「しょとくじ」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(22ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

本監督指針に掲げられる監督上の留意点について、金融コングロマリットのグループとしての経営管理、財務の健全性又は業務の適切性に疑義が生じた場合には、経営管理会社又はグループ内の金融機関等に対し、原因及び改善策等について深度あるヒアリングを行い、必要な場合には、法令に基づく報告を求めること等により着実な改善を促すものとする。例文帳に追加

In the event that any concern arises as to the management system, financial soundness and operational appropriateness of a financial conglomerate as a group in connection with the supervisory focal points described in this Guideline, in-depth interviews , concerning the causes and remedial measures, with a management company, group financial institutions or other group companies shall be conducted, and in cases where necessary, reporting pursuant to applicable laws and regulations shall be requested, among others measures, to urge effective improvements.  - 金融庁

日常の監督事務や、事故届出等を通じて把握された投資一任業者の弊害防止措置等に関する課題については、権利者に直接不利益を与えるおそれがあり、場合によっては忠実義務違反又は善管注意義務違反等の法令違反に該当する可能性があることから、深度あるヒアリングを行うことや、必要に応じて金商法第56条の２第１項の規定に基づく報告を求めることを通じて、投資一任業者における自主的な改善状況を把握することとする。例文帳に追加

When supervisors have recognized an issue of supervisory concern regarding a discretionary investment business operator’s measures to prevent internal collusion between different types of business, through daily supervisory administration or the reporting of problematic conduct, they shall identify and keep track of the status of voluntary improvement made by the discretionary investment business operator by holding in-depth hearings and, when necessary, requiring the submission of reports based on Article 56-2(1) of the FIEA, since such an issue could directly undermine the interests of rights holders and, in some cases, lead to legal violations, such as a violation of the duty of loyalty and duty of due care.  - 金融庁

日常の監督事務や、事故届出等を通じて把握された投資信託委託会社等の弊害防止措置等に関する課題については、権利者に直接不利益を与えるおそれがあり、場合によっては忠実義務違反又は善管注意義務違反等の法令違反に該当する可能性があることから、深度あるヒアリングを行うことや、必要に応じて金商法第56条の２第１項の規定に基づく報告を求めることを通じて、投資信託委託会社等における自主的な改善状況を把握することとする。例文帳に追加

When supervisors have recognized an issue of supervisory concern regarding measures taken by an investment trust investment company, etc., to prevent internal collusion between different types of business, through daily supervisory administration or the reporting of problematic conduct, they shall identify and keep track of the status of voluntary improvement made by the investment trust investment company, etc., by holding in-depth hearings and, when necessary, requiring the submission of reports based on Article 56-2(1) of the FIEA, since such an issue could directly undermine the interests of rights holders and, in some cases, lead to legal violations, such as a violation of the duty of loyalty and duty of due care.  - 金融庁

日常の監督事務や、事故届出等を通じて把握されたファンド運用会社の弊害防止措置等に関する課題については、権利者又は運用財産に直接不利益を与えるおそれがあり、場合によっては忠実義務違反又は善管注意義務違反等の法令違反に該当する可能性があることから深度あるヒアリングを行うことや、必要に応じて金商法第56条の２第１項の規定に基づく報告を求めることを通じて、ファンド運用会社における自主的な改善状況を把握することとする。例文帳に追加

When supervisors have recognized an issue of supervisory concern regarding a fund management company’s measures to prevent collusion between different types of business, through daily supervisory administration or the reporting of problematic conduct, they shall identify and keep track of the status of voluntary improvement made by the fund management company by holding in-depth hearings and, when necessary, requiring the submission of reports based on Article 56-2(1) of the FIEA, since such an issue could directly undermine the interests of rights holders and investment assets and, in some cases, lead to legal violations, such as a violation of the duty of loyalty and duty of due care.  - 金融庁

金融庁といたしましては、常日頃よりモニタリングデータの徴求、分析や金融機関等からのヒアリングなどを通じて、ドル資金の調達を含めた銀行財務の状況について注視しているところでございまして、ご指摘の報道の事実関係については、監督実務の詳細に関するものであることから、コメントは差し控えさせていただきたいと思っていますけれども、金融庁としては、足元の金融市場の動向を踏まえて、引き続き高い緊張感を持って、市場の動向が金融機関に与える影響について、しっかり注視しているところであります。例文帳に追加

The FSA is routinely monitoring banks’ financial conditions, including their procurement of dollar funds, based on monitoring data collected from and hearings held with financial institutions. As facts related to the media report you mentioned concern the specifics of practical processes of supervision, I would like to refrain from making comments. The FSA is closely monitoring the impact of market developments on financial institutions with high alertness.  - 金融庁

やはりヨーロッパのギリシャのソブリンリスクに始まって、非常に今、通貨の状態、あるいは金融状態が全世界的に不安定ですから、そういった意味で、為替が非常に変動しておりますので、そういったことを含めて、複雑な為替リスクを伴う通貨選択型ファンド、こういったことは非常に影響を受けますので、そういったことで顧客目線に立って、商品特性、リスク特性に応じた適切なきちんとした説明をしっかり行いなさいということを、ご存じのように、監督上の重要（項目）として位置づけたということです。例文帳に追加

As a result of the crisis that started with the Greek sovereign debt risk, the conditions of currencies and finance have become unstable around the world, so exchange rate movements have been very volatile. That considerably affects currency-select-type funds that involve complex exchange risk. Therefore, as a priority supervisory issue, we have instructed financial instruments business operators to provide appropriate explanations suited to the nature and risk profile of products from the standpoint of customers.  - 金融庁

主要損保3グループの今期決算については、23年3月期に比べまして減益となっており、3グループのうち今ご指摘のとおり2グループが赤字になったというふうに承知をいたしておりますが、保険会社の財務の健全性指標の１つであるソルベンシー・マージン比率は、各社とも監督上の基準値でございます200％を上回っておりまして、十分な健全性を確保しているというふうに考えております。例文帳に追加

As for the three major non-life insurance groups' financial results for the latest business year, one of them reported a profit decline compared with the year ended in March 2011 and the other two reported losses, as you mentioned. However, the solvency margin ratio, which is a benchmark of insurance companies' financial soundness, was higher than the supervisory standard of 200% at all of them, so I believe they have maintained adequate soundness.  - 金融庁

修正条件識別手段Ｓ３に格納されている電流数値データより取得時刻の異なる２つのデータ（又はデータ群）を所定の抽出条件で抽出して２つの識別用データ（又はデータ群）とし、前記識別用データ（又はデータ群）のうちの新しいデータの絶対値（又はデータ群の絶対値振幅）が古いデータの絶対値（又はデータ群の絶対値振幅）に対して小さいことを修正条件とすると共に、この修正条件が成立しているときは修正命令を出力し、動作条件識別手段Ｓ４は前記修正命令が出力されている期間に応じた期間，動作条件を常時の条件から不動作方向に修正するようにした。例文帳に追加

In addition, an operation condition recognizing means S4 modifies a normal operative condition into a non-operative condition for a period according to the period during which the modifying command is output. - 特許庁

ホルムアルデヒドなどシックハウス症侯群のもととなる化学物質や環境ホルモンを除去し、また電化製品内に発生するバクテリア、カビ、その他の細菌、臭気を除去するとともに電化製品から常に発生している電磁波をことごとく除去し、さらに建物内の湿度の調整並びにカビやダニ、シロアリ、細菌の発生を抑え、快適な住空間、環境をもたらす幾何学的連続形状のペーパーコアを提供する。例文帳に追加

To provide a paper core having a geometrical continuous shape removing not only a chemical substance or environmental hormone causing a sick but also bacteria, fungi, other bacteria and a malodor generated in an electric appliance while wholly removing electromagnetic waves always generated from the electric appliance, adjusting humidity in a building and suppressing the generation of fungi, mites, a white ant and bacteria to bring about a comfortable dwelling space and environment. - 特許庁

２　第百十三条及び第百十四条第一項並びに会社法第三百六十八条及び第三百六十九条の規定は清算人会について、同法第三百七十一条（第三項を除く。）の規定は清算投資法人について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百六十九条第一項中「取締役の」とあるのは「構成員の」と、同条第二項中「取締役」とあり、及び同条第三項中「取締役及び監査役」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人」と、同条第五項中「取締役で」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人で」と、同法第三百七十一条第二項中「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣（特別清算が開始された場合にあっては、裁判所。第四項及び第六項において同じ。）の許可を得て」と、同条第四項及び第六項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 113, Article 114, paragraph (1) of this Act and the provisions of Article 368 and Article 369 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a board of liquidators, and Article 371 (excluding paragraph (3)) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an Investment Corporation in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "of the directors" in Article 369, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the members," the terms "Directors" in Article 369, paragraph (2) of that Act and "the directors and company auditors" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors," the term "Directors" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Executive liquidators and liquidation supervisors," the phrase "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "with the permission of the Prime Minister (in cases where a special liquidation has been commenced, the court; the same shall apply in paragraph (4) and paragraph (6))," the term "the court" in Article 371, paragraph (4) and paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　第百八条第一項及び第二項並びに会社法第三百四十六条第三項及び第四百七十九条第一項の規定は、清算執行人又は清算監督人について準用する。この場合において、第百八条第二項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣（特別清算が開始された場合にあつては、裁判所）」と、同法第三百四十六条第三項中「前項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十三条第二項において読み替えて準用する投資法人法第百八条第二項」と、同法第四百七十九条第一項中「前条第二項から第四項までの規定により裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣又は裁判所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) Article 108, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of this Act and the provisions of Article 346, paragraph (3), and Article 479, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an executive liquidator or liquidation supervisor. In this case, the term "the Prime Minister" in Article 108, paragraph (2) of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister (in cases where a special liquidation has been commenced, the court)," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 346, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 153, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "the court pursuant to the provisions of paragraphs (2) through (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 479, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister or the court," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七十一条の十六　内閣総理大臣は、保険主要株主が法令若しくは法令に基づく内閣総理大臣の処分に違反したとき又は公益を害する行為をしたときは、当該保険主要株主に対し監督上必要な措置を命じ、又は当該保険主要株主の第二百七十一条の十第一項若しくは第二項ただし書の認可を取り消すことができる。この場合において、同条第一項の認可のうち設立に係るものは、当該認可を受けて設立された会社その他の法人である保険主要株主に対して与えられているものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 271-16 (1) The Prime Minister may, when a Major Shareholder of Insurance Company has violated any laws and regulations or a disposition given by the Prime Minister based on any laws and regulations or has committed an act that harms the public interest, order that Major Shareholder of the Insurance Company to take necessary measures for the purpose of supervision, or rescind the authorization set forth in Article 271-10, paragraph (1) or the proviso to Article 271-10, paragraph (2) for that Major Shareholder of the Insurance Company. In this case, the authorization set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article that pertains to establishment shall be deemed to be granted to the Major Shareholder of Insurance Companies, which is the company or any other juridical person that has been established under the authorization.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七十一条の三十　内閣総理大臣は、保険持株会社が法令、定款若しくは法令に基づく内閣総理大臣の処分に違反したとき、又は公益を害する行為をしたときは、当該保険持株会社に対しその取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくは監査役の解任その他監督上必要な措置を命じ、若しくは当該保険持株会社の第二百七十一条の十八第一項若しくは第三項ただし書の認可を取り消し、又は当該保険持株会社の子会社である保険会社に対しその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命ずることができる。この場合において、同条第一項の認可のうち設立に係るものは、当該認可を受けて設立された保険持株会社に対して与えられているものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 271-30 (1) The Prime Minister may, when an Insurance Holding Company has violated a law or regulation, its articles of incorporation or any disposition of the Prime Minister pursuant to a law or regulation, or has committed any act that harms the public interest, order the Insurance Holding Company to dismiss its directors, executive officers, accounting advisors or company auditors or to take necessary measures for the purpose of supervision, rescind the authorization given to the Insurance Holding Company under Article 271-18, paragraph (1) or the proviso to Article 271-18, paragraph (3), or order the subsidiary Insurance Company of the Insurance Holding Company to suspend its business in whole or in part. In this case, the authorization set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article that was granted for establishment of the Insurance Holding Company shall be deemed to be granted to the Insurance Holding Company established under the authorization.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十二条の三十四　内閣総理大臣は、銀行持株会社が法令、定款若しくは法令に基づく内閣総理大臣の処分に違反したとき又は公益を害する行為をしたときは、当該銀行持株会社に対しその取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくは監査役の解任その他監督上必要な措置を命じ、若しくは当該銀行持株会社の第五十二条の十七第一項若しくは第三項ただし書の認可を取り消し、又は当該銀行持株会社の子会社である銀行に対しその業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命ずることができる。この場合において、同条第一項の認可のうち設立に係るものは、当該認可を受けて設立された銀行持株会社に対して与えられているものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 52-34 (1) The Prime Minister may, if a Bank Holding Company has violated any laws and regulations, its articles of incorporation or a disposition given by the Prime Minister based on any laws and regulations or has committed an act that harms the public interest, order the Bank Holding Company to take necessary measures for the purpose of supervision, including dismissal of its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or company auditor, rescind the authorization set forth in Article 52-17(1) or the proviso to Article 52-17(3) granted to the Bank Holding Company, or order its subsidiary Bank to suspend the whole or part of its business. In this case, the authorization set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article that was granted for establishment of the Bank Holding Company shall be deemed to be granted to the Bank Holding Company established under the authorization.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

国が大株主である新生銀行の子会社の会長をやっていた人間が、法定で利益相反関係にある銀行の顧問に就任しました。国にとって、もしかしたらダメージがあるような問題に関してそういうことになっているというのは、やはりどうしても私としてはおかしいと思うのですけれども、監督官庁としても2つとも監督していてどっちかにプラス・マイナスが起きる。つまり、利益が相反する関係になっている銀行の間で、そこの役員がわたるということはちょっと理解しがたいというか、監督上も非常に難しいことになるのではないかと思うのですが、この点いかがでしょうか。例文帳に追加

The former chairperson of a subsidiary of Shinsei Bank, of which the government is a major shareholder, has taken up a post as an advisor to a bank that would be a conflict of interest under laws and regulations. From the perspective of the government, it does not make sense to me that this could happen in relation to a problem that could potentially be damaging; also from the perspective of the supervisory agency that is supervising both two companies, what could be beneficial to one company could be detrimental to the other. It is a bit hard to understand that an officer would be shared between banks where a conflict of interest exists in their relationship. It may also give rise to substantial difficulties in supervision. What are your thoughts on this?  - 金融庁

四　非上場会社の株式又は持分の取得（当該取得に係る当該非上場会社の株式の数若しくは出資の金額（以下この号において「株式等」という。）の当該非上場会社の発行済株式の総数若しくは出資の金額の総額（以下この号において「発行済株式等」という。）に占める割合又は当該取得をしたものが当該取得の後において所有することとなる当該非上場会社の株式等と当該取得をしたものを前条第四項の株式取得者とした場合に同項各号に掲げるものに該当することとなる非居住者である個人若しくは法人等が所有する当該非上場会社の株式等とを合計した株式等の当該非上場会社の発行済株式等に占める割合が百分の十以上となる場合の当該取得を除く。）であつて、次項各号に掲げる対内直接投資等に該当する非上場会社の株式又は持分の取得（上場会社等の株式に準ずるものとして主務省令で定める株式の取得を除く。）以外のもの例文帳に追加

(iv) The acquisition of the shares or equity of a non-listed company (excluding the acquisition in the cases where the proportion accounted for in the total issued shares or the total investment amount of said non-listed company (hereinafter referred to as "issued shares, etc." in this item) by the number of shares or the investment amount of said non-listed company pertaining to said acquisition (hereinafter referred to as "shares, etc." in this item), or the proportion accounted for in the total issued shares, etc. of said non-listed company by the sum of the shares, etc. of said non-listed company which the party having conducted said acquisition is to hold after said acquisition and the shares, etc. of said non-listed company held by the non-resident individuals or juridical persons which shall fall under those listed in each item of paragraph (4) of the preceding Article in the cases where the party having conducted said acquisition was treated as the share acquisitor referred to in paragraph (4) of the preceding Article is 10% or more), which is other than the acquisition of the shares or equity falling under the inward direct investments, etc. listed in each item of the next paragraph (excluding the acquisition of the shares specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry as those equivalent to the shares of a listed company, etc.);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

前は法律が少し変わっていましたが、私自身がワシントンに行きまして、ブレイナード財務次官にお話をしたというお話は何回かさせて頂いたと思いますし、また、東京の（駐日）大使にもお話しをしましたが、先日成立した郵政法案には、金融2社と他の金融機関との対等な競争条件の確保のために必要な措置が盛り込まれており、「必要な措置を盛り込まれており」というのは、いまさっき言いましたように、2分の1の株式を処分した後も届出プラス他の金融機関への適正な競争条件の配慮義務、それから民営化委員会への通知、必要に応じ関係各大臣への意見を言うこととか、民営化委員会がそういったことをきちんと法律上明記して通知することが可能でございます。　それから対等な競争条件でなければ、最後には主務大臣による監督上の命令を出す（ことになります）。例文帳に追加

I visited Washington and talked with Treasury Undersecretary for International Affairs Brainard, as I mentioned several times, and I also talked with the U.S.Ambassador to Japan. The recently enacted postal bill provides for measures necessary for ensuring equal competitive terms for the two postal financial institutions and other financial institutions. The “necessary measures” are the requirements that consideration should be given to ensure fair competitive terms for other financial institutions when Japan Post Insurance notifies the authorities of a plan to start a new business after the disposal of half of the government-held shares, and that the privatization committee should be notified and express opinions to relevant ministers as needed, as is made clear in the new law.　Finally, if equal competitive terms are not ensured, the minister in charge will issue a supervisory order.  - 金融庁

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百三十六条第三項を除く。）、第七編第二章第四節並びに第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条第二項を除く。）並びに第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）の規定は、清算投資法人の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十一条中「第四百九十二条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第三項」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の三（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主」と、同法第五百二十三条及び第五百二十六条第一項中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十四条中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十五条第一項中「清算人は」とあるのは「清算執行人は」と、「清算人代理」とあるのは「清算執行人代理」と、同法第五百三十条第一項中「清算人及び監査役並びに支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人並びに一般事務受託者、資産運用会社及び資産保管会社」と、同法第五百四十二条第一項中「設立時取締役、設立時監査役、第四百二十三条第一項に規定する役員等又は清算人」とあるのは「設立時執行役員、設立時監督役員、投資法人法第百十五条の六第一項に規定する役員等、清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百六十二条中「第四百九十二条第一項に規定する清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人」と、「同項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第一項」と、同法第九百三十八条第一項中「本店（第三号に掲げる場合であって特別清算の結了により特別清算終結の決定がされたときにあっては、本店及び支店）」とあるのは「本店」と、同条第二項第一号中「第四百七十九条第四項において準用する第三百四十六条第二項又は第四百八十三条第六項において準用する第三百五十一条第二項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十三条第二項において読み替えて準用する投資法人法第百八条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 through Article 518, the provisions of Subsection 2 through Subsection 10 of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) through Article 536, paragraph (3)), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4, the provisions of Chapter III, Section 1 of that Part (excluding Article 870, paragraph (2) through paragraph (5) and Article 870 through Article 874), the provisions of Section 3 of that Chapter (excluding Article 879, Article 880, Article 882, paragraph (2), and Article 896, paragraph (2)), and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation. In this case, the term "paragraph (3) of Article 492" in Article 521 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 155, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Investors who have held, for a consecutive period of the past six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity," the term "liquidators" in Article 523 and Article 526, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors," the term "liquidators" in Article 524 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors," the terms "liquidators" and "liquidators' agent" in Article 525, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidators" and "executive liquidators' agent" respectively, the phrase "liquidators and Company Auditors of a Liquidating Stock Company and employees, including managers," in Article 530, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation as well as the Administrative Agent, Asset Management Company, and Asset Custody Company," the phrase "directors upon incorporation, Company Auditors upon incorporation, Qualified Officers provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 423 or liquidators" in Article 542, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment, Supervisory Officers at Establishment, Officers, etc. specified in Article 115-6, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act, executive liquidator(s), or liquidation supervisors," the phrases "the liquidators provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 492" and "that paragraph" in Article 562 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the executive liquidator(s)" and "Article 155, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "the head office (or, in cases set forth in item (iii), if a ruling to conclude special liquidation is made due to completion of a special liquidation, the head office and branch office(s))" in Article 938, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office," the phrase "Article 351(2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 346(2) or Article 483(6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)" in Article 938, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 153, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　第百七十七条の規定は第一項の規定による外国保険会社等の清算の場合について、第百七十五条及び第百七十九条第一項の規定は第一項の規定による外国保険会社等の清算の場合（前項において準用する会社法第二編第九章第二節（第五百十条、第五百十一条及び第五百十四条を除く。）、第七編第三章第一節及び第三節並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項までの規定の適用がある場合を除く。以下この項において同じ。）について、第二百条第一項及び第二百一条第一項の規定は第一項の規定による外国保険会社等の清算の場合において内閣総理大臣が清算に係る外国保険会社等の清算の監督上必要があると認めるときについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第百七十七条第二項中「解散の日」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等に係る第百八十五条第一項の免許が取り消され、又はその効力を失った日」と、同条第三項中「清算保険会社等」とあるのは「清算に係る外国保険会社等」と、第百七十五条中「前条第一項、第四項又は第九項」とあるのは「第二百十二条第二項」と、「清算保険会社等」とあるのは「清算に係る外国保険会社等」と、第百七十九条第一項中「清算保険会社等」とあるのは「清算に係る外国保険会社等」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provision of Article 177 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. under paragraph (1); the provisions of Article 175 and Article 179, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. under paragraph (1) (excluding the cases to which apply the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Articles 510, 511 and 514), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 and 3, and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph); and the provisions of Article 200, paragraph (1) and Article 201, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. under paragraph (1) where the Prime Minister finds it necessary for supervising the liquidation of the liquidating Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "date of dissolution" in Article 177, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "date of cancellation or expiration of the license issued to the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. under Article 185, paragraph (1)"; the term "Liquidating Insurance Company, etc." in Article 177, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "liquidating Foreign Insurance Company, etc."; the terms "paragraph (1), (4) or (9) of the preceding Article" and "Liquidating Insurance Company, etc." in Article 175 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 212, paragraph (2)" and "liquidating Foreign Insurance Company, etc.," respectively; and the term "Liquidating Insurance Company, etc." in Article 179, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "liquidating Foreign Insurance Company, etc.;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　第百七十七条の規定は第一項の規定による免許特定法人及び引受社員の清算の場合について、第百七十五条及び第百七十九条第一項の規定は第一項の規定による免許特定法人及び引受社員の清算の場合（前項において準用する会社法第二編第九章第二節（第五百十条、第五百十一条及び第五百十四条を除く。）、第七編第三章第一節及び第三節並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項までの規定の適用がある場合を除く。以下この項において同じ。）について、第二百二十六条第一項及び第二百二十七条第一項の規定は第一項の規定による免許特定法人及び引受社員の清算の場合において内閣総理大臣が清算に係る免許特定法人及び引受社員の清算の監督上必要があると認めるときについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第百七十七条第二項中「解散の日」とあるのは「当該免許特定法人に係る第二百十九条第一項の免許が取り消され、又はその効力を失った日」と、同条第三項中「清算保険会社等」とあるのは「清算に係る引受社員」と、第百七十五条中「前条第一項、第四項又は第九項」とあるのは「第二百三十五条第二項」と、「清算保険会社等」とあるのは「当該清算に係る免許特定法人及び引受社員」と、第百七十九条第一項中「清算保険会社等」とあるのは「清算に係る免許特定法人及び引受社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provision of Article 177 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Licensed Specified Juridical Person and its Underwriting Members under paragraph (1); the provisions of Article 175 and Article 179, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Licensed Specified Juridical Person and its Underwriting Members under paragraph (1) (excluding the cases to which apply the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Articles 510, 511 and 514), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 and 3, and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph); and the provisions of Article 226, paragraph (1) and Article 227, paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Licensed Specified Juridical Person and its Underwriting Members under paragraph (1) where the Prime Minister finds it necessary for supervising the liquidation of the liquidating Licensed Specified Juridical Person and its Underwriting Members. In this case, the term "date of dissolution" in Article 177, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "date of cancellation or expiration of the license issued to the Licensed Specified Juridical Person under Article 219, paragraph (1)"; the term "Liquidating Insurance Company, etc." in Article 177, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "liquidating Underwriting Members"; the terms "paragraph (1), (4) or (9) of the preceding Article" and "Liquidating Insurance Company, etc." in Article 175 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 235, paragraph (2)" and "liquidating Licensed Specified Juridical Person and its Underwriting Members," respectively; and the term "Liquidating Insurance Company, etc." in Article 179, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "liquidating Licensed Specified Juridical Person and its Underwriting Members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム