1016万例文収録!

「後閲」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(8ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > 後閲に関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オフ

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

後閲の部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 371



例文

例えば東京のユーザは、ユーザ端末101aを用いてアクセスポイント109aにダイヤルアップ接続した、前記ユーザが所望のWebページを覧したいと望むときには、ユーザはURL情報およびユーザ端末101aに割り当てられたIPアドレスをアクセスポイント109aおよびインターネット115を介して前記URLが記述するドメインのWebサーバ119aに所望のWebデータの送信要求をする。例文帳に追加

When a user in Tokyo performs a dial-up connection to an access point 109a while using a user terminal 101a and wants to read the desired Web page later, the user requests the transmission of the desired Web data through the access point 109a and internet 115 to a Web server 119 in the domain described in the URL information while using the above URL and IP address allocated to the user terminal 101a. - 特許庁

ネットワークに接続されたコンピュータと、このコンピュータに接続されたUPS(無停電電源装置)で構成されるUPSシステムであって、コンピュータにはUPSを制御する制御ソフトウェアが格納され、制御ソフトウェアはUPSに格納された固有情報を取得した、コンピュータに格納されたインターネット覧ソフトウェアを起動するとともに、UPSのユーザー登録用ホームページへアクセスすることを特徴とするUPSシステム。例文帳に追加

A UPS system comprises a computer which is connected to a network and the UPS (uninterruptive power supply) connected to the computer and the computer stores control software which controls the UPS; and the control software after obtaining characteristic information stored in the UPS actuates Internet browsing software stored in the computer and accesses a homepage for user registration of the UPS. - 特許庁

したがって、サイト利用規約の変更の事実を適切な方法(例えば、トップページで変更を適切な予告期間を設けて告知しかつ変更履歴を覧できるようにサイトに掲載するなど)でサイト利用者に周知するようにしていない場合には、サイト利用規約の変更を知らなかった利用者に対する関係で、契約内容の錯誤や信義則などにより、変更の条件(特に変更前よりも利用者に不利となる条件)の拘束力に疑義が生じる可能性がある。例文帳に追加

For this reason, if the website operator does not notify the users on the changes of Website Terms of Use in an appropriate method (e.g. by setting an adequate period of notice on the changes in the front page of the website to notify the users and posting the change tracking so that the users can view the changes), question as to the binding force of the terms and conditions of the Website Terms of Use after the changes (especially if such changes are made to be much more unfavorable to the users than they were before) may arise due to falsification of contract or in accordance with the principles of good faith, as for the users who were not aware of the changes to the Website Terms of Use.  - 経済産業省

4 会社法第三十一条(第三項を除く。)(定款の備置き及び覧等)の規定は、第一項の資産流動化計画について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項及び第二項中「発起人(株式会社の成立にあっては、当該株式会社)」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同条第一項中「発起人が定めた場所(株式会社の成立にあっては、その本店及び支店)」とあるのは「その本店及び支店」と、同条第二項中「発起人(株式会社の成立にあっては、その株主及び債権者)」とあるのは「社員(資産流動化法第二十六条に規定する社員をいう。)及び債権者」と、「発起人が定めた時間(株式会社の成立にあっては、その営業時間)」とあるのは「特定目的会社の営業時間」と、同条第四項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 31 (excluding paragraph (3)) (Keeping and Inspection of Articles of Incorporation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Asset Securitization Plan set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the phrase "incorporator(s) (or the Stock Company after the formation of such Stock Company)" in Article 31(1) and (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company," the phrase "the place designated by the incorporator(s) (or at the head office or branch office of the Stock Company after the formation of such Stock Company)" in paragraph (1) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "its head office or branch office," the phrase "incorporator(s) (or, after the formation of such Stock Company, the shareholder(s) and creditor(s) of such Stock Company)" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (meaning the members prescribed in Article 26 of the Asset Securitization Act) and creditors," the phrase "the hours designated by the incorporator(s) (or, after the formation of such Stock Company, during the business hours of such Stock Company)" in Article 31(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the business hours of the Specific Purpose Company," and the term "Stock Company" in paragraph (4) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

(6)先の出願と同一の主題に関するそのの出願がなされた場合は,なされた締約国が同一又は相違であるに関わらず,締約国でなされたそのような主題に関する二つの出願となり,当該のの出願は,それが次の日において提出された場合,最初の条約出願として考慮される。(a)先の出願が,公衆の覧のために公開されずに,かつ,未行使の権利を残さずに,取り下げられた,放棄された又は拒絶された場合,及び (b)先の出願が優先権主張の根拠として未だ機能していない場合は,先の出願ではなくそのの出願がなされた日を(2)に基づく優先権期間の開始日とみなし,先の出願はその優先権主張の根拠として機能することができない。例文帳に追加

(6) Where a subsequent application concerning the same subject as an earlier application is filed, whether in the same or a different Convention country, and these are the first 2 applications concerning that subject to be filed in any Convention country, the subsequent application shall be considered the first Convention application if, at the date the subsequest application is filed- (a) the earlier application has been withdrawn, abandoned or refused, without having been laid open to public inspection and without leaving any rights outstanding; and (b) the earlier application has not yet served as a basis for claiming a right of priority. - 特許庁


例文

四 前項第一号ハ又はニに掲げる方法にあっては、当該記載事項に掲げられた取引を最に行った日以五年間(当該期間が終了する日までの間に当該記載事項に係る苦情の申出があったときは、当該期間が終了する日又は当該苦情が解決した日のいずれか遅い日までの間)次に掲げる事項を消去し又は改変することができないものであること。ただし、覧に供している記載事項を書面により交付する場合、顧客の承諾(令第十一条第一項に規定する方法による承諾をいう。)を得て前項第一号イ、ロ若しくは前項第二号に掲げる方法により交付する場合又は顧客による当該記載事項に係る消去の指図がある場合は、当該記載事項を消去することができる。例文帳に追加

(iv) with regard to the methods set forth in the preceding paragraph, item (i), (c) or (d), the following matters shall neither be deleted nor altered for five years after the last date when the transactions set forth in said Contents were carried out (when a claim pertaining to said Contents is filed for the period: until the date on which said period expires, the date when said period expires or the date when said claim is resolved, whichever occurs later); provided, however, that said Contents can be deleted in cases where the Contents provided for inspection are delivered with a document, in cases where the Contents provided for inspection are delivered by a method set forth in the preceding paragraph, item (i), (a) or (b), or in the preceding paragraph, item (ii), with the Consent (which means consent by the methods prescribed in Article 11, paragraph (1) of the Order) of the customer, or in cases where a customer is instructed to delete such Contents:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

四前項第一号ハ又はニに掲げる方法にあっては、当該記載事項に掲げられた取引を最 に行った日以五年間(当該期間が終了する日までの間に当該記載事項に係る苦 情の申出があったときは、当該期間が終了する日又は当該苦情が解決した日のいず れか遅い日までの間)次に掲げる事項を消去し又は改変することができないもので あること。ただし、覧に供している記載事項を書面により交付する場合、顧客の 承諾(令第十一条第一項 に規定する方法による承諾をいう。)を得て前項第一号イ、 ロ若しくは前項第二号に掲げる方法により交付する場合又は顧客による当該記載事 項に係る消去の指図がある場合は、当該記載事項を消去することができる。例文帳に追加

(iv) with regard to the methods set forth in the preceding paragraph, item 1, (c) or (d), the following matters shall neither be deleted nor altered for five years after the last date when the transactions set forth in said Contents were carried out (when a claim pertaining to said Contents is filed for the period: until the date on which said period expires, the date when said period expires or the date when said claim is resolved, whichever occurs later); provided, however, that said Contents can be deleted in cases where the Contents provided for inspection are delivered with a document, in cases where the Contents provided for inspection are delivered by a method set forth in the preceding paragraph, item 1, (a) or (b), or in the preceding paragraph, item 2, with the consent of the customer (which means consent by the methods prescribed in Article 11, paragraph 1 of the Ordinance), or in cases where a customer is instructed to delete such Contents:  - 経済産業省

第十二条 秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟(すべての秘密保持命令が取り消された訴訟を除く。)に係る訴訟記録につき、民事訴訟法(平成八年法律第百九号)第九十二条第一項の決定があった場合において、当事者から同項に規定する秘密記載部分の覧等の請求があり、かつ、その請求の手続を行った者が当該訴訟において秘密保持命令を受けていない者であるときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の申立てをした当事者(その請求をした者を除く。第三項において同じ。)に対し、その請求直ちに、その請求があった旨を通知しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 12 (1) Where a court has made a ruling under Article 92(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) with regard to the case record pertaining to the lawsuit in which a protective order has been issued (excluding a lawsuit in which all the protective orders have been rescinded), if there was a request for inspection, etc. of the portion of the record that represents the secret prescribed in the same paragraph by a party, and the person who performed the procedure for such request has not been issued a protective order in the lawsuit, the court clerk shall, immediately after the request, notify the party who filed the motion under the same paragraph (excluding the requester; the same shall apply in paragraph 3) of the fact that such a request was made.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十二条 秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟(すべての秘密保持命令が取り消された訴訟を除く。)に係る訴訟記録につき、民事訴訟法(平成八年法律第百九号)第九十二条第一項の決定があった場合において、当事者から同項に規定する秘密記載部分の覧等の請求があり、かつ、その請求の手続を行った者が当該訴訟において秘密保持命令を受けていない者であるときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の申立てをした当事者(その請求をした者を除く。第三項において同じ。)に対し、その請求直ちに、その請求があった旨を通知しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 42 (1) Where a ruling under Article 92 (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) was rendered pertaining to the record of litigation in which a protective order was issued (excluding litigation in which all protective orders have been rescinded), where a party to whom the protective order was not issued in the litigation requests inspection etc. of a part of the record in which the confidential information is contained, etc. under the said Article, immediately after the filing of the request, the court clerk shall notify the party who filed the motion under the said Article (excluding the person who filed the request, the same in paragraph (3)) of the fact that the said request has been filed.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第百五条の六 秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟(すべての秘密保持命令が取り消された訴訟を除く。)に係る訴訟記録につき、民事訴訟法第九十二条第一項の決定があつた場合において、当事者から同項に規定する秘密記載部分の覧等の請求があり、かつ、その請求の手続を行つた者が当該訴訟において秘密保持命令を受けていない者であるときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の申立てをした当事者(その請求をした者を除く。第三項において同じ。)に対し、その請求直ちに、その請求があつた旨を通知しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 105-6 (1) Where a ruling under Article 92(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure was rendered concerning the record of litigation in which a protective order was issued (excluding litigation in which all protective orders have been rescinded), where a party to whom the protective order was not issued in the litigation requests inspection etc. of a part of the record in which the confidential information is contained, etc under the said Article., immediately after the filing of the request, the court clerk shall notify the party who filed the motion (restricting access to the record) under the said Article (excluding the person who filed the request, the same in paragraph (3)) of the fact that the said request has been filed.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第百十四条の八 秘密保持命令が発せられた訴訟(すべての秘密保持命令が取り消された訴訟を除く。)に係る訴訟記録につき、民事訴訟法(平成八年法律第百九号)第九十二条第一項の決定があつた場合において、当事者から同項に規定する秘密記載部分の覧等の請求があり、かつ、その請求の手続を行つた者が当該訴訟において秘密保持命令を受けていない者であるときは、裁判所書記官は、同項の申立てをした当事者(その請求をした者を除く。第三項において同じ。)に対し、その請求直ちに、その請求があつた旨を通知しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 114-8 (1) In the case where a decision provided for in Article 92, paragraph (1) of the Code of Civil Procedure (Act No. 109 of 1996) has been made with regard to the case record for a lawsuit in which a protective order has been issued (excluding, however, a lawsuit in which all protective orders have been rescinded), the court clerk shall, if a party has made a request, pursuant to the same paragraph, for perusal, etc. of the portions [of the case record] containing the confidential matters and if the person who has made such request is not a person against whom a protective order has been issued in the subject lawsuit, immediately after said request, give notice of such request to the party who filed the petition provided for in that paragraph (other than, however, the person who made such request; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) 国防大臣は,前記のとおり通知を受けたときは,当該出願の対象である発明が国防目的のために重要であるか否かを直ちに検討しなければならず,当該出願に関連して局長に提供された一切の書類及び情報を覧することができ,また,その時又はその当該発明が国防目的に重要でないことを納得するときは,書面でその旨の通知を局長に送達しなければならず,また,局長は,この通知があったときは,前記の出願に関し(1)の規定に基づく自己の権限を行使することを止め,直ちにこれにつき前記の権限に基づいて発した指示を取り消さなければならない。例文帳に追加

(2) Where the Minister of Defence is notified as aforesaid, he shall forthwith consider whether the invention which is the subject-matter of the application in question is of importance for purposes of defence, and may inspect all documents and information furnished to the Commissioner in connection with the application, and if he is satisfied either then or subsequently that the invention is not of importance for purposes of defence he shall serve a notice in writing on the Commissioner to that effect, and thereupon the Commissioner shall cease to exercise his powers under subsection (1) of this section in relation to that application and shall forthwith revoke any directions given under those powers in relation thereto. - 特許庁

(3) 特許出願がされた時点で(2)(a)(ii)の条件が満たされていない場合は, (a)(i) 宣言された優先日,若しくは (ii) 宣言された優先日が存在しない場合は,当該出願の出願日, から16月, (b) 出願人からの請求に基づいて登録官が当該出願を第27条(1)適用上の所定の期間の終了前に公開する場合は,当該請求の日,又は (c) 登録官が第108条(4)に従って同条(1)に基づいて情報及び書類の覧を求める請求を何人からか受領した旨の通知を出願人に送付した場合は,登録官が当該請求の受領に係る通知を出願人に送付した1月の終了時, の何れか最も早く到来するときまでに,当該条件が満たされなければならない。例文帳に追加

(3) Where the condition of sub-paragraph (2)(a)(ii) is not satisfied at the time the application for a patent is filed, it shall be satisfied -- (a) within 16 months from -- (i) the declared priority date; or (ii) the date of filing the application where there is no declared priority date; (b) where, on a request made by the applicant, the Registrar publishes the application before the end of the period prescribed for the purposes of section 27(1), before the date of the request; or (c) where the Registrar sends notification to the applicant that, in accordance with section 108(4), he has received a request by any person for information and inspection of documents under subsection (1) of that section, before the end of one month after his sending to the applicant notification of his receipt of the request, whichever is the earliest. - 特許庁

条例第150条に基づいて様式が定められている書類以外の書類を登録官に提出若しくは送付する者又は当該書類が関係する手続の当事者は,当該書類の提出若しくは送付14日以内に,当該書類又はその者が指定するその一部が秘密として取り扱われるよう指示することを登録官に対し(請求の理由を挙げて)請求することができ,また登録官は,自らの裁量でそのように指示することができる。当該請求が登録官により検討されている間は,当該書類又は当該書類の一部(本条で関連書類という)は,公衆の覧に供されない。例文帳に追加

A person filing with, or sending to, the Registrar, a document other than a document for which a form has been specified under section 150 of the Ordinance, or any party to any proceedings to which the document relates, may, within 14 days of the filing or sending of the document, request the Registrar (giving reasons for the request) to direct that the document or any part of it specified by him be treated as confidential, and the Registrar may, at his discretion, so direct; and while the request is being considered by the Registrar, that document or part of the document (in this section referred to as the relevant document) shall not be open to public inspection.  - 特許庁

(2) 既に控訴状に含まれているときを除き,控訴理由は連邦最高裁判所に対し書面をもって提出しなければならない。控訴理由書の提出期間は 3月とする。当該期間は,判決全文の送達日から,ただし,遅くとも,その言渡から 5月が経過するときから起算する。裁判長は,請求に基づき,期限延期を許可することができるが,ただし,相手方が承諾することを条件とする。相手方が承諾しない場合においては,期限は 1月を限度として延期することがきるが,ただし,裁判長が独自に,その延期によって訴訟が遅延しないと確信すること,又は控訴人が顕著な理由を示すことができることを条件とする。控訴人がこの期限内の適切な時期に裁判所ファイルを覧する許可を得ることができない場合において請求があったときは,裁判長はその期限をファイルが送付されてから 2月まで延期することができる。例文帳に追加

(2) When not already contained in the notice of appeal, the grounds of the appeal shall be filed in a brief to the Federal Court of Justice. The time limit for submitting the grounds of appeal shall be three months. It shall commence on the date of service of the full text of the judgment, at the latest, however, upon expiry of five months after pronouncement. The time limit may be extended by the presiding judge upon request if the adversary should consent. If adversary should not consent, the time limit may be extended by up to one month if the presiding judge is independently convinced that the lawsuit will not be delayed by the extension or if the appellant can show significant grounds. If the appellant cannot be permitted inspection of the court files for an appropriate time period within this time limit, the presiding judge may extend, upon a request, the time limit by up to two months after the files have been forwarded.  - 特許庁

特許付与前に,ファイルを何人も覧することができる出願(第 31条(1)第 2文の段及び(2))に基づく権利が訴訟において主張され,かつ,その訴訟に関する決定が第33条(1)に基づく請求権が存在するか否かに依拠する場合は,裁判所は,その手続を,特許付与に関する決定が行われるまで停止するよう命ずることができる。第 44条に従った審査請求が提出されていない場合において,相手方当事者からの請求があったときは,裁判所は,出願による権利を主張する当事者に対し,審査請求を提出すべき期限を設定しなければならない。審査請求が当該期限内に提出されないときは,出願から生ずる権利は,その訴訟において主張することができない。例文帳に追加

If, prior to the grant of the patent, rights based on an application, the files of which may be inspected by any person (Section 31(1), second half of sentence 2, and (2)), are asserted in court proceedings, and if deciding the lawsuit depends on whether there is a claim under Section 33(1), the court may order that the proceedings be stayed until a decision on grant of the patent is rendered. If a request for examination has not been filed pursuant to Section 44, the court must, upon the request of the adversary, set a time-limit to the party claiming rights from the application for filing the request for examination. If the request for examination is not filed within said time-limit, the rights derived from the application may not be asserted in the lawsuit.  - 特許庁

それが次に掲げる出願,すなわち, (i) 第28.1条の場合の係属中の出願, (ii) 第28.2条の場合の同時係属中の出願, (iii) 第78.3条(1)の場合のの出願,又は (iv) 第78.3条(2)の場合の先の出願, の出願日前の12月よりも前に出願された場合であり, (b) (a)にいう出願日より前に,他の出願が, (i) 先に正規にされた出願をした者,又はその代理人,法律上の代表者若しくは前権利者によりされ, (ii) 先に正規にされた出願と同じ国において又は関してされ,また (iii) (a)に述べる出願のクレームで特定された主題を開示しており,かつ (c) (b)に述べる他の出願の出願日において,又は複数のかかる他の出願がある場合はそれらの最先の出願日において,先に正規にされた出願が, (i) 公衆の覧に供されることなく更に如何なる権利をも残すことなく取下,放棄又は拒絶され,かつ (ii) カナダを含む如何なる国においても優先権主張の基礎とされていない場合例文帳に追加

if (a) it was filed more than twelve months before the filing date of (i) the pending application, in the case of section 28.1, (ii) the co-pending application, in the case of section 28.2, (iii) the later application, in the case of subsection 78.3(1), or (iv) the earlier application, in the case of subsection 78.3(2); (b) before the filing date referred to in paragraph (a), another application (i) is filed by the person who filed the previously regularly filed application or by the agent, legal representative or predecessor in title of that person, (ii) is filed in or for the country where the previously regularly filed application was filed, and (iii) discloses the subject-matter defined by the claim in the application mentioned in paragraph (a); and (c) on the filing date of the other application mentioned in paragraph (b) or, if there is more than one such application, on the earliest of their filing dates, the previously regularly filed application (i) has been withdrawn, abandoned or refused without having been opened to public inspection and without leaving any rights outstanding, and (ii) has not served as a basis for a request for priority in any country, including Canada.  - 特許庁

(a)出願は,出願日又は優先日から18月が経過したに,庁により又は庁のために作成された調査書類であって,先行技術の記載がある文献を引用したものと共に,IPO公報において公開する。 ただし,次の条件で,出願人はその出願を早期公開するよう申請することができる。 (1)出願人が書面により次に掲げるものを放棄すること (a)上記の18月の期間,及び (b)調査報告の作成。 (2)出願日から6月より早期の公開でないこと,及び (3)早期公開の手数料が全額納付されていること。 (b)出願は,公開のための技術的な準備が終了する前に最終的に拒絶されたか又は取り下げられたか若しくは取り下げられたものとみなされる場合は,公開されない。 (c)公開される出願には,書誌事項,提出された図面,及び要約が含まれる。 (d)庁は,出願の公開に関して日付その他の情報を出願人に通知すると共に,実体審査請求を行わなければならない期間について注意を喚起する。 (e)特許出願の公開の,利害関係人は,庁に提出された出願書類を覧することができる。 (f)長官は,出願を公開することがフィリピン共和国の国家の安全及び利益を害することになると認める場合は,通商産業大臣の承認を得ることを条件として,出願の公開を禁止し又は制限することができる。(IP法第44条)例文帳に追加

(a) The application shall be published in the IPO Gazette together with a search document established by or on behalf of the Office citing any document or documents that reflect prior art, after the expiration of eighteen months(18) from the filing date or priority date. However, the applicant may request for the early publication of his application provided that the: 1. applicant submits a written waiver of the a) abovementioned 18-month period, and b) establishment of a search report; 2. publication shall not be earlier than six (6) months from filing date; and 3. required fee for early publication is paid in full. (b) The application will not be published if it has been finally refused or withdrawn or deemed to be withdrawn before the termination of the technical preparation for publication. (c) The application to be published shall contain the bibliographic data, any drawing as filed and the abstract. (d) The Office shall communicate to the applicant the date and other information regarding the publication of the application and draw his attention to the period within which the request for substantive examination must be filed. (e) After publication of a patent application, any interested party may inspect the application documents filed with the Office. (f) The Director General, subject to the approval of the Secretary of Trade and Industry, may prohibit or restrict the publication of an application, if in his opinion, to do so would be prejudicial to the national security and interests of the Republic of the Philippines. (Sec. 44, IP CODE) - 特許庁

第六十七条 会社法第七編第四章第一節(第九百七条を除く。)(総則)の規定並びに商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで(登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥)、第七条から第十五条まで(登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記)、第十七条から第二十七条まで(登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止)、第三十一条(営業又は事業の譲渡の際の免責の登記)、第三十三条(商号の登記の抹消)、第四十四条から第四十六条まで(会社の支配人の登記、添付書面の通則)、第四十七条第一項及び第三項(設立の登記)、第四十八条から第五十五条まで(支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記)並びに第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで(更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任)の規定は、相互会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第二十七条中「商号」とあるのは「商号又は名称」と、「営業所(会社にあつては、本店。以下この条において同じ。)」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「係る営業所」とあるのは「係る主たる事務所」と、同法第四十六条第二項中「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会(総代会を設けているときは、総代会)」と、同条第三項中「会社法第三百十九条第一項(同法第三百二十五条において準用する場合を含む。)又は第三百七十条(同法第四百九十条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)」とあるのは「保険業法第四十一条第一項において準用する会社法第三百十九条第一項又は保険業法第五十三条の十六若しくは第百八十条の十五において準用する会社法第三百七十条」と、「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第四項中「会社法第四百十六条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第四項」と、同法第四十八条から第五十三条までの規定中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 67 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter IV, Section 1 (excluding Article 907) (General provisions) of the Companies Act, and the provisions of Article 1-3 to 5 inclusive (Registry Office, Delegation of Duties, Suspension of Duties, Registrar, Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to 15 inclusive (Prohibition of Taking out Registry, etc., Loss and Restoration of Registry, Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc., Delivery, etc. of Certificate of Registered Matters,, Delivery of Document Containing Description of Registered Matters, Inspection of Annexed Documents, Seal Registration Certificate, Certification of Necessary Matters, etc. for Checking Measures to Indicate Preparer of Electromagnetic Record, Fees, Principle of Application by Party Concerned, Registration by Commission), Article 17 to 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration, Documents to Be Attached to Written Application, Electromagnetic Record to be Attached to Written Application, Submission of Seal, Reception, Receipt, Order of Registration, Identification by Registrar, Dismissal of Application, Registration After Expiration of Period for Filing Complaint, Modification of Administrative Boundaries, etc., Prohibition of Registration of Same Trade Name at Same Location), Article 31 (Registration of Discharge in Assigning Operation or business), Article 33 (Deletion of Registration of Trade Name), Article 44 to 46 inclusive (Registration of Company Managers, General Rules for Attached Documents), Article 47, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to 55 inclusive (Registration at Location of Branch Offices, Registration of Relocation of Head Office, Registration of Change of Directors, etc., Registration of Change of Persons to Temporarily Carry Out Duties of Accounting Auditor), and Article 132 to 148 inclusive (Correction, Application for Deletion, Deletion Without any Party's Request, Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act, Exclusion from Application of Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs, Exclusion from Application of Act on Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs, Application for Examination, Treatment of Cases of Application for Examination, Exclusion from Application from Administrative Appeal Act, Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a registration regarding a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "trade name," "business office (or, in a company, head office; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "business office pertaining to" in Article 27 of the latter Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade name or name," "principal office" and "principal office pertaining to," respectively; the term "shareholders meeting or class shareholders meeting" in Article 46, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "General Meeting of members (or General Meeting, where the company has such meeting)"; the terms "Article 319, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 325 of the Companies Act) or Article 370 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 490, paragraph (5) of that Act) of the Companies Act" and "shareholders meeting or class shareholder meeting" in Article 46, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 319, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act, or Article 370 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-16 or 180-15 of the Insurance Business Act" and "General Meeting of members", respectively; the term "Article 416, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 46, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-30, paragraph (4) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the terms "head office" and "branch offices" in the provisions of Article 48 to 53 inclusive of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office" and "secondary offices," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百十六条 商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで(登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥)、第七条から第十五条まで(登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記)、第十七条第一項、第二項及び第四項(登記申請の方式)、第十八条から第十九条の二まで(申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録)、第二十条第一項及び第二項(印鑑の提出)、第二十一条から第二十三条の二まで(受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認)、第二十四条(第十一号及び第十二号を除く。)(申請の却下)、第二十五条から第二十七条まで(提訴期間経過の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止)、第三十三条(商号の登記の抹消)、第四十四条、第四十五条(会社の支配人の登記)、第五十一条、第五十二条(本店移転の登記)、第百二十八条(申請人)、第百二十九条(外国会社の登記)、第百三十条第一項及び第三項(変更の登記)並びに第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで(更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任)の規定は、外国相互会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十七条第四項中「事項又は前項の規定により申請書に記載すべき事項」とあるのは「事項」と、「前二項」とあるのは「同項」と、同法第五十一条第一項中「本店」とあるのは「日本国内の事務所」と、同法第百二十九条第一項中「会社法第九百三十三条第一項の規定による外国会社」とあるのは「外国相互会社の事務所の設置」と、同条第三項中「日本における代表者を定めた旨又は日本に営業所」とあるのは「日本国内に事務所」と、同法第百三十条第三項中「前二項の登記の」とあるのは「第一項の登記の」と、「既に前二項」とあるのは「既に同項」と、「、前二項」とあるのは「、同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 216 The provisions of Article 1-3 to 5 inclusive (Registry Office, Delegation of Duties, Suspension of Duties, Registrar, Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to 15 inclusive (Prohibition of Taking out Registry, Loss and Restoration of Registry, Prevention of Loss of Registry, Delivery of Certificate of Registered Matters, etc., Delivery of Document Containing Description of Registered Matters, Inspection of Annexed Documents, Seal Registration Certificate, Certification of Necessary Matters for Checking Measures to Indicate Preparer of Electromagnetic Record, Fees, Principle of Application by Party concerned, Registration by Commission), Article 17, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) (Method of Application for Registration), Article 18 to 19-2 inclusive (Documents to be Attached to Written Application, Electromagnetic Record to be Attached to Written Application), Article 20, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Submission of Seal), Article 21 to 23-2 inclusive (Reception, Receipt, Order of Registration, Identification by Registrar), Article 24 (excluding items (xi) and (xii)) (Dismissal of Application), Article 25 to 27 inclusive (Registration after Expiration of Period for Filing Complaint, Modification of Administrative Boundaries, etc., Prohibition of Registration of Same Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Deletion of Registration of Trade Name), Articles 44 and 45 (Registration of Company Managers), Articles 51 and 52 (Registration of Relocation of Head Office), Article 128 (Applicant), Article 129 (Registration of Foreign Company), Article 130, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Registration of Change), and Article 132 to 148 inclusive (Correction, Application for Deletion, Deletion without any Party's Request, Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act, Exclusion from Application of Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs, Application for Examination, Treatment of Cases of Application for Examination, Exclusion from Application from Administrative Appeal Act, Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a registration regarding a Foreign Mutual Company. In this case, the term "or the matters to be described in a written application pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "preceding two paragraphs" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph"; the term "head office" in Article 51, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office in Japan"; the term "a foreign company under Article 933, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" in Article 129, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the establishment of an office of a Foreign Mutual Company"; the term "the company has designated its representative person in Japan or established a business office in Japan" in Article 129, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company has established an office in Japan"; and the terms "for registration under the preceding two paragraphs," "registration has been made under the preceding two paragraphs" and "documents set forth in the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 130, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "for registration under the preceding paragraph," "registration has been made under that paragraph" and "document set forth in that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第百八十三条 商業登記法(昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号)第一条の三から第五条まで(登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥)、第七条から第十五条まで(登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記)、第十七条から第二十七条まで(登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止)、第三十三条(商号の登記の抹消)、第三十四条(会社の商号の登記)、第四十四条、第四十五条(会社の支配人の登記)、第四十六条(第四項を除く。)(添付書面の通則)、第四十七条第一項(設立の登記)、第四十八条から第五十五条まで(支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記)、第六十四条(株主名簿管理人の設置による変更の登記)、第七十一条(解散の登記)、第七十三条から第七十五条まで(清算人の登記、清算人に関する変更の登記、清算結了の登記)及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで(更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任)の規定は、特定目的会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十五条中「第五十条まで(第九十五条、第百十一条及び第百十八条において準用する場合を含む。)」とあるのは「第五十条まで」と、「第五十一条第一項及び第二項、第五十二条、第七十八条第一項及び第三項、第八十二条第二項及び第三項、第八十三条、第八十七条第一項及び第二項、第八十八条、第九十一条第一項及び第二項、第九十二条、第百三十二条並びに」とあるのは「第百三十二条及び」と、同法第二十四条第七号中「書面若しくは第三十条第二項若しくは第三十一条第二項に規定する譲渡人の承諾書」とあるのは「書面」と、同法第三十四条第一項中「会社の登記簿」とあるのは「特定目的会社登記簿」と、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律(以下「資産流動化法」という。)第二十二条第四項において準用する会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」と、同法第五十四条第一項中「取締役、監査役、代表取締役又は特別取締役(委員会設置会社にあつては、取締役、委員、執行役又は代表執行役)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は代表取締役」と、同条第二項第三号中「会社法第三百三十三条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十一条第一項」と、「同法第三百三十七条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十三条第一項」と、同法第五十五条第一項中「会社法第三百四十六条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十六条第四項」と、同法第七十一条第三項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第一号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第一号」と、「同法第四百八十三条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十一条第四項」と、同法第七十三条第二項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第二号又は第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第二号又は第三号」と、同条第三項及び同法第七十四条第一項中「会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」と、同法第七十五条中「会社法第五百七条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第五百七条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 1-3 to Article 5 inclusive (Registry Office; Delegation of Affairs; Suspension of Affairs; Registrar; Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to Article 15 inclusive (Prohibition on Carrying Out of Registries and Other Documents; Loss and Restoration of Registries; Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc.; Issuance of Certificate of Registered Matters; Issuance of Documents Specifying Extract of Matters Registered; Inspection of Annexed Documents; Certificate of Seal Impression; Certification of Matters Required for Verification of Measures to Identify the Creator of Electromagnetic Records and Other Matters; Fees; Registration Upon Application by Party; Registration upon Commission), Article 17 to Article 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration; Document to Be Attached to Written Application; Electromagnetic Records to be Attached to Written Application; Submission of Seal Impression; Acceptance of Applications; Receipt; Order of Registration; Identity Confirmation by Registrar; Dismissal of Application; Registration to Be Made After Lapse of Period for Filing Action; Change in Administrative Zone, etc.; Prohibition on Registration of Identical Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Cancellation of Registration of Trade Name), Article 34 (Registration of Trade Name of Company), Article 44 and Article 45 (Registration of Company's Manager), Article 46 (excluding paragraph (4)) (General Rules on Documents to be Attached), Article 47(1) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to Article 55 inclusive (Registration to Be Made at Location of Branch Office; Registration of Relocation of Head Office; Registration of Change of Directors and Other Officers; Registration of Change of Person Who is to Temporarily Perform Duties of Accounting Auditors), Article 64 (Registration of Change Due to Share Option Issue), Article 71 (Registration of Dissolution), Article 73 to Article 75 inclusive (Registration of Liquidator; Registration of Change Related to Liquidator; Registration of Completion of Liquidation), and Article 132 to Article 148 inclusive (Correction; Application for Cancellation; Ex Officio Cancellation; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Procedure Act; Exclusion from Application of the Act on Access Information Held by Administrative Organs; Exclusion from the Application of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs; Request for Review; Handling of Request for Review Case; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Appeal Act; Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "to Article 50 inclusive (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95, Article 111 and Article 118)" and "Article 51, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 52, Article 78, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 82, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 83, Article 87, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 88, Article 91, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 92, Article 132" in Article 15 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "to Article 50 inclusive" and "Article 132," respectively, the phrase "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent or a transferor's written approval prescribed in Article 30, paragraph (2) or Article 31, paragraph (2)" in Article 24(vii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent," the term "company registry" in Article 34(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company Registry," the phrase "the items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22(4) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the 'Asset Securitization Act')," the phrase ", representative director or special director (in the case of a company with committees, a director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer)" in Article 54(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or representative director," the phrases "Article 333, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" and "Article 337, paragraph (1) of said Act" in Article 54(2)(iii) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 71(1) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 73(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 346, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 55(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Companies Act" and "Article 483, paragraph (4) of said Act" in Article 71(3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 171(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (ii) or (iii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(ii) or (iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 928, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(3) and Article 74(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 928(1)(ii) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 507, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act" in Article 75 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 507(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS