「WORK ON」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(365ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(7) The provisions of paragraphs 3 through 5 above shall apply mutatis mutandis to an employee of Japan Post (excluding an employee who is not required to work full-time and does not hold an official post with part-time working hours prescribed in Article 81-5 paragraph 1 of the National Public Service Act; referred to as "Employee of Japan Post" hereinafter in this Article). In this case, the term "a national public officer who is subject to the Special Act on Wages, etc. of Personnel Working in National Enterprises Managing National Forest (Act No. 141 of 1954; referred to as "Special Wage Act" hereinafter in this paragraph)" in paragraph 3 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an employee of Japan Post"; the term "a national public officers who is not required" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an employee who is not required"; the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc. or a person to whom the Minister, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, delegates the authority prescribed in Article 4 of the Special Wage Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc.")" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the president of Japan Post"; the term "said national public officer" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "said employee"; the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc." in paragraph 5 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the president of Japan Post"; and the term "national public officer" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee." 例文帳に追加

７　第三項から第五項までの規定は、日本郵政公社の職員（国家公務員法第八十一条の五第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員を除く。以下この条において「日本郵政公社職員」という。）について準用する。この場合において、第三項中「国有林野事業を行う国の経営する企業に勤務する職員の給与等に関する特例法（昭和二十九年法律第百四十一号。以下この条において「給特法」という。）の適用を受ける国家公務員」とあるのは「日本郵政公社の職員」と、「要しない国家公務員」とあるのは「要しない職員」と、「給特法第四条に規定する農林水産大臣又は政令の定めるところによりその委任を受けた者（以下「農林水産大臣等」という。）」とあるのは「日本郵政公社の総裁」と、「当該国家公務員」とあるのは「当該職員」と、第五項中「農林水産大臣等」とあるのは「日本郵政公社の総裁」と、「国家公務員」とあるのは「職員」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 51-7 (1) Before commencing construction work on the waste disposal facilities pertaining to the licensee of Category 1 waste disposal activity provided in the Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as "specified waste disposal facilities") or the facilities for radioactive waste storage provided in the Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as "specified waste storage facilities"), any licensee of Category 1 waste disposal activity (a person who has obtained the permission for the Category 1 waste disposal activity pursuant to the provision of Article 51-2 (1); the same shall apply hereinafter) or licensee of radioactive waste storage (person who has obtained the permission for the radioactive waste storage pursuant to the provision of said paragraph; the same shall apply hereinafter) shall, pursuant to the provision of the Ordinance of METI, obtain the approval of the Minister of METI with respect to the design and construction methods of the specified waste disposal facilities or specified waste storage facilities (except for welding methods pertaining to specified waste disposal facilities or specified waste storage facilities provided in Article 51-9 (1) that are to be welded; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article). The same shall also apply when making modifications to said specified waste disposal facilities or specified waste storage facilities. 例文帳に追加

第五十一条の七　第一種廃棄物埋設事業者（第五十一条の二第一項の規定による第一種廃棄物埋設の事業の許可を受けた者をいう。以下同じ。）又は廃棄物管理事業者（同項の規定による廃棄物管理の事業の許可を受けた者をいう。以下同じ。）は、経済産業省令で定めるところにより、政令で定める第一種廃棄物埋設の事業に係る廃棄物埋設施設（以下「特定廃棄物埋設施設」という。）又は政令で定める廃棄物管理施設（以下「特定廃棄物管理施設」という。）の工事に着手する前に、特定廃棄物埋設施設又は特定廃棄物管理施設に関する設計及び工事の方法（第五十一条の九第一項に規定する特定廃棄物埋設施設又は特定廃棄物管理施設であつて溶接をするものに関する溶接の方法を除く。以下この条において同じ。）について経済産業大臣の認可を受けなければならない。特定廃棄物埋設施設又は特定廃棄物管理施設を変更する場合における当該特定廃棄物埋設施設又は特定廃棄物管理施設についても、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

That is what the strong yen does, and that is the kind of recession we are in. As I just mentioned, 99.7 percent of companies in Japan are SMEs, and more than 40 million people in fact work at SMEs. In that sense, I believe the SME Financing Facilitation Act is timely legislation. It is temporary legislation that is due to expire at the end of March, after covering the calendar year end and the fiscal year end-the end of the accounting term-twice. I have been told that it was made temporary legislation with a two-year timeframe based on the expectation that the economy would recover by then. Regrettably, however, the economy is currently in such a state. The deadline is fast approaching for us to take these circumstances into consideration, take a positive approach, and make the decision to postpone its expiration. 例文帳に追加

それを実は思って帰ってきたわけでございますが、それが円高ということでございまして、そういった不況でもございますし、また今さっき申しましたように、日本の企業のうち99.7％が中小企業でございまして、4,000万人以上の人が実は中小企業で働いておられるわけでございますから、そういった意味で、中小企業金融円滑化法案というのは、本当に私は時宜にかなった、これは、年末と年度末・決算期（を）2回（含む）ということで、時限立法で3月いっぱいで、そこまでに景気がよくなればということで2年間の時限立法にさせていただけたという話は聞いておりますけれども、なかなか残念ながら、今景気がこういう状態ですから、しっかりそのことを視野に入れつつ、やはり中小企業は経済の太宗を占めると、なかなか大企業であれば、すぐ海外に工場を移したり等々、いろいろできるわけでございますけれども、中小企業はなかなか海外に移転する中小企業もあるのでございますけれども、なかなかそうはいかないところもございますから、そういったことを勘案しながら、しっかり前向きに、この決断をせねばならない時期が、延長せねばならない時期がだんだんだんだん迫りつつあるのかなというふうにも思っております。 - 金融庁

Argentina will work on implementing its action plan to address these deficiencies, including by: (1) adequately criminalising terrorist financing and addressing the remaining deficiencies with regard to the criminalisation of money laundering (Special Recommendation II and Recommendation 1); (2) establishing and implementing adequate procedures for the confiscation of funds related to money laundering and identifying and freezing terrorist assets (Recommendation 3 and Special Recommendation III); (3) enhancing financial transparency (Recommendation 4); (4) ensuring a fully operational and effectively functioning Financial Intelligence Unit and improving suspicious transaction reporting requirements (Recommendation 13, Special Recommendation IV and Recommendation 26); (5) implementing an adequate AML/CFT supervisory programme for all financial sectors (Recommendations 17, 23 and 29); (6) improving and broadening CDD measures for the non-banking or non-foreign exchange sectors (Recommendation 5); and (7) establishing appropriate channels for international co-operation and ensuring effective implementation (Recommendation 36, Recommendation 40 and Special Recommendation V). 例文帳に追加

同国は、①テロ資金供与の適切な犯罪化及び資金洗浄の犯罪化に関し残存する欠陥への対応（特別勧告Ⅱ及び勧告１）、②資金洗浄に関連する資金を没収するための適切な手続きの履行の構築及びテロリスト資産を特定し凍結するための適切な手続きの構築及び履行（勧告３及び特別勧告Ⅲ）、③金融の透明性の強化（勧告４）、④完全にかつ効果的に機能する金融情報機関の構築と、疑わしい取引の届出の提出要件の改善（勧告１３、特別勧告Ⅳ及び勧告２６）、⑤全ての金融セクターに対する、十分な資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策監督プログラムの履行（勧告１７、２３及び２９）、⑥非銀行業又は非外国為替業における顧客管理措置の改善及び拡大（勧告５）及び⑦国際協力のための適切なチャンネルの構築及び効果的な履行の確保（勧告３６、４０及び特別勧告Ⅴ）を含む、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策上の欠陥に対応するため、アクションプランの実施への取組みを継続すべきである。 - 財務省

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well. 例文帳に追加

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁

(2) With regard to the application of the provision of Article 48 of the New Employment Insurance Act to the benefit for daily work job applicant paid during September 1994, the stamp insurance premiums paid in respect of any day during July of the same year pursuant to the provisions of the Act on Collection, etc. of Insurance Premiums of Labor Insurance prior to revision by Article 2 shall be deemed as the stamp insurance premiums paid pursuant to the provisions of the Act on Collection, etc. of Insurance Premiums of Labor Insurance as revised by the same Article, and the portion of the Level I stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (i) of the Old Employment Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "old Level I stamp insurance premiums") corresponding to the number of days for which the payment of the Level I stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (i) of the New Employment Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "new Level I stamp insurance premiums") is made in respect of any day during August of the same year (or, if such number of days for which the payment is made exceeds the number of days for which the payment of the old Level I stamp insurance premiums is made in respect of any day during July of the same year, the number of days for which the payment of such old Level I stamp insurance premiums is made) shall be deemed as the new Level I stamp insurance premiums for such number of days for which such payment is made, the portion corresponding to the remaining number of days shall be deemed as the Level II stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(a) of the New Employment Insurance Act for such number of days, and the Level II stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(a) of the Old Employment Insurance Act, the Level III stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(b) of the Old Employment Insurance Act and the Level IV stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(c) of the Old Employment Insurance Act shall be deemed as the Level III stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(b) of the New Employment Insurance Act. 例文帳に追加

２　平成六年九月中に支給する日雇労働求職者給付金に関する新雇用保険法第四十八条の規定の適用については、同年七月中の日について第二条の規定による改正前の労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律の規定により納付された印紙保険料は、同条の規定による改正後の労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律の規定により納付された印紙保険料とみなし、旧雇用保険法第四十八条第一号に規定する第一級印紙保険料（以下「旧第一級印紙保険料」という。）のうち同年八月中の日について納付された新雇用保険料第四十八条第一号に規定する第一級印紙保険料（以下「新第一級印紙保険料」という。）の納付日数（その納付日数が同年七月中の日について納付された旧第一級印紙保険料の納付日数を超えるときは、当該旧第一級印紙保険料の納付日数）に相当する納付日数分については当該納付日数分の新第一級印紙保険料と、残余の納付日数分については当該納付日数分の新雇用保険法第四十八条第二号イに規定する第二級印紙保険料と、旧雇用保険法第四十八条第二号イに規定する第二級印紙保険料、旧雇用保険法第四十八条第二号ロに規定する第三級印紙保険料及び旧雇用保険法第四十八条第二号ハに規定する第四級印紙保険料については新雇用保険法第四十八条第二号ロに規定する第三級印紙保険料とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 63 (1) With respect to the permission or the approval on business commencement for a designated fishery, the provisions of paragraph (1), Article 34 (Restrictions or Conditions of Fishery Right), Article 35 (Notification of Absence from Work), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Article 37, paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (6) through paragraph (10) and paragraph (13) through paragraph (15) of Article 39 (Rescission of Fishery Right) and Article 12 (Measures for Fishery Employees) of the Aquatic Resources Conservation Act (Act No. 313 of 1951) shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, "the Governor concerned" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister"; "when granting a license, if he/she finds it necessary for ... other public interest" in paragraph (1), Article 34, with "when he/she finds it necessary for ...other public interest"; "fisheries adjustment" in paragraph (1), Article 39, with "the protection of reproduction of aquatic animals and plants, fisheries adjustment"; "the prefectural government concerned" in paragraph (6), paragraph (10) and paragraph (13) of the same Article, with "the national government"; "the Governor concerned, after he/she hears the opinions of the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission concerned" in paragraph (8) of the same Article, with "the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister"; "paragraph (10), paragraph (2), Article 34 (Consultation with the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission) and paragraph (4), Article 37 (Hearing of Opinions)" in paragraph (14) of the same Article, with "paragraph (10)"; "the disposition for nonpayment of local tax" in paragraph (15) of the same Article, with "the disposition for nonpayment of national tax"; "paragraph (5), Article 10" in Article 12 of the same Act, with "paragraph (1), Article 39 of the Fisheries Act applied mutatis mutandis in Article 63 of the same Act"; and "the day of the public notice of paragraph (4) of the same Article," with "the day when the permission is rescinded." 例文帳に追加

第六十三条　指定漁業の許可又は起業の認可に関しては、第三十四条第一項（漁業権の制限又は条件）、第三十五条（休業の届出）、第三十七条第一項及び第二項、第三十九条第一項、第二項、第六項から第十項まで及び第十三項から第十五項まで（漁業権の取消し）並びに水産資源保護法（昭和二十六年法律第三百十三号）第十二条（漁業従事者に対する措置）の規定を準用する。この場合において、「都道府県知事」とあるのは「農林水産大臣」と、第三十四条第一項中「公益上必要があると認めるときは、免許をするにあたり、」とあるのは「公益上必要があると認めるときは、」と、第三十九条第一項中「漁業調整」とあるのは「水産動植物の繁殖保護、漁業調整」と、同条第六項、第十項及び第十三項中「都道府県」とあるのは「国」と、同条第八項中「都道府県知事が海区漁業調整委員会の意見を聴いて」とあるのは「農林水産大臣が」と、同条第十四項中「第十項、第三十四条第二項（海区漁業調整委員会への諮問）並びに第三十七条第四項（意見の聴取）」とあるのは「第十項」と、同条第十五項中「地方税の滞納処分」とあるのは「国税滞納処分」と、同法第十二条中「第十条第五項」とあるのは「漁業法第六十三条において準用する同法第三十九条第一項」と、「同条第四項の告示の日」とあるのは「その許可の取消しの日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(xxviii)-2 Work handling nuclear fuel substances (meaning nuclear fuel substances prescribed by item (ii) of Article 3 of the Atomic Energy Basic Act (Act No. 186 of 1955); the same shall apply hereinafter), spent nuclear fuel (meaning spent nuclear fuel prescribed by paragraph (8) of Article 2 of the Act for the Regulations of Nuclear Source Materials, Nuclear Fuel Materials and Reactors (Act No. 166 of 1957); the same shall apply hereinafter) or materials contaminated with those substances (including nuclear fission product; the same shall apply hereinafter) in the controlled area (meaning the controlled area prescribed by paragraph (1) of Article 3 of the Ordinance on Prevention of Ionizing Radiation Dangers (Ordinance of the Ministry of Labour No. 41 of 1972); the same shall apply hereinafter) such as the processing facilities (meaning the processing facilities prescribed by item (ii) of paragraph (2) of Article 13 of the Act for the Regulations of Nuclear Source Materials, Nuclear Fuel Materials and Reactors (Act No. 166 of 1957)), the reprocessing facilities (meaning the reprocessing facilities prescribed by item (ii) of paragraph (2) of Article 44 of the same Act) and facilities handling those substances (meaning the facilities prescribed by item (iii) of Article 53 of the same Act (limited to the facilities handling nuclear fuel substances prescribed by Article 41 of the Enforcement Order of the Act for the Regulations of Nuclear Source Materials, Nuclear Fuel Materials and Nuclear Reactors [Cabinet Order No. 324 of 1957])); 例文帳に追加

二十八の二　加工施設（核原料物質、核燃料物質及び原子炉の規制に関する法律（昭和三十二年法律第百六十六号）第十三条第二項第二号に規定する加工施設をいう。）、再処理施設（同法第四十四条第二項第二号に規定する再処理施設をいう。）又は使用施設等（同法第五十三条第三号に規定する使用施設等（核原料物質、核燃料物質及び原子炉の規制に関する法律施行令（昭和三十二年政令第三百二十四号）第四十一条に規定する核燃料物質の使用施設等に限る。）をいう。）の管理区域（電離放射線障害防止規則（昭和四十七年労働省令第四十一号）第三条第一項に規定する管理区域をいう。次号において同じ。）内において核燃料物質（原子力基本法（昭和三十年法律第百八十六号）第三条第二号に規定する核燃料物質をいう。次号において同じ。）若しくは使用済燃料（核原料物質、核燃料物質及び原子炉の規制に関する法律第二条第八項に規定する使用済燃料をいう。次号において同じ。）又はこれらによつて汚染された物（原子核分裂生成物を含む。次号において同じ。）を取り扱う業務 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations. 例文帳に追加

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁

(2) With regard to the application of the provision of Article 48 of the New Employment Insurance Act to the benefit for daily work job applicant paid in respect of the day during September 1984 on which the job applicant is unemployed as prescribed by Article 47, paragraph (1) of the Employment Insurance Act, the stamp insurance premiums paid in respect of any day during July of the same year pursuant to the provisions of the Act on Collection, etc. of Insurance Premiums of Labor Insurance prior to revision by Article 2 shall be deemed as the stamp insurance premiums paid pursuant to the provisions of the Act on Collection, etc. of Insurance Premiums of Labor Insurance as revised by the same Article, and the portion of the Level I stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (i) of the Old Employment Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "old Level I stamp insurance premiums") corresponding to the number of days for which the payment of the Level I stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (i) of the New Employment Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "new Level I stamp insurance premiums") is made in respect of any day during August of the same year (or, if such number of days for which the payment is made exceeds the number of days for which the payment of the old Level I stamp insurance premiums is made in respect of any day during July of the same year, the number of days for which the payment of such old Level I stamp insurance premiums is made) shall be deemed as the new Level I stamp insurance premiums for such number of days for which such payment is made, the portion corresponding to the remaining number of days shall be deemed as the Level II stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(a) of the New Employment Insurance Act for such number of days, the Level II stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(a) of the Old Employment Insurance Act shall be deemed as the Level III stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(b) of the New Employment Insurance Act, and the Level III stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(b) of the Old Employment Insurance Act shall be deemed as the Level IV stamp insurance premiums prescribed by Article 48, item (ii)(c) of the New Employment Insurance Act. 例文帳に追加

２　昭和五十九年九月中の雇用保険法第四十七条第一項に規定する失業している日について支給する日雇労働求職者給付金に関する新雇用保険法第四十八条の規定の適用については、同年七月中の日について第二条の規定による改正前の労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律の規定により納付された印紙保険料は、同条の規定による改正後の労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律の規定により納付された印紙保険料とみなし、旧雇用保険法第四十八条第一号に規定する第一級印紙保険料（以下「旧第一級印紙保険料」という。）のうち同年八月中の日について納付された新雇用保険法第四十八条第一号に規定する第一級印紙保険料（以下「新第一級印紙保険料」という。）の納付日数（その納付日数が同年七月中の日について納付された旧第一級印紙保険料の納付日数を超えるときは、当該旧第一級印紙保険料の納付日数）に相当する納付日数分については当該納付日数分の新第一級印紙保険料と、残余の納付日数分については当該納付日数分の新雇用保険法第四十八条第二号イに規定する第二級印紙保険料と、旧雇用保険法第四十八条第二号イに規定する第二級印紙保険料については新雇用保険法第四十八条第二号ロに規定する第三級印紙保険料と、旧雇用保険法第四十八条第二号ロに規定する第三級印紙保険料については新雇用保険法第四十八条第二号ハに規定する第四級印紙保険料とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 45 (1) With regard to a client undertaking to which workers are dispatched for dispatch work in said undertaking, the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 3, Article 4, Article 10, Articles 12 to 13 inclusive (excluding paragraph (2)), Article 13-2, Article 18, Article 19-2, paragraph (2) of Article 59, Article 60-2, Article 62, paragraph (1) of Article 66-5, Article 69 and Article 70 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act (Act No. 57 of 1972) (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply, by deeming the person carrying out said client undertaking to also be a business operator employing the workers under dispatching (which means a business operator prescribed in item (iii) of Article 2 of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), and by deeming the workers under dispatching concerned to be workers also employed by the person carrying out the client undertaking concerned. In this case, in paragraph (1) of Article 10 of the same Act, the term "paragraph (2) of Article 25-2" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (2) of Article 25-2 (including cases where the provisions of said paragraph are applied under the provisions of paragraph (3) of Article 45 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act")), and the term "the following matters" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the following matters (with regard to a worker under dispatching prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Worker Dispatching Act (hereinafter referred to simply as a "worker under dispatching"), the matters referred to in item (ii) (excluding those pertaining to special education on safety and/or health prescribed in paragraph (3) of Article 59), the matters referred to in item (iii) (limited to those matters pertaining to medical examinations under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 66 (including medical examinations under the provisions of the second sentence of paragraph (2) of the same Article which are specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare), medical examinations pertaining to said medical examinations, under the provisions of paragraph (4) of the same Article, and medical examinations pertaining to those medical examinations under the provisions of the proviso to paragraph (5) of the same Article) and the matters referred to in item (v) (limited to those matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare ) shall be excluded; such matters shall be referred to as "safety and health management at the client's place of business" in paragraph (1) of Article 12 and Article 12-2)"; in paragraph (1) of Article 12 and in Article 12-2, the term "the matters listed in each item of paragraph (1) of Article 10" shall be deemed to be replaced with "safety and health management at the client's place of business," the term "paragraph (2) of Article 25-2" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (2) of Article 25-2 (including cases where the provisions of said paragraph are applied under the provisions of paragraph (3) of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act)" and the term "in each item of paragraph (1) of said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in each item of paragraph (1) of Article 25-2"; in paragraph (1) of Article 13, the term "health care for workers and (carry out) other matters provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter" shall be deemed to be replaced with "health care for workers and (carry out) other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (with regard to workers under dispatching, matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare shall be excluded from the matters concerned; in paragraph (3) and in the following Article"; and in paragraph (1) of Article 18, the term "the following matters" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the following matters (with regard to workers under dispatching, matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare shall be excluded from the matters concerned)". 例文帳に追加

第四十五条　労働者がその事業における派遣就業のために派遣されている派遣先の事業に関しては、当該派遣先の事業を行う者もまた当該派遣中の労働者を使用する事業者（労働安全衛生法（昭和四十七年法律第五十七号）第二条第三号に規定する事業者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）と、当該派遣中の労働者を当該派遣先の事業を行う者にもまた使用される労働者とみなして、同法第三条第一項、第四条、第十条、第十二条から第十三条（第二項を除く。）まで、第十三条の二、第十八条、第十九条の二、第五十九条第二項、第六十条の二、第六十二条、第六十六条の五第一項、第六十九条及び第七十条の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則の規定を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第十条第一項中「第二十五条の二第二項」とあるのは「第二十五条の二第二項（労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十五条第三項の規定により適用される場合を含む。）」と、「次の業務」とあるのは「次の業務（労働者派遣法第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣中の労働者（以下単に「派遣中の労働者」という。）に関しては、第二号の業務（第五十九条第三項に規定する安全又は衛生のための特別の教育に係るものを除く。）、第三号の業務（第六十六条第一項の規定による健康診断（同条第二項後段の規定による健康診断であつて厚生労働省令で定めるものを含む。）及び当該健康診断に係る同条第四項の規定による健康診断並びにこれらの健康診断に係る同条第五項ただし書の規定による健康診断に係るものに限る。）及び第五号の業務（厚生労働省令で定めるものに限る。）を除く。第十二条第一項及び第十二条の二において「派遣先安全衛生管理業務」という。）」と、同法第十二条第一項及び第十二条の二中「第十条第一項各号の業務」とあるのは「派遣先安全衛生管理業務」と、「第二十五条の二第二項」とあるのは「第二十五条の二第二項（労働者派遣法第四十五条第三項の規定により適用される場合を含む。）」と、「同条第一項各号」とあるのは「第二十五条の二第一項各号」と、同法第十三条第一項中「健康管理その他の厚生労働省令で定める事項（以下」とあるのは「健康管理その他の厚生労働省令で定める事項（派遣中の労働者に関しては、当該事項のうち厚生労働省令で定めるものを除く。第三項及び次条において」と、同法第十八条第一項中「次の事項」とあるのは「次の事項（派遣中の労働者に関しては、当該事項のうち厚生労働省令で定めるものを除く。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム