「litigation」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(6ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(2) The provisions of paragraphs (4) and (5) of Article 12 of the Administrative Case Litigation Act ((Act No. 139 of 1962) including where these paragraphs are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (1) of Article 38 of the Act) shall not apply to an appeal suit (which means an appeal suit as provided for by paragraph (1) of Article 3 of the Act) concerning a disposition (which means a disposition provided for by paragraph (2) of Article 3) or a determination (which means a determination provided for by paragraph (3) of the Article 3) undertaken pursuant to this Extradition Act. 例文帳に追加

２　この法律に基づいて行う処分（行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）第三条第二項に規定する処分をいう。）又は裁決（同条第三項に規定する裁決をいう。）に係る抗告訴訟（同条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟をいう。）については、同法第十二条第四項及び第五項（これらの規定を同法第三十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

A preliminary rejection by the Examiner is never to be taken literally. An applicant should remember that the Examiner may not be actually rejecting his application. The Examiner may in fact be quite prepared to admit the application, and is only trying to give the applicant a chance to explain away some reference or some difficulty rather than have him wait until the registration is granted and become involved in a litigation, when it may then be difficult for him to make the explanation.例文帳に追加

審査官による予備的拒絶は，決して文字通りに解釈してはならない。出願人は，審査官がその出願を実際に拒絶しようとしているのではないかもしれないことを忘れてはならない。実際のところ審査官は，出願を承認する準備を概ねしている可能性があり，出願人にとって登録許可後に訴訟になれば，釈明することが難しくなることがあるので，それを待たせるよりはむしろ，出願人に引例の回避の又は何らかの問題点の釈明をする機会を与えようとしているのである。 - 特許庁

If, in civil litigation whereby a claim arising out of one of the legal relationships regulated under this Law is asserted by a law suit, a party satisfies the court that the awarding of the costs of the case against him according to the full value in dispute would considerably endanger his financial position, the court may, at his request, order that the said party's liability to pay court costs be adjusted in accordance with a portion of the value in dispute that shall be appropriate to his financial position. 例文帳に追加

本法に基づき定められる法律関係の1つから生ずる請求が訴訟によって主張されている民事事件において，当事者が，係争中の価額の最高額に従って自己に対し事件の費用を裁定することが自己の財務状態を相当に危うくすることを裁判所に納得させる場合は，裁判所は，その者の請求により，裁判費用を支払うべきその者の負担を，その者の財務状態に適応した係争中の価額の割合に従って調整すべきことを命ずることができる。 - 特許庁

Article 135-3 With respect to a lawsuit pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1), Article 11 of the Administrative Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962) (including the case where this paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis in paragraph (1), Article 38 of the same Act) pertaining to the disposition (the disposition prescribed in paragraph (2), Article 3 of the same Act) or determination (determination pursuant to the provision of paragraph (3) of the same Article) of a Fisheries Adjustment Commission (excluding a Wide Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission) or an Inland Waters Fishing Ground Management Commission with the Governor concerned as the defendant, the Fisheries Adjustment Commission or the Inland Waters Fishing Ground Management Commission shall represent said Governor. 例文帳に追加

第百三十五条の三　漁業調整委員会（広域漁業調整委員会を除く。）又は内水面漁場管理委員会は、その処分（行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）第三条第二項に規定する処分をいう。）又は裁決（同条第三項に規定する裁決をいう。）に係る同法第十一条第一項（同法第三十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による都道府県を被告とする訴訟について、当該都道府県を代表する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) A reassessment or determination, etc. of a national tax pertaining to a person who has received a decision of the National Tax Tribunal, a determination of the taxation agency or a judgment of a court of justice (hereinafter referred to as a "decision, etc." in this item) on an appeal of dissatisfaction or litigation regarding a reassessment or determination, etc. of a national tax for which the tax base, etc. or tax amount is to be changed upon the change to the original disposition by such decision, etc. or upon the reassessment based on a request for reassessment (limited to such national tax falling under the tax item which applies to the national tax to which said decision, etc. or said reassessment pertains): six months from the day on which said decision, etc. or said reassessment was made 例文帳に追加

一　更正決定等に係る不服申立て若しくは訴えについての裁決、決定若しくは判決（以下この号において「裁決等」という。）による原処分の異動又は更正の請求に基づく更正に伴つて課税標準等又は税額等に異動を生ずべき国税（当該裁決等又は更正に係る国税の属する税目に属するものに限る。）で当該裁決等又は更正を受けた者に係るものについての更正決定等　当該裁決等又は更正があつた日から六月間 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The governments of the Lander shall have the power to designate by legal ordinance for the areas of several Provincial Courts one such court to be in whole or in part the competent court for litigation concerning signs, provided that such designation serves the advancement in substance or the faster conclusion of the proceedings. The governments of the Lander may transfer those powers to the Ministries of Justice of the Lander. The Lander may moreover transfer by agreement functions incumbent upon the courts of one of the Lander in whole or in part to the competent court of another Land. 例文帳に追加

州政府は，複数の地方裁判所の地域に係わる標識に関する訴訟の全部又は一部について，それら地方裁判所の内の1の裁判所をそのような標識に関する訴訟の管轄裁判所と指定する旨の法律上の命令を発する権限を有する。ただし，その指定が事実上の促進又は手続の迅速な終結に資する場合に限る。州政府は，この権限を州法務省に委譲することができる。更に，州は，取決めにより，州のうちの1の裁判所に課せられた職務の全部又は一部を他の州の管轄裁判所に委譲することができる。 - 特許庁

(3) In applying the Administrative Case Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962) to the exercise of authority set forth in this Act, the exercise of authority by delegation set forth in the provisions of Article 45-2, the exercise of authority set forth in the Public Water Body Reclamation Act and the Utilization of Land for Public Use Managed by Public Entities Act under the Management of Public Entities pursuant to the provisions of Article 58 paragraph (2), the exercise of authority pertaining to the collection of the contribution set forth in the provisions of the Enterprise Rationalization Promotion Act or the Environmental Pollution Control Expense Sharing Act and the petition pertaining to the application of the Administrative Execution by Proxy Act, the chairman of the board of directors of a port authority shall be deemed as an administrative agency. 例文帳に追加

３　この法律による職権の行使、第四十五条の二の規定による委任に基づく職権の行使、第五十八条第二項の規定に基づく公有水面埋立法による職権の行使及び公共団体の管理する公共用土地物件の使用に関する法律による職権の行使、企業合理化促進法又は公害防止事業費事業者負担法の規定による負担金の徴収に関する職権の行使並びに行政代執行法の適用に関する訴えに関する行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）の適用については、港務局の委員会の委員長は、行政庁とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1 With regard to the expediting of trials, since it is essential to conduct trials expeditiously under fair, appropriate and adequate proceedings in order for rights and interests to be properly realized through the judiciary, and for all other roles required of the judiciary to be fulfilled, and in addition, in line with the changes in social and economic conditions both in Japan and abroad, since there is an urgent need to respond to requests from the people for trials to be conducted expeditiously, the objective of this Act shall be to further expedite the overall proceedings of the courts, including the litigation proceedings in the first instance by providing for the purpose, responsibility of the state and other basic matters, which accordingly will contribute to realizing a judicial system that responds to the expectations of the people. 例文帳に追加

第一条　この法律は、司法を通じて権利利益が適切に実現されることその他の求められる役割を司法が十全に果たすために公正かつ適正で充実した手続の下で裁判が迅速に行われることが不可欠であること、内外の社会経済情勢等の変化に伴い、裁判がより迅速に行われることについての国民の要請にこたえることが緊要となっていること等にかんがみ、裁判の迅速化に関し、その趣旨、国の責務その他の基本となる事項を定めることにより、第一審の訴訟手続をはじめとする裁判所における手続全体の一層の迅速化を図り、もって国民の期待にこたえる司法制度の実現に資することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Subsequently, Japan decided — in light of the situation in the United States, the schedule of the Massachusetts state legislature, and the apparently positive attitude of the country — to observe the US actions. No progress was made, however, leading Japan and the EU to jointly request the establishment of a WTO panel in September 1998. This panel was established in October, but subsequent litigation within the United States (described below) declared the law unconstitutional and void, so Japan and the EU took procedures to suspend the panel in February 1999. On February 11, 2000, the authority of the panel lapsed because Article 12.12 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) voids panels that have been suspended for more than twelve months.例文帳に追加

その後、米国の国内事情、マサチューセッツ州議会日程等に配慮し、しばらくの間、米国の前向きな対応を見守っていたものの、事態の実質的な進展が図られなかったため、1998年９月にEU と共同歩調により、米国に対してパネル設置要請を行い、10月にはパネルの設置が決定した。しかしながら、その後、米国内での合衆国憲法との整合性についての国内裁判手続の中（後述）で、マサチューセッツ州法は、効力停止の状態とされたことから、我が国は、1999年２月にEU とともにパネルの検討の停止の手続をとったところ、本件パネルは、紛争解決了解（DSU）第12条12項の規定が、12ヶ月を超えてパネルが停止された際にはパネル設置の根拠を失う旨を定めていることから、2000年２月11日に消滅した。 - 経済産業省

A rejection by the Examiner is never to be taken literally. An applicant should remember that the Examiner may not be actually rejecting his invention. The Examiner may in fact be quite prepared to admit the invention over the references to the prior art. He may be merely rejecting the applicant’s claims, that is, the way in which the applicant has expressed his invention. An Examiner will frequently make a blanket rejection on some reference to the prior art just to be helpful to the applicant - just to give the applicant a chance to explain away some reference and make a change in his claims to avoid it, rather than to wait until the patent is granted and is involved in a litigation, when it may be too late to make the explanation.例文帳に追加

審査官による拒絶は，決して文字通りに解釈してはならない。出願人は，審査官がその発明を実際に拒絶しようとしているのではないかもしれないことを忘れてはならない。実際のところ審査官は，先行技術を参照して発明を承認する用意を概ねしている可能性がある。審査官は，出願人のクレーム，すなわち，出願人による発明の表現方法を拒絶しているのみかもしれない。 審査官は，出願人の助けになるように，先行技術を参照して包括的に拒絶することがよくある。これは，出願人にとって特許付与後に訴訟になれば，釈明することが手遅れになることがあるので，それを待たせるよりはむしろ，引例を回避するために釈明し，かつ，拒絶を回避するためにクレームを変更する機会を与えようとしているのである。 - 特許庁

A person who has neither a domicile nor an establishment in the Federal Republic of Germany may take part in proceedings under this Law before the Patent Office or the Patent Court and assert rights deriving from a design protected according to the provisions of this Law only if he has appointed a patent attorney or an attorney-at-law in the Federal Republic of Germany as his representative. The latter shall be authorized to represent him in proceedings before the Patent Office and the Patent Court and in civil litigation in respect of the design; he may also file requests for the institution of criminal proceedings. The place where the representative has his business premises shall be deemed, within the meaning of Section 23 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to be the place where the assets are located; if there are no business premises, the place where the representative has his domicile shall be relevant or, in the absence thereof, the place where the Patent Office has its seat. 例文帳に追加

ドイツ連邦共和国に住所も主たる事業所も有しない者は，その者がドイツ連邦共和国の弁理士又は弁護士をその代理人として指定した場合に限り，特許庁又は特許裁判所に対する本法に基づく手続をすることができ，本法の規定にしたがい保護される意匠により生じた権利を行使することができる。当該代理人は特許庁並びに特許裁判所での手続及び意匠に関するあらゆる民事訴訟において，活動する資格を有する。また，当該者は刑事訴訟手続の開始を要求することもできる。民事訴訟法第23条の趣旨において，代理人の事業所が当該資産の存する場所とみなされ，事業所がないときには代理人の住居が在る場所が適切とされ，それがないときには，特許庁がその本拠を有する地とされる。 - 特許庁

Article 52 Articles 131(1) and (2), 131-2 (excluding item (i) of paragraph 2) to 134, 135 to 154, 155(1) and (2), 156 to 158, 160(1) and (2), 161, and 167 to 170 (request for trial, trial examiner, procedures of trial, relation to litigation and costs of trial) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial. In this case, the term "a trial against the examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 161 and the term "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial for correction" in Article 169(3) of the said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial against an examiner's ruling dismissing an amendment." 例文帳に追加

第五十二条　特許法第百三十一条第一項及び第二項、第百三十一条の二（第二項第一号を除く。）から第百三十四条まで、第百三十五条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百五十六条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十条第一項及び第二項、第百六十一条並びに第百六十七条から第百七十条まで（審判の請求、審判官、審判の手続、訴訟との関係及び審判における費用）の規定は、審判に準用する。この場合において、同法第百六十一条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあり、及び同法第百六十九条第三項中「拒絶査定不服審判及び訂正審判」とあるのは、「拒絶査定不服審判及び補正却下決定不服審判」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In patent litigation, provisional measures ?until the contrary is rendered probable ? shall be considered necessary to protect the plaintiff's rights deserving special appreciation if the plaintiff proves that the invention is patented, and he is the patentee or an exploiter entitled to institute proceedings for infringement in his own name. In rendering the contrary probable, all circumstances of the case shall be taken into consideration, in particular that the patent was revoked by the Hungarian Patent Office or by the court of first instance, or the European patent effective also in the Republic of Hungary was revoked by an opposition division of the European Patent Office or in another Member State of the European Patent Organisation. The provision relating to the presumption substantiating the necessity of protecting the plaintiff's rights deserving special appreciation shall not apply where six months have already elapsed from the beginning of patent infringement or sixty days from the date on which the plaintiff became aware of the infringement and of the identity of the infringer.例文帳に追加

(2) 特許訴訟においては，原告が，当該発明は特許されていること及び自己が特許権者又は自己の名義で侵害手続を提起することができる実施者であることを証明した場合は，別段のことが示されるまでの暫定措置が，特別の評価に値する原告の権利を保護するために必要とみなされる。別段のことを示す際は，事件のすべての事情，特に，特許がハンガリー特許庁若しくは第1審裁判所により取り消されたこと，又はハンガリー共和国においても有効な欧州特許が欧州特許庁若しくは欧州特許機構の他の加盟国の異議申立部により取り消された事情が考慮に入れられる。特許侵害の開始から6月，又は原告が侵害及び侵害者の身元を認識した日から60日を既に経過している場合は，特別の評価に値する原告の権利を保護する必要性を立証する推定に関する規定は適用しない。 - 特許庁

Article 1 Owing to the changes in the social and economic climate at home and abroad, alternative dispute resolution (procedures for resolution of a civil dispute between parties who seek, with the involvement of a fair third party, a resolution without using litigation; the same shall apply hereinafter) has become an important means of achieving prompt dispute resolution based on the specialized expertise of a third party and in accordance with the actual facts of the dispute. Bearing such in mind, the purpose of the Act on Promotion of Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution is to provide for the basic concepts of the Act and for the responsibilities of the government and other entities; and to establish a certification system and set special rules on nullification of prescription and other matters so as to make alternative dispute resolution procedures easier to utilize, thereby enabling parties to a dispute to choose the most suitable method for resolving a dispute with the aim of appropriate realization of the rights and interests of the people. 例文帳に追加

第一条　この法律は、内外の社会経済情勢の変化に伴い、裁判外紛争解決手続（訴訟手続によらずに民事上の紛争の解決をしようとする紛争の当事者のため、公正な第三者が関与して、その解決を図る手続をいう。以下同じ。）が、第三者の専門的な知見を反映して紛争の実情に即した迅速な解決を図る手続として重要なものとなっていることにかんがみ、裁判外紛争解決手続についての基本理念及び国等の責務を定めるとともに、民間紛争解決手続の業務に関し、認証の制度を設け、併せて時効の中断等に係る特例を定めてその利便の向上を図ること等により、紛争の当事者がその解決を図るのにふさわしい手続を選択することを容易にし、もって国民の権利利益の適切な実現に資することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(e) The filing of a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 186, paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a right of retention under the Commercial Law under the provisions of Article 192, paragraph (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, a petition for a grant of discharge under the provisions of Article 248, paragraph (1) of said Act or a petition for the restoration of rights under the provisions of Article 256, paragraph (1) of said Act, a petition for permission to extinguish a security interest under the provisions of Article 148, paragraph (1) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act, a petition for revocation of an order for a stay of execution or a petition for the revocation of a provisional mandatory order or a provisional injunctive order under the provisions of the Administrative Case Litigation Act, a request under the provisions of Article 27-20 of the Labor Union Act (Act No. 174 of 1949), a petition under the provisions of Article 16, paragraph (3) or Article 17, paragraph (1) of the Act on the Prevention of Spousal Violence and the Protection of Victims, a petition for permission to appoint a person who is not an attorney-at-law as an agent under the provisions of the proviso to Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Labor Tribunal Act, a petition for a judicial decision ordering a stay or a continuation of civil execution proceedings under the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Act on Special Conciliation Proceedings for Expediting Adjustment of Specified Debts, etc., a petition under the provisions of Article 15-6 of the Act on Adjudication of Domestic Relations, a petition under the provisions of Article 39, paragraph (1) of the Personal Status Litigation Act (Act No. 109 of 2003), a motion under the provisions of Article 105-4, paragraph (1) or Article 105-5, paragraph (1) of the Patent Act (Act No. 121 of 1959), a petition under the provisions of Article 114-6, paragraph (1) or Article 114-7, paragraph (1) of the Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of 1970), or a petition under the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (1) or Article 11, paragraph (1) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993) 例文帳に追加

ホ　破産法第百八十六条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第百九十二条第三項の規定による商事留置権消滅の許可の申立て、同法第二百四十八条第一項の規定による免責許可の申立て若しくは同法第二百五十六条第一項の規定による復権の申立て、民事再生法第百四十八条第一項の規定による担保権消滅の許可の申立て、行政事件訴訟法の規定による執行停止決定の取消しの申立て、若しくは仮の義務付け若しくは仮の差止めの決定の取消しの申立て、労働組合法（昭和二十四年法律第百七十四号）第二十七条の二十の規定による申立て、配偶者からの暴力の防止及び被害者の保護に関する法律第十六条第三項若しくは第十七条第一項の規定による申立て、労働審判法第四条第一項ただし書の規定による弁護士でない者を代理人に選任することの許可を求める申立て、特定債務等の調整の促進のための特定調停に関する法律第七条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による民事執行の手続の停止若しくは続行を命ずる裁判を求める申立て、家事審判法第十五条の六の規定による申立て、人事訴訟法（平成十五年法律第百九号）第三十九条第一項の規定による申立て、特許法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十一号）第百五条の四第一項若しくは第百五条の五第一項の規定による申立て、著作権法（昭和四十五年法律第四十八号）第百十四条の六第一項若しくは第百十四条の七第一項の規定による申立て又は不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第十条第一項若しくは第十一条第一項の規定による申立て - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Articles 57 to 63-2 shall apply to a retrial and litigation pertaining to defensive mark registration. In this case, the term "each of the items in Article 37" in Article 59(ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "items (ii) to (vii) of Article 67," the term "a trademark right pertaining to ... trademark registration" in Article 60 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a right based on defensive mark registration in connection with ... defensive mark registration," the term "an application for trademark registration" in the same article shall be deemed to be replaced with "an application for the registration of a defensive mark or an application for the registration of a defensive mark or an application for registration of renewal of the duration of a right based on defensive mark registration," the term "the establishment of a trademark right ... has been registered" in the same article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the establishment of a right based on defensive mark registration or the renewal of the duration of a right based on defensive mark registration ... has been registered" and the term "the registered trademark or a trademark similar thereto ... in connection with the designated goods or designated services or in connection with goods or services similar thereto" in the same article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trademark identical with the registered defensive mark." 例文帳に追加

５　第五十七条から第六十三条の二までの規定は、防護標章登録に係る再審及び訴訟に準用する。この場合において、第五十九条第二号中「第三十七条各号」とあるのは「第六十七条第二号から第七号まで」と、第六十条中「商標登録に係る商標権」とあるのは「防護標章登録に係る防護標章登録に基づく権利」と、「商標登録出願」とあるのは「防護標章登録出願若しくは防護標章登録に基づく権利の存続期間の更新登録の出願」と、「商標権の設定の登録」とあるのは「防護標章登録に基づく権利の設定の登録若しくは防護標章登録に基づく権利の存続期間を更新した旨の登録」と、「又はこれらに類似する商品若しくは役務について当該登録商標又はこれに類似する商標」とあるのは「について当該登録防護標章と同一の商標」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 21 (1) In the case a lawsuit demanding the rescission of a Disclosure Decision, etc. or the rescission of a determination or decision regarding the objection to a Disclosure Decision, etc. (referred to as an "Information Disclosure Lawsuit" in the following paragraph and in paragraph 2 of the Supplementary Provisions) is brought to the court of special jurisdiction prescribed in the provision of Article 12, paragraph 4 of the Administrative Case Litigation Act (Act No. 139 of 1962), if, notwithstanding the provision of Article 12, paragraph 5 of the same Act, an appeal lawsuit ( which means an appeal lawsuit prescribed in Article3, paragraph 1 in the same Act; the same shall apply in the following paragraph.) against a Disclosure Decision etc. regarding the same, the same type of or similar Administrative Documents or against a determination or decision regarding the objection against such a Disclosure Decision etc., is pending in another court, the said court of special jurisdiction may, when it finds it reasonable in consideration of the addresses or locations of the parties, the addresses of witnesses who shall be examined, characteristics common to the points at issue or the evidence, and other circumstances, may in response to a petition or on its own authority transfer the whole lawsuit or a part of it to the other court or a court prescribed Article 12, paragraphs 1 to 3 of the same Act. 例文帳に追加

第二十一条　行政事件訴訟法（昭和三十七年法律第百三十九号）第十二条第四項の規定により同項に規定する特定管轄裁判所に開示決定等の取消しを求める訴訟又は開示決定等に係る不服申立てに対する裁決若しくは決定の取消しを求める訴訟（次項及び附則第二項において「情報公開訴訟」という。）が提起された場合においては、同法第十二条第五項の規定にかかわらず、他の裁判所に同一又は同種若しくは類似の行政文書に係る開示決定等又はこれに係る不服申立てに対する裁決若しくは決定に係る抗告訴訟（同法第三条第一項に規定する抗告訴訟をいう。次項において同じ。）が係属しているときは、当該特定管轄裁判所は、当事者の住所又は所在地、尋問を受けるべき証人の住所、争点又は証拠の共通性その他の事情を考慮して、相当と認めるときは、申立てにより又は職権で、訴訟の全部又は一部について、当該他の裁判所又は同法第十二条第一項から第三項までに定める裁判所に移送することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 56 (1) The provisions of Articles 131(1), 131-2(1), 132 to 133-2, 134(1), 134(3), 134(4), 135 to 154, 155(1), 155(2), 156 to 158, 160(1), 160(2), 161, and 167 to 170 (effect of trial decision, request for trial, trial examiner, trial procedures in relation to litigation, and costs of trial) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a trial. In this case, the term "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in item (iii) of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial for Patent invalidation, or in the event that approval is granted by the chief trial examiner under the following paragraph" in Article131-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "is made with respect to the grounds for the request as provided in Article 131(1)(iii) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 56(1) of this Act in the course of filing a request for a trial other than a trial under Article 46(1) of the Trademark Act," the term "a trial for Patent invalidation and a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 132(1) and 167 of the Patent Act and the term "a trial for Patent invalidation or a trial for invalidation of the registration of extension of term" in Articles 145(1) and 169(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 46(1), 50(1), 51(1), 52-2(1), 53(1) or 53-2 of the Trademark Act," the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(i), (ii) and (v) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case", the term "a party in the case or an intervener in the case" in Article 139(iii) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a party in the case, an intervener in the case or an opponent to the registration in the case," the term "a trial against the examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 161 of the Patent Act and "a trial against an examiner's decision of refusal and a trial for correction" in Article 169(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," and the term "the decision in another trial" in Article 168(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a decision on the opposition to registration or a trial decision in another trial." 例文帳に追加

第五十六条　特許法第百三十一条第一項、第百三十一条の二第一項、第百三十二条から第百三十三条の二まで、第百三十四条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第百三十五条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項及び第二項、第百五十六条から第百五十八条まで、第百六十条第一項及び第二項、第百六十一条並びに第百六十七条から第百七十条まで（審決の効果、審判の請求、審判官、審判の手続、訴訟との関係及び審判における費用）の規定は、審判に準用する。この場合において、同法第百三十一条の二第一項中「特許無効審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき、又は次項の規定による審判長の許可があつたとき」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項の審判以外の審判を請求する場合における同法第五十六条第一項において準用する特許法第百三十一条第一項第三号に掲げる請求の理由についてされるとき」と、同法第百三十二条第一項及び第百六十七条中「特許無効審判又は延長登録無効審判」とあり、並びに同法第百四十五条第一項及び第百六十九条第一項中「特許無効審判及び延長登録無効審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十六条第一項、第五十条第一項、第五十一条第一項、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十三条第一項又は第五十三条の二の審判」と、同法第百三十九条第一号、第二号及び第五号中「当事者若しくは参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人若しくは登録異議申立人」と、同条第三号中「当事者又は参加人」とあるのは「当事者、参加人又は登録異議申立人」と、同法第百六十一条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあり、及び同法第百六十九条第三項中「拒絶査定不服審判及び訂正審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第百六十八条第一項中「他の審判の審決」とあるのは「登録異議の申立てについての決定若しくは他の審判の審決」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム