取締役の報告義務の英語

検討中の会社法改正においては、取締役の義務を上記のような考え方を反映して明確化することが予定されているとともに、こうした長期的な価値創造を企業が達成しているかどうかを評価するための仕組みとして、従来の財務関連報告書に加えて、「企業活動財務報告書（ Operating and Financial Review）」を企業が作成・開示することが検討されている。例文帳に追加

In the reform in corporate law under consideration, obligations of board directors are set to be clarified to reflect the above-described line of thinking. Also, as a mechanism to assess the achievement of such long-term value creation by companies, the preparation and disclosure of the "Operating and Financial Review (OFR)" are under study, on top of conventional financial reports.] - 経済産業省

２　銀行の取締役又は執行役が当該銀行から信用の供与を受ける場合における会社法第三百六十五条第一項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定により読み替えて適用する同法第三百五十六条第一項（競業及び利益相反取引の制限）の規定及び同法第四百十九条第二項（執行役の監査委員に対する報告義務等）において準用する同法第三百五十六条第一項の規定による取締役会の承認に対する同法第三百六十九条第一項（取締役会の決議）の規定の適用については、同項中「その過半数（これを上回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合以上）」とあるのは、「その三分の二（これを上回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に当たる多数」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) With regard to the application of the provisions of Article 369(1) (Resolution of Board of Directors Meetings) of the Companies Act to approval by the board of directors under the provisions of Article 356(1) (Restrictions on Competition and Conflicting Interest Transactions) of that Act applied by the reading of terms pursuant to Article 365(1) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with Board of Directors) of that Act and under the provisions of Article 356(1) of that Act as applied mutates mutandis pursuant to Article 419(2) (Executive Officer's Duty to Report to Audit Committee Members) of that Act in the case of granting of credit by a Bank to a director or executive officer of that Bank, the phrase "The Majority (in cases where a higher proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion or more)" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Majority of at Least Two-Thirds (in cases where a higher proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)."発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八十五条　会社法第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の代表取締役について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は特定目的会社の職務代行者について、同法第三百五十四条（表見代表取締役）の規定は特定目的会社について、同法第三百五十五条（忠実義務）及び第三百五十七条第一項（取締役の報告義務）の規定は特定目的会社の取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十五条中「法令及び定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画及び定款」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 85 The provisions of Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)(a) and (c)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Director of a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an acting representative for a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 354 (Apparent Representative Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 355 (Duty of Loyalty) and Article 357(1) (Director's Duty to Report) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "laws and regulations, the articles of incorporation" and "shareholders meeting" in Article 355 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, the articles of incorporation" and "general meeting of members," respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第八十条及び第八十二条から第八十四条まで並びに会社法第三百五十四条（表見代表取締役）、第三百五十五条（忠実義務）、第三百五十七条第一項（取締役の報告義務）、第四百八十四条（清算株式会社についての破産手続の開始）及び第四百八十五条（裁判所の選任する清算人の報酬）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の清算人（第八十四条の規定については、第百六十七条第三項から第六項までの規定により裁判所が選任したものを除く。）について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十四条中「社長、副社長その他株式会社を代表する権限を有するものと認められる名称」とあるのは「清算特定目的会社を代表する権限を有するものと認められる名称」と、同法第三百五十五条中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第三百五十七条第一項中「株主（監査役設置会社にあっては、監査役）」とあるのは「監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 80 and Article 82 to Article 84 inclusive of this Act and Article 354 (Apparent Representative Director), Article 355 (Duty of Loyalty), Article 357(1) (Director's Duty to Report), Article 484 (Commencement of Bankruptcy Procedures for Liquidating Stock Companies), and Article 485 (Remuneration for Liquidators Appointed by the Court) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidators (with regard to the provisions of Article 84, liquidators appointed by the court pursuant to the provisions of Article 167(3) to (6) inclusive shall be excluded) of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "the title of president, vice president or other title regarded as having authority to represent the Stock Company" in Article 354 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the title of the person who is found to have the authority to represent the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 355 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "the shareholders (or, for a Company with Auditors, the company auditors)" in Article 357(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company auditors," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の二十　会社法第三百八十二条から第三百八十八条まで（取締役への報告義務、取締役会への出席義務等、株主総会に対する報告義務、監査役による取締役の行為の差止め、監査役設置会社と取締役との間の訴えにおける会社の代表、監査役の報酬等、費用等の請求）の規定は、相互会社の監査役について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百八十三条第一項中「第三百七十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十六において準用する第三百七十三条第一項」と、同条第二項中「第三百六十六条第一項ただし書」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十六において準用する第三百六十六条第一項ただし書」と、同条第四項中「第三百七十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十六において準用する第三百七十三条第二項」と、同法第三百八十六条第一項中「第三百四十九条第四項、第三百五十三条及び第三百六十四条」とあり、及び同条第二項中「第三百四十九条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十五において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」と、同項第一号中「第八百四十七条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百四十七条第一項」と、同項第二号中「第八百四十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百四十九条第三項」と、「第八百五十条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百五十条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-20 The provisions of Article 382 to 388 inclusive (Duty to Report to Directors, Duty to Attend Board of Directors Meetings, Duty to Report to Shareholders Meetings, Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Company Auditors, Representation of Company in Actions between Company with Auditors and Directors, Remunerations for Company Auditors, Requests for Indemnification of Expenses) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the company auditors of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "Article 373, paragraph (1)" in Article 383, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 373, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-16 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "proviso to Article 366, paragraph (1)" in Article 383, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "proviso to Article 366, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-16 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 373, paragraph (2)" in Article 383, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 373, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-16 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 349, paragraph (4), Article 353 and Article 364" in Article 386, paragraph (1) of that Act and the term "Article 349, paragraph (4)" in Article 386, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 847, paragraph (1)" in Article 386, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 847, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the terms "Article 849, paragraph (3)" and "Article 850, paragraph (2)" in Article 386, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 849, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 850, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百十八条　特定目的会社が中間配当をした場合において、当該中間配当をした日の属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る計算書類につき第百四条第二項の承認を受けた時（同条第四項前段に規定する場合にあっては、同項後段の報告をした時）における第百十四条第一項第二号から第四号までに掲げる額の合計額が同項第一号に掲げる額を超えるときは、当該中間配当に関する職務を行った取締役は、当該特定目的会社に対し、連帯して、その超過額（当該超過額が当該中間配当の分配金の額を超える場合にあっては、当該分配金の額）を支払う義務を負う。ただし、当該取締役がその職務を行うについて注意を怠らなかったことを証明した場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 118 In cases where a Specific Purpose Company makes Payments of Interim Dividends, when the sum of the amounts listed in Article 114(1)(ii) to (iv) inclusive exceeds the amount listed in Article 114(1)(i) as of the time when the Specific Purpose Company has obtained approval under Article 104(2) for the Financial Statements pertaining to the business year (if the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year) (in the case referred to in the first sentence of Article 104(4), the time when the report under the second sentence of that paragraph has been made) that contains the date on which said Payments of Interim Dividends were made, the directors who performed the duties related to said Payments of Interim Dividends shall jointly and severally have an obligation to pay such excess amount (in cases where said excess amount exceeds the amount of Cash Distributions of said Payments of Interim Dividends, said amount of Cash Distributions) to said Specific Purpose Company; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where said director has proved that he/she did not fail to exercise due diligence in performing his/her duties.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　特定目的会社が第二項の特定出資の取得をした場合において、当該取得をした日の属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度（各事業年度に係る第百二条第二項に規定する計算書類につき第百四条第二項の承認を受けた場合（同条第四項前段に規定する場合にあっては、同項後段の報告をした場合）における当該各事業年度のうち最も遅いものをいう。以下同じ。）でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る第百二条第二項に規定する計算書類につき第百四条第二項の承認を受けた時（同条第四項前段に規定する場合にあっては、同項後段の報告をした時）における第百十四条第一項第二号から第四号までに掲げる額の合計額が同項第一号に掲げる額を超えるときは、当該取得に関する職務を行った取締役は、当該特定目的会社に対し、連帯して、その超過額（当該超過額が当該特定出資の取得により特定社員に対して交付した金銭の総額を超える場合にあっては、当該金銭の総額）を支払う義務を負う。ただし、当該取締役がその職務を行うについて注意を怠らなかったことを証明した場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

(4) In cases where a Specific Purpose Company acquires the Specified Equity set forth in paragraph (2), if the total sum of the amounts listed in Article 114(1)(ii) to (iv) inclusive as of the time when the approval set forth in Article 104(2) has been obtained (in the case prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (4) of that Article, the time when the report set forth in the second sentence of that paragraph has been made) with respect to the financial statements prescribed in Article 102(2) pertaining to the business year that contains the date of said acquisition (if the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the Most Recent Business Year (the latest of the business years for which approval under Article 104(2) has been obtained (in the case prescribed in the first sentence of paragraph (4) of that Article, the time when the report set forth in the second sentence of that paragraph has been made) with respect to the financial statements prescribed in Article 102(2) relating to each business year; the same shall apply hereinafter), the business year immediately preceding such business year) exceeds the amount set forth in Article 114(1)(i), the directors who performed duties in relation to the acquisition shall jointly and severally have an obligation to pay such excess amount (in cases where such excess amount exceeds the total amount of monies delivered to Specified Members as a result of the acquisition of said Specified Equity, the total amount of such monies) to said Specific Purpose Company; provided, however, that this shall not apply to any director who proves that he/she did not fail to exercise due care with respect to the performance of his/her duties.発音を聞く  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム