「In one day's time」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(4ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 66-4-2 (1) Where a domestic corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (including the cases where a foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the competent authority of the other Contracting State which is related to the foreign corporation), the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十六条の四の二　内国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合（外国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき当該外国法人に係る条約相手国の権限ある当局に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合を含む。）には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、これらの申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（これらの申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、これらの申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

If protection of an invention in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg is sought by means of an international application for which the Service acts as designated Office or elected Office, the owner shall be required, prior to expiry of the time limit applicable in accordance with Article 22 or 39 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty, to pay the due national fees as if it were a national application that had been filed on the same day as the international application and to provide all information and documents that would be required in relation to a regularly filed national application. If the international application has not been published by the International Bureau in German or French, the owner shall also be required to file within the same time limit a translation into one of those two languages.例文帳に追加

ルクセンブルク大公国における出願の保護を庁が指定官庁又は選択官庁として行動する国際出願によって受けようとする場合は，特許権者は，特許協力条約第22条又は第39条に従って適用される期間の満了前に，それが国際出願と同日に出願した国内特許であるかのように納付を要する国内手数料を納付し，かつ，正規の国内出願に関してならば必要とされる筈の情報及び書類をすべて提出しなければならない。国際出願が国際事務局によってドイツ語又はフランス語で公開されなかった場合は，特許権者はまた，それら2言語の1への翻訳文も同一期限内に提出しなければならない。 - 特許庁

(2) With regard to a business cooperative or a minor business cooperative which is already a specified mutual aid association (limited to one engaged in the activities of reinsurance or retrocession) prescribed in Article 9-2, paragraph (7) of the New Cooperatives Act or a federation of cooperatives which is already a specified federation of mutual aid associations (limited to one engaged in the activities of reinsurance or retrocession) prescribed in Article 9-2, paragraph (4) of the New Cooperatives Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act whose total amount of contribution is less than thirty million yen, the provisions of Article 25, paragraph (2) of the New Cooperatives Act shall not apply until the day on which five years have elapsed from the enforcement date. 例文帳に追加

２　この法律の施行の際現に新協同組合法第九条の二第七項に規定する特定共済組合（再共済又は再再共済の事業を行うものに限る。）に該当する事業協同組合若しくは事業協同小組合又は新協同組合法第九条の九第四項に規定する（再共済又は再再共済の事業を行うものに限る。）に該当する協同組合連合会であってその出資の総額が三千万円に満たないものについては、新協同組合法第二十五条第二項の規定は、施行日から起算して五年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) The application shall relate to one invention only or to a group of inventions forming a single general inventive concept. (Sec. 38.1, IP CODE) (b) If several independent inventions which do not form a single general inventive concept are claimed in one application, the Director may require that the application be restricted to a single invention. A later application filed for an invention divided out shall be considered as having been filed on the same day as the first application: Provided that the later application is filed within four months after the requirement to divide becomes final, or within such additional time, not exceeding four months, as may be granted. Provided further, That each divisional application shall not go beyond the disclosure in the initial application. (Sec. 38.2, IP CODE)例文帳に追加

(a)出願は，1の発明又は単一の発明概念を形成する1群の発明についてのみ行う。(IP法第38条(38.1)) (b)単一の発明概念を形成しない複数の独立した発明が1の出願においてクレームされている場合は，局長は，当該出願を単一の発明に限定するよう要求することができる。分割した発明についてなされる後の出願は，最初の出願と同一の日に出願されたものとみなす。ただし，分割の要求が確定した後4月以内又は4月を超えない範囲で認められる追加期間内に後の出願がなされることを条件とする。更に，各分割出願が当初の出願における開示の範囲を超えないことを条件とする。(IP法第38条(38.2)) - 特許庁

Article 15 A cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or a cooperative other than one engaged in mutual aid activities (excluding a credit cooperative and a federation of cooperatives engaged in the activities set forth in Article 9-9, paragraph (1), item (i) of the New Cooperatives Act) which is already investing the surplus funds that were accrued during the course of its activities by a method other than the methods prescribed in Article 57-5 of the New Cooperatives Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act and whose total number of partner (partner of the member cooperatives in the case of a federation of cooperatives) exceeds the standard specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 35, paragraph (6) of the New Cooperatives Act shall dispose of its assets pertaining to said investment by the day on which three years have elapsed from the enforcement date. 例文帳に追加

第十五条　この法律の施行の際現に新協同組合法第五十七条の五に規定する方法以外でその業務上の余裕金を運用する共済事業を行う協同組合及び共済事業を行う協同組合以外の協同組合（信用協同組合及び新協同組合法第九条の九第一項第一号の事業を行う協同組合連合会を除く。）であって組合員（協同組合連合会にあっては、会員たる組合の組合員）の総数が新協同組合法第三十五条第六項の政令で定める基準を超えるものは、施行日から起算して三年を経過する日までの間に当該運用に係る資産を処分しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (hereinafter referred to as the "New Order") exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Order"), the standard amount for said Futures Commission Merchant prescribed in Article 49, paragraph (1) of the Act shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Former Order, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Effective Date"), notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the New Order. 例文帳に追加

２　この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法（以下「法」という。）第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令（以下「新令」という。）第五条に定める額が改正前の商品取引所法施行令（以下「旧令」という。）第五条に定める額を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日（以下「施行日」という。）から一年間は、新令第五条の規定にかかわらず、旧令第五条に定める額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 52-4 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 52-2(1), a Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company (limited to one that has obtained a license set forth in Article 3 or Article 53(1) of the Trust Business Act) or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference Date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Bank or Bank Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の四　銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を営む者に限る。）、信託会社（信託業法第三条又は第五十三条第一項の免許を受けたものに限る。）その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である銀行又は銀行持株会社の営業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情をして内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る銀行議決権保有届出書は、第五十二条の二第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となつた基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であつて、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph (1) of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision. 例文帳に追加

２　この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph 1 of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision. 例文帳に追加

この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 経済産業省

Article 271-5 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 271-3, paragraph (1), A Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company, or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Insurance Company or Insurance Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Act) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister by stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二百七十一条の五　銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を行う者に限る。）、信託会社その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である保険会社又は保険持株会社の事業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る保険議決権保有届出書は、第二百七十一条の三第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となった基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であって、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

Article 212 (1) A person who pays a nonresident, in Japan, domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-2 to (xii) (in the case where the nonresident falls under the category listed in Article 164(1)(iv) (Nonresidents Having No Permanent Establishments in Japan): limited to domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (xii), and excluding that specified by a Cabinet Order) or a person who pays a foreign corporation, in Japan, domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-2 to (vii) or (ix) to (xii) (in the case where the foreign corporation falls under the category listed in Article 141(iv) of the Corporation Tax Act (Foreign Corporations Having No Permanent Establishments in Japan): limited to domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (vii) or (ix) to (xii), and excluding the one that falls under the provision of Article 180(1) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Domestic Source Income Received by Foreign Corporations Having Permanent Establishments in Japan) or Article 180-2(1) or (2) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest, etc. on Trust Property) and that specified by a Cabinet Order) shall, at the time of payment, collect income tax with respect to the said domestic source income, and pay it to the State no later than the tenth day of the month following the month that includes the date of collection. 例文帳に追加

第二百十二条　非居住者に対し国内において第百六十一条第一号の二から第十二号まで（国内源泉所得）に掲げる国内源泉所得（その非居住者が第百六十四条第一項第四号（国内に恒久的施設を有しない非居住者）に掲げる者である場合には第百六十一条第一号の三から第十二号までに掲げるものに限るものとし、政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払をする者又は外国法人に対し国内において同条第一号の二から第七号まで若しくは第九号から第十二号までに掲げる国内源泉所得（その外国法人が法人税法第百四十一条第四号（国内に恒久的施設を有しない外国法人）に掲げる者である場合には第百六十一条第一号の三から第七号まで又は第九号から第十二号までに掲げるものに限るものとし、第百八十条第一項（国内に恒久的施設を有する外国法人の受ける国内源泉所得に係る課税の特例）又は第百八十条の二第一項若しくは第二項（信託財産に係る利子等の課税の特例）の規定に該当するもの及び政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払をする者は、その支払の際、これらの国内源泉所得について所得税を徴収し、その徴収の日の属する月の翌月十日までに、これを国に納付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents. 例文帳に追加

(1)を制限することなく，同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し，本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して，又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して，制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること，及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に，宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として，本法に基づいて，宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために，かつ，それに関して規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること，及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で，登録簿への記入の補正のために，かつ，その補正に関連して規定を制定すること，及びある者に対し，本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に，登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず，1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること，及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し，出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を，登録官に付与すること，規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること，及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること，及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること，及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め，本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために，かつ，それに関連して規定を制定すること，及び当該期間の延長について定めること，及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に，必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること，及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて)，1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること，及び本法又は規則の適用上，電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること，及び登録官に対し，登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する，公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること，及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること - 特許庁