「USE CASE」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(68ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Tokyo District Court Judgment, May 26, 1977 (p.51 of Hanrei Jiho No. 832) "Judging from the fact that the use of the land constitutes an indispensable basis of the daily life of Y and his family. the bid is reasonably sufficient, even considering that the land has Y.s leasehold rights. In this context, X demanded Y to vacate the land immediately after X won the bid without negotiating with Y at all . it is assumed that, in this auction case, despite the fact that X had announced that the land is accompanied by the leasehold in accordance with which the lessee is supposed to own a building thereon, which could be perfected against the winning bidder, X was trying to obtain a huge amount of profits by winning the bid at an extremely low price, taking advantage of the lack of registry required for perfection of such leasehold. Considering the circumstances with respect to Y as recognized in the foregoing, X.s demand of the removal of and vacation of the building on the land shall not be accepted on the ground that it is an abuse of right." 例文帳に追加

東京地裁昭和５２年５月２６日判決・判例時報８３２号５１頁「本件土地の使用はYおよびその一家の生活の基盤として欠くべからざるものであること《中略》競売価格は本件土地にYの貸借権が設定されているものとして扱っても十分見合う金額であること、Xは右土地を競落するや直ちにYに本件土地の明渡を求め、話し合いには一切応じない態度を堅持していたこと《中略》これらの事実よりすれば、Xは右競売事件において本件土地に競落人に対抗しうる建物所有の目的の賃借権がある旨広告されていたが、その賃借権がたまたま対抗力に必要な登記を欠いていたことを奇貨として、極めて低廉な価額で競落したうえ巨額な利益をえようとしているものと推認できるので、前示認定のようなY側の事情等をも考慮すると、Xの本件建物収去・土地明渡の請求は権利の濫用として許されないものといわなければならない。」 - 経済産業省

Article 21-10 If a report has been submitted by a specified emitter as prescribed in Article 15, Paragraph 1 of the Act on Rationalization of Energy Use (Act No. 49 of 1979) (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, Paragraph 1 of that law), or in Article 20, Paragraph 3; Article 56, Paragraph 1 (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 69 or Article 71, Paragraph 6 of that law); or Article 63, Paragraph 1 of that law, then with regard to application of the provisions of Articles 21-2 through 21-9, Article 45, and Article 47, the portions of that report regarding matters pertaining to carbon dioxide emissions shall be deemed as reports pursuant to Article 21-2, Paragraph (1) regarding carbon dioxide emissions produced in conjunction with the use of energy (referring to energy as prescribed in Article 2, Paragraph (1) of that law). In this case, the words "minister who has jurisdiction over the area of business pertaining to the place of business in question (hereinafter referred to as 'minister having jurisdiction over the business in question')" in Article 21-2, Paragraph (1), the words "minister having jurisdiction over the business in question" in Article 21-3, Paragraphs (1), (3), (4), and (6), Article 21-4, Paragraphs (1), (3) and (4), Article 21-5, Paragraph (4), Article 21-8, Paragraphs (1), (2) and (5), Article 45, Paragraphs (1) and (2), and Article 47, Paragraph (1), the words "that minister having jurisdiction over the business in question" in Article 21-5, Paragraph (2) and Article 21-8, Paragraph (4), and the words "that minister having jurisdiction over relevant businesses" in Article 21-5, Paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with the words "competent minister" as prescribed in Article 11, Paragraph (1) of the Act on Rationalization of Energy Use (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 12-3, Paragraph (1) of that law) with regard to reporting under Article 15, Paragraph 1 of that law (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, Paragraph 1 of that law); with the words "competent minister" as prescribed in Article 20, Paragraph 3 of the Act on Rationalization of Energy Use with regard to reporting under Article 20, Paragraph 3 of that law; with the words "Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism" with regard to reporting under Article 56, Paragraph 1 of that law (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 69 and Article 71, Paragraph 6 of that law); or with the words "competent minister" as prescribed in Article 63, Paragraph 1 of the Act on Rationalization of Energy Use with regard to reporting under Article 63, Paragraph 1 of that law; and other necessary technical matters with regard to application of the provisions of Articles 21-2 through 21-9, Article 45, and Article 47 shall be specified by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十一条の十　特定排出者から、エネルギーの使用の合理化に関する法律（昭和五十四年法律第四十九号）第十五条第一項（同法第十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十条第三項、第五十六条第一項（同法第六十九条及び第七十一条第六項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第六十三条第一項の規定による報告があったときは、第二十一条の二から前条まで、第四十五条及び第四十七条の規定の適用については、当該報告のうち二酸化炭素の排出量に係る事項に関する部分は、エネルギー（同法第二条第一項に規定するエネルギーをいう。）の使用に伴って発生する二酸化炭素の排出量についての第二十一条の二第一項の規定による報告とみなす。この場合において、同項中「当該事業所に係る事業を所管する大臣（以下「事業所管大臣」という。）」とあり、第二十一条の三第一項、第三項、第四項及び第六項、第二十一条の四第一項、第三項及び第四項、第二十一条の五第四項、第二十一条の八第一項、第二項及び第五項、第四十五条第一項及び第二項並びに第四十七条第一項中「事業所管大臣」とあり、第二十一条の五第二項及び第二十一条の八第四項中「当該事業所管大臣」とあり、並びに第二十一条の五第三項中「関係事業所管大臣」とあるのは、同法第十五条第一項（同法第十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による報告については「エネルギーの使用の合理化に関する法律第十一条第一項（同法第十二条の三第一項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する主務大臣」と、同法第二十条第三項の規定による報告については「エネルギーの使用の合理化に関する法律第二十条第三項に規定する主務大臣」と、同法第五十六条第一項（同法第六十九条及び第七十一条第六項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による報告については「国土交通大臣」と、同法第六十三条第一項の規定による報告については「エネルギーの使用の合理化に関する法律第六十三条第一項に規定する主務大臣」とするほか、第二十一条の二から前条まで、第四十五条及び第四十七条の規定の適用に関し必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where the provision of the preceding paragraph shall apply, and the said domestic corporation has any liabilities arising from a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. among its liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. that are related to the said domestic corporation, the said domestic corporation may use, as the multiple number applicable to the equity interest held by the foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said domestic corporation or applicable to the amount of equity capital of the said domestic corporation, the multiple number applicable to the equity interest held by a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said domestic corporation or applicable to the amount of equity capital, which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order based on [1] the average balance of liabilities calculated by deducting the average balance of liabilities regarding the specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order from the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to the said foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and fund provider, etc., or [2] the average balance of liabilities calculated by deducting the average balance of liabilities regarding the specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order from the average balance of liabilities regarding the total liabilities for the relevant business year, and thereby determine the amount calculated by deducting the amount of interest on liabilities, etc. arising from the specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order from the amount of interest on liabilities, etc. payable to the foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and fund provider, etc. that are related to the said domestic corporation, to be the amount of interest on liabilities, etc. payable to the foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and fund provider, etc. that are related to the said domestic corporation. In this case, the term "threefold" in the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "twofold." 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定を適用する場合において、当該内国法人は、当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債のうちに特定債券現先取引等に係る負債があるときは、当該国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債に係る平均負債残高から政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高を控除して計算した平均負債残高又は当該事業年度の総負債に係る平均負債残高から政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高を控除して計算した平均負債残高を基礎として政令で定めるところにより計算した国外支配株主等の資本持分又は自己資本の額に係る各倍数を当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等の資本持分又は当該内国法人の自己資本の額に係る各倍数とし、当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に支払う負債の利子等の額から政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る負債の利子等の額を控除した金額を当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に支払う負債の利子等の額とすることができる。この場合において、前項中「三倍」とあるのは、「二倍」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where the provision of the preceding paragraph shall apply, and the said consolidated corporation has any liabilities arising from a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. among its liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. that are related to the said consolidated corporation, the said consolidated corporation may use, as the multiple number applicable to the equity interest held by the foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said consolidated corporation or applicable to the amount of equity capital of the said consolidated corporation, the multiple number applicable to the equity interest held by a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said consolidated corporation or applicable to the amount of equity capital, which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order based on [1] the average balance of liabilities calculated by deducting the average balance of liabilities regarding the specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order from the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to the said foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and fund provider, etc., or [2] the average balance of liabilities calculated by deducting the average balance of liabilities regarding the specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order from the average balance of liabilities regarding the total liabilities for the relevant consolidated business year, and thereby determine the amount calculated by deducting the amount of interest on liabilities, etc. arising from the specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order from the amount of interest on liabilities, etc. payable to the foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and fund provider, etc. that are related to the said consolidated corporation, to be the amount of interest on liabilities, etc. payable to the foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and fund provider, etc. that are related to the said consolidated corporation. In this case, the term "threefold" in the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "twofold." 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定を適用する場合において、当該連結法人は、当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債のうちに特定債券現先取引等に係る負債があるときは、当該国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債に係る平均負債残高から政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高を控除して計算した平均負債残高又は当該連結事業年度の総負債に係る平均負債残高から政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高を控除して計算した平均負債残高を基礎として政令で定めるところにより計算した国外支配株主等の資本持分又は自己資本の額に係る各倍数を当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等の資本持分又は当該連結法人の自己資本の額に係る各倍数とし、当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に支払う負債の利子等の額から政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る負債の利子等の額を控除した金額を当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に支払う負債の利子等の額とすることができる。この場合において、前項中「三倍」とあるのは、「二倍」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 5-4 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment find sufficient reason to suspect that any single Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of Article 2, if they have found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph since said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing environmental pollution if said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph, in view of the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing of said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has been operating such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health or on the life and/or growth of animals at the top of the food chain if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第五条の四　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第一種監視化学物質につき、第二条第二項各号のいずれかに該当すると疑うに足りる理由があると認める場合であつて、その製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第一種監視化学物質が同項各号のいずれかに該当するものであるとすれば、当該第一種監視化学物質による環境の汚染が生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第一種監視化学物質について同項各号のいずれかに該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第一種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康又は高次捕食動物の生息若しくは生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 25-3 (1) In the case that the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Minister of the Environment have, with regard to any single Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance, found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under item (ii) of paragraph (3) of Article 2 since said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing damage to the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment through environmental pollution if said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under said item, in view of the results of the tests prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2) and any other available knowledge concerning said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance as well as the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who operated such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第二十五条の三　経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第三種監視化学物質につき、第四条第七項（第四条の二第九項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する試験の試験成績その他当該第三種監視化学物質に関して得られている知見及びその製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第三種監視化学物質が第二条第三項第二号に該当するものであるとすれば、当該第三種監視化学物質による環境の汚染により生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第三種監視化学物質について同号に該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第三種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（継続的に当該化学物質が摂取され、又はこれにさらされる場合における生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In the City Bus case the Tokyo District Court July 25, 2001 ruled that "whether or not Article 46, Item 4 is applicable should depend on whether the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or the reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. In order to determine this, circumstances such as the formalities, the contents, the manner and method of use of the publication should be objectively examined." In light of these criteria, the judgment further held that "the Defendant's book is a publication edited for the purpose of explaining to children various types of vehicles running on the street by using their photographs. It provides an explanation on the exterior and role of each of the 24 types of vehicles in total. This book is edited from the viewpoint of pre-school education in that children are expected to develop their observation skills as well as curiosity, which will in the future become a basis for learning. The method of inserting the picture in the cover page and page 14 is not unnatural in light of the purpose of this publication. Considering that the viewers of this book will have the impression that the photograph of the bus is placed on various pages as an the example of the diverse vehicles referred to in the body text of the book, the act of selling a book which includes a photograph of the bus with the plaintiff's work shall not fall under the relevant criteria as previously descirbed; the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or such reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. Therefore, such act does not fulfill the conditions required under Article 46, Item 4 of the Copyright Law. 例文帳に追加

前掲東京地裁平成１３年７月２５日判決は、「法４６条４号に該当するか否かについては、著作物を利用した書籍等の体裁及び内容、著作物の利用態様、利用目的などを客観的に考慮して、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する例外的な場合に当たるといえるか否か検討すべきことになる。」とし、「被告書籍は、幼児向けに、写真を用いて、町を走る各種自動車を解説する目的で作られた書籍であり、合計２４種類の自動車について、その外観及び役割などが説明されていること、各種自動車の写真を幼児が見ることを通じて、観察力を養い、勉強の基礎になる好奇心を高めるとの幼児教育的観点から監修されていると解されること、表紙及び本文１４頁の掲載方法は、右の目的に照らして、格別不自然な態様とはいえないので、本件書籍を見る者は、本文で紹介されている各種自動車の一例として、本件バスが掲載されているとの印象を受けると考えられること等の事情を総合すると、原告作品が描かれた本件バスの写真を被告書籍に掲載し、これを販売することは、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する行為には、該当しないというべきである。」として著作権法第46条第４号の要件を充たさないとした。 - 経済産業省

(21) The term "In-Home Long-Term Care Support" as used in this Act means to establish a plan (herein referred to as an "In-Home Service Plan" in this paragraph, Article 115-38, paragraph (1), item (v), and the appended table to this Act) that provides the types and contents of Designated In-Home Service, etc. (herein referred to as "Designated In-Home Service, etc." in this paragraph), the personnel in charge of said services to be used by an In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care, and other items as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, at the request of said Person Requiring Long-Term Care and in consideration of his or her mental and physical condition, surroundings, and the person's and his or her family's preferences, etc., in order for an In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care to be able to use appropriately the Designated In-Home Service as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act, In-Home Service related to Exceptional Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service or equivalent services, Designated Community-Based Service as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of this Act, Community-Based Service related to Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service or equivalent services, and other necessary health and medical services or public aid services for performing daily activities at home (hereinafter referred to as "Designated In-Home Service, etc." in this paragraph); the term also means to provide communication and coordination among Designated Providers of In-Home Long-Term Care as prescribed in Article 41, paragraph (1) of this Act, Designated Community-Based Service Provider as prescribed in Article 42-2, paragraph (1) of this Act and other person and to provide other conveniences in order to ensure provision of the Designated In-Home Service, etc., based on said In-Home Service Plan, and in a case when said In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care requires admission to a Community-Based Facility for the Elderly Covered by Public Aid Requiring Long-Term Care or a Facility Providing Insured Long-Term Care, the term means to introduce a Community-Based Facility for the Elderly Covered by Public Aid Requiring Long-Term Care or Facility Providing Insured Long-Term Care and to provide other conveniences. The term "Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support Business" as used in this Act means a business to provide In-Home Long-Term Care Support. 例文帳に追加

２１　この法律において「居宅介護支援」とは、居宅要介護者が第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス又は特例居宅介護サービス費に係る居宅サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス又は特例地域密着型介護サービス費に係る地域密着型サービス若しくはこれに相当するサービス及びその他の居宅において日常生活を営むために必要な保健医療サービス又は福祉サービス（以下この項において「指定居宅サービス等」という。）の適切な利用等をすることができるよう、当該居宅要介護者の依頼を受けて、その心身の状況、その置かれている環境、当該居宅要介護者及びその家族の希望等を勘案し、利用する指定居宅サービス等の種類及び内容、これを担当する者その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を定めた計画（以下この項、第百十五条の三十八第一項第五号及び別表において「居宅サービス計画」という。）を作成するとともに、当該居宅サービス計画に基づく指定居宅サービス等の提供が確保されるよう、第四十一条第一項に規定する指定居宅サービス事業者、第四十二条の二第一項に規定する指定地域密着型サービス事業者その他の者との連絡調整その他の便宜の提供を行い、並びに当該居宅要介護者が地域密着型介護老人福祉施設又は介護保険施設への入所を要する場合にあっては、地域密着型介護老人福祉施設又は介護保険施設への紹介その他の便宜の提供を行うことをいい、「居宅介護支援事業」とは、居宅介護支援を行う事業をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 36 (1) The provisions of Article 8 to Article 8-2-3 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a building or another structure specified by Cabinet Order as one for which the respective measures set forth in these provisions are particularly necessary in order to mitigate any damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order. In this case: in Article 8, paragraph (1) to paragraph (4), the term "fire prevention manager" shall be deemed to be replaced with "disaster prevention manager"; in Article 8, paragraph (1), the phrase "qualified persons specified by Cabinet Order" shall be deemed to be replaced with "qualified persons who have knowledge of the mitigation of the damage arising from fires and other disasters and who are specified by Cabinet Order," and the phrase "conduct drills for fire extinguishing activities, reporting and evacuation, inspect and improve the equipment used for fire defense, water supply for fire defense or facilities necessary for fire extinguishing activities, supervise the use or handling of fire, maintain and manage the structure and equipment necessary for evacuation or fire prevention, manage the capacity of the property at the appropriate level, and perform any other operations necessary for fire prevention management" shall be deemed to be replaced with "conduct drills for evacuation and perform any other operations necessary for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8, paragraph (4), Article 8-2, paragraph (1) and Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1), the phrase "for fire prevention management" shall be deemed to be replaced with "for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1), the phrase "on the prevention of fire" shall be deemed to be replaced with "on the mitigation of the damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order," and the phrase "the installation and maintenance of equipment used for fire defense, water supply for fire defense or facilities necessary for fire extinguishing activities and other matters necessary for prevention of fire" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and other matters necessary for the mitigation of the damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order"; in Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) and Article 8-2-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)(d), the term "qualified inspector of property under fire prevention measures" shall be deemed to be replaced with "qualified inspector for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8-2-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)(a), and paragraph (6), item (ii) of said Article, the phrase "or Article 17-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" shall be deemed to be replaced with ", Article 17-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2), or Article 8, paragraph (3) or paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 36, paragraph (1)." 例文帳に追加

第三十六条　第八条から第八条の二の三までの規定は、火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減のため特に必要がある建築物その他の工作物として政令で定めるものについて準用する。この場合において、第八条第一項から第四項までの規定中「防火管理者」とあるのは「防災管理者」と、同条第一項中、「政令」とあるのは、「火災その他の災害の被害の軽減に関する知識を有する者で政令」と、「消火、通報及び避難の訓練の実施、消防の用に供する設備、消防用水又は消火活動上必要な施設の点検及び整備、火気の使用又は取扱いに関する監督、避難又は防火上必要な構造及び設備の維持管理並びに収容人員の管理その他防火管理上」とあるのは「避難の訓練の実施その他防災管理上」と、同条第四項、第八条の二第一項及び第八条の二の二第一項中「防火管理上」とあるのは「防災管理上」と、同項中「火災の予防に」とあるのは「火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減に」と、「、消防の用に供する設備、消防用水又は消火活動上必要な施設の設置及び維持その他火災の予防上」とあるのは「その他火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減のために」と、同項、同条第二項及び第八条の二の三第一項第二号ニ中「防火対象物点検資格者」とあるのは「防災管理点検資格者」と、同号イ及び同条第六項第二号中「又は第十七条の四第一項若しくは第二項」とあるのは、「、第十七条の四第一項若しくは第二項又は第三十六条第一項において準用する第八条三項若しくは第四項」と読み替えるもとのする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract. 例文帳に追加

第四十条　連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方（その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。）は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日（その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品（施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。）の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。）から起算して二十日を経過したとき（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) Without prejudice to the provision of section 51 of this Act. the registration of a person as a registered user- (a) may be varied by Registrar as regards the goods or services in respect of which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, if has effect, on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor of the trademark; (b) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor or of the registered user or of any other registered user of the trademark; (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person on any of the following grounds, namely :- (i) that the Registered user has used the trademark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; (ii) that the proprietor or the Registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration, which if accurately represented or disclosed would have justified the refusal of the application for registration of the Registered user; (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested; (iv) that the circumstances have changed since the date of registration in such a way that at the date of such application for cancellation they would have justified the refusal of an application for registration of the registered user; (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar in respect of any goods or services, as the case may be, in relation to which the trademark is no longer Registered; (e) may be cancelled by the Registrar of his own motion or on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person, on the ground that any stipulation in the agreement between the Registered proprietor and the registered user regarding the quality of the goods or services in relation to which the trademark is to be used is either no being enforced or is not being complied with. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法51条の規定を妨げず、登録使用権者としての登録は次に掲げとおりとする。(a)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者が所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、関連の当該商品若しくは役務について、又はその前提となる条件又は制限が有効であれば当該条件についても変更することができる。(b)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者若しくは登録使用権者又はその他任意の登録使用権者の所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(c)登録官は、次に掲げる理由のいずれかにより、何人であれ所定の方式で書面による請求を行った場合、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(i)登録使用権者が許諾された使用以外の方法で、又は誤認若しくは混同を招くかそのおそれのあるような方法で、当該商標を使用したこと(ii)所有者又は登録使用権者が登録出願にとって重要な事実、それが正確に表明又は開示されていれば当該登録使用権者の登録申請拒絶が正当とされたであろう事実を偽って表明し、又は開示しなかったこと(iii)当該登録は、出願人がその実施に利害を有する契約の観点から当該登録により出願人に付与される権利を考慮すると設定されるべきではなかったこと(iv)出願日であったら登録使用権者の登録を求める出願の拒絶が正当化されていたであろう態様で、登録日以後に事情の変更があったこと(d)登録官は、すでに商標が登録されていない商品又は役務(場合に応じ)につき取り消すことができる。(e)登録官は、職権により、又は何人かにより所定の方式で書面の請求があれば、当該商標が使用されるはずの商品若しくは役務の品質に関する登録所有者と登録使用権者間の合意規定が発効していない、又は遵守されていないことを理由として、取り消すことができる。 - 特許庁