「with free」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(189ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The Panel issued its report on July 31, 2000, finding: (a) members imposing safeguards must consider factors raised by interested parties in addition to the factors listed in Article 4.2 of the Agreement on Safeguards; (b) there must be causal link in which imports on their own have caused serious injury; (c) when imports from specific countries are excepted from the measures because they are members of free trade agreements, the authority must determine whether increased imports from other countries have caused serious injury to the domestic industry; and (d) members imposing safeguard measures must make required notifications before the safeguard takes effect. The Panel therefore found that the US safeguard measures were inconsistent with Article XIX of the GATT and the Agreement on Safeguards.例文帳に追加

パネルは2000年７月31日に報告書を発出し、①セーフガード協定第４条２項に列挙されている要素の他、当事者から提出された事項についても検討しなければならない、②輸入が単独でも重大な損害を引き起こしたという関係にあることが必要である、③自由貿易協定などを理由として措置対象から除外する場合、それ以外の国からの輸入のみで重大な損害が発生したことを明らかにしなければならない、④発動前に所定の通報を行わなければならない等を理由として、本件セーフガード措置はGATT 第19条並びにセーフガード協定に違反している、と判断した。 - 経済産業省

Under the Guideline on Policy Promotion For the Revitalization of Japan (Cabinet decision adopted on May 17, 2011), which presented the policy toward reconstruction from the Great East Japan Earthquake, the “Strategy for Strengthening Bonds between Countries” was clearly indicated; the Guideline stated as regards EPA/FTA that “the Minister-level Meeting on FTAAP (Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific)/EPA (Economic Partnership Agreements) will consider the basic policy for strengthening “kizuna” (the bonds of friendship) with other countries, such as promoting high-level economic partnerships based on “Basic Policy on Comprehensive Economic Partnership” (Cabinet decision adopted in November 2010) and establishing economic security, taking into consideration factors such as the sentiments of the farmers and fishermen who have suffered enormous damage from the earthquake and the nuclear incident, progress in the international negotiations, and concerns of de-industrialization.”例文帳に追加

さらに、東日本大震災からの復興を進める方針を提示した「政策推進指針」（平成 23 年 5 月 17 日閣議決定）では、「国と国との絆の強化による開かれた経済再生」が明記され、EPA／FTA については、「「FTAAP・EPA のための閣僚会合」において、「包括的経済連携に関する基本方針」に基づく高いレベルの経済連携推進や経済安全保障の確立等、国と国との絆の強化に関する基本的考え方を、震災や原子力災害によって大きな被害を受けている農業者・漁業者の心情、国際交渉の進捗、産業空洞化の懸念等に配慮しつつ、検討する」こととされた。 - 経済産業省

There are two types of risks: risks held directly by financial institutions themselves and risks that may arise from off-balance-sheet assets. Unless a certain degree of transparency is introduced with regard to the management of such risks, another incident like the Lehman shock could occur. As is often pointed out, the remuneration system of rewarding risk-taking with higher pay encourages unrestrained risk-taking, so this must be curbed under the financial regulatory framework. One year on from the outbreak of the crisis, some people in the financial industry may be saying that they should be free to do as they like as they have recovered, but I won't buy such an argument. According to one estimate, over the past year, governments in the United States and Europe may have used funds equivalent to 5% to 6% of GDP to bail out financial institutions and help them stay afloat. The financial industry must not simply continue “business as usual” in the hope that it will get limitless protection 例文帳に追加

これは二通りありまして、一つは本体の持っているリスク、それから簿外債務となり得るリスク、こういうものは一定の透明性を持ってやりませんとリーマンのようなことが起きますし、今しきりに議論されていますけれども、リスクを取った方が報酬が増えるというあの方式ですときりなくリスクを取ってしまうという、そういうもの全体を金融規制の中できちっとやらなければならないと思っていますけれども、１年経つと世界の金融界の一部の人は「もういいじゃないか、治ったから」、そうは思ってないのですけれども、この間各国政府が投入した救済の資金、つなぎの資金、アメリカ、ヨーロッパ、トータルするとＧＤＰのおよそ５～６％に及んでいるのではないかという説もありまして、金融界は際限なく守られるということを期待して金融証券業務をやっていただいては困る、そのように思っております - 金融庁

8. With regard to items to be recorded (except for the date of record, name of customer, name of Commodity Exchange, Type of Listed Commodity or Listed Commodity Index, expiration month, date of contract, and session or time), such amount shall be recorded by each open contract, by customer (by each customer and distinction of existence or non-existence of replacement, or by Deposit Deferral), and by each of all of the above for all customers; provided, however, that with regard to unsecured Mark-to-Market profit and loss amounts, amount of deposited margin, accounts receivable from a customer, unsecured accounts receivable from a customer, total amount of required amount of clearing margin, and additional margin of such related details, amount exceeding deposited margin or amount of claim for shortage, maintenance account for the clearing margin, Mark-to-Market applicable reserve, free margin, deposit amount declared to a Commodity Exchange or Commodity Clearing Organization, deduction amount against allocations, and amount scheduled to be refunded, it is not necessary to record such amounts individually by open contract. 例文帳に追加

八　記載事項（帳簿の作成日、委託者名、商品取引所名、上場商品又は上場商品指数の種類、限月、約定年月日及び場節又は時間を除く。）については、個々の建玉、委託者（一人ずつ及び差換の有無又は預託猶予の別ごと）及び全ての委託者ごとにその額を記載すること。ただし、無担保値洗損金通算額、預り証拠金額、委託者未収金、無担保委託者未収金、取引証拠金預託必要額の合計額及びその内訳中追証拠金、預り証拠金余剰額又は不足請求額、取引証拠金維持額、値洗充当可能額、余剰証拠金、商品取引所又は商品取引清算機関に対する預託申告額、充当控除額並びに返還予定額については、個々の建玉ごとにその額を記載することを要しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 30, paragraphs 2 to 4 inclusive, Article 31, Article 32, Article 32-4, Article 32-5, Article 32-6, paragraph 2, paragraph 3 and paragraph 5, Articles 32-7 to 32-10 inclusive, and Articles 32-12 to 32-16 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the free employment placement business conducted under the license provided for in paragraph 1 and the person who obtained said license. In this case, the phrase "the license set forth in the preceding paragraph" in Article 30, paragraph 2, the phrase "the license provided for in paragraph 1 of the preceding Article" in Article 31, and the phrase "the license provided for in Article 30, paragraph 1" in Article 32, Article 32-4, paragraph 1, Article 32-5, Article 32-6, paragraph 5, Article 32-8, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the license provided for in Article 33, paragraph 1," the phrase "preceding paragraph" in Article 32-6, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33, paragraph 3," the phrase "matters concerning fees, matters concerning complaints" in Article 32-13 shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters concerning complaints," the phrase "the amount of fees concerning employment placement, and other matters" in Article 32-16, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "and other matters." 例文帳に追加

４　第三十条第二項から第四項まで、第三十一条、第三十二条、第三十二条の四、第三十二条の五、第三十二条の六第二項、第三項及び第五項、第三十二条の七から第三十二条の十まで並びに第三十二条の十二から第三十二条の十六までの規定は、第一項の許可を受けて行う無料の職業紹介事業及び同項の許可を受けた者について準用する。この場合において、第三十条第二項中「前項の許可」とあり、第三十一条中「前条第一項の許可」とあり、並びに第三十二条、第三十二条の四第一項、第三十二条の五、第三十二条の六第五項、第三十二条の八第二項及び第三十二条の九第一項中「第三十条第一項の許可」とあるのは「第三十三条第一項の許可」と、第三十二条の六第二項中「前項」とあるのは「第三十三条第三項」と、第三十二条の十三中「手数料に関する事項、苦情」とあるのは「苦情」と、第三十二条の十六第二項中「、職業紹介に関する手数料の額その他」とあるのは「その他」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1105, paragraph 1 of NAFTA provides an obligation to accord fair and equitable treatment “in accordance with international law.” However, in the Pope and Talbot case it was held that because NAFTA was entered into for the purpose of building a closer economic relationship between the three countries of North America, there is not only an obligation to provide treatment consistent with the minimum standard under international law, but also obligations in addition to such minimum standard. In addition, in the S.D. Myers case it was held that a breach of other provisions under NAFTA automatically establishes a breach of general treatment obligations. Criticisms regarding the interpretation of this provision were raised mainly in the U.S. With a view to posing limitations on the expansive reading of this obligation, the NAFTA Free Trade Commission, in response to such criticisms, published “Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions” on August 1, 2001 confirming that general treatment obligations do not exceed that which is required by the customary international law minimum standard for treatment of aliens, and a breach of another provision of NAFTA, or of a separate international agreement, does not establish that there has been a breach of the general treatment obligations.例文帳に追加

なお、NAFTA 第1105条第１項は、「国際法に従って」公正衡平待遇を与える義務を規定しているが、Pope and Talbot 事件で、NAFTAが北米三国間により一層強固な経済関係を築く目的で締結されたものであることなどから一般国際法上の義務のみでなく、これに付加的なものであるとの判断が下されたこと、また、S.D.Myers事件ではNAFTA 上のこの他の規定に違反している場合、必然的に一般待遇義務にも違反するとの判断が下されたことから、米国を中心にこの規定の解釈について批判の声があがり、これを受ける形で2001年８ 月１ 日にNAFTA 自由貿易委員会（NAFTA FreeTrade Commission）は、公正衡平待遇義務は慣習国際法上の最低基準を付与するものであり、それ以上の待遇を求めるものではないこと、NAFTA 上又は他の国際協定の公正衡平待遇義務以外の義務違反があったことによって、公正衡平待遇義務違反があったこととはならないことを確認する覚書（Notes of Interpretationof Certain Chapter 11Provisions）を公表し、この義務の範囲に制限をかけた。 - 経済産業省

This type of decision used to be typically hindered by sectionalism, but we are hoping to eliminate sectionalism as much as possible and proceed in a proper fashion. We are also committed to continuing to work in partnership with related authorities to make progress in the examination needed to put the idea into practice. I would like everyone to have a thorough understanding of that point. Given the times that we live in, there are things that the public administration can and cannot do, but the FSA is eager to do the best it can do in its capacity in the context of a free economy – it was in such a frame of mind that we developed this policy. 例文帳に追加

このような決定は、昔ならもう経済産業省は経済産業省、金融庁は金融庁、財務省は財務省、JBICはJBICとなりがちだったのですけれども、その縦割りの弊害をできるだけなくして、きちっとやっていきたいと思っておりまして、引き続き関係省庁と連携しつつ、具体化に向けた検討を進めてまいりたいと思いますので、このことはしっかりご理解頂いて、日本もこういう時代ですから、行政は行政でできることと、してはならないことと、せねばならないことと色々ありますけれども、自由主義経済において金融庁も官庁としてできることは、最大限させて頂きたい、そういう気持ちでこういう政策を立てさせて頂いたわけでございます。 - 金融庁

A vehicle for both passenger and goods with a folding seat: whereby two rows of seats consisting of the second seat (42) and the third seat (50) in which a seat back (1, 43), which can be folded forward, is fixed on the top face of a seat cushion (2, 44) and is attached to the luggage compartment (40) in the rear of the driver's seat; wherein an entrance for getting in and out (48) is installed in the lateral direction of the second seat (42); wherein a rear wheel house (39) is attached to the rear of the third seat (50); wherein said third seat (50) is separated right and left into two parts (51, 52); wherein the first leg (8) supporting a seat cushion (2), which can be turned and moved in the direction of a car body panel and can be slid (11, 12) in the direction of a rear wheel house (39), is attached to a side portion of the reverse face of a seat cushion (2) of the part (52), on the side of the entrance for getting in and out (48), of the third seat; and wherein the second leg (24) which is free in folding and supporting a seat cushion (2) when someone is seated is attached to the other side portion of the reverse face. (See Figure 2 and 3) 例文帳に追加

運転室後方の荷物室(40)に、シートバック(１)、(43)がシートクッション(２)、(44)上面に前倒可能に取付けられたセカンドシート(42)とサードシート(50)からなる２列のシートが配設され、前記セカンドシート(42)側方に乗降口(48)が、前記サードシート(50)後方にリヤホイルハウス(39)が設けられている乗貨兼用車両において、前記サードシート(50)は左右に２分割(51、52)され、該サードシートの乗降口(48)側シート(52)のシートクッション(２)の裏面の一側部にはシートクッション(２)を車体壁側に回動可能(21)かつリヤホイルハウス(39)方向へスライド可能(11、12)に支持する第１脚(８)と、前記裏面の他側部には着座状態でシートクッション(２)を支持する起伏自在の第２脚(24)が設けられたことを特徴とする車両用折り畳みシートを備えた乗貨兼用車両。 - 特許庁

The word haikara I began to write has been used very often today in our society and the reason I wrote this word is to contrast it with a pistol in Verbeck's story, that is to say, I wrote in my Tosei Personal Criticism in the Yokohama Mainichi Shimbun that "Aritomo YAMAGATA, Koyata SHIMAO, Tateki TANI and so on belong to a conservative budanha (party of hawks), Nippon Party of Jyoiha (exclusionists sect), stubborn/unwise Party of hawks, Chiyomumage Party or Pistol Party, while Shigenobu OKUMA, Hirobumi ITO, Kinmochi SAIONJI and so on belong to a Liberal Party of doves, Oka (Westernization) Sect of Kaikoku (opening of Japan to western countries) party, free-spirited Haikara Party, Necktie Party or Cosmetic Party", which became the origin of the word haikara, and among them this word alone has become extremely popular, but today many people use it without knowing that I invented the word, which has become one important Japanese word, however, I originally wrote this word haikara (pp.18-19) in the newspaper five or six years after the interview with Mr.Verbeck. 例文帳に追加

我輩がハイカラと云ふ言葉を書き始めた為めに、今日では大変に世間に行はれて居るが、此のハイカラと云ふ言葉を書いたのは、全く此のフルベツキ先生の話のピストルに対照させる為めで有ッた、即ち横浜毎日新聞に掲げたる当世人物評中に、「山縣有朋、鳥尾小弥太、谷干城などは保守主義の武断派、攘夷党の日本党、頑冥不霊なるチヨム髷党、ピストル党であるが、大隈重信、伊藤博文、西園寺公望等は進歩主義の文治派で、開国党の欧化党、胸襟闊達なるハイカラ党、ネクタイ党、コスメチツク党で有る」と書いたのが起因で、外のチヨム髷党、ピストル党、コスメチツク党、ネクタイ党などは少しも流行しなかッたが、唯此のハイカラと云ふ一語だけが、馬鹿に大流行を来した、今日では最早や我輩が発明したと云ふ事を知らずに用ひて居る者も多く、一の重要なる日本語となッて仕舞ふたが、然るに実は我輩が此のハイカ（p18/p19）ラと云ふことを書いた起因を申すと、全く此の時のフルベッキ先生の話を胸中に蓄えて居て、それを五六年の後に至って新聞の上に現はした結果で有る。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

The Tokyo High Court judgment dated February 24, 1999, a major judicial precedent ("King Crimson Case") states that, where a name or image of a celebrity is utilized in speech or publication, "the introduction etc. of a celebrity unavoidably brings with it his/her power to attract customers. Since it is impossible to introduce him/her free of influence of his/her power to attract customers' attention. Therefore, a person is regarded as utilizing a celebrity's power to attract customer only if the sole purpose and effect of such utilization is solely focused on the procurement of the economic benefit or value derived from his/her power to attract customers. If such person simply introduces a celebrity or does something similar thereto, aware of his/her power to attract customers, such person shall not be considered as having utilized such power." This judgment held that such person shall not be regarded as having infringed the publicity rights except in cases such person "solely" utilized the celebrity's power to attract customers. 例文帳に追加

その代表的な裁判例である東京高裁平成１１年２月２４日判決（以下「キングクリムゾン高裁判決」という。）は、言論、出版において、著名人の氏名・肖像が利用される場合に、「著名人の紹介等は必然的に当該著名人の顧客吸引力を反映することになり、紹介等から右顧客吸引力の影響を遮断することはできないから、著名人の顧客吸引力を利用する行為であるというためには、右行為が専ら著名人の顧客吸引力に着目しその経済的利益ないし価値を利用するものであることが必要であり、単に著名人の顧客吸引力を承知の上で紹介等をしたというだけでは当該著名人の顧客吸引力を利用したということはできない」として、「専ら」顧客吸引力の価値を利用したといえない場合には、パブリシティ権侵害を否定する立場に立っている。 - 経済産業省