出版物であるとの一事をもって、表現の自由による保護が優先し、パブリシティ権の権利侵害が生じないと解するのは正当ではなく、当該出版物の販売と表現の自由の保障の関係を顧慮しながら、当該著名な芸能人の名声、社会的評価、知名度等、そしてその肖像等が出版物の販売、促進のために認められたか否か、その肖像等の利用が無断の商業的利用に該当するかどうかを検討することによって判断するのが正当である。」として、「専ら」顧客吸引力に着眼したか否か、というキングクリムゾン高裁判決後に踏襲されてきた立場とは若干異なる判示をした 。 - 経済産業省

Assuming from the high possibility of large kofun (tumulus) being a tomb of leader (great king) of the time by the chronological order of kofun and others, the following kofun tumulus show there was a sovereignty in this region (present day Sakurai City and Tenri City): Yamato-kofun Tumulus Clusters and Yanagimoto Otsuka Tumulus built at the foot of the Mt. Miwa, in the southeast of Nara basin in the early Kofun period (from about the middle of the third century to the early fourth century), and large scattered kofun with the hill length of 300 meters to 200 meters such as Shibutani Mukoyama-kofun Tumulus (identified as a mausoleum of Emperor Keiko), Hashihaka-kofun Tumulus (surmised by some researchers to be a grave of Himiko), Andonyama-kofun Tumulus (identified as a mausoleum of Emperor Sujin), Mesuriyama-kofun Tumulus, and Nishitonotsuka-kofun Tumulus (identified as the grave of Tashiraka no Himemiko). 例文帳に追加

古墳の編年などから大型古墳はその時代の盟主（大王）の墳墓である可能性が高いことなどから推測すると、古墳時代の前期（3世紀の中葉から4世紀の初期）に奈良盆地の東南部の三輪山山麓に大和古墳群・柳本大塚が展開し、渋谷向山古墳（景行陵に比定）、箸墓古墳（卑弥呼の墓と推測する研究者もいる）、行燈山古墳（崇神陵に比定）、メスリ山古墳、西殿塚古墳（手白香皇女墓と比定）などの墳丘長が300から200メートルある大古墳が点在し、この地方（現桜井市や天理市）に王権があったことがわかる。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス