「hinder」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(17ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

may choose not to grant approval only where the implementation of the business pertaining to the application is found not to be in the public interest or to hinder the protection of Investors due to the difficulty of managing the risk of losses arising from the business (in the case of approval for conducting Specified Investment Management Activities in the course of business, cases where a person is found not to have a personnel structure sufficient for carrying out the business of conducting Specified Investment Management Activities in an appropriate manner shall be included). In this case, the Prime Minister shall, in advance, hear the opinions of the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism or another head of an administrative organ specified by a Cabinet Order which is found to be related thereto, with regard to whether or not such person has a personnel structure sufficient for carrying out the business of conducting said Specified Investment Management Activities, taking into consideration the contents and method of said business. 例文帳に追加

認められるとき（業として特定投資運用行為を行うことについての承認にあつては、当該特定投資運用行為を行う業務を適確に遂行するに足りる人的構成を有しないと認められるときを含む。）に限り、承認しないことができる。この場合において、内閣総理大臣は、あらかじめ、その者が当該特定投資運用行為を行う業務を適確に遂行するに足りる人的構成を有する者であるかどうかにつき、当該業務の内容及び方法を勘案して関係があると認められる国土交通大臣その他の政令で定める行政機関の長の意見を聴くものとする - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) An "Excessive Loan Contract for an Individual Customer" as provided in the preceding paragraph means a loan contract concluded with an Individual Customer (excluding Home Loan Contracts and other contracts specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Home Loan Contracts, etc.") and contracts for Revolving Credit Loans), under which the Total Borrowings of an Individual Customer pertaining to said Individual Customer (excluding the outstanding balance pertaining to a Home Loan Contract, etc.) exceed the Base Amount (meaning the amount obtained by dividing the total amount of said Individual Customer's annual salary and other regular income similar thereto as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by three; the same shall apply in paragraph (5) of the following Article) (excluding contracts specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those that will not hinder the protection of the Individual Customer's interests). 例文帳に追加

２　前項に規定する「個人過剰貸付契約」とは、個人顧客を相手方とする貸付けに係る契約（住宅資金貸付契約その他の内閣府令で定める契約（以下「住宅資金貸付契約等」という。）及び極度方式貸付けに係る契約を除く。）で、当該貸付けに係る契約を締結することにより、当該個人顧客に係る個人顧客合算額（住宅資金貸付契約等に係る貸付けの残高を除く。）が当該個人顧客に係る基準額（その年間の給与及びこれに類する定期的な収入の金額として内閣府令で定めるものを合算した額に三分の一を乗じて得た額をいう。次条第五項において同じ。）を超えることとなるもの（当該個人顧客の利益の保護に支障を生ずることがない契約として内閣府令で定めるものを除く。）をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

It has been argued that personal guarantees hinder restarts and restructuring. At the same time, however, guarantees reduce agency costs and are used as a signal that debtors will repay their debts properly under the terms of imperfect agreements, and the system itself is recognized as playing a certain role. Guarantees cannot therefore be regarded in an entirely negative light. Nevertheless, as we have seen above, (1) the chances of obtaining an unguaranteed loan are improved by building relations with financial institutions, and (2) the development of financial instruments in recent years has also led to the emergence of borrowing instruments40) that do not require security or third-party guarantees, such as quick loans, giving enterprises a choice of options regarding personal guarantees best suited to their circumstances.例文帳に追加

個人保証は再起や再生の妨げになっているとの指摘もあるが、その一方で保証はエージェンシーコストを軽減する、あるいは債務者が不完全な契約の下できちんと返済行動をとることを示すシグナルとして利用される面があり、仕組み自体は一定の役割を持っているとの指摘もされており39、全てを否定的に見ることはできないが、これまでに見てきたとおり、〔1〕金融機関とのリレーションを構築することにより無保証での借入れの可能性が高くなり、〔2〕近年の金融商品の開発によりクイックローンのように無担保・第三者保証のいらない借入れの商品40も出来てきていることから、個人保証についても企業の事情に合わせて選択する道も出てきている。 - 経済産業省

As reviewed in Section 2, Chapter III, arrangement of the following environment is required in Japan as a part of the measures to expand the scale of internal direct investments: (i) utilization of location advantages including local areas and the dissemination of investment information abroad; (ii) further improvement of Japan’s investment environment by, for example, reviewing regulations; and (iii) development of legal system for M&A. As for measures to address (i), establishing a location advantage is important by making the use of superior human resources and well-developed information infrastructure rather than simply reducing business activity costs. As for (ii) regulations that hinder market entry in the service business still remain, therefore, reexamination of such regulations are expected to help foreign companies newly enter into particular fields, such as medicine and welfare, education, and human resources business,. Lastly, for (iii), cross-border M&As are expected to accelerate by overcoming hindering factors.例文帳に追加

対内直接投資の規模を拡大するための取組としては、第３章第２節で見たように、①地域を含めた我が国の立地優位性の活用と対外的な情報発信、②規制の見直し等を通じた投資環境の一層の整備、③M&Aに関する法整備が必要である。①については、単に事業活動コストを引き下げるのではなく、優れた人材、整備された情報インフラ等をいかした立地優位性を確立していくことが重要である。②については、サービス業において実質的な参入障壁となっているような規制が一部残存しており、これらの見直しによって、特に医療・福祉サービス分野、公共サービス分野への外資企業の新規参入が期待される。また、③については、M&Aに関する阻害要因の克服などにより、クロスボーダーM&Aの加速が期待される。 - 経済産業省

Article 65 (1) The director of the probation office shall, as provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, hear the sentiments of the victims (including the victims' current situation and their opinion toward their offenders' life or behavior, hereinafter referred to as 'feelings'), whenever victims ask this of him/her, in the course of the relevant probationer's supervision period, and communicate such feelings to the probationers. The director of the probation office, however, has the discretion not to communicate the feelings to the probationers when he/she finds that there is a reasonable possibility that the communication may hinder the probationers from rehabilitation or it is not appropriate in light of the nature of the case or further administration of their supervision. The term 'victims' in this paragraph, includes their statutory agents or in the case of the victim's death or their suffering from a severe mental or physical disorder, their spouse, lineal relatives or siblings. 例文帳に追加

第六十五条　保護観察所の長は、法務省令で定めるところにより、保護観察対象者について、被害者等（当該保護観察対象者が刑若しくは保護処分を言い渡される理由となった犯罪若しくは刑罰法令に触れる行為により害を被った者（以下この項において「被害者」という。）又はその法定代理人若しくは被害者が死亡した場合若しくはその心身に重大な故障がある場合におけるその配偶者、直系の親族若しくは兄弟姉妹をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から、被害に関する心情、被害者等の置かれている状況又は保護観察対象者の生活若しくは行動に関する意見（以下この条において「心情等」という。）の伝達の申出があったときは、当該心情等を聴取し、当該保護観察対象者に伝達するものとする。ただし、その伝達をすることが当該保護観察対象者の改善更生を妨げるおそれがあり、又は当該被害に係る事件の性質、保護観察の実施状況その他の事情を考慮して相当でないと認めるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム