1016万例文収録!

「ありえない」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(349ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > ありえないの意味・解説 > ありえないに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

ありえないの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 17369



例文

9 信託法第百十条、第百十一条、第百十二条第二項、第百十四条、第百十五条第二項、第百十六条第一項及び第二項、第百十七条、第百二十条並びに第百二十一条の規定は、投資信託委託会社が書面による決議を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第百十条第一項中「前条第一項」とあるのは「投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律(以下「投資信託法」という。)第十七条第二項」と、同条第二項中「前条第二項」とあり、並びに同法第百十四条第四項及び第百十六条第二項中「第百九条第二項」とあるのは「投資信託法第十七条第三項」と、同法第百十条第三項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「投資信託法第十七条第五項」と、同法第百十一条中「第百八条第三号」とあるのは「投資信託法第十七条第一項第三号」と、「第百九条第二項」とあるのは「同条第三項」と、同法第百十二条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「投資信託法第十七条第六項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(9) The provisions of Article 110, Article 111, Article 112, paragraph (2), Article 114, Article 115, paragraph (2), Article 116, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 117, Article 120, and Article 121 of the Trust Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust adopts a written resolution. In this case, the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance," the term "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 110, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (2) of the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations (hereinafter referred to as the 'Investment Trust Act')," the terms "paragraph (2) of the preceding Article" in Article 110, paragraph (2) and "Article 109, paragraph (2)" in Article 114, paragraph (4) and Article 116, paragraph (2) of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (3) of the Investment Trust Act," the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 110, paragraph (3) of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (5) of the Investment Trust Act," the terms "Article 108, item (iii)" and "Article 109, paragraph (2)" in Article 111 of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the Investment Trust Act" and "paragraph (3) of that Article" respectively, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 112, paragraph (2) of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (6) of the Investment Trust Act" and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十八条 法第七条、第八条、第三十八条、第三十九条、第四十六条、第四十七条、第五十六条及び第五十七条に規定する主務大臣の権限に属する事務並びにその事務に係る法第六条の二、第三十四条の二、第三十六条の二、第四十三条の二、第四十四条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十四条の二及び第六十六条第一項から第三項までに規定する主務大臣の権限に属する事務並びに訪問販売に係る取引、連鎖販売取引、特定継続的役務提供に係る取引及び業務提供誘引販売取引に関する法第六十条に規定する主務大臣の権限に属する事務で、当該都道府県の区域内における販売業者、役務提供事業者、統括者、勧誘者、一般連鎖販売業者又は業務提供誘引販売業を行う者の業務に係るものは、都道府県知事が行うこととする。ただし、二以上の都道府県の区域にわたり訪問販売に係る取引、連鎖販売取引、特定継続的役務提供に係る取引若しくは業務提供誘引販売取引の公正及び購入者等の利益が害されるおそれがあり、主務大臣がその事態に適正かつ効率的に対処するため特に必要があると認めるとき、又は都道府県知事から要請があつたときは、主務大臣が法第六条の二、第七条、第八条、第三十四条の二、第三十六条の二、第三十八条、第三十九条、第四十三条の二、第四十四条の二、第四十六条、第四十七条、第五十二条の二、第五十四条の二、第五十六条、第五十七条及び第六十六条第一項から第三項までに規定する主務大臣の権限に属する事務を自ら行うことを妨げない例文帳に追加

Article 18 (1) The prefectural governor shall process the affairs under the authority of the competent minister prescribed in Article 7, Article 8, Article 38, Article 39, Article 46, Article 47, Article 56, and Article 57 of the Act and the affairs under the authority of the competent minister prescribed in Article 6-2, Article 34-2, Article 36-2, Article 43-2, Article 44-2, Article 52-2, Article 54-2, and Article 66(1) to (3) of the Act pertaining to such affairs, and the affairs under the authority of the competent minister prescribed in Article 60 of the Act relating to transactions pertaining to Door-to-Door Sales, transactions pertaining to Multilevel Marketing Transactions, transactions pertaining to Specified Continuous Service Offers, and Business Opportunity Related Sales Transactions that are associated with the business of a seller, a Service Provider, a Supervisor, a solicitor, a general multilevel marketing distributor, or a person conducting Business Opportunity Related Sales within the area of the prefecture. However, where there is the risk of harming the fairness of the transactions pertaining to Door-to-Door Sales, transactions pertaining to Multilevel Marketing Transactions, transactions pertaining to Specified Continuous Service Offers, or Business Opportunity Related Sales Transactions and the interests of the purchaser, etc. in the areas of two or more prefectures, and the competent minister finds it specially necessary for appropriately and efficiently dealing with the situation, or upon the request of the prefectural governor, this shall not preclude the competent minister from processing the affairs under the authority of the competent minister prescribed in Article 6-2, Article 7, Article 8, Article 34-2, Article 36-2, Article 38, Article 39, Article 43-2, Article 44-2, Article 46, Article 47, Article 52-2, Article 54-2, Article 56, Article 57, and Article 66(1) to (3) of the Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

局長は,次に掲げる事情においては,何れかの商品又はサービスに関する商標(商標A)を登録してはならない。それが,他の所有者に属しており,かつ,登録されているか,又は第34条若しくは第36条に基づく優先権を有する商標(商標B)と同一であって,同一の商品又はサービスに関するものであるか,又はそれらの商品又はサービスに類似する商品若しくはサービスに関するものであり,それを使用すれば誤認又は混同を生じる虞がある場合それが,他の所有者に属しており,かつ,同一の商品若しくはサービス,又はそれらの商品若しくはサービスに類似する商品若しくはサービスに関して登録されているか,又は第34条若しくは第36条に基づく優先権を有する商標(商標C)と類似しており,それを使用すれば誤認又は混同を生じる虞がある場合それが,又はそれに係る何らかの本質的要素が,商標であって,それらの商品若しくはサービス,又は類似の商品若しくはサービス,又は他の何れかの商品若しくはサービスに関し,宣伝活動その他の何れかにより,ニュージーランドにおいて広く知られているもの(商標D)と同一であるか若しくは類似している,又はその翻訳である場合。ただし,商標Aを使用したとき,それらの他の商品又はサービスと商標Dの所有者との間に業としての関連を示すものと受け取られ,当該所有者の利益が害される虞があることを条件とする。例文帳に追加

The Commissioner must not register a trade mark (trade mark A) in respect of any goods or services if it is identical to a trade mark ("trade mark B") belonging to a different owner and that is registered, or has priority under section 34 or section 36, in respect of the same goods or services; or in respect of goods or services that are similar to those goods and services, and its use is likely to deceive or confuse; or it is similar to a trade mark (trade mark C) that belongs to a different owner and that is registered, or has priority under section 34 or section 36, in respect of the same goods or services or goods or services that are similar to those goods or services, and its use is likely to deceive or confuse; or it is, or an essential element of it is, identical or similar to, or a translation of, a trade mark that is well known in New Zealand (trade mark D), whether through advertising or otherwise, in respect of those goods or services or similar goods or services or any other goods or services if the use of trade mark A would be taken as indicating a connection in the course of trade between those other goods or services and the owner of trade mark D, and would be likely to prejudice the interests of the owner. - 特許庁

6 第一項から第四項までに規定する許可(以下この条及び次条において「代替許可」という。)があったときは、当該代替許可に係る事項について株主総会等、種類株主総会又は取締役会の決議があったものとみなす。この場合における第十六条第一項、第百三十六条の二第一項(第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。)並びに第二百五十条第三項及び第五項の規定の適用については、第十六条第一項中「資本金又は準備金(以下この節において「資本金等」という。)の額の減少(減少する準備金の額の全部を資本金とする場合を除く。)の決議に係る株主総会(会社法第四百四十七条第三項(資本金の額の減少)又は第四百四十八条第三項(準備金の額の減少)に規定する場合にあっては、取締役会)の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「資本金又は準備金の額の減少(減少する準備金の額の全部を資本金とする場合を除く。)に係る第二百四十九条の二第一項の許可のあった日以後二週間以内の日」と、第百三十六条の二第一項中「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「保険契約の移転に係る第二百四十九条の二第一項又は第二項の許可のあった日以後二週間以内の日」と、第二百五十条第三項中「次項の公告」とあり、及び同条第五項中「前項の公告」とあるのは「第二百四十九条の二第八項の公告」とし、第百五十六条の二及び第二百五十条第四項の規定は、適用しない例文帳に追加

(6) When the permissions prescribed in paragraph (1) to paragraph (4) inclusive (hereinafter referred to as "Replacement Permissions" in this Article and the following Article) have been obtained, it shall be deemed that a resolution of the Shareholders Meeting, etc., class meeting, or board of directors has been made concerning matters pertaining to said Replacement Permissions. With regard to the application of the provisions in Article 16, paragraph (1), Article 136-2, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29), and Article 250, paragraphs (3) and (5) in this case, the term "two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting pertaining to the resolution on the reduction (excluding the cases where the whole of the amount by which the reserves are reduced is appropriated to the capital) of the capital or reserves (hereinafter referred to as "capital, etc." in this Section) (or, the date of the board of directors meeting where Article 447, paragraph (3) (Reductions in Amount of Capital) or Article 448, paragraph (3) (Reductions in Amount of Reserves) of the Companies Act applies)" in Article 60, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a date within two weeks from the date of receipt of the permission set forth in Article 249-2, paragraph (1) pertaining to the reduction (excluding the cases where the whole of the amount by which the reserves are reduced is appropriated to the capital) of the capital or reserves," the term "two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in Article 136, paragraph (1) in the preceding Article" in Article 136-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a date within two weeks from the date of receipt of the permission set forth in Article 249-2, paragraph (1) or (2) pertaining to the transfer of insurance contracts," and the terms "the public notice set forth in the following paragraph" in Article 250, paragraph (3) and "the public notice set forth in the preceding paragraph" in paragraph (5) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the public notice set forth in Article 249-2, paragraph (8)"; and the provisions of Article 156-2 and Article 250, paragraph (4) shall not apply.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

原子力安全・保安院は、高経年化プラントへの対応を充実強化するために、産業界、学会、政府機関の間で、国内外の技術情報を共有し、有効に活用するために原子力安全基盤機構の中に技術情報調整委員会を発足させ、また、日本原子力学会の下に、原子力安全・保安院、原子力安全基盤機構、大学、研究機関、電力事業者、原子力プラントメーカー、エンジニアリング会社等が参加した特別委員会を設置して、2004年7月から、2005年3月にかけて高経年化対策及び軽水炉の長寿命安全運転に対するロードマップを整備した。例文帳に追加

Moreover, NISA launched the Coordination Committee on Technical Information in JNES, in order to reinforce the measures for aged plants, and in order to share domestic and overseas technical information for effective utilization among the industrial world, academic and governmental institutions. Furthermore, JNES established an ad-hoc committee that consists of NISA, universities, research organizations, electric utilities, nuclear plant manufacturers, plant engineering companies, etc. under the Atomic Energy Society of Japan. From July 2004 through March 2005, the ad-hoc committee had prepared a road map on measures for aging management and long life-time safe operation of light water reactors. - 経済産業省


例文

重視していることは、もう今さっきの話にもございましたように、リーマン・ショックの後、G8、それからG20にありまして、中国、インド、ブラジル、そういったところも加わっていただきますし、G8だけではもう世界の経済をカバーでき得ないというような実態が皆さん方よくお分かりのようにあるわけでございまして、色々な、バーゼルIIIだって、G20でまさに中国、インド、ブラジル、そういった今、非常に発展の速度の速い人口の多い国といいますか、そういったことがまさに世界の大きな力を持って参加してきたわけでございますから、中国は日本の隣でございますし、日本から言えばここ3年間としては、輸出輸入ナンバーワンは中国になっていると思いますし、中国からとっても、輸出のナンバーワンはアメリカ、2番目がEU、3番目は日本でございますからね、大変、日本と中国というのは戦略的互恵関係にあるということもございますし、そういった意味で、特に金融の問題については、もうご存じのように非常に金融はグローバル化したというか、まさに瞬時に金融の影響というのは世界経済に影響を及ぼすわけでございますから、アメリカの国債を一番たくさん持っているのは中国でございまして、2番目が日本でございますし。まさに中国というのは8、9%の、リーマン・ショックのときに一旦落ちましたけれども、また60兆円ぐらいの財政出動をして、中国の景気が非常にいいということを皆さん方はよくお分かりだと思いますけれども、しかし、どうも少しバブル気味だというようなご意見もございますので、そこら辺も中国人民銀行の行長さん、バーナンキさんにしても、アメリカに適する人でございますが、それに温家宝首相をはじめ、国務院の経済担当の副総理がおられまして、そういった方が中心でやるわけでございますが、当然銀行監督あるいは証券の監督、保険の監督といった(金融当局の)方もお会いをさせていただく等、色々な私も非常に期待をさせていただいております。例文帳に追加

My focus will be on the post-global-financial-crisis G8 and G20 including China, India and Brazil, as mentioned earlier. The reality is that G8 alone can no longer cover the global economy. There is also Basel III. Populous countries undergoing extremely rapid development such as China, India and Brazil have joined G20 with significant power. China, being Japan’s neighbor, has been the Japan’s biggest import and export partner in the past three years. For China, Japan is the third biggest export destination, behind the United States and EU, ranked first and second, respectively, so Japan and China are in a strategic, mutually beneficial relationship. In that sense, especially when it comes to the issue of finance, the financial sector is extremely globalized; the impact of the financial sector on the global economy is instant. China is the leading holder of U.S. Treasury securities, followed by Japan. With some 60 trillion yen of public spending, China is booming, as you may be well aware, although some people have suggested that a bubble may be forming.  - 金融庁

6 第四十四条の二(第三項後段を除く。)及び第七十三条から前条までの規定は、保険契約者総代会について準用する。この場合において、第四十四条の二第三項前段において準用する会社法第三百十条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十四条の二第一項」と、同条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第七十四条第三項において準用する第六十八条第三項」と、同条第七項中「株主(前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。)」とあるのは「保険契約者又は社員」と、第七十四条第三項中「第七十四条から第七十六条まで」とあるのは「第七十五条及び第七十六条」と、同項及び同条第四項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「総代」と、同条第三項において準用する同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「総代、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、総代、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 44-2 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (3)) and Article 73 to the preceding Article inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of Policyholders. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 310, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the first sentence of Article 44-2, paragraph (3) and the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 310, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 44-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 299, paragraph (3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 68, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders or members"; the term "Article 74 to 76 inclusive" in Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 75 and 76"; the term "Policyholder" in Article 74, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representatives, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, general representatives, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百四十一条 内閣総理大臣は、保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等の業務若しくは財産の状況に照らしてその保険業の継続が困難であると認めるとき、又はその業務(外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における業務。以下この条から第二百五十五条の二までにおいて同じ。)の運営が著しく不適切でありその保険業の継続が保険契約者等の保護に欠ける事態を招くおそれがあると認めるときは、当該保険会社等又は外国保険会社等に対し、業務の全部若しくは一部の停止、合併、保険契約の移転(外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における保険契約の移転)若しくは当該保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等の株式の他の保険会社等、外国保険会社等若しくは保険持株会社等による取得(第二百四十七条第一項、第二百五十六条から第二百五十八条まで、第二百七十条の三の二第四項及び第五項並びに第二百七十条の四第四項及び第五項において「合併等」という。)の協議その他必要な措置を命じ、又は保険管理人による業務及び財産(外国保険会社等にあっては、日本に所在する財産。次条及び第二百四十六条の二から第二百四十七条の二までにおいて同じ。)の管理を命ずる処分をすることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 241 (1) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds that the continuation of an Insurance Business will be difficult in light of the state of the business or property of an Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or when he/she finds that the operation of that business (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., business in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 255-2 inclusive) is extremely inappropriate and that there is a risk that the continuation of that Insurance Business could bring about a situation that lacks protection for Insurance Policyholders, etc., order the whole or partial suspension of business, a merger, a transfer of insurance contracts (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., the transfer of insurance contracts in Japan) or agreement for the acquisition of the shares of that Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., by another Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or Insurance Holding Company, etc. (referred to as "Merger, etc." in Article 247, paragraph (1); Article 256 to Article 258 inclusive; Article 270-3-2, paragraph (4) and Article 270-3-2, paragraph (5); and Article 270-4, Article 270-4, paragraph (4) and Article 270-4, paragraph (5)) or any other necessary measure against that Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or make a disposition ordering the business and property management (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., property located in Japan. The same shall apply in the following Article and Article 246-2 to Article 247-2 inclusive.) by an Insurance Administrator.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

6 会社法第六十七条(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号を除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十三条第四項(創立総会の決議)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)及び第八十一条(第四項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。)中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主(創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。)」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間(当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役(保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)若しくは設立時監査役(同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造(ツクリカタメ)なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。例文帳に追加

Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

例文

第四十九条 会社法第二百九十六条(株主総会の招集)、第二百九十八条(第二項及び第三項を除く。)(株主総会の招集の決定)、第二百九十九条(第二項各号を除く。)(株主総会の招集の通知)、第三百条(招集手続の省略)、第三百十一条(書面による議決権の行使)、第三百十二条(電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで(取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議)及び第三百十八条(第五項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定(同法第二百九十八条第一項(各号を除く。)及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。)中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項(各号を除く。)及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間(当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十九条 第二十四条から前条までの規定は、課徴金の納付命令について準用する。この場合において、第二十四条第一項中「法第四十九条第五項」とあるのは「法第五十条第六項において準用する法第四十九条第五項」と、「排除措置命令の名あて人」とあるのは「納付命令の名あて人」と、同項第一号中「予定される排除措置命令の内容」とあるのは「納付を命じようとする課徴金の額」と、同項第二号中「委員会の認定した事実及びこれに対する法令の適用」とあるのは「課徴金の計算の基礎及びその課徴金に係る違反行為」と、第二十五条中「前条第一項」とあり、並びに第二十六条第一項並びに第二十七条第一項、第四項及び第七項中「第二十四条第一項」とあるのは「第二十九条において準用する第二十四条第一項」と、第二十五条中「法第四十九条第四項」とあるのは「法第五十条第六項において準用する法第四十九条第四項」と、「委員会の認定した事実」とあるのは「課徴金の計算の基礎又はその課徴金に係る違反行為」と、第二十七条第一項及び第四項中「法第四十九条第三項」とあるのは「法第五十条第六項において準用する法第四十九条第三項」と、前条第一項中「排除措置命令書の謄本」とあるのは「課徴金納付命令書の謄本」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書の謄本の送達に当たっては、当該排除措置命令」とあるのは「課徴金納付命令書の謄本の送達に当たっては、当該納付命令」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 29 The provisions of Articles 24 to 28 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a surcharge payment order. In this case, the phrase "Article 49 (5) of the Act" in Article 24 (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 49 (5) where applied mutatis mutandis under Article 50 (6)"; the phrase "the addressee of the cease and desist order" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the addressee of the surcharge payment order"; the phrase "Tentative content of the cease and desist order" in Article 24 (1) (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Amount of surcharge the Commission intends to order the person to pay"; the phrase "The facts found by the Commission and the application of laws and regulations thereto" in Article 24 (1) (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "The basis for the calculation of such amount and the act in violation with regard to the surcharge"; the phrases "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 25 and "Article 24 (1)" in Article 26 (1) and Article 27 (1), (4) and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 24 (1) where applied mutatis mutandis under Article 29"; the phrase "Article 49 (4) of the Act" in Article 25 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 49 (4) of the Act where applied mutatis mutandis under Article 50 (6)"; the phrase "the fact finding of the Commission" in Article 25 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the basis for the calculation of such amount or the act in violation with regard to the surcharge"; the phrase "Article 49 (3) of the Act" in Article 27 (1) and (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 49 (3) of the Act where applied mutatis mutandis under Article 50 (6)"; the phrase "A certified copy of a written cease and desist order" in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "A certified copy of a written surcharge payment order"; and the phrase "In the service of a certified copy of a written cease and desist order, a written notice shall be attached thereto stating that the addressee may request hearing on said cease and desist order" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall deemed to be replaced with "In the service of a certified copy of a written surcharge payment order, a written notice shall be attached thereto stating that the addressee may request hearing on said surcharge payment order."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

4 第九十条の二及び第九十一条の規定は設立企画人が創立総会を招集する場合について、会社法第六十八条第五項から第七項まで、第七十二条第一項本文、第七十三条第一項及び第四項、第七十四条から第八十三条まで並びに第九十三条第二項及び第三項の規定は投資法人の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)の規定は投資法人の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十一条第一項中「二月前までに当該日を公告し、当該日の二週間」とあるのは「二週間」と、同法第六十八条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「投資法人法第六十七条第一項第十六号又は第七十一条第四項第一号」と、同条第七項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第一項」と、同法第七十三条第四項中「第六十七条第一項第二号」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項第二号」と、同法第七十四条第四項及び第七十六条第二項中「第六十八条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第八十条中「第六十七条及び第六十八条」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第八十一条第四項及び第八十二条第四項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第九十三条第二項及び第三項中「設立時取締役」とあるのは「設立時執行役員及び設立時監督役員」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 90-2 and Article 91 of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the organizer(s) call an Organizational Meeting; the provisions of Article 68, paragraph (5) through paragraph (7), the main clause of Article 72, paragraph (1), Article 73, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), Article 74 through Article 83, and Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation; and the provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837, Article 838, Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to sub-item (g) of item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of absence or an invalidation of a resolution adopted at an Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation or an action seeking rescission of such resolution. In this case, the phrase "shall give public notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two months prior to that date, and shall send notice thereof in writing to the Investors more than two weeks prior to that date" in Article 91, paragraph (1) of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall send notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two weeks prior to that date," the phrase "item (v) of Article 27, or item (i) of Article 59(3)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 67, paragraph (1), item (xvi) or Article 71, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 68, paragraph (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 67(1)" in Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 68(3)" in Article 74, paragraph (4) and Article 76, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 67 and Article 68" in Article 80 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "the court" in Article 81, paragraph (4) and Article 82, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the phrase "The Directors at Incorporation" in Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment and Supervisory Officers at Establishment," the terms "the preceding paragraph" in Article 93, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act and "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 73, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS