「無効だ」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(57ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

第37条に従って公告されている商標登録出願は，混同を生じる商標又は商号が登録出願人又はその前権利者以外の他人により先に使用されたか又は公知にされたことを理由として拒絶されることはなく，かつ，商標登録が抹消，補正又は無効とされることはないものとするが，当該他人又はその権原承継人の申立による場合はこの限りでなく，また，当該他人又はその承継人は，出願人の出願公告日に混同を生じる商標又は商号を放棄していなかった事実を明らかにする立証責任を負うものとする。例文帳に追加

No application for registration of a trade-mark that has been advertised in accordance with section 37 shall be refused and no registration of a trade-mark shall be expunged or amended or held invalid on the ground of any previous use or making known of a confusing trade-mark or trade-name by a person other than the applicant for that registration or his predecessor in title, except at the instance of that other person or his successor in title, and the burden lies on that other person or his successor to establish that he had not abandoned the confusing trade-mark or trade-name at the date of advertisement of the applicant’s application.  - 特許庁

被告又は被告の1人の住所又は居所がその管轄区域にある控訴裁判所の本部において開廷される裁判所が，次に掲げる事項を審理する専属管轄権を有するものとする。特許出願又は特許の所有権を請求する申立，強制ライセンスについて相互的義務の決定を求める申立，特許の無効を求める申立，特許出願又は特許に関する譲渡契約についての異議，特許出願又は特許の対象である発明を実施するライセンスに関する移転契約についての異議，又は当該ライセンスに対する移転契約についての異議，1955年1月10日法律第10条に規定する調停が不調に終わったときに，同条にいう特許発明及びその関連のノウハウに関して提起される異議。例文帳に追加

The court sitting at the headquarters of the Court of Appeal in whose jurisdiction the domicile or residence of the defendant or of one of the defendants is located shall have sole jurisdiction to hear: petitions claiming ownership of a patent application or a patent; petitions for the determination of reciprocal obligations in respect of compulsory patent licenses; petitions for the annulment of a patent; opposition to assignment contracts in respect of patent application or of a patent; opposition to assignment contracts in respect of a license to work an invention which is the subject matter of a patent application or of a patent and opposition in respect of assignment contracts for such license; opposition in respect of patented inventions and of related know-how, referred to in Article 10 of the Law of January 10, 1955, when the conciliation provided for therein has failed.  - 特許庁

(3) 請求提出時に少なくとも5年間登録されていた先の商標の所有者が，別の後の商標を無効とする宣言を求めた場合は，当該所有者は，被告が例外措置として要求した場合は，請求提出日に先立つ5年間に，商標が登録されかつ請求の根拠となる商品又はサービスについて当該商標が現実かつ実効的な使用の対象であったこと，又は不使用を正当化する理由が存在することを証明するものとする。これらの目的で，当該商標は，それが実際に使用された商品又はサービスに限り，登録されたとみなされる。例文帳に追加

(3) Where the owner of a prior trademark which has been registered for at least five years at the time the request is submitted requests that another subsequent trademark be declared null and void, he shall prove, if the defendant so requests by way of exception, that in the course of the five years prior to the date of submission of the request the trademark has been the subject of real and effective use for the goods or services for which it is registered and on which the request is based, or that causes exist justifying the lack of use. For these purposes, the trademark shall be considered registered only for the goods or services for which it has actually been used. - 特許庁

(a) ある者に対し，特定の者の製品以外の製品を販売することを禁止する趣旨の契約書の条件に影響を及ぼすこと，又は (b) 他の理由で無効となるような契約を有効にすること，又は (c) 契約を解除する権利，又は契約の中の条件であって，本条とは無関係に行使可能なものを解除する権利に影響を及ぼすこと，又は (d) 特許製品の賃貸契約又は特許製品を実施するライセンスに関する契約における条件であって，特許製品を修理して良好な状態に保つために必要な特許製品に関する新たな部品の供給権を賃貸人又は実施許諾者に留保するものに影響を及ぼすこと例文帳に追加

(a) affects a condition in a contract that prohibits a person from selling products other than those of a particular person; or (b) validates a contract that would otherwise be invalid; or (c) affects a right to terminate a contract, or to terminate a condition of a contract, being a condition exercisable independently of this section; or (d) affects a condition in a contract for the lease of, or a license to exploit, a patented product, that reserves to the lessor or licensor the right to supply new parts of the patented product that are required to put or keep it in repair.  - 特許庁

(i) 有価約因の有無を問わず，国内標章に関する所有の個人的権利若しくは財産権又は保証の権利を設定し，変更し又は移転する生存者間の証書 (ii) (i)にいう権利に関する分割の証書，会社の証書，贈与財産の証書及び放棄の証書 (iii) (ii)にいう証書が予め記録されていない場合には，その証書の存在を確立する判決記録された証書の無効，失効，取消，撤廃又は廃止を確立する判決は，それらが関係する証書の記録の余白に記載しなければならない。更に，本条にいう判決を受けることを目的とした法的請求を記録することができる。この場合，判決の記録の効力は，その法的請求の記録の日に遡及して生ずる。 (iv) 適法な遺言書を残さない相続を立証する遺言書及び証書並びにこれらに関連する判決第50条例文帳に追加

(1) deeds inter vivos, whether for valuable consideration or not, constituting, modifying or transferring personal or property rights of possession or guarantee rights in respect of national marks; (2)deeds of partition, company deeds, deed of settlement, deeds of release relative to the rights referred to in the preceding item; (3) judgments establishing the existence of the acts referred to in the preceding items, where such acts have not been previously registered. Judgments establishing the invalidity, annulment, termination, rescission, revocation of a registered act must be noted in the margin of the registration of the act to which they refer. Furthermore, judicial claims to obtain the judgments referred to in this Article may be registered; in such case, the effects of the registration of the judgment shall be retroactive to the date of registration of the judicial claim; (4) wills and acts proving the intestate succession and the judgments relative thereto. - 特許庁

(2) 本条(3)，(4)及び(5)に基づいて，次に掲げる各号の場合，営業権を伴わない登録商標の譲渡は無効である。 (a) 当該商標がパプアニューギニア国内において譲渡人又は前権利者により善意に使用されたことがない場合，又は， (b) 実質的に同一の又は混同を生じるほど類似する商標が，譲渡後も譲渡人によりその他の商品に継続して使用され，かつ以下の条件をみたす場合 (i) それらの商品及び譲渡人との間に取引上の関係が存在すること，及び (ii) それらの商品が (A) 譲渡された商標に関する商品と同一の内容を有すること，又は (B) 譲渡人及び譲受人による各自の商品への当該商標の使用により，公衆が誤認混同するおそれがある内容を有すること例文帳に追加

(2) Subject to Subsections (3), (4) and (5) an assignment of a registered trade mark without goodwill is invalid if - (a) the trade mark was not at any time in use in good faith in Papua New Guinea by the assignor or his predecessor in title; or (b) a substantially identical or deceptively similar trade mark continues to be used by the assignor, after the assignment in relation to other goods, where - (i) there exists a connection in the course of trade between those goods and the assignor; and (ii) those goods are - (A) of the same description as those in respect of which the trade mark has been assigned; or (B) of such a description that the public is likely to be deceived by the use of the trade mark by the assignor and assignee on their respective goods. - 特許庁

税関職員が輸入され税関の管理下にある商品が第82条に基づいて受理された通知に関わる商品である可能性があるとの意見を有する場合，これら商品は速やかに税関職員によって次にいたるまで差押えられる。税関長が，第87条に基づく手続において発せられた当該通知を無効にする命令の通達を受けた，税関長が，第87条に基づく手続において発せられた当該商品を引き渡す命令の通達を受けた，当該商品が侵害商品でないという決定により第87条に基づく手続(全ての上訴を含む)が決定された，第87条に基づく何れかの手続(全ての上訴を含む)が放棄された，又は，第85条に基づき通知が送達されてから10日経過し，当該輸入者又は荷受人以外の者より第87条に基づき提起された手続の通知が税関長に対して通知されていない。これらに至った場合，当該商品は，本条に従うことを条件として，その権利を有する者に引き渡される。例文帳に追加

Where an officer of customs has formed an opinion that any goods that have been imported and are under customs control may be goods to which a notice accepted under paragraph of section 82 relates, those goods shall forthwith be detained by him until ? the Controller of Customs has been served with an order made in proceedings under section 87 that the notice be discharged; the Controller of Customs has been served with an order made in proceedings under section 87 that the goods be released; any proceedings under section 87 (including any appeal) have been determined by a decision that the goods are not infringing goods; any proceedings under section 87 (including any appeal) have been abandoned; or 10 days have elapsed since notice was served under section 85 and the Controller of Customs has not been served with notice of proceedings brought under section 87 by any person other than the importer or consignee, whereupon the goods shall, subject to this section, be released to the person entitled to them.  - 特許庁

(4) 変更請求は，共同体商標出願として付与された出願日に提出されたとみなされ，優先権又は経過年数が主張されている場合は，これらの権利を享受するものとする。更に，変更請求は国内商標出願と同様に処理される。ただし，変更の請求対象が既に登録された共同体商標に言及する場合は，更なる手続なく，国内商標の地位が付与され，第22条(4)の規定が適用されるが，放棄，不更新又は商標所有者に起因するその他の理由により，決定がスペインにおける保護に影響を与える可能性のある無効又は失効の理由の実質に関して係属しているという事実は除くものとし，この場合は，当該請求は国内商標出願として処理される。本項に定める直接付与の合意に対しては，絶対的又は相対的禁止事由の存在を根拠として審判請求することができないが，当該審判請求は，有効な変更の要件又は申請した共同体商標を直接付与する要件を充足しないことを根拠として行うことができる。例文帳に追加

(4) An application for conversion shall be considered filed on the filing date granted to it as a Community trademark application and, if it claimed priority or age, it shall benefit from these rights. Moreover, the application for conversion shall be processed in the same way as a national trademark application. Nevertheless, if the application for conversion refers to a Community trademark already registered, it shall be granted the status of a national trademark without further procedure, and the provisions of Article 22(4) shall apply, apart from the fact that, owing to renunciation, failure to renew or any other cause attributable to its owner, a pronouncement has been pending as regards the substance of any reason for invalidity or lapse capable of affecting the protection of the trademark in Spain, in which case it shall be processed as a national trademark application. No appeal based on the existence of absolute or relative prohibitions may be lodged against the direct grant agreement provided for in this paragraph, but such an appeal may be based on failure to satisfy the requirements for the valid conversion or direct grant of the Community trademark applied for. - 特許庁

消費者がウェブ画面を通じて事業者が画面上に表示する手続に従って当該事業者との契約の申込みを行う際、意図しない申込み（例えば、全く申込みを行う意思がないにもかかわらず、操作を誤って申込みを行ってしまったような場合）や意図と異なる内容の申込み（例えば、操作を誤って申込みの内容を入力してしまったにもかかわらず、それを訂正しないままに内心の意思と異なる内容の申込みであると表示から推断される表示行為を行ってしまったような場合）を行った場合は、事業者が消費者に対して申込みを行う意思や申込みの内容について確認を求める措置を講じた場合及び消費者自らが申込みを行う意思や申込みの内容についての確認の機会が不要である旨の意思を表明をした場合を除き、民法第９５条ただし書の規定は適用されず、消費者は、意図しない契約の申込みや意図と異なる申込みの意思表示を無効とすることができる（電子契約法第３条）。例文帳に追加

Where a consumer can enter into a contract with a business entity by following the procedure displayed on its website, if he makes an unintentional offer (for example, where he mistakenly sends an offer although he has no actual intention to make an offer) or if he makes an offer in which the contents do not correspond to his actual intentions (for example, where he acted without revising his first offer where the first offer does not correspond with his actual intention, and where he intended to make a change), then he can assert the invalidity of the offer which was not intended or which is different from his actual intention. The proviso to Article 95 of the Civil Code is not applicable except where the business entity has taken measures to give the consumer an opportunity to confirm his intention to make the offer and to confirm the contents of the offer or where the consumer voluntarily waives such opportunity (Article 3 of the Electronic Contract Law).  - 経済産業省

次の契約又はライセンスにおいて，次に掲げる効果を有する条件を挿入することは，違法とする。(i) 意匠が登録された物品の販売若しくは賃貸に関する契約において，又は(ii) 意匠が登録された物品を製造し若しくは使用するライセンスにおいて，又は(iii) 意匠が登録された物品を包装するライセンスにおいて，(a) 意匠が登録されている物品以外の何らかの物品について，購入者，賃借人，又は実施権者に対して販売者，賃貸人，実施許諾者若しくはその者の被指名人から取得することを強制し，又は何人からも取得することを禁止し若しくは何人からも取得できるその者の権利を何らかの方法若しくは何らかの程度まで制限し，又は販売者，賃貸人，実施許諾者若しくはその者の被指名人以外の者から取得することを禁止すること，又は (b) 意匠が登録されている物品以外の物品であって，販売者，賃貸人，実施許諾者，若しくはその者の被指名人により供給されないものについて，購入者，賃借人，又は実施権者に対して使用することを禁止し，それを使用できる購入者，賃借人，若しくは実施権者の権利を何らかの方法若しくは何らかの程度まで制限すること 前記の如何なる条件も，無効とする。例文帳に追加

It shall not be lawful to insert- (i) in any contract for or in relation to the sale or lease of an article in respect of which a design is registered; or (ii) in a license to manufacture or use an article in respect of which a design is registered; or (iii) in a license to package the article in respect of which a design is registered, a condition the effect of which may be- (a) to require the purchaser, lessee, or licensee to acquire from the vendor, lessor, or licensor or his nominees, or to prohibit him from acquiring or to restrict in any manner or to any extent his right to acquire from any person or to prohibit him from acquiring except from the vendor, lessor, or licensor or his nominees any article other than the article in respect of which a design is registered; or (b) to prohibit the purchaser, lessee or licensee from using or to restrict in any manner or to any extent the right of the purchaser, lessee or licensee, to use an article other than the article in respect of which a design is registered which is not supplied by the vendor, lessor or licensor or his nominee, and any such condition shall be void. - 特許庁

(1)商標の登録は、当該登録の日よりも後に、当該商標に含まれる1個若しくは数個の単語、又は、物品や物質若しくは役務の名称又は表示を構成する単語の使用のみを理由として無効になるとはみなされない。ただし、次に掲げる事項のいずれかが証明される場合、第(2)項の規定が適用されるものとする。(a)当該物品若しくは物質又は役務を扱う取引を営む者による当該物品若しくは物質又は役務の名称あるいは表示としての当該単語が周知であって使用が定着しており、取引の過程で当該商標の所有者又は登録使用権者に繋がる商品又は役務に、又は証明商標の場合、これらの所有者によって証明される商品又は役務に関連して使用されていないこと。(b)当該物品若しくは物質又は役務は特許により製造され、当該特許期間満了後2年以上経過しており、かつその1個又は数個の単語は当該物品若しくは物質又は役務の実用に供する名称又は表示に過ぎないこと。例文帳に追加

(1) The registration of a trademark shall not be deemed to have become invalid by reason only of any use after the date of the registration of 28 any word or words which the trademark contains or of which it consists of the name or description of an article or substance or services: Provided that, if it is proved either- (a) that there is a well-known and established use of the said word or words as the name or description of the article or substance or service by a person or persons carrying on a trade therein, not being use in relation to goods or services connected in the course of trade with the proprietor or a registered user of the trademark or in the case of a certification trademark, goods or services certified by these proprietor; or (b) that the article or substance or service was manufactured under a patent and that a period of two years or more has passed after the patent has elapsed, and that the said word or words are the only practicable name or description of the article or substance or service- the provisions of sub-section (2) shall apply.  - 特許庁

第百二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第六号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第六号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定は、会員金融商品取引所の組織変更の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第六号中「組織変更をする会社の株主等若しくは社員等」とあるのは「組織変更をする会員金融商品取引所の会員等（会員、理事長、理事、監事又は清算人をいう。）」と、「組織変更後の会社の株主等、社員等」とあるのは「組織変更後株式会社金融商品取引所の株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。）」と、同法第九百三十七条第三項中「各会社の本店」とあるのは「金融商品取引所の本店及び支店並びに主たる事務所及び従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 102 (1) The provisions of Articles 828(1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)), Article 835(1), Articles 836 to 839 inclusive, Article 846 and Article 937(3) (limited to the part pertaining to item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of Entity Conversion of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. or members, etc. of the company implementing entity conversion" in Article 828(2)(vi) of the that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc. (meaning members, president, board members, auditors or liquidators) of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange implementing entity conversion"; and the term "shareholders, etc., members, etc. of the company after Entity Conversion" in that item of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders, etc. (meaning shareholders, directors or liquidators (with regard to a company with board of company auditors, meaning shareholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators; and with regard to a company with committees, meaning shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators)) of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange after Entity Conversion,"; the term "the head office of each company" in Article 937(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office and branch offices of and the principal office and secondary offices of the Financial Instruments Exchange,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八百四十四条　株式会社の株式交換又は株式移転の無効の訴えに係る請求を認容する判決が確定した場合において、株式交換又は株式移転をする株式会社（以下この条において「旧完全子会社」という。）の発行済株式の全部を取得する株式会社（以下この条において「旧完全親会社」という。）が当該株式交換又は株式移転に際して当該旧完全親会社の株式（以下この条において「旧完全親会社株式」という。）を交付したときは、当該旧完全親会社は、当該判決の確定時における当該旧完全親会社株式に係る株主に対し、当該株式交換又は株式移転の際に当該旧完全親会社株式の交付を受けた者が有していた旧完全子会社の株式（以下この条において「旧完全子会社株式」という。）を交付しなければならない。この場合において、旧完全親会社が株券発行会社であるときは、当該旧完全親会社は、当該株主に対し、当該旧完全子会社株式を交付するのと引換えに、当該旧完全親会社株式に係る旧株券を返還することを請求することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 844 (1) In cases where a judgment upholding a claim relating to an action seeking invalidation of a Share Exchange or Share Transfer of a Stock Company has become final and binding, if the Stock Company acquiring all of the Issued Shares (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Wholly Owning Parent Company" in this Article) of the Stock Company effecting the Share Exchange or Share Transfer (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company" in this Article) has delivered the shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company" in this Article) at the time of the Share Exchange or Share Transfer, the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company shall deliver to shareholders pertaining to the Shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company as of the time such judgment became final and conclusive the shares of the Former Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Shares of the Former Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company" in this Article) that had been held, at the time of the Share Exchange or Share Transfer, by the persons who received delivery of the Shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company. In such cases, when such Former Wholly Owning Parent Company is a Company Issuing Share Certificates, the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company may request such shareholders to return the old share certificates representing such Shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company in exchange for the delivery of such Shares of the Former Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第六十七条第一項（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで（議事録）及び第三百十六条第一項（株主総会に提出された資料等の調査）の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百四十六条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項の規定は第百三十六条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条及び第八百七十六条の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号中「株主等若しくは社員等」とあるのは「会員等（会員、理事長、理事、監事又は清算人をいう。以下この号において同じ。）」と、「株主等、社員等」とあるのは「会員等、株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。）」と、同項第八号中「株主等若しくは社員等」とあるのは「会員等（会員、理事長、理事、監事又は清算人をいう。以下この号において同じ。）若しくは株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この号において同じ。）」と、「株主等、社員等」とあるのは「会員等、株主等」と、同法第九百三十七条第三項中「本店」とあるのは「本店（会員金融商品取引所にあっては、主たる事務所及び従たる事務所）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 146 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the parts pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the parts pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 834 (limited to the parts pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 835(1), Articles 836 to 839 inclusive, Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), item (iii) and item (iv) and the proviso to paragraph (2)), Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the parts pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) and paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of merger under Article 136(1); and the provisions of Article 868(5), Article 870 (limited to the parts pertaining to item (xv)), the main clause of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the part pertaining to item (iv)), the main clause of Article 873, Article 875 and Article 876 of said Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to filing of the motion under Article 843(4) of said Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "Shareholders, etc. or Members, etc." in Article 828(2)(vii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc. (meaning members, presidents, directors, auditors or liquidators; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item); the term "Shareholders, etc., Members, etc." in said item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc., Shareholders, etc. (meaning shareholders, directors or liquidators (with regard to a company with auditors, meaning shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators; and with regard to a company with Committees, meaning shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators)); the term "Shareholders, etc. or Members, etc." in Article 828(2)(viii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc. (meaning members, presidents, directors, auditors or liquidators; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) or Shareholders, etc. (meaning shareholders, directors or liquidators (with regard to a company with auditors, meaning shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators; and with regard to a company with Committees, shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item); and the term "Shareholders, etc., Members, etc." in said item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc., Shareholders, etc."; and the term "the head office" in Article 937(3) of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office (with regard to a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange, the principal office and secondary offices); and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) 本条に従うことを条件として，特許製品の供給契約若しくは特許発明を実施するライセンス，又は当該供給若しくはライセンスに関する契約の条件は，次の何れかを意図するものである限り，無効とする。 (a) 供給契約の場合は，供給を受ける者に対して，当該特許製品以外の何らかのものを，当該供給者若しくはその指名を受けた者から取得することを義務付けるか，又は特定の者から取得すること若しくは当該供給者若しくはその指名を受けた者以外の者から取得することを禁じること (b) 特許発明を実施するライセンスの場合は，実施権者に対して，当該特許発明である製品又は(発明が方法の場合は)直接に当該方法により得られたか若しくは当該方法が適用された製品以外の何らかのものを，当該実施許諾者若しくはその指名を受けた者から取得することを義務付けるか，又は特定の者から取得すること若しくは当該許諾者若しくはその指名を受けた者以外の者から取得することを禁じること (c) 何れの場合も，供給を受ける者又は実施権者に対して，当該供給者若しくは実施許諾者，又はその指名を受けた者により供給されない物品(特許製品であるか否かを問わない)か，又は当該供給者若しくは実施許諾者若しくはその指名を受けた者に帰属しない何らかの特許方法を使用することを禁じること，又は供給を受ける者若しくは実施権者の当該物品又は方法を使用する権利を制限すること例文帳に追加

(1) Subject to this section, any condition or term of a contract for the supply of a patented product or of a licence to work a patented invention, or of a contract relating to any such supply or licence, shall be void in so far as it purports -- (a) in the case of a contract for supply, to require the person supplied to acquire from the supplier, or his nominee, or prohibit him from acquiring from any specified person, or from acquiring except from the supplier or his nominee, anything other than the patented product; (b) in the case of a licence to work a patented invention, to require the licensee to acquire from the licensor or his nominee, or prohibit him from acquiring from any specified person, or from acquiring except from the licensor or his nominee, anything other than the product which is the patented invention or (if it is a process) other than any product obtained directly by means of the process or to which the process has been applied; or (c) in either case, to prohibit the person supplied or the licensee from using articles (whether patented products or not) which are not supplied by, or any patented process which does not belong to, the supplier or licensor, or his nominee, or to restrict the right of the person supplied or the licensee to use any such articles or process. - 特許庁

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第九十条の二及び第九十一条の規定は設立企画人が創立総会を招集する場合について、会社法第六十八条第五項から第七項まで、第七十二条第一項本文、第七十三条第一項及び第四項、第七十四条から第八十三条まで並びに第九十三条第二項及び第三項の規定は投資法人の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十一条第一項中「二月前までに当該日を公告し、当該日の二週間」とあるのは「二週間」と、同法第六十八条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「投資法人法第六十七条第一項第十六号又は第七十一条第四項第一号」と、同条第七項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第一項」と、同法第七十三条第四項中「第六十七条第一項第二号」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項第二号」と、同法第七十四条第四項及び第七十六条第二項中「第六十八条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第八十条中「第六十七条及び第六十八条」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第八十一条第四項及び第八十二条第四項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第九十三条第二項及び第三項中「設立時取締役」とあるのは「設立時執行役員及び設立時監督役員」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 90-2 and Article 91 of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the organizer(s) call an Organizational Meeting; the provisions of Article 68, paragraph (5) through paragraph (7), the main clause of Article 72, paragraph (1), Article 73, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), Article 74 through Article 83, and Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation; and the provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837, Article 838, Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to sub-item (g) of item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of absence or an invalidation of a resolution adopted at an Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation or an action seeking rescission of such resolution. In this case, the phrase "shall give public notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two months prior to that date, and shall send notice thereof in writing to the Investors more than two weeks prior to that date" in Article 91, paragraph (1) of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall send notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two weeks prior to that date," the phrase "item (v) of Article 27, or item (i) of Article 59(3)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 67, paragraph (1), item (xvi) or Article 71, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 68, paragraph (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 67(1)" in Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 68(3)" in Article 74, paragraph (4) and Article 76, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 67 and Article 68" in Article 80 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "the court" in Article 81, paragraph (4) and Article 82, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the phrase "The Directors at Incorporation" in Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment and Supervisory Officers at Establishment," the terms "the preceding paragraph" in Article 93, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act and "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 73, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム