「application code」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(17ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

By analogy to the relationship between a supermarket and its tenant, in the relationship between a cybermall operator and a cyber shop if (i) an appearance exists which caused the customer of the cyber shop to unavoidably mistake the cybermall operator as the seller; (ii) the cybermall operator is complicit in the presentation of the aforementioned appearance; and (iii) the customer had misidentified the identity of its operator without gross negligence when the customer conducted the transaction, then the cybermall operator could be held responsible through the analogical application of Article 14 of the Commercial Code. 例文帳に追加

スーパーマーケットとそのテナントの関係と、モールとその店舗の関係は同一ではないが、一定の類似性があることから、モールにおいても、①店舗の営業がモール運営者の営業であると一般のモール利用者が誤認するのもやむを得ない外観が存在し、②当該外観の作出にモール運営者に帰責事由があり、③当該モール利用者が重大な過失無くして営業主を誤認して取引をした場合には、商法第１４条の類推適用によりモール運営者が責任を負う場合もあり得るものと解される。 - 経済産業省

(3) In addition to what is provided for in the preceding paragraph, in the case set forth in the same paragraph, with regard to the application of the provisions of the Organized Crime Punishment Act during the period until the day preceding the effective date of the Act for Partial Revision of the Penal Code, etc. for Coping with Internationalization and Organization of Crimes and Advancement of Information Processing, the crime of Article 157 (aggravated breach of trust of directors, etc.) of the Old Intermediate Corporation Act in the case where the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 457 shall be deemed to be the crime set forth in item 62 of the appended table of the Organized Crime Punishment Act. 例文帳に追加

３ 前項に規定するもののほか、同項の場合において、犯罪の国際化及び組織化並びに情報処理の高度化に対処するための刑法等の一部を改正する法律の施行の日の前日までの間における組織的犯罪処罰法の規定の適用については、第四百五十七条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされている場合における旧中間法人法第百五十七条（理事等の特別背任）の罪は、組織的犯罪処罰法別表第六十二号に掲げる罪とみなす。 - 経済産業省

(v) the filing of a final appeal or a petition for acceptance of a final appeal, or the filing of an appeal under the provisions of Article 330 or Article 336, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure or a petition for permission to appeal under the provisions of Article 337, paragraph (2) of the Code of Civil Procedure which are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 25 of the Non-Contentious Case Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 42, paragraph (1) of the Land and Building Lease Act, against a judicial decision made on a petition or application set forth in the preceding item: the fact that a judicial decision of dismissal without prejudice made by the court of prior instance (in the case of the filing of a petition for permission to appeal, the court with which such petition has been filed; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) has become final and binding, or the withdrawal prior to the court of prior instance sending the case to the final appellate court or the court in charge of the appeal. 例文帳に追加

五　上告の提起若しくは上告受理の申立て又は前号の申立て若しくは申出についての裁判に対する借地借家法第四十二条第一項において準用する非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第二十五条において準用する民事訴訟法第三百三十条若しくは第三百三十六条第一項の規定による抗告の提起若しくは第三百三十七条第二項の規定による抗告の許可の申立て　原裁判所（抗告の許可の申立てにあつては、その申立てを受けた裁判所。以下この号において同じ。）における却下の裁判の確定又は原裁判所が上告裁判所若しくは抗告裁判所に事件を送付する前における取下げ - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 209 The provisions of Article 186 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance), Article 187 (Prepayment of Expenses in Cases of Filing Final Appeal), Article 189 (Service of Written Notice of the Filing of Final Appeal, etc.), Article 192 (Indication of Precedents), Article 193 (Manner in Which Reasons for Final Appeal Should be Stated), Article 195 (Number of Copies of Document Stating Reasons for Final Appeal), Article 196 (Order to Correct) and paragraph (1) of Article 199 (Petition for Acceptance of Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petition set forth in paragraph (2) of Article 337 (Appeal with Permission) of the Code, the provision of Article 200 (Order to Accept Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases of giving permission under the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 337 of the Code, and the provision of the preceding Article (Special Appeal against Ruling to the Supreme Court) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where permission was given under the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 337 of the Code. In this case, the term "written notice of the filing of a final appeal" in Article 187 and Article 189 shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice of a petition for permission for an appeal against ruling." 例文帳に追加

第二百九条　第百八十六条（控訴の規定の準用）、第百八十七条（上告提起の場合における費用の予納）、第百八十九条（上告提起通知書の送達等）、第百九十二条（判例の摘示）、第百九十三条（上告理由の記載の仕方）、第百九十五条（上告理由を記載した書面の通数）、第百九十六条（補正命令）及び第百九十九条（上告受理の申立て）第一項の規定は、法第三百三十七条（許可抗告）第二項の申立てについて、第二百条（上告受理の決定）の規定は、法第三百三十七条第二項の規定による許可をする場合について、前条（特別抗告）の規定は、法第三百三十七条第二項の規定による許可があった場合について準用する。この場合において、第百八十七条及び第百八十九条中「上告提起通知書」とあるのは、「抗告許可申立て通知書」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Articles 27 and 37 of this Act, Articles 104-3 to 105-2, 105-4 to 105-6 and 106 of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 39 of this Act, and Articles paragraphs (3) to (6) of Article 168 of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 56(1) of this Act and Articles 719 and 724(Tort) of the Civil Code shall apply mutatis mutandis to the exercise of the right to claim under paragraph (1). In this case, where prior to the registration of the establishment of the trademark right, the person having the right to claim becomes aware of the fact that the trademark in connection with the application for trademark registration is used, and the identity of the person using the trademark, the term "the time when the injured party or his/her legal representative becomes aware of such damage, and of the person responsible therefor" in Article 724 of the said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "the date of the registration of the establishment of the trademark right." 例文帳に追加

５　第二十七条、第三十七条、第三十九条において準用する特許法第百四条の三から第百五条の二まで、第百五条の四から第百五条の六まで及び第百六条、第五十六条第一項において準用する特許法第百六十八条第三項から第六項まで並びに民法第七百十九条及び第七百二十四条（不法行為）の規定は、第一項の規定による請求権を行使する場合に準用する。この場合において、当該請求権を有する者が商標権の設定の登録前に当該商標登録出願に係る商標の使用の事実及びその使用をした者を知つたときは、同条中「被害者又はその法定代理人が損害及び加害者を知った時」とあるのは、「商標権の設定の登録の日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 147 The provisions of Article 137 to the preceding Article (Request for Examination of Documentary Evidence, etc.; Attaching of Translation, etc.; Period for Submission of Copy of Documentary Evidence; Method of Filing Petition for Order to Submit Document, etc.; Retention of Presented Document; Record of Examination of Evidence by Authorized Judge, etc.; Method of Submission, etc. of Document; Handling in Cases where Request for Examination of Documentary Evidence was Made for Transcription of Audio Tape, etc.; Clear Indication of Reason in Cases of Denying Authenticity of Creation of Document; and Record, etc. pertaining to Document, etc. to be Used for Comparison of Handwriting, etc.) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the objects prescribed in Article 231 (Application Mutatis Mutandis to Objects Equivalent to Documents) of the Code, except as otherwise provided. 例文帳に追加

第百四十七条　第百三十七条から前条まで（書証の申出等、訳文の添付等、書証の写しの提出期間、文書提出命令の申立ての方式等、提示文書の保管、受命裁判官等の証拠調べの調書、文書の提出等の方法、録音テープ等の反訳文書の書証の申出があった場合の取扱い、文書の成立を否認する場合における理由の明示及び筆跡等の対照の用に供すべき文書等に係る調書等）の規定は、特別の定めがある場合を除き、法第二百三十一条（文書に準ずる物件への準用）に規定する物件について準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24 (1) Prefectural governors may designate no more than one organization per prefecture as a prefectural promotion center for climate change action (hereinafter referred to as "Prefectural Centers for Climate Change Action") upon application by that organization, providing that the organization was established for the purpose of promoting activities to contribute to the prevention of global warming by means such as education concerning global warming countermeasures, that the organization is recognized as capable of appropriately and reliably performing the operations prescribed in Paragraph (2) below, and that it is either a corporation under Article 34 of the Civil Code (Law No. 89 of 1896) or a specified nonprofit corporation under Article 2, Paragraph (2) of the Law to Promote Specified Nonprofit Activities (Law No. 7 of 1998). 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　都道府県知事は、地球温暖化対策に関する普及啓発を行うこと等により地球温暖化の防止に寄与する活動の促進を図ることを目的として設立された民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第三十四条の法人又は特定非営利活動促進法（平成十年法律第七号）第二条第二項の特定非営利活動法人であって、次項に規定する事業を適正かつ確実に行うことができると認められるものを、その申請により、都道府県に一を限って、都道府県地球温暖化防止活動推進センター（以下「都道府県センター」という。）として指定することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With respect to the application of provisions of Article 50 and Article 63 for the person under probation with suspension of execution of the sentence for whom the probation is provisionally suspended pursuant to the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 25-2 of the Penal Code, the term "hereinafter referred to as "general conditions" in Article 50 shall be deemed to be replaced with "excluding matters listed in item (ii)(b) and item (iii)", and the term "observe the following matters and to undergo the instruction and supervision of probation officers and volunteer probation officers sincerely" in item (ii) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "observe the following matters", and the term "change the residence or travel for more than seven days" in item (v) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "change the residence", and the term "the conditions" in item (ii) of paragraph (2) of Article 63 shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters listed in Article 50 as applied by being deemed to be replaced pursuant to the provision of paragraph (3) of Article 81". 例文帳に追加

３　刑法第二十五条の二第二項の規定により保護観察を仮に解除されている保護観察付執行猶予者に対する第五十条及び第六十三条の規定の適用については、第五十条中「以下「一般遵守事項」という」とあるのは「第二号ロ及び第三号に掲げる事項を除く」と、同条第二号中「守り、保護観察官及び保護司による指導監督を誠実に受ける」とあるのは「守る」と、同条第五号中「転居又は七日以上の旅行」とあるのは「転居」と、第六十三条第二項第二号中「遵守事項」とあるのは「第八十一条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用される第五十条に掲げる事項」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 186 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance), Article 187 (Prepayment of Expenses in Cases of Filing Final Appeal), Article 189 (Service of Written Notice of the Filing of Final Appeal) and Article 192 to the preceding Article (Indication of Precedents; Matter in Which Reasons for Final Appeal Should be Stated; Period for Submission of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal; Number of Copies of Document Stating Reasons for Final Appeal; Order to Correct; Sending of Case to Final Appellate Court; and Service of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal. In this case, the term "written notice of the filing of a final appeal" in Article 187, Article 189 and Article 194 shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice of a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal," the term "appellee of the final appeal" in paragraph (2) of Article 189, Article 195 and the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "opponent," and the phrase "Article 190 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of Article 312 of the Code) or Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code)" in paragraph (1) of Article 196 shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of Article 199 (Petition for Acceptance of Final Appeal)." 例文帳に追加

２　第百八十六条（控訴の規定の準用）、第百八十七条（上告提起の場合における費用の予納）、第百八十九条（上告提起通知書の送達等）及び第百九十二条から前条まで（判例の摘示、上告理由の記載の仕方、上告理由書の提出期間、上告理由を記載した書面の通数、補正命令、上告裁判所への事件送付及び上告理由書の送達）の規定は、上告受理の申立てについて準用する。この場合において、第百八十七条、第百八十九条及び第百九十四条中「上告提起通知書」とあるのは「上告受理申立て通知書」と、第百八十九条第二項、第百九十五条及び前条中「被上告人」とあるのは「相手方」と、第百九十六条第一項中「第百九十条（法第三百十二条第一項及び第二項の上告理由の記載の方式）又は第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）」とあるのは「第百九十九条（上告受理の申立て）第一項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In the case where the effective date of the Act for Partial Revision of the Penal Code, etc. for Coping with Internationalization and Organization of Crimes and Advancement of Information Processing (Act No. of 2006) comes after the Effective Date, with regard to the application of the provisions of item 62 of the appended table of the Act on Punishment of Organized Crimes and Control of Crime Proceeds (Act No. 136 of 1999; referred to as the "Organized Crime Punishment Act" in the following paragraph) during the period between the Effective Date and the day preceding the effective date of the same Act, "the crime set forth in Article 157 (aggravated breach of trust of directors, etc.) of the Intermediate Corporation Act (Act No. 49 of 2001)" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the crime set forth in Article 334 (aggravated breach of trust of directors, etc.) of the Act Concerning General Corporations and General Foundations (Act No. 48 of 2006)." 例文帳に追加

２ 犯罪の国際化及び組織化並びに情報処理の高度化に対処するための刑法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十八年法律第号）の施行の日が施行日後となる場合には、施行日から同法の施行の日の前日までの間における組織的な犯罪の処罰及び犯罪収益の規制等に関する法律（平成十一年法律第百三十六号。次項において「組織的犯罪処罰法」という。）別表第六十二号の規定の適用については、同号中「中間法人法（平成十三年法律第四十九号）第百五十七条（理事等の特別背任）の罪」とあるのは、「一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四十八号）第三百三十四条（理事等の特別背任）の罪」とする。 - 経済産業省

Article 30-30 (1) The provisions of Article 50 of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) and Article 600, Articles 614 through 619, Article 621 and Article 622 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Legal Professional Corporations. The provisions of Articles 55 of the Civil Code and Article 581, Article 582, Article 585, paragraphs (1) and (4), Article 586, Article 593, Article 595, Article 596, Article 601, Article 605, Article 606, Article 609, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 611 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) and Article 613 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a member of Legal Professional Corporations. The provisions of Articles 859 through 862 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an expulsion of a member of a Legal Professional Corporation or an action for nullifying the authority to execute activities for, or to represent, the Legal Professional Corporation. In such cases, "trade name" as used in Article 613 shall be read as "name" and "Article 594, paragraph (1) (including a case of mutatis mutandis application in Article 598, paragraph (2))" as used in Article 859, item (ii) shall be read as "Attorney Act (Act No. 205 of 1949) Article 30-19, paragraph (1) or (2)." 例文帳に追加

第三十条の三十　民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第五十条並びに会社法第六百条、第六百十四条から第六百十九条まで、第六百二十一条及び第六百二十二条の規定は弁護士法人について、民法第五十五条並びに会社法第五百八十一条、第五百八十二条、第五百八十五条第一項及び第四項、第五百八十六条、第五百九十三条、第五百九十五条、第五百九十六条、第六百一条、第六百五条、第六百六条、第六百九条第一項及び第二項、第六百十一条（第一項ただし書を除く。）並びに第六百十三条の規定は弁護士法人の社員について、同法第八百五十九条から第八百六十二条までの規定は弁護士法人の社員の除名並びに業務を執行する権利及び代表権の消滅の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第六百十三条中「商号」とあるのは「名称」と、同法第八百五十九条第二号中「第五百九十四条第一項（第五百九十八条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「弁護士法（昭和二十四年法律第二百五号）第三十条の十九第一項又は第二項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 5 With regard to the application of the Civil Code, the Civil Execution Act (Act No. 4 of 1979) and other laws and regulations, a transcript or extract of a registry prescribed in Article 21, paragraph (1) of the Former Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-2, paragraph (3) of the Former Act) that has been issued prior to the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be a certificate of registered matters. The same shall apply to a transcript or extract of a registry prescribed in Article 21, paragraph (1) of the Former Act which shall remain in force pursuant to the provision of Article 3, paragraph (4) of the Supplementary Provisions (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-2, paragraph (3) of the Former Act which shall remain in force pursuant to the provision of Article 3, paragraph (4) of the Supplementary Provisions) or in Article 21, paragraph (1) of the Former Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the provision of Article 24-2, paragraph (3) of the Former Act which shall remain in force pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article. 例文帳に追加

第五条　この法律の施行前に交付された旧法第二十一条第一項（旧法第二十四条ノ二第三項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する登記簿の謄本又は抄本は、民法、民事執行法（昭和五十四年法律第四号）その他の法令の適用については、これを登記事項証明書とみなす。附則第三条第四項の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる旧法第二十一条第一項（附則第三条第四項の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる旧法第二十四条ノ二第三項において準用する場合を含む。）又は前条第一項の規定によりなおその効力を有することとされる旧法第二十四条ノ二第三項の規定において準用する旧法第二十一条第一項に規定する登記簿の謄本又は抄本も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 16 Articles 668 (joint ownership of partnership assets), 669 (responsibility of persons delaying in making cash contribution), 671 though 674 (mutatis mutandis application of provisions for entrustment, resignation or removal of an executor of business, partners' right of inspection of the state of business and assets and proportion in respect of distribution of profits and losses to partners), 676 (restriction on disposal of equity interest by partners and prohibition of split of partnership assets), 677 (prohibition of set-off by debtors to the partnership), 680 (expulsion), 681 (return of equity interest to withdrawing partners), 683 (request for dissolution by partners), 684 (non-retroactiveness of effect of termination), 687 (resignation or removal of partner liquidators) and 688 (authority of liquidators and method of distribution of remaining assets) of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) shall apply mutatis mutandis with respect to a Partnership. 例文帳に追加

第十六条　組合については、民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第六百六十八条（組合財産の共有）、第六百六十九条（金銭出資遅滞者の責任）、第六百七十一条から第六百七十四条まで（委任の規定の準用、業務執行者の辞任又は解任、組合員の業務及び財産の状況の検査権並びに組合員の損益分配の割合）、第六百七十六条（組合員の持分処分の制限及び組合財産分割の禁止）、第六百七十七条（組合債務者の相殺の禁止）、第六百八十条（除名）、第六百八十一条（脱退組合員の持分の払戻し）、第六百八十三条（組合員の解散請求）、第六百八十四条（解除の効力の不そ及）、第六百八十七条（組合員である清算人の辞任又は解任）及び第六百八十八条（清算人の職務権限及び残余財産の分割方法）の規定を準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 21 A person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in Article 16, paragraph (1), item (i) is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment with work is to be enforced; a person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in item (ii) of the same paragraph is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment without work is to be enforced; the assistance punishment prescribed in item (i) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment with work; the assistance punishment in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment without work; and the following provisions shall apply for the purpose of enforcing the assistance punishment: Article 22, Article 24, Article 28, Article 29, Articles 31 to 33 and Article 34, paragraph (1) of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), Article 474, Articles 480 to 482, Articles 484 to 489, Articles 502 to 504 and Article 507 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 2, paragraph (1), Article 27, paragraph (1), Article 56, Article 57 and Article 61 of the Juvenile Act (Act No. 168 of 1948), Article 1, Article 2, Articles 4 to 9, Article 10, paragraph (1), Article 10-2, Article 13, Article 14, paragraphs (1), (4) and (5), Articles 14-2 to 16, Article 17, paragraph (2), Article 17-2 and Article 17-4 to Article 17-6 of the Juvenile Training Schools Act (Act No. 169 of 1948) and Article 3, Article 4, paragraph (2), Articles 11 to 14, Article 16, Articles 23 to 30, Article 33, Article 34, paragraph (1), Articles 35 to 40, Article 48, Article 49, paragraph (1), Article 50, Article 51, Article 52, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 53, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 54, paragraph (2), Articles 55 to 58, Articles 60 to 65, Articles 75 to 77, Article 82, Articles 84 to 88 and Articles 91 to 98 of the Offenders Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 88 of 2007). In such a case, the "one-third" in Article 28 of the Penal Code shall be, "one-third (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment as defined in Article 2, item (i) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "foreign punishment"), rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer as defined in Article 2, item (xi) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer") in a sentencing state as defined in Article 2, item (vii) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "sentencing state"))"; "10 years" shall be "10 years (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer in the sentencing state)"; "after a sentence has become final and binding" in Article 32 of the same code shall be "after the surrender by a sentencing state in accordance with the order prescribed in Article 13 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "two or more" and "the greatest among the punishments" in Article 474 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be "assistance punishment as defined in Article 2, item (ii) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "assistance punishment")"; "the other punishment" in the same Article shall be "the principal punishment"; "the public prosecutors office responding to the court that has rendered the punishment" in Article 480 and Article 482 of the same code shall be "the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"; "category of punishment" in Article 487 of the same code shall be "types of assistance punishment"; "a person upon whom a decision is to be enforced" in Article 502 in the same code shall be "a person upon whom the assistance punishment is to be enforced"; "the court that rendered such decision" in the same Article shall be "the Tokyo District Court"; and "a judgment of guilty has become final and binding against an individual in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 27, paragraph (1) of the Juvenile Act and "a sentence of imprisonment with or without work, or of penal detention has become final and binding in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 57 in the same code shall be "a person with regard to whom assistance punishment as defined in item (ii) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons is to be enforced and who is currently undergoing a protective measure"; additional technicalities requiring alternative readings in connection with the application of these provisions shall be determined by a Cabinet order. 例文帳に追加

第二十一条　共助刑の執行に関しては、第十六条第一項第一号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を懲役に処せられた者と、同項第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を禁錮に処せられた者と、同項第一号の共助刑を懲役と、同項第二号の共助刑を禁錮とそれぞれみなして、刑法（明治四十年法律第四十五号）第二十二条、第二十四条、第二十八条、第二十九条、第三十一条から第三十三条まで及び第三十四条第一項、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条、第四百八十条から第四百八十二条まで、第四百八十四条から第四百八十九条まで、第五百二条から第五百四条まで及び第五百七条、少年法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十八号）第二条第一項、第二十七条第一項、第五十六条、第五十七条及び第六十一条、少年院法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十九号）第一条、第二条、第四条から第九条まで、第十条第一項、第十条の二、第十三条、第十四条第一項、第四項及び第五項、第十四条の二から第十六条まで、第十七条第二項、第十七条の二並びに第十七条の四から第十七条の六まで並びに更生保護法（平成十九年法律第八十八号）第三条、第四条第二項、第十一条から第十四条まで、第十六条、第二十三条から第三十条まで、第三十三条、第三十四条第一項、第三十五条から第四十条まで、第四十八条、第四十九条第一項、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十二条第二項及び第三項、第五十三条第二項及び第三項、第五十四条第二項、第五十五条から第五十八条まで、第六十条から第六十五条まで、第七十五条から第七十七条まで、第八十二条、第八十四条から第八十八条まで並びに第九十一条から第九十八条までの規定を適用する。この場合において、刑法第二十八条中「三分の一」とあるのは「三分の一（国際受刑者移送法第二条第七号の裁判国（以下「裁判国」という。）において同法第二条第十一号の受入移送犯罪（以下「受入移送犯罪」という。）に係る確定裁判において言い渡された同法第二条第一号の外国刑（以下「外国刑」という。）の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、「十年」とあるのは「十年（裁判国において受入移送犯罪に係る確定裁判において言い渡された外国刑の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、同法第三十二条中「刑の言渡しが確定した後」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第十三条の命令により裁判国から引渡しを受けた後」と、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条中「二以上の」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑（以下「共助刑」という。）と」と、「その重いもの」とあり、及び「重い刑」とあるのは「共助刑」と、「他の刑」とあるのは「主刑」と、同法第四百八十条及び第四百八十二条中「刑の言渡をした裁判所に対応する検察庁」とあるのは「東京地方検察庁」と、同法第四百八十七条中「刑名」とあるのは「共助刑の種類」と、同法第五百二条中「裁判の執行を受ける者」とあるのは「共助刑の執行を受ける者」と、「言渡をした裁判所」とあるのは「東京地方裁判所」と、少年法第二十七条第一項中「保護処分の継続中、本人に対して有罪判決が確定した」とあり、及び同法第五十七条中「保護処分の継続中、懲役、禁錮又は拘留の刑が確定した」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者が保護処分の継続中である」とし、その他これらの規定の適用に関し必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

If the invention protected by a patent, hereafter referred to as the “second patent”, within the country cannot be worked without infringing another patent, hereafter referred to as the “first patent”, granted on a prior application or benefiting from an earlier priority, a compulsory license may be granted to the owner of the second patent to the extent necessary for the working of his invention, subject to the following conditions: (a) The invention claimed in the second patent involves an important technical advance of considerable economic significance in relation to the first patent; (b) The owner of the first patent shall be entitled to a cross-license on reasonable terms to use the invention claimed in the second patent; (c) The use authorized in respect of the first patent shall be non-assignable except with the assignment of the second patent; and (d) The terms and conditions of Section 95 (Requirement to obtain a license on reasonable commercial terms), Section 96 (Compulsory Licensing of patents involving semi-conductor technology), Section 98 (Form and Contents of Petition), Section 99 (Notice of Hearing), and Section 100 (Terms and Conditions of Compulsory License) of the IP Code.例文帳に追加

国内において，ある特許(以下「第2特許」という)により保護される発明が，先の出願に基づいて付与された又は先の優先権を有する他の特許(以下「第1特許」という)を侵害することなく実施することができない場合は，第2特許の所有者がその発明を実施するために必要とする範囲で，次の条件に従うことを条件として，第2特許の所有者に強制ライセンスを許諾することができる。 (a)第2特許に係わる発明が，第1特許と連関して相当な経済的重要性を有する重要な技術の進歩を生じさせること (b)第1特許の所有者が，合理的な条件で第2特許に係わる発明を使用するクロスライセンスを受ける権利を与えられること (c)第1特許について付与されたライセンスは，第2特許とともに譲渡する場合を除いて，譲渡することができないこと (d)IP法第95条(合理的な商業上の条件でライセンスを得る要件)，第96条(半導体技術に係わる特許の強制ライセンス許諾)，第98条(申請の様式及び内容)，第99条(審理の通知)並びに第100条(強制ライセンスの条件)の条件によること - 特許庁

(1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.例文帳に追加

(1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁

Article 9-7-5 (1) The provisions of Part 2, Chapter X, Section 1, Subsection 1 (excluding Article 650, paragraph (1) and Article 664) (General Provisions on Casualty Insurance) of the Commercial Code shall apply mutatis mutandis to mutual aid contracts concluded by a business cooperative or a minor business cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or a fire mutual aid cooperative (hereinafter referred to as "a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities" in this Article) whereby mutual aid premiums are received by promising to compensate for damages that may be caused by certain accidental incidents; the provisions of Subsection 2 (Fire Insurance) of the same Section shall apply mutatis mutandis to fire mutual aid contracts concluded by a fire mutual aid cooperative; the provisions of Subsection 3 (Cargo Insurance) of the same Section shall apply mutatis mutandis to mutual aid contracts concluded by a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities (excluding a fire mutual aid cooperative) whereby mutual aid premiums are received by promising to compensate for damages to cargos that may be caused by certain accidental incidents; and the provisions of Section 2 (excluding the provisions pertaining to Article 664 among the provisions on application mutatis mutandis set forth in Article 683, paragraph (1)) (Life Insurance) of the same Chapter shall apply mutatis mutandis to mutual aid contracts concluded by a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities (excluding a fire mutual aid cooperative) whereby mutual aid premiums are received by promising to pay a certain amount of money with regard to the survival or death of a person (including a physical condition where said person has been diagnosed by a doctor to have no more than a certain period left to live). 例文帳に追加

第九条の七の五　商法第二編第十章第一節第一款（第六百五十条第一項及び第六百六十四条を除く。）（損害保険の総則）の規定は共済事業を行う事業協同組合若しくは事業協同小組合又は火災共済協同組合（以下この条において「共済事業を行う協同組合」という。）が締結する一定の偶然の事故によつて生ずることのある損害をてん補することを約し共済掛金を収受する共済契約について、同節第二款（火災保険）の規定は火災共済協同組合が締結する火災共済契約について、同節第三款（運送保険）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合（火災共済協同組合を除く。）が締結する一定の偶然の事故によつて生ずることのある運送品の損害をてん補することを約し共済掛金を収受する共済契約について、同章第二節（第六百八十三条第一項に掲げる準用規定のうち第六百六十四条に係る規定を除く。）（生命保険）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合（火災共済協同組合を除く。）が締結する人の生存又は死亡（当該人の余命が一定の期間以内であると医師により診断された身体の状態を含む。）に関し一定の金額を支払うことを約し共済掛金を収受する共済契約について、それぞれ準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 33 Articles 2 through 5 (Register Office and Registrar), 7 through 18, 19-2 through 23, 24 (excluding item (xvi)), 26 (General Rules for Registry, etc. and Registration Procedure), 27 (Prohibition on Use of Similar Trade Names), 56 through 59, 61(1) (Registration of Incorporated General Partnership (gomei gaisha)) and 107 through 127 (Revision or Cancellation of Registration, Special Rules on Registration by Electronic Information Processing Organization and Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) and Articles 56 (Entrustment of Registration of Provisional Dispositions Concerning Suspension of Business Execution by a Representative of a Juridical person, etc.) of the Civil Preservation Act (Act No 91 of 1989) shall apply mutatis mutandis with respect to the registration of a Partnership. In application of the foregoing provisions of the Commercial Registration Act, the phrase "Article 64(1) of the Commercial Code" in Article 56(3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be replaced with "Article 17 of the Limited Partnership Act for Investment (Act No 90 of 1998)" and the phrases "a representative of the juridical person or other executives of the juridical person" and "the head office or principal office and branches or secondary offices of the juridical person" in Article 56 of the Civil Preservation Act shall respectively be replaced with "a general partner or a liquidator of the Investment LPS" and "the principal office and secondary offices of the Investment LPS". 例文帳に追加

第三十三条　組合の登記については、商業登記法（昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号）第二条から第五条まで（登記所及び登記官）、第七条から第十八条まで、第十九条の二から第二十三条まで、第二十四条（第十六号を除く。）、第二十六条（登記簿等及び登記手続の通則）、第二十七条（類似商号登記の禁止）、第五十六条から第五十九条まで、第六十一条第一項（合名会社の登記）及び第百七条から第百二十条まで（登記の更正及び抹消、電子情報処理組織による登記に関する特例並びに雑則）並びに民事保全法（平成元年法律第九十一号）第五十六条（法人の代表者の職務執行停止の仮処分等の登記の嘱託）の規定を準用する。この場合において、商業登記法第五十六条第三項中「商法第六十四条第一項」とあるのは「投資事業有限責任組合契約に関する法律（平成十年法律第九十号）第十七条」と、民事保全法第五十六条中「法人を代表する者その他法人の役員」とあるのは「投資事業有限責任組合の無限責任組合員又は清算人」と、「法人の本店又は主たる事務所及び支店又は従たる事務所」とあるのは「投資事業有限責任組合の主たる事務所及び従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 82 and Article 83 of the Civil Code, Article 35(2) and Article 40 of the Act of Procedures in Non-Contentious Matters (Act No. 14 of 1898), and Article 644 (excluding item (iii)), Articles 645 to 649 inclusive, Article 650(1) and (2), Article 651(1) and (2) (excluding the portion pertaining to application mutatis mutandis of Article 594 of the same Act), Article 652, Article 653, Articles 655 to 659 inclusive, Articles 662 to 664 inclusive, Article 666, Article 667, Article 672, Article 673, Article 675, Article 863, Article 864, Article 868(1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dissolution and liquidation of audit corporations. In this case, the term "Article 641(v)" in Article 644(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-18(1)(iii) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "Article 641(iv) or (vii)" in Article 647(3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-18(1)(v) or (vi) or Article 34-18(2) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 658(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance," and the term "Article 580" in Article 673(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-10-6 of the Certified Public Accountants Act." 例文帳に追加

２　民法第八十二条及び第八十三条、非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第三十五条第二項及び第四十条並びに会社法第六百四十四条（第三号を除く。）、第六百四十五条から第六百四十九条まで、第六百五十条第一項及び第二項、第六百五十一条第一項及び第二項（同法第五百九十四条の準用に係る部分を除く。）、第六百五十二条、第六百五十三条、第六百五十五条から第六百五十九条まで、第六百六十二条から第六百六十四条まで、第六百六十六条、第六百六十七条、第六百七十二条、第六百七十三条、第六百七十五条、第八百六十三条、第八百六十四条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条の規定は、監査法人の解散及び清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第六百四十四条第一号中「第六百四十一条第五号」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十八第一項第三号」と、同法第六百四十七条第三項中「第六百四十一条第四号又は第七号」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十八第一項第五号若しくは第六号又は第二項」と、同法第六百五十八条第一項中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第六百七十三条第一項中「第五百八十条」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十の六」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム