| 例文 (999件) |
_訟を含む例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 4568件
第百三十二条の十 民事訴訟に関する手続における申立てその他の申述（以下「申立て等」という。）のうち、当該申立て等に関するこの法律その他の法令の規定により書面等（書面、書類、文書、謄本、抄本、正本、副本、複本その他文字、図形等人の知覚によって認識することができる情報が記載された紙その他の有体物をいう。以下同じ。）をもってするものとされているものであって、最高裁判所の定める裁判所に対してするもの（当該裁判所の裁判長、受命裁判官、受託裁判官又は裁判所書記官に対してするものを含む。）については、当該法令の規定にかかわらず、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子情報処理組織（裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。以下同じ。）と申立て等をする者又は第三百九十九条第一項の規定による処分の告知を受ける者の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。第三百九十七条から第四百一条までにおいて同じ。）を用いてすることができる。ただし、督促手続に関する申立て等であって、支払督促の申立てが書面をもってされたものについては、この限りでない。例文帳に追加
Article 132-10 (1) In the case of a petition or any other statement to be filed or made in the procedures for civil suits (hereinafter referred to as a "petition, etc."), which shall be filed or made, pursuant to the provisions of this Code or other laws and regulations concerning such petition, etc., by means of a document, etc. (meaning a document, a transcript, extract, authenticated copy or duplicate of a document or a duplicate of a bill or note, or any other paper or other tangible object on which information recognizable to human perception such as characters and shapes is stated; the same shall apply hereinafter) to the court specified by the Supreme Court (including one filed or made to the presiding judge, authorized judge, commissioned judge or court clerk of such court), notwithstanding the provisions of said laws and regulations, as provided for by the Rules of the Supreme Court, the petition, etc. may be filed or made by means of an electronic data processing system (meaning an electronic data processing system wherein the computer (including input-output devices; the same shall apply hereinafter) used in the court is connected, by way of telecommunication lines, to the computer used by the person who files or makes the petition, etc. or person who receives a notice of a disposition under the provision of Article 399(1); the same shall apply in Article 397 to Article 401); provided, however, that this shall not apply to a petition, etc. on the demand procedure where a petition for demand for payment is filed or made by means of a document. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第二百三十八条 小規模個人再生においては、第三十四条第二項、第三十五条、第三十七条本文（約定劣後再生債権に係る部分に限る。）及びただし書、第四十条、第四十条の二（民法第四百二十三条の規定により再生債権者の提起した訴訟に係る部分を除く。）、第四十二条第二項（約定劣後再生債権に係る部分に限る。）、第三章第一節及び第二節、第八十五条第六項、第八十七条第三項、第八十九条第二項及び第九十四条第一項（これらの規定中約定劣後再生債権に係る部分に限る。）、第四章第三節（第百十三条第二項から第四項までを除く。）及び第四節、第百二十六条、第六章第二節、第百五十五条第一項から第三項まで、第百五十六条（約定劣後再生債権に係る部分に限る。）、第百五十七条から第百五十九条まで、第百六十三条第二項、第百六十四条第二項後段、第百六十五条第一項、第七章第三節（第百七十二条を除く。）、第百七十四条第一項、第百七十四条の二、第百七十五条第二項、第百七十八条から第百八十条まで、第百八十一条第一項及び第二項、第百八十五条（第百八十九条第八項、第百九十条第二項及び第百九十五条第七項において準用する場合を含む。）、第百八十六条第三項及び第四項、第百八十七条、第百八十八条、第二百条第二項及び第四項、第二百二条第一項、第二百五条第二項並びに第十二章の規定は、適用しない。例文帳に追加
Article 238 In the case of rehabilitation for individuals with small-scale debts, the following provisions shall not apply: Article 34(2), Article 35, the main clause of Article 37 (limited to the part concerning a consensually-subordinated rehabilitation claim) and the proviso to said Article, Article 40, Article 40-2 (excluding the part concerning an action filed by a rehabilitation creditor pursuant to the provision of Article 423 of the Civil Code), Article 42(2) (limited to the part concerning a consensually-subordinated rehabilitation claim), Chapter III, Section 1 and Section 2, Article 85(6), Article 87(3), Article 89(2) and Article 94(1) (limited to the parts of the provisions concerning a consensually-subordinated rehabilitation claim), Chapter IV, Section 3 (excluding Article 113(2) to (4)) and Section 4, Article 126, Chapter VI, Section 2, Article 155(1) to (3), Article 156 (limited to the part concerning a consensually-subordinated rehabilitation claim), Article 157 to Article 159, Article 163(2), the second sentence of Article 164(2), Article 165(1), Chapter VII, Section 3 (excluding Article 172), Article 174(1), Article 174-2, Article 175(2), Article 178 to Article 180, Article 181(1) and (2), Article 185 (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 189(8), Article 190(2), and Article 195(7)), Article 186(3) and (4), Article 187, Article 188, Article 200(2) and (4), Article 202(1), Article 205(2), and Chapter XII. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
７ 刑事訴訟法（昭和二十三年法律第百三十一号）第六十四条、第七十三条第一項前段及び第三項、第七十四条並びに第七十六条第一項本文及び第二項の規定（勾引に関する部分に限る。）は、第二項又は第三項の引致状及びこれらの規定による保護観察対象者の引致について準用する。この場合において、同法第六十四条第一項中「罪名、公訴事実の要旨」とあり、同法第七十三条第三項中「公訴事実の要旨」とあり、及び同法第七十六条第一項本文中「公訴事実の要旨及び弁護人を選任することができる旨並びに貧困その他の事由により自ら弁護人を選任することができないときは弁護人の選任を請求することができる旨」とあるのは「引致の理由」と、同法第六十四条第一項中「裁判長又は受命裁判官」とあるのは「裁判官」と、同法第七十四条中「刑事施設」とあるのは「刑事施設又は少年鑑別所」と、同法第七十六条第二項中「合議体の構成員又は裁判所書記」とあるのは「地方更生保護委員会が引致した場合においては委員又は保護観察官、保護観察所の長が引致した場合においては保護観察官」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
(7) The provisions of Article 64, the first sentence of paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of Article 73, Article 74, the main clause of paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (which shall be limited to the part relating to subpoenas) of Article 76 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Act No. 131 of 1948) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the warrant of arrest under paragraph (2) or (3) and the apprehending of the probationers and parolees pursuant to the provisions of these paragraphs. In this case, the terms "the crime, a summary of the charged facts" in paragraph (1) of Article 64 of said Code, "a summary of the charged facts" in paragraph (3) of Article 73 of said Code, and "a summary of the charged facts, that he/she has the right to appoint counsel, and that, when he/she is unable to appoint counsel him/herself because of indigence or other reasons, he/she is entitled to request the court to appoint counsel instead" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the reason for apprehending", the terms "the presiding judge or the commissioned judge" in paragraph (1) of Article 64 of said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "the judge", the term "penal institution" in Article 74 of said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "penal institution or juvenile classification home", the term "a judge of a collegiate panel or a court clerk" in paragraph (2) of Article 76 of said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Board member or a probation officer if apprehended by the Regional Parole Board or a probation officer if apprehended by the director of the probation office". - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第百五十一条 第百四十七条並びに民事訴訟法第九十三条第一項（期日の指定）、第九十四条（期日の呼出し）、第百七十九条から第百八十一条まで、第百八十三条から第百八十六条まで、第百八十八条、第百九十条、第百九十一条、第百九十五条から第百九十八条まで、第百九十九条第一項、第二百一条から第二百四条まで、第二百六条、第二百七条、第二百十条から第二百十三条まで、第二百十四条第一項から第三項まで、第二百十五条から第二百二十二条まで、第二百二十三条第一項から第六項まで、第二百二十六条から第二百二十八条まで、第二百二十九条第一項から第三項まで、第二百三十一条、第二百三十二条第一項、第二百三十三条、第二百三十四条、第二百三十六条から第二百三十八条まで、第二百四十条から第二百四十二条まで（証拠）及び第二百七十八条（尋問等に代わる書面の提出）の規定は、前条の規定による証拠調べ又は証拠保全に準用する。この場合において、同法第百七十九条中「裁判所において当事者が自白した事実及び顕著な事実」とあるのは「顕著な事実」と、同法第二百四条及び第二百十五条の三中「最高裁判所規則」とあるのは「経済産業省令」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
Article 151 Article 147 of this Act and Articles 93(1) (designation of date), 94 (summons on designated date), 179 to 181, 183 to 186, 188, 190, 191, 195 to 198, 199(1), 201 to 204, 206, 207, 210 to 213, 214(1) to 214(3), 215 to 222, 223(1) to 223(6), 226 to 228, 229(1) to 229(3), 231, 232(1), 233, 234, 236 to 238, 240 to 242 (evidence) and 278 (submission of document in lieu of examination, etc) of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis to the examination and preservation of evidence under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "facts that are admitted by the party in court or that are obvious" in Article 179 of the said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "obvious facts", and the term "Supreme Court Rules" in Article 204 and 215-3 of the said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry." - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第百六十七条の十四 第百四十六条から第百五十二条まで、第百五十五条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十四条第五項及び第六項並びに第百六十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）の規定は、少額訴訟債権執行について準用する。この場合において、第百四十六条、第百五十五条第三項及び第百五十六条第三項中「執行裁判所」とあるのは「裁判所書記官」と、第百四十六条第一項中「差押命令を発する」とあるのは「差押処分をする」と、第百四十七条第一項、第百四十八条第二項、第百五十条及び第百五十五条第一項中「差押命令」とあるのは「差押処分」と、第百四十七条第一項及び第百四十八条第一項中「差押えに係る債権」とあるのは「差押えに係る金銭債権」と、第百四十九条中「差押命令が発せられたとき」とあるのは「差押処分がされたとき」と、第百六十四条第五項中「差押命令の取消決定」とあるのは「差押処分の取消決定若しくは差押処分を取り消す旨の裁判所書記官の処分」と、第百六十五条（見出しを含む。）中「配当等」とあるのは「弁済金の交付」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
Article 167-14 The provisions of Articles 146 to 152, Articles 155 to 158, Article 164(5) and (6), and Article 165 (excluding item (iii) and item (iv)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to execution against a claim relating to an action on small claim. In this case, the term "execution court" in Article 146, Article 155(3) and Article 156(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "court clerk," the phrase "issue an order of seizure" in Article 146(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make a disposition of seizure," the term "order of seizure" in Article 147(1), Article 148(2), Article 150 and Article 155(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition of seizure," the phrase "claim pertaining to a seizure" in Article 147(1) and Article 148(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "monetary claim pertaining to a seizure," the phrase "an order of seizure is issued" in Article 149 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a disposition of seizure is made," the phrase "an order to revoke an order of seizure" in Article 164(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an order to revoke an order of seizure or a disposition by a court clerk to revoke a disposition of seizure," and the term "liquidating distribution, etc." in Article 165 (including the title of the Article) shall be deemed to be replaced with "delivery of payment money." - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
特許の全部又は一部の取消しは、高等裁判所への請願書により、又は高等裁判所に係属している侵害訴訟中の反訴により、次の各号に掲げる事由のすべて又はいずれかを理由として得ることができる。すなわち、その発明はバングラデシュ国内において先願により有効に付与された特許の対象であること。真正かつ最先の発明者又はその法定代理人若しくは譲受人は当該特許出願人若しくは出願人の一人ではなかったこと。その特許は取消しを申請している者又は当該申請人がなす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該申請人が代理している者の権利を詐害する目的で取得されたこと。その発明は特許された日において新規性を欠く製造方法又は改良であったこと。その発明は特許の日以前に知られていた又は使用されていたものに係るものであり、進歩性がないこと。その発明は有用性がないこと。完全な明細書は十分かつ正確に記載されておらず、発明の本質及び発明の実施方法が確認されないこと。完全な明細書から、請求する発明の範囲が十分かつ明瞭に確認されないこと。その特許は虚偽の示唆又は不実表示に基づいて取得されたこと。その発明の主な又は目的とする用途又は実施が法令に反すること。その特許権者が、当該特許に含まれる条件に違反し又は遵守していないこと。完全な明細書が、当該明細書が特許意匠商標庁に提出された当時に当該特許に係る出願人が知っていた、当該発明の最良の実施方法を開示していない。例文帳に追加
Revocation of a patent in whole or in part may be obtained on petition to or on a counter claim in a suit for infringement before the High Court Division on all or any of the following grounds, namely:- that the invention has been the subject of a valid prior grant of a patent in Bangladesh; that the true and first inventor or his legal representative or assign was not the applicant or one of the applicants for the patent; that the patent was obtained in fraud of the rights of the person applying for the revocation or of any person under or through whom he claims; that the invention was not, at the date of the patent, a manner of new manufacture or improvement; that the invention does not involve any inventive step, having regard to what was known or used prior to the date of the patent; that the invention is of no utility; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe and ascertain the nature of the invention and the manner in which the invention is to be performed; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and clearly ascertain the scope of the invention claimed; that the patent was obtained on a false suggestion or representation; that the primary or intended use or exercise of the invention is contrary to law; that the patentee has contravened, or has not complied with, the conditions contained in the patent; that the complete specification does not disclose the best method of performance of the invention known to the applicant for the patent at the time when the specification was left at the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. - 特許庁
(1) エストニア共和国において特許発明を実施することに関心を有しており，かつ，その実施の能力を有する者は，特許所有者がライセンスを許諾しなかった場合は，強制ライセンスを取得するために訴訟を提起することができる。ただし，次に掲げる事情が存在していることを条件とする。 1) 特許所有者が，特許証発行に関する通知の公告から3年以内又は特許出願から4年以内のうち何れか遅く終了する期間内に，エストニア共和国において特許発明を実施していないこと (1999年10月27日。2000年1月1日施行－RT I 1999, 84, 764) 2) 特許所有者が，エストニア共和国の国内市場の需要に見合う程度に特許発明を実施していないこと 3) エストニア共和国の経済にとって重要であって技術的に進歩した他の発明の実施をその特許が妨げていること 4) 国防，環境保護，公衆衛生及びその他エストニア共和国の重要な国益が，その発明の実施(自然災害又は他の緊急事態に関連する発明の実施を含む)を必要としていること 5) その特許が，植物品種権法(RT I 1998, 36/37, 553; 2000, 10, 56; 2001, 93, 565; 2002, 53, 336; 61, 375; 63, 387)による植物品種権の付与，又は法的保護が付与されている植物品種の実施を妨げていること (1999年10月27日。2000年1月1日施行－RT I 1999, 84, 764)例文帳に追加
(1) A person who is interested in using a patented invention and is capable of doing so in the Republic of Estonia, may, upon refusal of the proprietor of the patent to grant a licence, file an action in court for acquiring a compulsory licence if: 1) the proprietor of the patent has not used the invention in the Republic of Estonia within three years after publication of the notice concerning the issue of the patent or within four years after filing a patent application, and in such case the term which ends later shall apply; (27.10.1999 entered into force 01.01.2000 - RT I 1999, 84, 764) 2) the proprietor of the patent does not use the invention in the extent which would correspond to the needs of the domestic market of the Republic of Estonia; 3) the patent hinders the use of another, technically advanced invention significant for the economy of the Republic of Estonia; 4) national defence, environmental protection, public health and othersignificant national interests of the Republic of Estonia require the use of the invention, including the need to use the invention in connection with a natural disaster or other emergency. 5) the patent hinders the grant of plant variety rights pursuant to the Plant Variety Rights Act (RT I 1998, 36/37, 553; 2000, 10, 56; 2001, 93, 565; 2002, 53, 336; 61, 375; 63, 387) or the use of a plant variety which is granted legal protection. (27.10.1999 entered into force 01.01.2000 - RT I 1999, 84, 764) - 特許庁
一方、EU-ETSに対しては、①第一約束期間の削減目標については、排出枠の設定が緩く、割当の緩さが判明した時点で価格が暴落するなど、キャップの設定に課題があったこと、②各国の排出上限量となる国別割当計画の策定過程において、割当方法及び割当量をめぐって、第一約束期間においては、企業が各国政府を提訴した事例がEU全体で800件程度あり、第二約束期間については、チェコ、ラトビア、ポーランド、ハンガリー、エストニア等旧東欧諸国が欧州委員会の要求する厳しい割当量を巡り、欧州委員会を相手に訴訟を起こしているなど、キャップの衡平性に課題があること、③フランスのボルローエコロジー・持続可能な開発整備相が、「EU域内から環境規制が緩いまたは無い他の地域に工場など移転する、いわゆる『炭素リーケージ』について懸念がある。」と表明し、ドイツの産業エネルギー連盟リヒマン事務総長が、「競争相手に炭素コストが生じなければ、産業界はこのコストを世界市場で転嫁できないので、労働市場が失われるだけではなく、生産拠点の移転もあり得るが、これは、欧州外での排出増加になる。」と発言しているなど、炭素リーケージ及び域内企業の国際競争力低下の懸念があること、等、様々な課題が指摘されている。例文帳に追加
On the other hand, experts have pointed out various issues pertaining to the EU-ETS, including the following. ① Regarding the reduction targets of Phase I, there are problems in cap setting, such as moderate emissions allowances that lead to a price fall when the moderate allocation is realized. ② There are problems related to fairness and equity with respect to the cap. For example, during Phase I, in the process of creating national allocation plans that determine each country’s emissions cap, there were about 800 cases26 in all the EU countries wherein the companies sued their national governments over allocation methods and allocation amounts. Further, during Phase II, the former East European countries, such as Czech Republic, Latvia, Poland, Hungary, and Estonia, sued the European Commission over its strict demand on the allocation amount27. ③ There are concerns about “carbon leakage” and a loss of international competitiveness among the EU companies. For example, Jean-Louis Borloo, the French Minister of Ecology and Sustainable Development, expressed his concern about “carbon leakage,” which occurs when economic activities and plant locations move from the EU countries to countries with lesser or no environmental regulations. Secretary General Mr. Richmann of German Federation of Industry and Energy stated that in a situation wherein the competitors do not need to bear carbon costs, domestic industries cannot pass on the carbon costs to the international market. This would lead to not only loss of the labor market but also migration of the manufacturing bases, resulting in increased emissions outside of Europe. - 経済産業省
第五十三条の十五 会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
５ 会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
２ 会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告（資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。）」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項（第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項（資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第六十九条 組合の解散及び清算については、会社法第四百七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）、第四百七十六条、第四百七十八条第二項及び第四項、第四百七十九条第一項及び第二項（各号列記以外の部分に限る。）、第四百八十一条、第四百八十三条第四項及び第五項、第四百八十四条、第四百八十五条、第四百八十九条第四項及び第五項、第四百九十二条第一項から第三項まで、第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで、第五百七条（株式会社の清算）、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条（非訟）並びに非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第四十条（検査をすべき者の選任の裁判）の規定を、組合の清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十五条の四、第三十六条の二、第三十六条の三第一項及び第二項、第三十六条の五から第三十八条の四まで（第三十六条の七第四項を除く。）、第四十条（第一項、第十一項及び第十三項を除く。）、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第五十三条の二並びに会社法第三百五十七条第一項、同法第三百六十条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する同条第一項並びに同法第三百六十一条、第三百八十一条第二項、第三百八十二条、第三百八十三条第一項本文、第二項及び第三項、第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで並びに第五百八条の規定を、組合の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについては、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除き、監査権限限定組合にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定を、監査権限限定組合の清算人については、同法第三百五十三条、第三百六十条第一項及び第三百六十四条の規定を準用する。この場合において、第四十条第二項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表」と、「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同条第三項、第五項から第十項まで並びに第十二項第一号及び第三号中「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同法第三百八十二条中「取締役（取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会）」とあるのは「清算人会」と、同法第四百七十九条第二項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる株主」とあるのは「総組合員の五分の一以上の同意を得た組合員」と、同法第三百八十四条、第四百九十二条第一項、第五百七条第一項並びに第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第四百九十九条第一項中「官報に公告し」とあるのは「公告し」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
Article 69 (1) With regard to the dissolution and liquidation of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)), Article 476, Article 478, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 479, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portions other than those listed in the respective items), Article 481, Article 483, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 484, Article 485, Article 489, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 492, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 499 to 503, Article 507 (Liquidation of a Stock Company), Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 (Non-Contentious Cases) of the Companies Act and Article 40 (Judicial Decision for Appointment of a Person to Conduct Inspections) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 35-4, Article 36-2, Article 36-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Articles 36-5 to 38-4 (excluding Article 36-7, paragraph (4)), Article 40 (excluding paragraph (1), paragraph (11), and paragraph (13)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 53-2 of this Act, the provisions of Article 357, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, paragraph (1) of the same Article as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 360, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and the provisions of Article 361, Article 381, paragraph (2), Article 382, the main clause of Article 383, paragraph (1), Article 383, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Articles 384 to 386, and Article 508 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to an action to pursue the liability of a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Part 7, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5), and Article 851, and excluding the portions pertaining to the company auditors in the case of a cooperative limiting the audit authority)(Action to Pursue the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative limiting the audit authority, the provisions of Article 353, Article 360, paragraph (1) and Article 364 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, a profit and loss statement, and a plan for the appropriation of surplus or a plan for the disposal of losses" in Article 40, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property and a balance sheet," the term "a business report" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an affairs written report," the term "business report" in paragraph (3), paragraphs (5) to (10), and paragraph (12), item (i) and item (iii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "affairs written report," the term "the directors (or, for a Company with Board of Directors, to the board of directors)" in Article 382 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the board of liquidators," the term "the following shareholders" in the portions of Article 479, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act other than those listed in the respective items shall be deemed to be "a member who has obtained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 384, Article 492, paragraph (1), Article 507, paragraph (1), and Article 847, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be "ordinance of the competent ministry," the phrase "give public notice in the official gazette" in Article 499, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "give public notice," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
ロ 執行裁判所の執行処分に対する執行異議の申立て、民事執行法第十三条第一項の代理人の選任の許可を求める申立て、執行文の付与の申立てに関する処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第三十六条第一項若しくは第三項の規定による強制執行の停止若しくは続行を命じ、若しくは執行処分の取消しを命ずる裁判を求める申立て、同法第四十一条第二項の規定による特別代理人の選任の申立て、同法第四十七条第四項若しくは第四十九条第五項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、執行裁判所に対する配当要求、同法第五十五条第一項の規定による売却のための保全処分若しくは同条第五項の規定によるその取消し若しくは変更の申立て、同法第五十六条第一項の規定による地代等の代払の許可を求める申立て、同法第六十二条第三項若しくは第六十四条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第六十八条の二第一項の規定による買受けの申出をした差押債権者のための保全処分の申立て、同法第七十七条第一項の規定による最高価買受申出人若しくは買受人のための保全処分の申立て、同法第七十八条第六項の規定による裁判所書記官の処分に対する異議の申立て、同法第八十三条第一項の規定による不動産の引渡命令の申立て、同法第百十五条第一項の規定による船舶国籍証書等の引渡命令の申立て、同法第百十七条第一項の規定による強制競売の手続の取消しの申立て、同法第百十八条第一項の規定による船舶の航行の許可を求める申立て、同法第百二十七条第一項の規定による差押物の引渡命令の申立て、少額訴訟債権執行の手続における裁判所書記官の執行処分に対する執行異議の申立て、少額訴訟債権執行の手続における裁判所書記官に対する配当要求、同法第百六十七条の十五第三項の規定による申立て、同法第百七十二条第二項の規定による申立て、同法第百八十七条第一項の規定による担保不動産競売の開始決定前の保全処分若しくは同条第四項の規定によるその取消しの申立て又は同法第百九十条第二項の動産競売の開始の許可の申立て例文帳に追加
(b) The filing of an objection to a disposition of execution by the executing court, a petition seeking permission for the appointment of an agent set forth in Article 13, paragraph (1) of the Civil Execution Act, an objection to a disposition concerning a petition for a grant of a certificate of execution, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of a compulsory execution or ordering a revocation of a disposition of execution under the provisions of Article 36, paragraph (1) or paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition for appointment of a special agent under the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (2) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 47, paragraph (4) or Article 49, paragraph (5) of said Act, a demand for liquidation distribution by the executing court, a petition for a temporary restraining order on a sale under the provisions of Article 55, paragraph (1) of said Act or for a revocation or change of such an order under the provisions of paragraph (5) of said Article, a petition for permission to pay rent on land, etc. in place of the obligor under the provisions of Article 56, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 62, paragraph (3) or Article 64, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for an obligee effecting a seizure who has made a purchase offer under the provisions of Article 68-2, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order for the highest purchase price offeror or the purchaser under the provisions of Article 77, paragraph (1) of said Act, an objection to a disposition by a court clerk under the provisions of Article 78, paragraph (6) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver real property under the provisions of Article 83, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver the certificate of a vessel's nationality, etc. under the provisions of Article 115, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for the rescission of a compulsory auction procedure under the provisions of Article 117, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission for navigation of a vessel under the provisions of Article 118, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for an order to deliver seized property under the provisions of Article 127, paragraph (1) of said Act; an objection to a disposition of execution by a court clerk in the procedure of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a demand on a court clerk for liquidation distribution during the process of executing a claim relating to a small claim action, a petition under the provisions of Article 167-15, paragraph (3) of said Act, a petition under the provisions of Article 172, paragraph (2) of said Act, a petition for a temporary restraining order prior to a commencement order for a secured real property auction under Article 187, paragraph (1) of said Act or for revocation of such an order under the provisions of Article 187, paragraph (4), or a petition for permission to commence an auction of movables as set forth in Article 190, paragraph (2) of said Act - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
２ 民法第八十二条及び第八十三条、非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第三十五条第二項及び第四十条並びに会社法第六百四十四条（第三号を除く。）、第六百四十五条から第六百四十九条まで、第六百五十条第一項及び第二項、第六百五十一条第一項及び第二項（同法第五百九十四条の準用に係る部分を除く。）、第六百五十二条、第六百五十三条、第六百五十五条から第六百五十九条まで、第六百六十二条から第六百六十四条まで、第六百六十六条、第六百六十七条、第六百七十二条、第六百七十三条、第六百七十五条、第八百六十三条、第八百六十四条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条の規定は、監査法人の解散及び清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第六百四十四条第一号中「第六百四十一条第五号」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十八第一項第三号」と、同法第六百四十七条第三項中「第六百四十一条第四号又は第七号」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十八第一項第五号若しくは第六号又は第二項」と、同法第六百五十八条第一項中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第六百七十三条第一項中「第五百八十条」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の十の六」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
(2) The provisions of Article 82 and Article 83 of the Civil Code, Article 35(2) and Article 40 of the Act of Procedures in Non-Contentious Matters (Act No. 14 of 1898), and Article 644 (excluding item (iii)), Articles 645 to 649 inclusive, Article 650(1) and (2), Article 651(1) and (2) (excluding the portion pertaining to application mutatis mutandis of Article 594 of the same Act), Article 652, Article 653, Articles 655 to 659 inclusive, Articles 662 to 664 inclusive, Article 666, Article 667, Article 672, Article 673, Article 675, Article 863, Article 864, Article 868(1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dissolution and liquidation of audit corporations. In this case, the term "Article 641(v)" in Article 644(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-18(1)(iii) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "Article 641(iv) or (vii)" in Article 647(3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-18(1)(v) or (vi) or Article 34-18(2) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 658(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance," and the term "Article 580" in Article 673(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 34-10-6 of the Certified Public Accountants Act." - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
２ 民法第八十二条、非訟事件手続法（明治三十一年法律第十四号）第三十五条第二項及び第四十条並びに会社法第六百四十四条（第三号を除く。）、第六百四十五条から第六百四十九条まで、第六百五十条第一項及び第二項、第六百五十一条第一項及び第二項（同法第五百九十四条の準用に係る部分を除く。）、第六百五十二条、第六百五十三条、第六百五十五条から第六百五十九条まで、第六百六十二条から第六百六十四条まで、第六百六十六条から第六百七十三条まで、第六百七十五条、第八百六十三条、第八百六十四条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条の規定は、弁護士法人の解散及び清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第六百四十四条第一号中「第六百四十一条第五号」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の二十三第一項第三号」と、同法第六百四十七条第三項中「第六百四十一条第四号又は第七号」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の二十三第一項第五号から第七号まで」と、同法第六百六十八条第一項及び第六百六十九条中「第六百四十一条第一号から第三号まで」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の二十三第一項第一号又は第二号」と同法第六百七十条第三項中「第九百三十九条第一項」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の二十八第六項において準用する第九百三十九条第一項」と、同法第六百七十三条第一項中「第五百八十条」とあるのは「弁護士法第三十条の十五」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
(2) The provisions of Article 82 of the Civil Code and Article 35, paragraph (2), Article 40 of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act (Act No. 14 of 1898), Companies Act Article 644 (excluding item (iii)), Articles 645 through 649, Article 650, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 651, paragraphs (1) and (2) (excluding portions relating to reference to Article 594), Article 652, Article 653, Articles 655 through 659, Articles 662 through 664, Articles 666 through 673, Article 675, Article 863, Article 864, Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (only with regard to items (ii) and (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (only with regard to item (iv)), Article 874 (only with regard to items (i) and (iv)), Article 875 and Article 876 shall apply mutatis mutandis to dissolution and liquidation of Legal Professional Corporations. In such a case, "Article 641, item (v)" as used in Article 644, item (i) shall be read as "Attorney Act Article 30-23, paragraph (1), item (iii)" and "Article 641, item (iv) or (vii)" as used in Article 647, paragraph (3) shall be read as "Attorney Act Article 30-23, paragraph (1), items (v) through (vii)" and "Article 641, items (i) through (iii)" as used in Article 668, paragraph (1) and Article 669 shall be read as "Attorney Act Article 30-23, paragraph (1), item (i) or (ii)" and "Article 939, paragraph (1)" as used in Article 670, paragraph (3) shall be read as "Article 939, paragraph (1) as referred to in Attorney Act Article 30-28, paragraph (6)" and "Article 580" as used in Article 673, paragraph (1) shall be read as "Attorney Act Article 30-15." - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第五十六条 特許法第百三十一条第一項、第百三十一条の二第一項、第百三十二条から第百三十三条の二まで、第百三十四条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第百三十五条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百五十六条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十条第一項及び第二項、第百六十一条並びに第百六十七条から第百七十条まで（審決の効果、審判の請求、審判官、審判の手続、訴訟との関係及び審判における費用）の規定は、審判に準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十一条の二第一項中「特許無効審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき、又は次項の規定による審判長の許可があつたとき」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項の審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同法第五十六条第一項において準用する特許法第百三十一条第一項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき」と、同法第百三十二条第一項及び第百六十七条中「特許無効審判又は延長登録無効審判」とあり、並びに同法第百四十五条第一項及び第百六十九条第一項中「特許無効審判及び延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項又は第五十三条の二の審判」と、同法第百三十九条第一号、第二号及び第五号中「当事者若しくは参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人若しくは登録異議申立人」と、同条第三号中「当事者又は参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人又は登録異議申立人」と、同法第百六十一条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあり、及び同法第百六十九条第三項中「拒絶査定不服審判及び訂正審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第百六十八条第一項中「他の審判の審決」とあるのは「登録異議の申立てについての決定若しくは他の審判の審決」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
Article 56 (1) The provisions of Articles 131(1), 131-2(1), 132 to 133-2, 134(1), 134(3), 134(4), 135 to 154, 155(1), 155(2), 156 to 158, 160(1), 160(2), 161, and 167 to 170 (effect of trial decision, request for trial, trial examiner, trial procedures in relation to litigation, and costs of trial) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial. In this case, the term "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in item (iii) of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial for Patent invalidation, or in the event that approval is granted by the chief trial examiner under the following paragraph" in Article131-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in Article 131(1)(iii) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 56(1) of this Act in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial under Article 46(1) of the Trademark Act," the term "a trial for Patent invalidation and a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 132(1) and 167 of the Patent Act and the term "a trial for Patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 145(1) and 169(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act," the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(i), (ii) and (v) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case", the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(iii) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case," the term "a trial against the examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 161 of the Patent Act and "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial for correction" in Article 169(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," and the term "the decision in another trial" in Article 168(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a decision on the opposition to registration or a trial decision in another trial." - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第二十一条 共助刑の執行に関しては、第十六条第一項第一号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を懲役に処せられた者と、同項第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者を禁錮に処せられた者と、同項第一号の共助刑を懲役と、同項第二号の共助刑を禁錮とそれぞれみなして、刑法（明治四十年法律第四十五号）第二十二条、第二十四条、第二十八条、第二十九条、第三十一条から第三十三条まで及び第三十四条第一項、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条、第四百八十条から第四百八十二条まで、第四百八十四条から第四百八十九条まで、第五百二条から第五百四条まで及び第五百七条、少年法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十八号）第二条第一項、第二十七条第一項、第五十六条、第五十七条及び第六十一条、少年院法（昭和二十三年法律第百六十九号）第一条、第二条、第四条から第九条まで、第十条第一項、第十条の二、第十三条、第十四条第一項、第四項及び第五項、第十四条の二から第十六条まで、第十七条第二項、第十七条の二並びに第十七条の四から第十七条の六まで並びに更生保護法（平成十九年法律第八十八号）第三条、第四条第二項、第十一条から第十四条まで、第十六条、第二十三条から第三十条まで、第三十三条、第三十四条第一項、第三十五条から第四十条まで、第四十八条、第四十九条第一項、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十二条第二項及び第三項、第五十三条第二項及び第三項、第五十四条第二項、第五十五条から第五十八条まで、第六十条から第六十五条まで、第七十五条から第七十七条まで、第八十二条、第八十四条から第八十八条まで並びに第九十一条から第九十八条までの規定を適用する。この場合において、刑法第二十八条中「三分の一」とあるのは「三分の一（国際受刑者移送法第二条第七号の裁判国（以下「裁判国」という。）において同法第二条第十一号の受入移送犯罪（以下「受入移送犯罪」という。）に係る確定裁判において言い渡された同法第二条第一号の外国刑（以下「外国刑」という。）の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、「十年」とあるのは「十年（裁判国において受入移送犯罪に係る確定裁判において言い渡された外国刑の執行としての拘禁をしたとされる日数を含む。）」と、同法第三十二条中「刑の言渡しが確定した後」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第十三条の命令により裁判国から引渡しを受けた後」と、刑事訴訟法第四百七十四条中「二以上の」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑（以下「共助刑」という。）と」と、「その重いもの」とあり、及び「重い刑」とあるのは「共助刑」と、「他の刑」とあるのは「主刑」と、同法第四百八十条及び第四百八十二条中「刑の言渡をした裁判所に対応する検察庁」とあるのは「東京地方検察庁」と、同法第四百八十七条中「刑名」とあるのは「共助刑の種類」と、同法第五百二条中「裁判の執行を受ける者」とあるのは「共助刑の執行を受ける者」と、「言渡をした裁判所」とあるのは「東京地方裁判所」と、少年法第二十七条第一項中「保護処分の継続中、本人に対して有罪判決が確定した」とあり、及び同法第五十七条中「保護処分の継続中、懲役、禁錮又は拘留の刑が確定した」とあるのは「国際受刑者移送法第二条第二号の共助刑の執行を受ける者が保護処分の継続中である」とし、その他これらの規定の適用に関し必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
Article 21 A person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in Article 16, paragraph (1), item (i) is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment with work is to be enforced; a person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in item (ii) of the same paragraph is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment without work is to be enforced; the assistance punishment prescribed in item (i) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment with work; the assistance punishment in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment without work; and the following provisions shall apply for the purpose of enforcing the assistance punishment: Article 22, Article 24, Article 28, Article 29, Articles 31 to 33 and Article 34, paragraph (1) of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), Article 474, Articles 480 to 482, Articles 484 to 489, Articles 502 to 504 and Article 507 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 2, paragraph (1), Article 27, paragraph (1), Article 56, Article 57 and Article 61 of the Juvenile Act (Act No. 168 of 1948), Article 1, Article 2, Articles 4 to 9, Article 10, paragraph (1), Article 10-2, Article 13, Article 14, paragraphs (1), (4) and (5), Articles 14-2 to 16, Article 17, paragraph (2), Article 17-2 and Article 17-4 to Article 17-6 of the Juvenile Training Schools Act (Act No. 169 of 1948) and Article 3, Article 4, paragraph (2), Articles 11 to 14, Article 16, Articles 23 to 30, Article 33, Article 34, paragraph (1), Articles 35 to 40, Article 48, Article 49, paragraph (1), Article 50, Article 51, Article 52, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 53, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 54, paragraph (2), Articles 55 to 58, Articles 60 to 65, Articles 75 to 77, Article 82, Articles 84 to 88 and Articles 91 to 98 of the Offenders Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 88 of 2007). In such a case, the "one-third" in Article 28 of the Penal Code shall be, "one-third (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment as defined in Article 2, item (i) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "foreign punishment"), rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer as defined in Article 2, item (xi) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer") in a sentencing state as defined in Article 2, item (vii) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "sentencing state"))"; "10 years" shall be "10 years (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer in the sentencing state)"; "after a sentence has become final and binding" in Article 32 of the same code shall be "after the surrender by a sentencing state in accordance with the order prescribed in Article 13 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "two or more" and "the greatest among the punishments" in Article 474 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be "assistance punishment as defined in Article 2, item (ii) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "assistance punishment")"; "the other punishment" in the same Article shall be "the principal punishment"; "the public prosecutors office responding to the court that has rendered the punishment" in Article 480 and Article 482 of the same code shall be "the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"; "category of punishment" in Article 487 of the same code shall be "types of assistance punishment"; "a person upon whom a decision is to be enforced" in Article 502 in the same code shall be "a person upon whom the assistance punishment is to be enforced"; "the court that rendered such decision" in the same Article shall be "the Tokyo District Court"; and "a judgment of guilty has become final and binding against an individual in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 27, paragraph (1) of the Juvenile Act and "a sentence of imprisonment with or without work, or of penal detention has become final and binding in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 57 in the same code shall be "a person with regard to whom assistance punishment as defined in item (ii) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons is to be enforced and who is currently undergoing a protective measure"; additional technicalities requiring alternative readings in connection with the application of these provisions shall be determined by a Cabinet order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第九十四条 公職選挙法第八条（特定地域に関する特例）、第十条第二項（被選挙人の年齢の算定方法）、第十七条（投票区）、第十八条（第一項ただし書を除く。）（開票区）、第二十三条から第二十五条まで、第三十条（選挙人名簿）、第三十三条、第三十四条第一項、第三項、第四項及び第六項（選挙期日）、第六章（投票）（第三十五条、第三十六条、第三十七条第三項及び第四項、第三十八条第四項、第四十条、第四十六条、第四十六条の二、第四十九条第四項から第八項まで並びに第四十九条の二の規定を除く。）、第七章（開票）（第六十一条第三項及び第四項、第六十二条第三項から第五項まで及び第八項ただし書、第六十八条並びに第六十八条の二第二項、第三項及び第五項の規定を除く。）、第八章（選挙会及び選挙分会）（第七十五条第二項、第七十七条第二項及び第八十一条の規定を除く。）、第八十六条の四第一項、第二項、第五項及び第九項から第十一項まで、第八十六条の八、第九十条、第九十一条第二項（候補者）、第十章（当選人）（第九十五条の二から第九十八条まで、第九十九条の二、第百条第一項から第三項まで、第七項及び第八項、第百一条から第百一条の二の二まで並びに第百八条第二項の規定を除く。）、第百十一条第一項及び第二項（欠けた場合の通知）、第百十六条（議員又は当選人がすべてない場合の一般選挙）、第百十七条（設置選挙）、第百二十九条、第百三十条、第百三十一条第一項及び第二項、第百三十二条から第百三十七条まで、第百三十七条の三、第百三十八条、第百四十条の二、第百四十八条の二、第百六十一条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第百六十四条の六、第百六十六条、第百七十八条（選挙運動）、第十五章（争訟）（第二百二条第二項、第二百四条、第二百五条第五項、第二百六条第二項、第二百八条、第二百九条の二第二項、第二百十一条第二項、第二百十六条及び第二百二十条第四項の規定を除く。）、第十六章（罰則）（第二百二十四条の三、第二百三十五条の二第一号及び第二号、第二百三十五条の三、第二百三十五条の四、第二百三十五条の六、第二百三十六条第二項、第二百三十六条の二、第二百三十八条の二、第二百三十九条第一項第四号及び第二項、第二百三十九条の二第一項、第二百四十条第二項、第二百四十二条第二項、第二百四十二条の二、第二百四十三条第一項第一号及び第二号から第九号まで並びに第二項、第二百四十四条第一項第一号から第五号の二まで、第七号及び第八号並びに第二項、第二百四十六条から第二百五十条まで、第二百五十一条の二第二項、第三項及び第五項、第二百五十一条の三、第二百五十一条の四、第二百五十二条の二、第二百五十二条の三、第二百五十五条第三項から第五項まで並びに第二百五十五条の二から第二百五十五条の四までの規定を除く。）、第二百六十四条の二（行政手続法の適用除外）、第二百七十条第一項本文（選挙に関する届出等の時間）、第二百七十条の二（不在者投票の時間）、第二百七十条の三（選挙に関する届出等の期限）、第二百七十二条（命令への委任）並びに附則第四項及び第五項の規定は、衆議院議員、参議院議員、地方公共団体の長及び市町村の議会の議員の選挙に関する部分を除くほか、海区漁業調整委員会の委員の選挙に準用する。この場合において、次の表の上欄に掲げる同法の規定の中で同表中欄に掲げるものは、それぞれ同表下欄のように読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
Article 94 The provisions of Article 8 (Exception concerning Specified Regions), paragraph (2), Article 10 (Method for Calculating the Age of a Person Eligible for Election), Article 17 (Voting Precincts), Article 18 (excluding the proviso of paragraph (1)) (Ballot Counting Districts), Article 23 through Article 25, Article 30 (Pollbook), Article 33, paragraph (1), paragraph (3), paragraph (4) and paragraph (6), Article 34 (Date of Election), Chapter XI (Voting) (excluding the provisions of Article 35, Article 36, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 37, paragraph (4), Article 38, Article 40, Article 46, Article 46-2, paragraph (4) through paragraph (8), Article 49 and Article 49-2), Chapter VII (Ballot Counting) (excluding the provisions of paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 61, paragraph (3) through paragraph (5) and the proviso of paragraph (8), Article 62, Article 68 and paragraph (2), paragraph (3) and paragraph (5), Article 68-2), Chapter VIII (Electoral Committee and Electoral Subcommittees) (excluding the provisions of paragraph (2), Article 75, paragraph (2), Article 77 and Article 81), paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (5) and paragraph (9) through paragraph (11), Article 86, Article 86-8, Article 90, paragraph (2), Article 91 (Candidates), Chapter X (Elected Candidates) (excluding the provisions of Article 95-2 through Article 98, Article 99-2, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3), paragraph (7) and paragraph (8), Article 100, Article 101 through Article 101-2-2 and paragraph (2), Article 108), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 111 (Notice in Case of Vacancy), Article 116 (General Election in the Case Where None of Assemblymen or Elected Candidates Exists), Article 117 (Established Municipality Election), Article 129, Article 130, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 131, Article 132 through Article 137, Article 137-3, Article 138, Article 140-2, Article 148-2, paragraph (1), paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 161, Article 164-6, Article 166, Article 178 (Election Campaign), Chapter XV (Lawsuits) (excluding the provisions of paragraph (2), Article 202, Article 204, paragraph (5), Article 205, paragraph (2), Article 206, Article 208, paragraph (2), Article 209-2, paragraph (2), Article 211, Article 216 and paragraph (4), Article 220), Chapter XVI (Penal Provisions) (excluding the provisions of Article 224-3, item (i) and item (ii), Article 235-2, Article 235-3, Article 235-4, Article 235-6, paragraph (2), Article 236, Article 236-2, Article 238-2, item (iv), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 239, paragraph (1), Article 239-2, paragraph (2), Article 240, paragraph (2), Article 242, Article 242-2, item (i) and item (ii) through item (ix), paragraph (1), and paragraph (2), Article 243 , item (i) through item (v)-2, item (7) and item (8), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 244, Article 246 through Article 250, paragraph (2), paragraph (3) and paragraph (5), Article 251-2, Article 251-3, Article 251-4, Article 252-2, Article 252-3, paragraph (3) through paragraph (5), Article 255, and Article 255-2 through Article 255-4), Article 264-2 (Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act), Main Clause, paragraph (1), Article 270 (Time of Notifications concerning Elections), Article 270-2 (Time of Absentee Voting), Article 270-3 (Deadlines of Notifications concerning Elections), Article 272 (Delegation to Orders) and paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of Supplementary Provision of the Public Offices Election Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the elections of the members of Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commissions, except the portions concerning the elections of members of the House of Representatives, the members of the House of Councilors, the governors and mayors of local governments, and the members of the assemblies of municipalities. In this case, the respective phrasings in the middle column of the following table corresponding to the provisions of the Act stated in the left column of the table shall be deemed to be replaced with the corresponding phrasings in the right column of the table. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 例文 (999件) |
| Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved. |
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
 | ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
検索履歴を保存できる！|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
