「かえる」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(854ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

家電機器が有する複数の機能の組み合わせをシーン毎に設定して記憶する記憶部と、記憶部に記憶された複数のシーンを選択可能に一覧表示するシーン選択画面を表示する表示部と、シーン選択画面中のシーンを選択及び決定するための操作部と、制御部とを備え、操作部の操作によりシーン選択画面中のシーンが選択決定されると、制御部は、選択決定されたシーンが有する機能の組合せ構成に基づいて、複数のシーンそれぞれに対して、選択されたシーンとの類似順位付けを行い、類似度が高いシーン順にそのシーンが優先表示されるようにシーン選択画面の表示を切り替える。例文帳に追加

When a scene displayed on the scene selection screen is selected and decided by an operation at the operation section, the control section grades the plurality of scenes with respect to similarity with the combination of functions of the selected and decided scene, and switches display on the scene selection screen such as to give display priority to a scene having higher similarity. - 特許庁

９ 会員商品取引所が電子公告によりこの法律その他の法令の規定による公告をする場合については、会社法第九百四十条第三項、第九百四十一条、第九百四十六条、第九百四十七条、第九百五十一条第二項、第九百五十三条及び第九百五十五条の規定を準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第三項中「前二項の規定にかかわらず、これらの規定」とあるのは「商品取引所法第十一条第八項の規定にかかわらず、同項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「商品取引所法第六十八条の三」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(9) When a Member Commodity Exchange gives a public notice pursuant to the provisions of this Act or other Acts, the provisions of Article 940, paragraph 3, Article 941, Article 946, Article 947, Article 951, paragraph 2, Article 953 and Article 955 of the Company Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, .... pursuant to these provisions" in Article 940, paragraph 3 of said Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 11, paragraph 8 of the Commodity Exchange Act, .... pursuant to the same paragraph," the term "Article 440, paragraph 1" in Article 941 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 68-3 of the Commodity Exchange Act" and any other technical replacement shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 経済産業省

商業登記法（昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号）第二条から第五条まで、第七条から第十五条まで、第十七条から第二十三条の二まで、第二十四条（第十五号及び第十六号を除く。）、第二十五条から第二十七条まで、第四十八条から第五十三条まで及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条までの規定は、会員商品取引所の登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは、「商品取引所法第二十四条第二項各号」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

The provisions of Articles 2 to 5 inclusive, Articles 7 to 15 inclusive, Articles 17 to 23-2 inclusive, Article 24 (excluding items 15 and 16), Articles 25 to 27 inclusive, Article 48 to 53 inclusive and Articles 132 to 148 inclusive of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) shall apply mutatis mutandis to registration of a Member Commodity Exchange. In this case, the phrase "the respective items of Article 930, paragraph 2 of the Company Act" in Article 48, paragraph 2 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective items of Article 24, paragraph 2 of the Commodity Exchange Act."  - 経済産業省

３ 第五十七条第四項及び第五項の規定は、第一項の規定により備え置く業務規程及び取引参加者名簿について準用する。この場合において、同条第四項中「会員及び会員商品取引所の債権者」とあるのは「株式会社商品取引所の株主、取引参加者及び債権者」と、「会員商品取引所の事業時間内」とあるのは「株式会社商品取引所の営業時間内」と、同項ただし書中「会員商品取引所の定めた」とあるのは「株式会社商品取引所の定めた」と、同条第五項中「会員商品取引所」とあるのは「株式会社商品取引所」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 57, paragraphs 4 and 5 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the market rules and Trading Participant register that are kept pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1. In this case, the phrase "A member and a creditor of a Member Commodity Exchange" in paragraph 4 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "A shareholder, Trading Participant and creditor of a Incorporated Commodity Exchange," the phrase "during the business hours of the Member Commodity Exchange" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "during the business hours of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange," the phrase "decided by the Member Commodity Exchange" in the proviso of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "decided by the Incorporated Commodity Exchange" and the term "Member Commodity Exchange" in paragraph 5 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Incorporated Commodity Exchange."  - 経済産業省

会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第六号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項 （第六号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定は、組織変更の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同項中「各会社の本店」とあるのは、「株式会社商品取引所の本店及び支店並びに会員商品取引所の主たる事務所及び従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

The provisions of Article 828, paragraph 1 (limited to the part pertaining to item 6) and paragraph 2 (limited to the part pertaining to item 6), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item 6), Article 835, paragraph 1, Articles 836 to 839 inclusive, Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph 3 (limited to the part pertaining to item 1) of the Company Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for nullity of Entity Conversion. In this case, "the head office of each company" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office and branch offices of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange and the principal office and secondary offices of the Member Commodity Exchange."  - 経済産業省

前条第二項の帳簿その他業務に関する書類の内容が、電磁的方法（電子的方法、磁気的 方法その他の人の知覚によって認識することができない方法をいう。第百十四条において 同じ。）により記録され、当該記録が必要に応じ電子計算機その他の機器を用いて直ちに 表示されることができるようにして保存されるときは、当該記録の保存をもって前条第三 項に規定する帳簿その他業務に関する書類の保存に代えることができる。この場合におい て、会員等は、当該記録が滅失し、又はき損することを防止するために必要な措置を講じ なければならない。例文帳に追加

When the conten ts of books and other business-related documents set forth in paragraph 2 of the preceding Article are recorded by an Electromagnetic Device (which means a method such as an electronic method or a magnetic method that cannot be recognized by human perception; the same shall apply in Article 114), and said record is preserved so as to be displayed promptly on a computer or through other equipment as needed, said preservation of record may substitute for the preservation of books and other business-related documents set forth in paragraph 3 of the preceding Article. In this - 72 - case, a Member, etc. shall take the necessary measures for preventing the loss of and damage to said record.  - 経済産業省

ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商 品取引所の成立の日。第四号において同じ。）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務 の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与 える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の二第二項の会員総会の日 の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存す ることとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の 内容に限る。）例文帳に追加

(b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an - 89 - Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in item 4), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 2 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year);  - 経済産業省

ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商 品取引所の成立の日。第四号において同じ。）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務 の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与 える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日 のいずれか早い日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が 存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事 象の内容に限る。）例文帳に追加

(b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in item 4), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year);  - 経済産業省

総合すると、我々は、「『DRCコンフリクト・フリー』ではない」という表現から「『DRCコンフリクト・フリー』であることが判明しなかった」という表現に置き換えること、付加的な説明と開示を認めること、および一定期間「DRCコンフリクト判定不能」というカテゴリーを認めることにより、最初は自社の紛争鉱物が対象国を原産国とするかどうかを判断できない、あるいは対象国を原産国とする紛争鉱物が対象国における武装集団の直接間接の資金源となっていなかった、もしくはこれらに利益をもたらすものではなかったと判断できない発行人に、議会が「DRCコンフリクト・フリー」ではない製品の開示を求めたときに意図した目的を達成しながらそれらを開示する手段を与えることになると考える。例文帳に追加

Overall, we believe that the change from “not ‘DRC conflict free’” to having “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free,’” the ability to add additional explanation and disclosure, and the periods for the “DRC conflict undeterminable” category will provide issuers who are initially unable to determine that their conflict minerals did not originate in the Covered Countries or unable to determine that their conflict minerals that originated in the Covered Countries did not directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the Covered Countries means to make their disclosure while still accomplishing the goals that Congress intended when it required the disclosure of products that are not “DRC conflict free.” - 経済産業省

IMF（2008）では、中・東欧諸国経済が抱える3つのリスクとして、①米国サブプライム住宅ローン問題の損失を補填するために西欧の銀行が中・東欧諸国向け融資を引き上げたり、資本コストやリスク・スプレッドの上昇に直面した西欧の銀行が、中・東欧向け融資を縮小したり、融資条件を厳格化するリスク、②生産性上昇率を上回って賃金が上昇することで国際競争力が急速に低下し、海外からの投資が減少したり、融資の多くが住宅ローンの形で住宅市場に投資されているようなケースで、住宅市場の縮小によって信用リスクの見直しが行われるリスク、③中・東欧に流入する資金の多くが、産油諸国や一次産品輸出者の資金と推測される中、世界経済が減速して、これら資金の流入が枯渇するリスクを挙げている。例文帳に追加

The IMF (2008) lists the following three risks as being faced by the economies of Central and Eastern European countries: (a) the risk of Western European banks withdrawing finance to Central and Eastern European countries in order to compensate the losses arising from the US subprime mortgage problem, or, faced with rising capital costs and risk spreads, reducing the capital or tightening their loan conditions for Central and Eastern Europe; (b) the risk of rapid declines in international competitiveness or decreases in investments from overseas due to wages rising in excess of the rate of productivity growth, or, in cases where much of the finance has been invested in the housing market in the form of mortgages, of credit risks being reviewed as a consequence of a shrinking housing market; and (c) presuming that much of the funds flowing into Central and Eastern Europe are the funds of oil-producing countries and primary commodity exporters, the risk of these funds drying up as the world economy slows. - 経済産業省

日立が上記のような手法を活用した企業分析を受けているのは、①日立グループが多様な業種の集合体であるため、各事業部の有する知的資本を個別・客観的に明らかにすることで、各事業部の強みや弱みが明らかになり、事業部間での連携や管理部門たるコーポレート（本社機能）と各事業部との役割分担が容易になること、また、②従業員のやる気やブランド等の目に見えない知的資本をできる限り可視化することで、会社や自分たちの抱える問題点についての「気づき」を従業員１人１人に誘発することが可能になること、という効果があるのではないかと期待しているからである。例文帳に追加

Hitachi has subjected itself to the corporate analysis with the use of the above-mentioned method because it has expectations that (i) since the Hitachi group is the aggregate of companies in diversified industry sectors, the individual and objective understanding of intellectual capital possessed by each business division would help reveal the strengths/weaknesses of each division and make it easier to cooperate cross-divisionally and to divide the roles between the administrative division (the head office function) and business divisions; (ii) the visualization of invisible intellectual capital, such as the morale of employees and brands, would induce each employee to become "aware" of problems the company and employees are faced with. - 経済産業省

福島第一原子力発電所の事故に関連した水道水中の放射性物質への対応について、平成 23 年 3 月 19 日付け健水発 0319 第 2 号厚生労働省健康局水道課長通知「福島第一・第二原子力発電所の事故に伴う水道の対応について」及び平成 23 年 3 月 21 日付け健水発 0321 第 2 号厚生労働省健康局水道課長通知「乳児による水道水の摂取に係る対応について」に基づき、指標等（放射性ヨウ素 300 Bq/kg（乳児の摂取は 100 Bq/kg）、放射性セシウム 200 Bq/kg）を超過した時には、厚生労働省より、水道事業者に対し飲用を控える要請を行うこととした。例文帳に追加

In response to radioactive materials detected in tap water in relation to the accident at the Fukushima No. 1 Nuclear Power Plant, the MHLW has decided to request that water supply utilities refrain from having their users intake tap water when the radioactive materials in their tap water exceed the index levels (for radioactive iodine: 300 Bq/kg (for intake by infants: 100 Bq/kg); for radioactive cesium: 200 Bq/kg), based on the “Measures to be taken against watersupply associated with the accident at the Fukushima No. 1 and No 2. Nuclear Power Plants (No. 2-0319 Notice of the director of the Water Supply Division, Health Service Bureau, MHLW, issued on March 19, 2011) and the “Measures for infants’ ingestion of tap water” (No. 2-0321 Notice of the director of the Water Supply Division, Health Service Bureau, MHLW, issued on March 21, 2011). - 厚生労働省

僕たちの主張というのは、僕たちは決して自分から間違ったことをしないというものか、あるいは、間違ったことをやるべき時とやってはいけない時があるというものか、どっちなんだろうか。言い換えると、間違ったことは常に悪くて不名誉なことなのかどうか、ということだ。昔こういうことを議論していて、僕たちはこの点で意見の一致を見たね。それとも、その意見はわずかな日数でもって捨てられてしまったのかね。僕たちは、こんなに年寄りで、しかもお互い長いことあんなに真剣に議論していながら、発見したのは、僕たちが子供と何の変わりもないということに過ぎなかったのか。それとも、多くの人の意見があっても、あるいは結果の善し悪しにかかわらず、僕たちは、不正は常に悪いことであり、不正な行動は不名誉をもたらすものだと主張するのだろうか。僕たちはそうすべきなのか。その通りだ。例文帳に追加

Are we to say that we are never intentionally to do wrong, or that in one way we ought and in another way we ought not to do wrong, or is doing wrong always evil and dishonorable, as I was just now saying, and as has been already acknowledged by us? Are all our former admissions which were made within a few days to be thrown away? And have we, at our age, been earnestly discoursing with one another all our life long only to discover that we are no better than children? Or, in spite of the opinion of the many, and in spite of consequences whether better or worse, shall we insist on the truth of what was then said, that injustice is always an evil and dishonour to him who acts unjustly? Shall we say so or not? Yes.  - Plato『クリトン』

２　第十五条、第十七条第一項から第三項まで、第二十三条、第二十五条第一項及び第三十三条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定は貨物軽自動車運送事業者について、第十七条第四項の規定は貨物軽自動車運送事業者の事業用自動車の運転者及び運転の補助に従事する従業員について、第三十四条の規定は貨物軽自動車運送事業者の事業用自動車について準用する。この場合において、第二十三条中「第十六条第一項、第四項若しくは第六項、第十七条第一項から第三項まで、第十八条第一項、第二十二条第二項若しくは第三項若しくは前条の規定又は安全管理規程」とあるのは「第三十六条第二項において準用する第十七条第一項から第三項までの規定」と、第三十三条中「若しくは事業の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、又は第三条の許可を取り消すことができる」とあるのは「又は事業の全部若しくは一部の停止を命ずることができる」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 15, paragraphs (1) to (3) of Article 17, Article 23, paragraph (1) of Article 25 and Article 33 (limited to the part pertaining to item (i)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the light motor truck transportation business operator, the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 17 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the drivers of the service vehicles of the light motor truck transportation business operator and its employees who are engaged in assisting the drivers and the provision in Article 34 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the service vehicles of the light motor truck transportation business operator. In these cases, the term "the provisions of paragraph (1), (4) or (6) of Article 16, paragraphs (1) to (3) of Article 17, paragraph (1) of Article 18, paragraph (2) or (3) of Article 22 or the preceding Article or the Safety Management Rule" in Article 23 shall be deemed to be replaced with "provisions from paragraph (1) to (3) of Article 17 to which paragraph (2) of Article 36 applies mutatis mutandis" and "or suspension of whole or part of the business or rescind the permission given in Article 3" in Article 33 shall be deemed to be replaced with "or suspension of whole or part of the business".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

７　第三項から第五項までの規定は、日本郵政公社の職員（国家公務員法第八十一条の五第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない職員を除く。以下この条において「日本郵政公社職員」という。）について準用する。この場合において、第三項中「国有林野事業を行う国の経営する企業に勤務する職員の給与等に関する特例法（昭和二十九年法律第百四十一号。以下この条において「給特法」という。）の適用を受ける国家公務員」とあるのは「日本郵政公社の職員」と、「要しない国家公務員」とあるのは「要しない職員」と、「給特法第四条に規定する農林水産大臣又は政令の定めるところによりその委任を受けた者（以下「農林水産大臣等」という。）」とあるのは「日本郵政公社の総裁」と、「当該国家公務員」とあるのは「当該職員」と、第五項中「農林水産大臣等」とあるのは「日本郵政公社の総裁」と、「国家公務員」とあるのは「職員」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(7) The provisions of paragraphs 3 through 5 above shall apply mutatis mutandis to an employee of Japan Post (excluding an employee who is not required to work full-time and does not hold an official post with part-time working hours prescribed in Article 81-5 paragraph 1 of the National Public Service Act; referred to as "Employee of Japan Post" hereinafter in this Article). In this case, the term "a national public officer who is subject to the Special Act on Wages, etc. of Personnel Working in National Enterprises Managing National Forest (Act No. 141 of 1954; referred to as "Special Wage Act" hereinafter in this paragraph)" in paragraph 3 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an employee of Japan Post"; the term "a national public officers who is not required" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an employee who is not required"; the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc. or a person to whom the Minister, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, delegates the authority prescribed in Article 4 of the Special Wage Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc.")" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the president of Japan Post"; the term "said national public officer" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "said employee"; the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc." in paragraph 5 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the president of Japan Post"; and the term "national public officer" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　第三項から第五項までの規定は、地方公務員法（昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号）第四条第一項に規定する職員（同法第二十八条の五第一項に規定する短時間勤務の職を占める職員以外の非常勤職員を除く。以下この条において同じ。）がその要介護家族の介護をするための休業について準用する。この場合において、第三項中「給特法第四条に規定する農林水産大臣又は政令の定めるところによりその委任を受けた者（以下「農林水産大臣等」という。）」とあるのは「地方公務員法（昭和二十五年法律第二百六十一号）第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者（地方教育行政の組織及び運営に関する法律（昭和三十一年法律第百六十二号）第三十七条第一項に規定する県費負担教職員については、市町村の教育委員会。以下同じ。）」と、第五項中「農林水産大臣等」とあるのは「地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of paragraphs 3 through 5 above shall apply mutatis mutandis to leave taken by an employee prescribed in Article 4 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (excluding part-time personnel who do not hold an official post with short working hours prescribed in Article 28-5 paragraph 1 of the same Act, the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article), for the purpose of taking care of his/her Family Member in Care-requiring Condition. In this case, the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries or a person to whom the Minister, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, delegates the authority prescribed in Article 4 of the Special Wage Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc.")" in paragraph 3 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act (Act No. 261 of 1950) (or the municipal board of education with regard to the educational personnel whose wages are paid by a prefectural government prescribed in Article 37 paragraph 1 of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration (Act No. 162 of 1956), the same shall apply hereinafter)"; and the term "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc." in paragraph 5 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百二十一条の十　第二十七条、第二十八条の二、第三十条から第三十二条まで、第三十五条から第三十八条まで及び第百六条第二項の規定は、特定計量証明認定機関及び第百二十一条の二の認定に準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「都道府県知事又は特定市町村の長」とあるのは「経済産業大臣」と、第二十七条、第二十八条の二第一項及び第三十八条第五号中「第二十条第一項」とあるのは「第百二十一条の二」と、第二十八条の二第二項中「前三条」とあるのは「第百二十一条の七、第百二十一条の八及び第百二十一条の十において準用する第二十七条」と、第三十五条中「第二十八条第二号」とあるのは「第百二十一条の八第一号」と、第三十七条中「第二十八条第一号から第五号まで」とあるのは「第百二十一条の八第一号から第四号まで」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 121-10 The provisions of Article 27, Article 28-2, Articles 30 through 32, Articles 35 through 38 and Article 106, paragraph 2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to specified measurement certification accreditation organizations and an accreditation set forth in Article 121-2. In this case, the term "the prefectural governor or the head of specified municipality" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry", the term "Article 20, paragraph 1" in Article 27, Article 28-2, paragraph 1 and Article 38, item 5 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 121-2", the term "The preceding three Articles" in Article 28-2, paragraph 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 27 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 121-7, Article 121-8 and Article 121-10", the term "Article 28, item 2" Article 35 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 121-8, item 1", and the term "items 1 through 5 of Article 28" in Article 37 shall be deemed to be replaced with "items 1 through 4 of Article 121-8."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十四条　第四十二条の規定は第四十条第二項に該当することにより命令等制定機関が自ら意見公募手続を実施しないで命令等を定める場合について、前条第一項から第三項までの規定は第四十条第二項に該当することにより命令等制定機関が自ら意見公募手続を実施しないで命令等を定めた場合について、前条第四項の規定は第四十条第二項に該当することにより命令等制定機関が自ら意見公募手続を実施しないで命令等を定めないこととした場合について準用する。この場合において、第四十二条中「当該命令等制定機関」とあるのは「委員会等」と、前条第一項第二号中「命令等の案の公示の日」とあるのは「委員会等が命令等の案について公示に準じた手続を実施した日」と、同項第四号中「意見公募手続を実施した」とあるのは「委員会等が意見公募手続に準じた手続を実施した」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 44 The provisions of Article 42 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case that Organs Establishing Administrative Orders, etc. establish the Administrative Orders, etc. without implementing the Public Comment Procedure pursuant to the provision of Article 40, paragraph 2; the provisions of paragraph 1 to 3 inclusive of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case that Organs Establishing Administrative Orders, etc. established the Administrative Orders, etc. without implementing the Public Comment Procedure pursuant to the provision of Article 40, paragraph 2; and the provisions of paragraph 4 of the preceding Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case that Organs Establishing Administrative Orders, etc. decided not to establish the Administrative Orders, etc. without implementing the Public Comment Procedure pursuant to the provision of Article 40, paragraph 2. In these cases, the terms "Organs Establishing Administrative Orders etc." in Article 42, "Date of the public notice of the proposed Administrative Orders, etc." in paragraph 1, item 2 of the preceding Article and "upon which the Public Comment Procedure was implemented" in item 4 of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced respectively with "Committees, etc.," "Date upon which the committee has implemented a procedure equivalent to the Public Comment Procedure upon the proposed Administrative Orders, etc." and "upon which the procedure equivalent to the Public Comment Procedure."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十一条　会社法第八条（会社と誤認させる名称等の使用の禁止）の規定は相互会社であると誤認されるおそれのある商号又は名称の使用について、同法第九条（自己の商号の使用を他人に許諾した会社の責任）の規定は相互会社について、同法第一編第三章第一節（会社の使用人）の規定は相互会社の使用人について、同章第二節（第十八条を除く。）（会社の代理商）の規定は相互会社のために取引の代理又は媒介をする者について、同編第四章（第二十四条を除く。）（事業の譲渡をした場合の競業の禁止等）の規定は相互会社が事業を譲渡し、又は事業若しくは営業を譲り受けた場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第十条（支配人）中「会社（外国会社を含む。以下この編において同じ。）」とあるのは「相互会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 21 (1) The provision of Article 8 (No Use of Name, etc. Which is Likely to be Mistaken for a Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the use of a misleading trade name or any other name that might evoke a Mutual Company; the provision of Article 9 (Liability of Company Permitting Others to Use its Trade Name) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 1 (Employees of a Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the employees of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Section 2 of said Chapter (excluding Article 18) (Commercial Agents of the Companies) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person acting as an agent or intermediary in transactions for a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Chapter IV of said Part (excluding Article 24) (Non Competition after Assignment of Business) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company either assigns its business, or takes over any business or operation, respectively. In this case, the term "Company (including a Foreign Company, hereinafter the same shall apply in this Part)" in Article 10 (Manager) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第百二十条第二項から第五項まで（株主の権利の行使に関する利益の供与）の規定は前項の場合について、同法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百二十条第三項の利益の返還を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百二十条第三項及び第四項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項」と、同条第五項中「総株主」とあるのは「総社員」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項（責任追及等の訴え）中「株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「社員である者」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 120, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive (Giving Benefits on Exercise of Shareholder's Right) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case set forth in the preceding paragraph; and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), and Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Responsibility, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the return of benefits under Article 120, paragraph (3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, respectively. In this case, the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 120, paragraphs (3) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "all shareholders" in Article 120, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; the term "shareholder who has been holding shares (other than a holder of share less than one unit who may not exercise his/her rights pursuant to the provision of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2))" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Responsibility, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who has been a member"; and the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十一　会社法第三百四十三条（監査役の選任に関する監査役の同意等）の規定は相互会社の監査役の選任について、同法第三百四十四条（会計監査人の選任に関する監査役の同意等）の規定は相互会社の会計監査人の選任について、同法第三百四十五条（会計参与等の選任等についての意見の陳述）の規定は相互会社の会計参与、監査役又は会計監査人の選任若しくは解任又は辞任についての意見の陳述について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百四十三条第四項中「第三百四十一条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十」と、同法第三百四十五条第三項中「第二百九十八条第一項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第四十一条第一項又は第四十九条第一項において準用する第二百九十八条第一項第一号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-11 The provision of Article 343 (Consent of Company Auditors to Election of Company Auditors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the election of the company auditors of a Mutual Company; the provision of Article 344 (Consent of Company Auditors to the Election of Accounting Auditors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the election of the accounting auditors of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 345 (Statement of Opinions on Election of Accounting Advisors, etc.) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the statement of opinions regarding the election or dismissal, or resignation of the accounting advisors, company auditors or accounting auditors of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "Article 341" in Article 343, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-10 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 298, paragraph (1), item (i)" in Article 345, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 298, paragraph (1), item (i) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41, paragraph (1) or Article 49, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七十一条　会社法第七百七十七条（新株予約権買取請求）、第七百七十八条（新株予約権の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、組織変更をする株式会社が新株予約権を発行している場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第七百七十八条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「組織変更後持分会社」とあるのは「組織変更後相互会社（保険業法第六十九条第四項第一号に規定する組織変更後相互会社をいう。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 71 The provisions of Article 777 (Demand for Purchase of Share Options), Article 778 (Determination on Value of Share Options, etc.), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where the converting Stock Company has issued share options. In this case, the term "converted membership company" in Article 778, paragraph (1), Article 778, paragraph (2), and Article 778, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Converted Mutual Company (referring to a Converted Mutual Company as defined in Article 69, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第二十八条第二項から第六項まで、第二十九条から第三十条の二まで、第三十条の三（第二項及び第三項を除く。）並びに第三十条の五第二項及び第三項の規定は、第一項の募集について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時に募集をする基金」とあり、及び「相互会社の設立時の基金」とあるのは「第七十八条第一項の募集に係る基金」と、第二十八条第四項中「第一項各号」とあるのは「第七十八条第二項各号」と、第三十条中「前二条」とあるのは「第七十八条第二項（第三号を除く。）及び同条第三項において準用する第二十八条第二項から第六項まで」と、第三十条の三第四項中「成立後の相互会社」とあるのは「組織変更後相互会社」と、第三十条の五第三項中「相互会社の成立後」とあるのは「組織変更後」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 28, paragraphs (2) to (6) inclusive, Article 29 to 30-2 inclusive, Article 30-3 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)), and Article 30-5, paragraphs (2) and (3) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a solicitation under (1). In this case, the term "incorporators" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company"; the terms "funds solicited at incorporation" and "funds of a Mutual Company at incorporation" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "funds solicited under Article 78, paragraph (1)"; the term "the items in paragraph (1)" in Article 28, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 78, paragraph (2)"; the term "the preceding two Articles" in Article 30 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 78, paragraph (2) (excluding item (iii)) and Article 28, paragraphs (2) to (6) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 30, paragraph (3)"; the term "Mutual Company thus established" in Article 30-4, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Converted Mutual Company"; and the term "After the establishment of the Mutual Company" in Article 30-5, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "After the Entity Conversion"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　信託業法第十一条（営業保証金）、第二十二条から第三十一条まで（信託業務の委託、信託業務の委託に係る信託会社の責任、信託の引受けに係る行為準則、金融商品取引法の準用、信託契約の内容の説明、信託契約締結時の書面交付、信託財産状況報告書の交付、信託会社の忠実義務等、信託財産に係る行為準則、重要な信託の変更等、費用等の償還又は前払の範囲等の説明、信託の公示の特例、信託財産に係る債務の相殺）、第四十二条（立入検査等）及び第四十九条（免許等の取消し等の場合の解任手続）並びに金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第六条（損失の補てん等を行う旨の信託契約の締結）の規定は、生命保険会社が第三項の規定により保険金信託業務を行う場合について準用する。この場合において、次の表の上欄に掲げる信託業法の規定中同表の中欄に掲げる字句は、同表の下欄に掲げる字句と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 11 (Business Deposit), Articles 22 to 31 inclusive (Entrustment of Trust Business, Liability of Trust Company Pertaining to Entrustment of Trust Business, Conduct Rules Pertaining to Underwriting of Trust, Application mutatis mutandis of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, Explanation of Contents of Trust Contract, Written Issuance at Conclusion of Trust Contract, Issuance of Report on Trust Property Situation, Duty of Loyalty of Trust Company, etc., Conduct Rules Pertaining to Trust Property, Change of Important Trust, etc., Explanation of Reimbursement of Costs, etc. or Scope of Advance Payment, etc., Special Measures for Public Notice of Trusts, and Debt Set-off Pertaining to Trust Property), Article 42 (Inspection, etc.), and Article 49 (Dismissal Procedure in the Case of Rescission, etc. of License, etc.) of the Trust Business Act and Article 6 (Conclusion of Trust Contract on Loss Compensation, etc.) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Life Insurance Company carries out the Insurance Claim Trust Business pursuant to the provision of paragraph (3). In this case, the phrases listed in the middle column of the following table in the provisions of the Trust Business Act listed in the left column of the table shall be deemed to be replaced with the phrases listed in the right column of the table.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第三百五十三条から第三百五十七条まで（株式会社と取締役との間の訴えにおける会社の代表、表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）及び第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）の規定は、清算人（同条の規定については、第百七十四条第一項、第四項又は第九項の規定により内閣総理大臣が選任したものを除く。）について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十三条中「第三百四十九条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の九第五項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」と、同法第三百五十四条中「代表取締役」とあるのは「代表清算人」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 353 to 357 inclusive (Representation of Companies in Actions Between Stock Company and Directors, Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflicting Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders) and Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a liquidator (with regard to the provision of Article 361 of that Act, other than a liquidator appointed by the Prime Minister pursuant to the provision of Article 174, paragraph (1), (4) or (9)). In this case, the term "Article 349, paragraph (4)" in Article 353 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-9, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "a Representative Director" in Article 354 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Representative Liquidator"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members of the company" and "irreparable damage," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七条　第百二十三条から第百二十五条までの規定は、外国保険会社等について準用する。この場合において、第百二十三条第一項中「第四条第二項第二号から第四号まで」とあるのは「第百八十七条第三項第二号から第四号まで」と、第百二十四条第一号中「第四条第二項第二号及び第三号」とあるのは「第百八十七条第三項第二号及び第三号」と、「第五条第一項第三号イからホまで」とあるのは「第百八十七条第五項において準用する第五条第一項第三号イからホまで」と、同条第二号中「第四条第二項第四号」とあるのは「第百八十七条第三項第四号」と、「第五条第一項第四号イからハまで」とあるのは「第百八十七条第五項において準用する第五条第一項第四号イからハまで」と、第百二十五条中「第五条第一項第三号イからホまで又は第四号イからハまで」とあるのは「第百八十七条第五項において準用する第五条第一項第三号イからホまで又は第四号イからハまで」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 207 The provisions in Article 123 to 125 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "Article 4, paragraph (2), items (ii) to (iv) inclusive" in Article 123, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 187, paragraph (3), items (ii) to (iv) inclusive," the term "Article 4, paragraph (2), items (ii) and (iii)" in Article 124, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 187, paragraph (3), items (ii) and (iii)," the term "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a) to (e) inclusive" in Article 124, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a) to (e) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 187, paragraph (5)," the term "Article 4, paragraph (2), item (iv)" in the same Article, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 187, paragraph (3), item (iv)," the term "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iv), (a) to (c) inclusive" in the same Article, item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iv), (a) to (c) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 187, paragraph (5)," and the term "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a) to (e) inclusive or item (iv), (a) to (c) inclusive" in Article 125 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 5, paragraph (1), item (iii), (a) to (e) inclusive or item (iv), (a) to (c) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 187, paragraph (5)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社更生法第六十九条、第七十条、第八十条並びに第八十一条第一項及び第五項（数人の管財人の職務執行、管財人代理の選任、注意義務並びに費用の前払及び報酬）の規定は保険管理人について、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律第七十八条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）の規定は被管理会社について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、会社更生法第六十九条第一項中「裁判所の許可」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の承認」と、同法第七十条中「管財人代理」とあるのは「保険管理人代理」と、同条第二項中「裁判所の許可」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の承認」と、同法第八十一条第一項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同条第五項中「管財人代理」とあるのは「保険管理人代理」と、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律第七十八条中「代表理事その他の代表者」とあるのは「保険管理人」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 69, Article 70, Article 80, and Article 81, paragraph (1) and Article 81, paragraph (5) (Execution of Duty by Several Trustees, Appointment of Trustee Representatives, Duty of Care, and Advance Payment of Costs and Compensation of a Trustee) of the Corporate Rehabilitation Act and the provisions of Article 78 (Liability for Damages with regard to Acts of Representative Persons) of the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation shall apply mutatis mutandis to Insurance Administrators and the Company Being Managed, respectively. In this case, the term "permission of a court" in Article 69, paragraph (1) of the Corporate Rehabilitation Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "approval of the Prime Minister," the term "trustee representatives" in Article 70 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrator Representatives," the term "permission of a court" in paragraph (2) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Approval of the Prime Minister," the term "court" in Article 81, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "trustee representatives" in paragraph (5) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrator Representatives," and the term "representative directors and other representative persons" in Article 78 of the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrators."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　第百八十六条（控訴の規定の準用）、第百八十七条（上告提起の場合における費用の予納）、第百八十九条（上告提起通知書の送達等）及び第百九十二条から前条まで（判例の摘示、上告理由の記載の仕方、上告理由書の提出期間、上告理由を記載した書面の通数、補正命令、上告裁判所への事件送付及び上告理由書の送達）の規定は、上告受理の申立てについて準用する。この場合において、第百八十七条、第百八十九条及び第百九十四条中「上告提起通知書」とあるのは「上告受理申立て通知書」と、第百八十九条第二項、第百九十五条及び前条中「被上告人」とあるのは「相手方」と、第百九十六条第一項中「第百九十条（法第三百十二条第一項及び第二項の上告理由の記載の方式）又は第百九十一条（法第三百十二条第三項の上告理由の記載の方式）」とあるのは「第百九十九条（上告受理の申立て）第一項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 186 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance), Article 187 (Prepayment of Expenses in Cases of Filing Final Appeal), Article 189 (Service of Written Notice of the Filing of Final Appeal) and Article 192 to the preceding Article (Indication of Precedents; Matter in Which Reasons for Final Appeal Should be Stated; Period for Submission of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal; Number of Copies of Document Stating Reasons for Final Appeal; Order to Correct; Sending of Case to Final Appellate Court; and Service of Statement of Reasons for Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal. In this case, the term "written notice of the filing of a final appeal" in Article 187, Article 189 and Article 194 shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice of a petition for the acceptance of a final appeal," the term "appellee of the final appeal" in paragraph (2) of Article 189, Article 195 and the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "opponent," and the phrase "Article 190 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2) of Article 312 of the Code) or Article 191 (Method of Stating Reasons for Final Appeal Set Forth in Paragraph (3) of Article 312 of the Code)" in paragraph (1) of Article 196 shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) of Article 199 (Petition for Acceptance of Final Appeal)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百九条　第百八十六条（控訴の規定の準用）、第百八十七条（上告提起の場合における費用の予納）、第百八十九条（上告提起通知書の送達等）、第百九十二条（判例の摘示）、第百九十三条（上告理由の記載の仕方）、第百九十五条（上告理由を記載した書面の通数）、第百九十六条（補正命令）及び第百九十九条（上告受理の申立て）第一項の規定は、法第三百三十七条（許可抗告）第二項の申立てについて、第二百条（上告受理の決定）の規定は、法第三百三十七条第二項の規定による許可をする場合について、前条（特別抗告）の規定は、法第三百三十七条第二項の規定による許可があった場合について準用する。この場合において、第百八十七条及び第百八十九条中「上告提起通知書」とあるのは、「抗告許可申立て通知書」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 209 The provisions of Article 186 (Application Mutatis Mutandis of Provisions Concerning Appeal to Court of Second Instance), Article 187 (Prepayment of Expenses in Cases of Filing Final Appeal), Article 189 (Service of Written Notice of the Filing of Final Appeal, etc.), Article 192 (Indication of Precedents), Article 193 (Manner in Which Reasons for Final Appeal Should be Stated), Article 195 (Number of Copies of Document Stating Reasons for Final Appeal), Article 196 (Order to Correct) and paragraph (1) of Article 199 (Petition for Acceptance of Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the petition set forth in paragraph (2) of Article 337 (Appeal with Permission) of the Code, the provision of Article 200 (Order to Accept Final Appeal) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases of giving permission under the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 337 of the Code, and the provision of the preceding Article (Special Appeal against Ruling to the Supreme Court) shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where permission was given under the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 337 of the Code. In this case, the term "written notice of the filing of a final appeal" in Article 187 and Article 189 shall be deemed to be replaced with "written notice of a petition for permission for an appeal against ruling."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第九百十五条第一項及び第二項（変更の登記）、第九百十六条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（他の登記所の管轄区域内への本店の移転の登記）、第九百十七条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（職務執行停止の仮処分等の登記）並びに第九百十八条（支配人の登記）の規定は、特定目的会社の本店の所在地における登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百十五条第一項中「第九百十一条第三項各号又は前三条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十二条第二項各号」と、同条第二項中「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、同法第九百十六条第一号中「第九百十一条第三項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十二条第二項各号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 915(1) and (2) (Registration of a Change), Article 916 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of Relocation of the Head Office to the Jurisdictional District of Another Registry), Article 917 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of a Provisional Disposition, etc. Suspending Execution of Duties) and Article 918 (Registration of a Manager) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to registration of a Specific Purpose Company at the location of its head office. In this case, the phrase "in the items of Article 911(3) or in the items of the preceding three Articles" in Article 915(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the items of Article 22(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" and the term "share" in Article 915(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Specified Equity," respectively, the term "the items of Article 911(3)" in Article 916(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 22(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は、発起人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役の責任を追及する訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員（資産流動化法第二十六条に規定する優先出資社員をいう。）」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 97(3) and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action pursuing the liability of an incorporator, a Director at Incorporation, or a Company Auditor at Incorporation. In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation as set forth in Article 189(2)) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member (meaning a preferred equity member as defined in Article 26 of the Asset Securitization Act) who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第百四十七条第三項（株式の質入れの対抗要件）の規定は特定出資について、同法第百四十九条第一項から第三項まで（株主名簿の記載事項を記載した書面の交付等）、第百五十条（登録株式質権者に対する通知等）、第百五十二条第二項及び第百五十四条第二項（株式の質入れの効果）の規定は特定目的会社の特定出資に係る登録特定出資質権者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主名簿」とあるのは「特定社員名簿」と、同法第百四十九条第一項中「前条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十二条第三項各号」と、「同条各号」とあるのは「同項各号」と、同法第百五十二条第二項中「前条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十二条第四項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 147(3) (Perfection of Pledges of Shares) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Equity, and the provisions of Article 149(1) to (3) inclusive (Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to be Stated in Shareholder Registry), Article 150 (Notices to Registered Pledgees of Shares), Article 152(2), and Article 154(2) (Effect of Pledge of Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Registered Pledgee of Specified Equity pertaining to Specified Equity of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the term "shareholder registry" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member Registry," the phrases "the items of the preceding Article" and "the items of that Article" in Article 149(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 32(3) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "the items of that paragraph," respectively, the term "the preceding Article" in Article 152(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 32(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第三十条第一項及び前条並びに会社法第百三十三条（株主の請求による株主名簿記載事項の記載又は記録）の規定は、第一項の規定に基づき特定出資を信託する場合について準用する。この場合において、第三十条第一項中「取得した者の氏名又は名称及び住所」とあるのは「受託者及び受益者の氏名又は名称及び住所その他の特定出資信託に係る内閣府令で定める事項並びに特定出資信託の設定」と、前条第一項から第三項までの規定中「特定出資」とあるのは「特定出資信託の受益権」と、同条第四項中「特定出資を」とあるのは「特定出資信託の受益権を」と、「当該特定出資」とあるのは「当該特定出資信託の受益権」と、同法第百三十三条第一項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 30(1) and the preceding Article and the provisions of Article 133 (Stating or Recording of Matters to Be Stated in Shareholder Registry at the Request of Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case of placing Specified Equity in trust based on the provisions of paragraph (1). In this case, the phrase "the name and address of the person who acquires" in Article 30(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the names and addresses of the trustee and the beneficiaries and any other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance pertaining to the Specified Equity Trust as well as the fact that the Specified Equity Trust has been created," the term "Specified Equity" in the provisions of paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of the preceding Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the beneficial interest of a Specified Equity Trust," the phrase "over Specified Equity" and the term "said Specified Equity" in paragraph (4) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "over the beneficial interest of a Specified Equity Trust" and "said beneficial interest of the Specified Equity Trust," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 133(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は、第五項において準用する同法第二百十二条第一項の規定による支払を求める訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 97(3) and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking payment under the provisions of Article 212(1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5). In this case, the phrase "shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such a period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member, or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in paragraphs (3) to (5) and (7) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第百二十三条（株主名簿管理人）、第百二十四条第二項及び第三項（基準日）、第百二十五条第一項から第三項まで（株主名簿の備置き及び閲覧等）並びに第百二十六条（株主に対する通知等）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資社員に係る優先出資社員名簿について、同法第百九十六条第一項及び第二項（株主に対する通知の省略）の規定は優先出資社員に対する通知について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主名簿管理人」とあるのは「優先出資社員名簿管理人」と、「基準日株主」とあるのは「基準日において優先出資社員名簿に記載され、又は記録されている優先出資社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「優先出資」と、同法第百二十五条第二項及び第三項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第百二十六条第五項中「第二百九十九条第一項（第三百二十五条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十六条第一項（第六十六条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 123 (Administrator of Shareholder Registry), Article 124(2) and (3) (Record Date), Article 125(1) to (3) inclusive (Keeping and Making Available for Inspection of Shareholder Registry) and Article 126 (Notice to Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Preferred Equity Member Registry pertaining to Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 196(1) and (2) (Omission of Notices to Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a notice to a Preferred Equity Member. In this case, the term "Administrator of Shareholder Registry" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Administrator of the Preferred Equity Member Registry," the phrase "Shareholders as of the Record Date" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members Stated or Recorded in the Preferred Equity Member Registry as of the Record Date," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity," the terms "shareholder" and "shareholders" in Article 125 (2) and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member" and "members," respectively, the phrase "Article 299(1) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis in Article 325)" in Article 126(5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 56(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66(3)) of that Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第百三十一条第二項（権利の推定等）の規定は優先出資証券について、同法第百三十二条第一項及び第二項（株主の請求によらない株主名簿記載事項の記載又は記録）並びに第百三十三条（株主の請求による株主名簿記載事項の記載又は記録）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と、「株主名簿記載事項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第四十三条第一項各号に掲げる事項」と、「株主名簿」とあるのは「優先出資社員名簿」と、同法第百三十一条第二項中「株式」とあるのは「優先出資」と、同法第百三十二条第一項第三号中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己優先出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己優先出資をいう。）」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 131(2) (Presumption of Rights) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Preferred Equity Security, and the provisions of Article 132(1) and (2) (Stating or Recording of Matters to Be Stated in Shareholder Registry Not Requested by Shareholders) and Article 133 (Stating or Recording of Matters to Be Stated in Shareholder Registry at Request of Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Preferred Equity of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "shareholders" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Member" and "Preferred Equity Members" respectively, the phrase "Matters to be Stated in the Shareholder Registry" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "matters listed in the items of Article 43(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholder registry" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Member Registry," the term "shares" in Article 131(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity," and the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 132(1)(iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第百四十六条（株式の質入れ）、第百四十七条第二項及び第三項（株式の質入れの対抗要件）、第百四十八条（株主名簿の記載等）並びに第百五十一条（第四号、第八号、第九号及び第十四号に係る部分に限る。）、第百五十三条第二項及び第百五十四条（株式の質入れの効果）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資の質入れについて準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と、「株券」とあるのは「優先出資証券」と、「登録株式質権者」とあるのは「登録優先出資質権者」と、同法第百四十八条中「株主名簿」とあるのは「優先出資社員名簿」と、同法第百五十一条第八号中「剰余金」とあるのは「利益」と、同法第百五十三条第二項中「前条第二項に規定する場合」とあるのは「優先出資を併合した場合」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 146 (Pledge of Shares), Article 147(2) and (3) (Perfection of Pledges of Shares), Article 148 (Entries in Shareholder Registry), and Article 151 (limited to the portions pertaining to items (iv), (viii), (ix), and (xiv)), Article 153(2), and Article 154 (Effect of Pledge of Shares) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Preferred Equity of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the term "shareholders" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members," the term "share certificates" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," the term "Registered Pledgees of Shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registered Pledgees of Preferred Equity," the term "shareholder registry" in Article 148 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Member Registry," the term "surplus" in Article 151(viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "profits," the phrase "the cases provided for in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article" in Article 153(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the cases where Preferred Equity has been consolidated," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十条　会社法第百八十条（第三項を除く。）（株式の併合）、第百八十一条（株主に対する通知等）及び第百八十二条（効力の発生）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資の併合について準用する。この場合において、同法第百八十条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第百八十一条第一項中「株主（種類株式発行会社にあっては、同項第三号の種類の種類株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員（二以上の種類の優先出資を発行する特定目的会社にあっては、同項第三号の種類の優先出資社員」と、「登録株式質権者」とあるのは「登録優先出資質権者」と、同法第百八十二条中「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と、「株式（種類株式発行会社にあっては、同項第三号の種類の株式。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「優先出資（二以上の種類の優先出資を発行する特定目的会社にあっては、同項第三号の種類の優先出資。以下この条において同じ。）」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 50 (1) The provisions of Article 180 (excluding paragraph (3)) (Consolidation of Shares), Article 181 (Notices to Shareholders), and Article 182 (Effectuation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to consolidation of Preferred Equity of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 180(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "shareholders (or, for a Company with Class Shares, referring to the Class Shareholders of the classes of shares under item (iii) of that paragraph" in Article 181(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members (or, for a Specific Purpose Company issuing two or more classes of Preferred Equity, referring to the Preferred Equity Members pertaining to the classes of Preferred Equity under item (iii) of that paragraph," the term "Registered Pledgees of the Shares" in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registered Pledgees of Preferred Equity," the term "shareholders" in Article 182 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members," the phrase "shares (or, for a Company with Class Shares, shares of the classes provided for in item (iii) of that paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in this Article.)" in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity (or, for a Specific Purpose Company issuing two or more classes of Preferred Equity, Preferred Equity of the classes provided for in item (iii) of that paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," the term "number" in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第二百十九条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第二項及び第三項（株券の提出に関する公告等）並びに第二百二十条（株券の提出をすることができない場合）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資の併合に係る優先出資証券の提出について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百十九条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と、「登録株式質権者」とあるのは「登録優先出資質権者」と、同項第二号中「株式（種類株式発行会社にあっては、第百八十条第二項第三号の種類の株式）」とあるのは「優先出資（二以上の種類の優先出資を発行する特定目的会社にあっては、資産流動化法第五十条第一項において準用する第百八十条第二項第三号の種類の優先出資）」と、同条第二項中「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 219(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)), (2) and (3) (Public Notice in Relation to Submission of Share Certificate) and Article 220 (Cases Where Share Certificates Cannot Be Submitted) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to submission of Preferred Equity Securities pertaining to the consolidation of a Specific Purpose Company's Preferred Equity. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 219(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Member," the term "Registered Pledgee of Shares" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registered Pledgee of Preferred Equity," the phrase "shares (or, for a Company with Class Shares, the class shares under Article 180(2)(iii))" in item (ii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity (or, for a Specific Purpose Company issuing two or more classes of Preferred Equity, Preferred Equity of the classes under Article 180(2)(iii) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50(1) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the term "shareholders" in Article 219(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第二百三十四条第二項及び第二百三十五条第一項（一に満たない端数の処理）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資の消却及び併合について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百三十四条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十条第三項において準用する第二百三十五条第一項」と、同法第二百三十五条第一項中「数に一株」とあるのは「口数に一口」と、「合計数」とあるのは「合計口数」と、「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 234(2) and Article 235(1) (Treatment of Fractions), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cancellation and consolidation of a Specific Purpose Company's Preferred Equity. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 234(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 235(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "one share in the number" in Article 235(1) of Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit in the number of units," the term "shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第二百九十七条第四項（株主による招集の請求）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項又は第二項の規定による社員総会の招集の請求があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百九十七条第四項中「第一項の規定による請求をした株主」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十三条第一項の規定による請求をした特定社員又は同条第二項の規定による請求をした優先出資社員」と、同項第一号及び第二号中「第一項の規定による請求」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十三条第一項又は第二項の規定による請求」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 297(4) (Demand for Calling of Meeting by Shareholders), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions of Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from the Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the request that a general meeting of members be called is made pursuant to paragraph (1) or paragraph (2). In this case, the phrase "the shareholders who made the request pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)" in Article 297(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specified Equity Members who made the request pursuant to Article 53(1) of the Asset Securitization Act or the Preferred Equity Members who made the request pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article" and the phrase "the request pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1)" in Article 297(4)(i) and (ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the request pursuant to the provisions of Article 53(1) or (2) of the Asset Securitization Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三百六条第三項から第七項まで（株主総会の招集手続等に関する検査役の選任）及び第三百七条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百六条第四項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第三百七条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 306(3) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector on Calling Procedures of Shareholders Meeting), Article 307 (Determination by the Court of the Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 306(4) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "a shareholders meeting" in Article 307(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a general meeting of members," the term "the shareholders" in Article 307(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十五条　会社法第三百条本文（招集手続の省略）の規定は第五十六条第一項の社員総会（第百五十二条第一項に規定する計画変更決議を行う社員総会を除く。）について、同法第三百十条（議決権の代理行使）並びに第三百十三条第一項及び第三項（議決権の不統一行使）の規定は特定目的会社の社員の議決権の行使について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百条中「株主」とあるのは「社員（当該社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない社員を除く。）」と、同法第三百十条第二項及び第五項から第七項までの規定中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十五条第三項（資産流動化法第五十六条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）」と、同法第三百十三条第三項中「株式」とあるのは「特定出資又は優先出資」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 65 (1) The main clause of Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members set forth in Article 56(1) (excluding a general meeting of members which adopts a Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 152(1)) and the provisions of Article 310 (Proxy Voting), and Article 313(1) and (3) (Diverse Exercise of Votes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the exercise of voting rights of the members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the term "shareholders" in Article 300 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (excluding members who may not exercise their voting rights on all of the matters on which a resolution may be effected at the general meeting of members)," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 310(2) and (5) to (7) inclusive of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "Article 299(3)" in Article 310(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 55(3) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 56(3) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "the shares" in Article 313(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specified Equity or Preferred Equity," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三百五十八条第二項、第三項及び第五項から第七項まで（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合の検査役及びその報告があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十八条第三項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 358(2), (3), and (5) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector of Execution of Inspector), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an inspector where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed or to cases where the inspectors report has been given. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 358(3) and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "the shareholders" in Article 358(7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 359(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "shareholders" in Article 359(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム